Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/09

2021

01 September 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. NW1223(Howl at me|My hunts) 23:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 23:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism. I can't tell when the last clean version was. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because an Executive of the organization would like to edit . A.chicago.steph (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: By "edit", do you mean "create" (as this page currently does not exist)? Also, since this page has repeatedly been created for unconstructive purposes, do you have a clear and good reason why you (or someone you know) should? Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 02:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liamyangll, the user has made an error and not named the article they refer to. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Article not identified. Plus 'Executive of the organization would like to edit' is not a persuasive reason to lift a protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page needs correcting in areas such as the Primary School & Secondary School sections which have no valid sources and some unnecessary content. Destructive editing has now ended. FlowD (talk) 07:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A fall in 'destructive editing' is a well-known side effect of protection. Have you proposed your improvements to the article on the talk page? And discussed the protection with the protecting administrator? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove all vaccines, domestic violence pornography, blocked, request confirmed.

207.47.139.116 (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What page? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Article not identified; edit request not clear. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because an Executive of the organization would like to edit . A.chicago.steph (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: By "edit", do you mean "create" (as this page currently does not exist)? Also, since this page has repeatedly been created for unconstructive purposes, do you have a clear and good reason why you (or someone you know) should? Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 02:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liamyangll, the user has made an error and not named the article they refer to. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Article not identified. Plus 'Executive of the organization would like to edit' is not a persuasive reason to lift a protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page needs correcting in areas such as the Primary School & Secondary School sections which have no valid sources and some unnecessary content. Destructive editing has now ended. FlowD (talk) 07:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A fall in 'destructive editing' is a well-known side effect of protection. Have you proposed your improvements to the article on the talk page? And discussed the protection with the protecting administrator? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove all vaccines, domestic violence pornography, blocked, request confirmed.

207.47.139.116 (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What page? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Article not identified; edit request not clear. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Keres🌑(talkctb) 21:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since August 8. — Diannaa (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:28, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. --Titodutta (talk) Titodutta (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because he has been released and that needs to be changed. ....... . 97.116.94.3 (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Given the current purge of Wei's online existence on Chinese websites, it's likely that either official attempts or unofficial vandals will try to remove or severely dock this page.

Example source of the purge: https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/internet/china-erases-billionaire-actress-zhao-wei-from-history/news-story/94100f6569377078cfeee411f5fc3538 Axslayer33 (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. GABgab 00:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To prevent Vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billy19802022 (talkcontribs) 01:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I’m not seeing a need for protection at this time, Billy. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Increase in IP vandalism to the page. – DarkGlow09:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected, it has been pending changes protected indefinitely, but the protection got lost after a move of the article--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement: WP:ARBIPA. WP:BLP violations. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 11:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Biography of living person article vandalized regularly, mostly by unregistered IPs, and is now more vulnerable due to the recent crackdown on controversial Chinese actresses/actors. JETH888 message me 09:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 11:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of unsourced, speculative content by IPs — DaxServer (talk to me) 12:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent unsourced, disruptive, non-NPOV, original research edits by auto confirmed and extended confirmed editors; I would revert but 3RR forbids me to do so. Throast (talk | contribs) 21:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection because the page is being targeted by an IP-hopping vandal who is trying to insert and preserve personal opinion synthesis, and is extremely hesitant to discuss its changes beyond personal attacks and temper tantrums in the edit summaries.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Brand new article that's been getting lots of attention from Malaysian IPs, ostensibly due to the subject "stealing" a Paralympic gold medal from a Malaysian athlete. Think this needs a few days for things to settle. AngryHarpytalk 12:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 16:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Today's featured article Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Has died down after not being on the main-page anymore. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Iran. MoonlightVector 18:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by two IPs who are seeking to use the article as a spin piece for the article subject. — Manticore 03:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ― Tartan357 Talk 05:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deepfriedokra. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 2021-07-11T08:15:42‎ to now are all reverts... by Special:Contributions/192.76.8.74 Special:Contributions/95.145.110.165 Special:Contributions/185.69.144.154 Special:Contributions/185.69.145.9 Special:Contributions/81.100.17.180 Special:Contributions/90.251.18.230 ..... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption just isn't heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant (for years) IP's changing the nationality of Malcolm and Angus, hoping for indef-semi for both pages. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption just isn't heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but in my opinion these sets need to be indf. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
At need this can be escalated. Lectonar (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant (for years) IP's changing the nationality of Malcolm and Angus, hoping for indef-semi for both pages. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption just isn't heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Page was protected several times before, last time for 1 month, when protection enden vandalism resumed. Abudabanas (talk) 16:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism with the style of stuff. MoonlightVector 19:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As the season premiere nears closer and closer next month (September 20), it seems more are returning to speculation/rumors as their 'source' for celebrity contestants. Seems like some sort of protection may be necessary prior to the full cast reveal on September 8. Magitroopa (talk) 19:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And just today, seems like there was some more speculation added that I had to remove. Magitroopa (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Star MississippiMelanieN (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This User:Ab207 keep vandalise Meena (actress) wikipedia by change/editing her personal life, age, marital status and add unreliable sources from broken website. Removed poorly sourced personal info. Removal of birthdate and adding non-notable people back in infobox. Wikicircuit (talk) 19:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The user Wikicircuit is engaged in disruption at Meena (actress). See [1] 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207: The page is now semi-protected, but Wikicircuit will return soon to edit. Keep a watch 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They have already [6]. ECP or a block may be needed. Pinging protecting admin Ponyo -- Ab207 (talk) 20:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 23:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption resumed after protection expired - [7]. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 02:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article has needed protection almost continuously since it was created. MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Protection expired yesterday. The IP editor making disruptive edits has returned. They have been making edits with changing IP addresses. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please do not make the protection indefinite because that is too much. 26zhangi (talk) 19:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – reduced to finite duration, which was my colleague's intention. Favonian (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Mishary94 (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm so sick and tired of editors claiming to work for Rozonda Thomas, and removing referenced material that I added. Can this article please be protected. Catfurball (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. More eyes on this would probably help. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 18:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 17:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Problems seem to have disappeared, now that it's no longer TFA. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: already SP'd --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing Shurpanakha (talk) 14:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Disputants are auto confirmed. Caste related content disputes. WP:BRD --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism continuing after end of previous protection. 2601:188:180:B8E0:98E1:991A:2540:23FA (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article under fire from multiple vandal IPs. The Right 'Orrible (talk) 21:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. SquirrelCrown (talk) 22:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. SquirrelCrown (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of unproductive edits from newly registered accounts. William Avery (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recurrent BLP violations by IP editors. Jack Frost (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Follows an earlier protection of two months but I suspect it will need further protection in due course - the IP is persistent. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from numerous ip addresses Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, crossed with Ohnoitsjamie who protected for two weeks. No harm done. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High traffic due to (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/world/google-doodle-who-rudolf-weigl-b1912544.html) and covers a large no of countries per (https://www.google.com/doodles/rudolf-weigls-138th-birthday). The doodle does not link to this Wikipedia page; it's just the first result shown if you click on the doodle to learn more. 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pages are not protected pre-emptively. MelanieN (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: disruptive edits have started, see [8], [9] 2402:3A80:1C40:B45F:D93E:C05B:C306:571 (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A few edits, from one editor, who self-reverted. I still don't see any need for protection at this time. -- MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from 27.67.20.246 & 27.67.13.183, the latter having been used by blocked user. Unserefahne Erminwin (talk) 19:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced and inaccurate changes by anonymous editor. Hunterb212 (talk) 21:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article needs page protection as this person has died recently, which is confirmed by reliable sources. Some of his followers who disagree with this are removing the "death date". — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 19:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For the last few days, a mix of IP addresses and newly-created accounts that are only editing this article are added unsourced info (and as far as I can tell, completely false info) about the subject's sexual orientation. As this is a BLP, I feel the page should be protected from that (likely) one person attempting the vandalism. Benicio2020 (talk) 01:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blp edit warring. Unsourced birth year. Crboyer (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been protected due to an edit war but I don't think it was a proper edit war. There is a consensus at WT:FOOTY (see Archive 41) who says that players injuries should not be reported . An user constantly undid edits who removed the injuries reports and in my opinion was vandalism and not an edit war Dr Salvus 21:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you discussed this with the protecting administrator? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5, no I haven't. I'm going to do it Dr Salvus 22:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Protection has expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All article pages

Indefinitely semi protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- Two usernames is Blue sky 4068 and Green Grass 5584 with 4 digit at the end is similar to sockmaster is in investigation of Rgalo10. [10]172.58.227.184 (talk) 01:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of long standing image on page by edit warring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_Scotia_Duck_Tolling_Retriever Scottyten (talk) 02:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, fully endorse request for page protection, preferably pinklock or silverlock, the nom is trying to override consensus for a more appropriate image in the article’s infobox (TP discussion) edit warring their own photograph (citation needed)into the article, six reverts in under 48 hours [11][12][13][14][15][16] the first four in a 10 hour period. Cavalryman (talk) 03:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

For context this was kicked off by @Gionabalena who replaced the image and it was reverted. Then @Cavalryman removed longstanding image and updated without gaining or allowing time for consensus. Edit warred repeatedly and did not allow for consensus discussions. Cavalryman has entered two Edit Wars within 30 days on this page with different users.Scottyten (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC) See here below[reply]

″Well, that deteriorated quickly. We both edit warred so please drop your gloves and you are misreading BRD, as you were bold, I reverted and you at the point had the choice to continue, but you reverted again.

I cannot demonstrate what you are asking. Can you show me where the discussion to exclude portals with icons from see also sections? If your next response does not do so (and instead makes inaccurate accusations, as this previous did) I will go to a larger forum. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Very happy to lay down arms, it’s never productive when two good faith editors clash. A recent discussion between the members of WP:DOGS and WP:WPPORT occurred here, where consensus was to exclude the icon from see also sections. As far as I can discern, the only rationale for including such as icon is to draw attention towards the link and away from other, possibly more relevant, links in the section, it is purely decorative. As such I see no encyclopedic purpose to it. Regards, Cavalryman (talk) 01:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)."

  • Oppose Scottyten is unfamiliar with basic process. There was a discussion and a new WP:CONSENSUS was created. They objected and started an edit war with two other editors. I have also reverted Scottyten who is being tractable and insisting that their opinion (and only their opinion as a long-time breed owner) is valid. Not willing to discuss. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Discussion is continuing on the talk page but the edit warring is unacceptable. Given it's a content dispute (in some respects), cannot semi-protect. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 06:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject passed away today. LearnIndology (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The actor has died recently [17]. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sidharth Shukla please quicky protect the page as he died recently and page getting multiple edits from inexperienced users. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unsourced information and red categories added by IPs. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing amount of vandalism due to high profile nature of person. In particular, there are two unsightly photos (Marcelo Bielsa 2018.jpg) and (Marcelo Bielsa 2018 (cropped).jpg) from Wikipedia Commons that are continually uploaded as the profile picture instead of sensible alternatives. Upon investigation, these photos originate from Newell's Old Boys official media (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDfHSXvABwo) and their use on Wikipedia is therefore a violation of copyright. Wonderr123 (talk) 02:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (Talk) 09:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by block evading bouncing IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 05:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – various IP editors have been adding unsourced content, generally violating WP:BLPCRIME. – robertsky (talk) 03:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Gobs of vandalism from various IPs. Weigl is the subject of today's Google Doodle. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP and new users are frequently changing the birth year without reliable sources. Ab207 (talk) 08:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for now. If needed protection can be increased in future. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 10:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page featured on Google Doodle. High volume of views, also IP Vandalism. Merangs (talk) 08:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We had a bad experience with the internet. Some people try to edit our page and delete written texts about the person Johannes Jacobus Onvlee. We would like to protect this page because we want to protect the page from vandalism. Johannes Jacobus Onvlee (talk) 01:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Relinked page, no explanation or justification for protection... - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I’ll leave a note on the user's talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Inaccurate information and vandalism Affies (talk) 11:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 11:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a page Rajnandgaon in that page there is a paragraph https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajnandgaon#Notable_people so you have to remove notable people list and add this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:People_from_Rajnandgaon as main article template because Reason 1 - It is a list of miscellaneous information so it have to removed Reason 2 - If we add a catergory we don't have to add citiations Reason 3 - There are not some names which are in the catergory Reason 4 - In the list someone write 1 name for 2,3 times so it is neccessary to to add that main page and remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.36.43.167 (talk) 12:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you’ve made a 'semi-protected edit request' for this on the article talk page. Let’s see how that works out. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. A duplicated request. A 'semi-protected edit request' for this has been made on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – COVID/BLP... Protection recently expired and this is at it again. Obviously this disruption won't stop for the time being; at least not until we can bid good riddance to this virus. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protection has proven to be inadequate. MelanieN (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - especially prevalent during football's international breaks Felixsv7 (talk) 07:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The underlying PC protection will persist after the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sock puppetry – Some editor is using multiple accounts to add "Max Al-Zubaidi" in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirateMelanieN (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing the page. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 15:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent uptick in vandalism due to apparent spat between his father and another person. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected..--Ymblanter (talk) 17:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Rarely edited page, but most edits are unconstructive or vandalism; requesting this because this has become a perennial problem. Uness232 (talk) 10:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an IP editor who repeatedly changes the field for "Legislature" in the infobox from "Legislature" to "Legislative Assembly". The editor's reason appears to be political; the edits are normally accompanied by anti-monarchical slogans. I have posted an explanation on the Talk page that the Constitution of Canada states that the Legislature is composed of the Legislative Assembly and the Lieutenant Governor, and repeatedly invited the IP editor to come to the Talk page to discuss, but that has never happened. I'm quite willing to have that discussion, but until the IP editor is prepared to come to the Talk page and have the discussion, I think the page should be put under protection. This has been going on for some months now. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple edit warring by involved parties of lawsuit, newly created accounts, IPs appear to be socking. Ifnord (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Ifnord: Please try to start some dispute resolution on the talk page, if you have the bandwidth to do so. qedk (t c) 18:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (talk to me) 17:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 12:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Fixer 2000. (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing with WP:BLPPRIVACY concerns, but it is the repeated addition of what appears to be an obviously incorrect DOB. The issue was previously discussed at my Talk page [20], but IPs have recently been adding the same DOB without a source. Beccaynr (talk) 19:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – frequent addition of info of a transaction that has not been officially completed. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There are only a few cases of this kind of addition, and most of them are from autoconfirmed users, so semi-protection would be ineffective. Also, semi-protection would eliminate the constructive edits that some IPs are making. MelanieN (talk) 17:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandalizing. MoonlightVector 14:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Titodutta (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the page containing his nationality is wrong Kimp59 (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The controversy concerning this subject is the reason for the protection. State your case on Talk:Syed Ali Shah Geelani. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP(s) over the course of a month or so reverting sourced roster and player class. BarkeepChat 19:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The creator of this software program has been confirmed by RSes to have committed suicide, but at least 3 vastly different IPs are challenging/removing this information, likely indicating some off-site push to question this information. Somne PP would be helpful. Masem (t) 20:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • And of course because I'm one working to fix it, my talk page got targetted by yet another user. Definitely looks like an external meatpuppetry going on --Masem (t) 20:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing, mainly by IP users. PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 12:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. RossButsy (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Bouncing IP removing sourced information about release dates/box office grosses. Nate (chatter) 22:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of vandalism, specifically from a temporarily blocked IP user. Hyperx1000 (talk) 23:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Let's see if the disruption returns after the block. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of vandalism, specifically from a temporarily blocked IP user. Hyperx1000 (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Let's see if the vandalism resumes after the block expires. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps changing Caitlyn's name. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. rando 00:14, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated edits by an ever-changing series of IP addresses (but probably all the same person, given they are all in the same general location). Keeps claiming the 2022 parade is cancelled, with no evidence, and there is plenty of evidence to the contrary. Floatjon (talk) 00:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 13:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Currently pending changes protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent disruptive editing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See history for sequentially number vandal account. A pause may encourage them to find another hobby. Ifnord (talk) 03:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Carlosguitar. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 04:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Carlosguitar. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Explicit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism continued after protection expired - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Among Us vandalism. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Low-level but extremely persistent edits of a generally unhelpful nature by non-ACs continuing months after the previous protection. Given this is the national anthem of a large western country, there's no real reason to think that this will stop in the near-term. PC might also be an option if you think SP is too drastic, but I fail too see much in the way of constructive edits by non-ACs. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article was only semi-protected once, and the frequency of disruption doesn't rise to a level of where semi-protection is needed; I have watchlisted, and will see if pending-changes protection should be changed to indefinite after the 3 months. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Countless editors who can't read that the totals are as of the end of the 2018 Winter Paralympics, and Summer totals are up to 2016. Needs protecting until current Games are finished. David Biddulph (talk) 09:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent disruptive editing. Closing ceremony on 5 September. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (talk to me) 10:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism by new account and IPs. Jack Frost (talk) 11:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing level of IP vandalism over years MaryMO (AR) (talk) 01:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: to stop for edit from every user and only to those who are registered Ydl9903562552 (talk) 04:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism / nonsensical edits from IP addresses; some form of minor, temporary protection should be sufficient.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 05:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Has been a target of subtle vandalism for several years by a group of apparently linked IP editors. See contributions by 76.118.19.54, 198.246.186.210, and 198.246.186.211, who have been making the same sort of vandal edits to multiple pages for years now. PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP hopping Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 12:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Producing fake information and deleting necessary informations. Freakinglucid10511 (talk) 10:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of edits the past few months. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing name vandalism by IPs. DonIago (talk) 14:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs making joke edits. Isabelle 🔔 14:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace the page contents with the contents of User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test in order to eliminate almost all of the lint errors, while making no changes to the text and only de minimis changes to the appearance. This page is one of only two in all of English Wikipedia with Miscellaneous issues lint errors, and I have eliminated them in my sandbox. Alternatively, allow me to edit User talk:Yorkshirian myself. —Anomalocaris (talk) 12:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Anomalocaris (talk) 12:45, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP keeps removing the children parameter. See edit summaries for the last few days and the talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article is not yet in need of full protection; regardless of the "truth", there is NO source in the article supporting that Kovack has any children. Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Users adding unsourced information to the article after multiple reminders and warnings. OceanHok (talk) 08:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper repeatedly adding unreferenced promotional content [22], [23], [24]. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indef for block evasion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been edited by an IP hopping vandal from the 112.198.16x.xxx range for several months, usually adding a fake list of guest stars that supposed to appear in this program. - WayKurat (talk) 02:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced information by an IP editor with an odd affinity for Bambi, as most of their edits involves adding mentions of that film or Bambi II in their edits. (I don't know if they are Bambifan101.) The editor has also removed or changed other content in these articles without explanation. The IP editor in question has recently used an entirely different IPv4 address than their initial IP, thus necessitating page protection. –WPA (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, protected three out of four for a week.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP is back with the same non-policy-abiding CSD nominations, days after protection expired. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is wrong information about jadeja Rajputs Mitrajsinh zala (talk) 13:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – state your case at Talk:Jadeja. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:ARBGENDER. (CC) Tbhotch 04:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Increased disruption over the past few days — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, deleting sourced information and refusing to engage on talkpage discussion.  oncamera  (talk page) 21:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent long-term edit warring over BLP violations. Article talk page indicates ownership, possibly by the subject. This is under discussion at WP:BLPN. [26]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I warned the IP--Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently this page and its subpages have been changed to a more accessible table, from which the discussion can be found on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Progress tables across all seasons for better accessibility and multiple other reasons. These templates are sensitive to (unregistered) users and/or fans of the show/franchise and are already being reverted by them. Protection for these templates would help this issue. -- Thijslandsmeer (talk) 21:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there was never disruption at this template, and the transclusion/link count is not so high.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – B-class biography article of a living person that is regularly vandalized by unregistered IPs and sometimes even new accounts. JETH888 (message) 12:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is recurrent, but not frequent enough to justify semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism of changing of sourced info. RF23 (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: User talk page has been repeatedly moved to incorrect locations. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:05, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also explained to the user on their talk page. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection as some anonymous users are adding unsourced things in it. Zarif1511 (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-running target of the acronym LTA. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Correction needed 98.114.40.110 (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Needs correction Kennyfranz86 (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, attakers making changes. Shamal6789 (talk) 08:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Hxrvy (talk) 08:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 23:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Constantly and persistently for a long time. Every time we reverted it back, an anonymous user will again revert it although material is unsourced (see page's history). Muhammad Pascal Fajrin (talk) 17:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Redirect that needs protection against cut-and-paste moves (or page-moves without consensus) of Port Elizabeth. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 17:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please make the vandalism stop!. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism/POV whitewashing from Anonymous and new editors. See: [27] [28] [29] [30] [31]. Prior BLP protection in Dec 2020: [32] — Shibbolethink ( ) 19:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor pushing a usonian POV. See Talk:Gatling_gun#Gatling_Guns_are_NOT_Machine_Guns. Binksternet (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please try to engage the user at the article talk page.  MelanieN (talk) 03:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It contains a high level of vandalism by unknown people, who add programs that were not shown on the channel Mishary94 (talk) 21:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing on WP:TROUBLES arrticle by probable meatpuppets recruited as a result of this and this. FDW777 (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:36, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article needs much stronger protection than just autoconfirmed. It has been visited repeatedly by sockpuppets of User:Giubbotto non ortodosso who make 10 or 12 edits and then jump into editing the biography. Special:Contributions/Feet_b_stankin came to the article after 11 edits, Special:Contributions/Penombris_Labio came after 10, Special:Contributions/Happy_feat_breezy came after 12, Special:Contributions/Ryan_Fukety came after 13, Special:Contributions/Blopping_doen_the_street made 15 edits, Special:Contributions/Pretty_broman showed up after 11, and Special:Contributions/Slime_&_Berzy made just 10 edits before jumping in. These socks go back five years; the guy is very persistent. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 03:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for Isaac Herzog to be semi-protected or extended confirm protected, due to other Israeli politicians having their pages protected. thank you Aryan Persaud (talk) 15:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Page are not protected proactively. MelanieN (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP adding deletion tag. And the manager of Franzén has also been doing vandalism at the article.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to a recent controversial event that was dug up from this actor's past involving Japanese and Chinese war relations, info related to the event keeps getting unnecessarily reverted/edited between users. As of the submission of this protection request, all relevant information on his page is accurate and no longer needs modification. Strwbrryswtchbld (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Imcdc (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid protection would cause too much collateral damage, there are many good IP edits than bad ones.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. For the bot. MelanieN (talk) 03:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP edits, removal of cited content, edit warring. BilCat (talk) 04:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High number of low quality and unsourced additions Gravelove (talk) 05:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If this editor returns, please contact them on their talk page, explaining Wikipedia's policies. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Potential vector for abuse, as it's invoked in all AWB edits. Highly unlikely an unconfirmed user would ever come across it, let alone want to edit it. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Effectively this is a very highly substituted template so I've opted for ECP. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruptive editing ArojamDharkon (talk) 23:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ 69.94.57.75 (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The single disruptive IP has been given a final warning. If they continue, they can be blocked Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page was vandalized by IP from 23 August 2021 to 2 September 2021. Vitaium (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Shivam (talk) 06:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of cited content. Producing fake contents. This page is being edited again and again with false information of a politician. Contributor copyright,Edit warring, and Sanctions. Freakinglucid10511 (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Chaniyana (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC) i am a registered user[reply]

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism 2601:246:CF80:3990:89C:FC7D:609A:78B7 (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent death; unsourced additions continue immediately after the previous protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Plenty of vandalism the last few days on this BLP, probably all related to her recent tweets, meaning that it should get better over the next days. 15 (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistently suffered from persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from anonymous or recently registered nationalists and their sockpuppets removing sourced content or replacing it with unsourced or poorly-sourced content. It's been Semi-Protected twice already in the past, only for vandalism to continue almost as soon as protection wears off. Indefinite extended confirmed protection. Wareno (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistently suffered from persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from anonymous or recently registered nationalists and their sockpuppets removing sourced content or replacing it with unsourced or poorly-sourced content. It's been Semi-Protected twice already in the past, only for vandalism to continue almost as soon as protection wears off. Indefinite extended confirmed protection. Wareno (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – I've been the target for harassment by an LTA four times now about my failed RfA, and I'm Goddamn tired of it. It's by no means frequent, but I want to move on. Please protect my user/talk from untenured editors. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 19:36, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if anywhere else needs attention, not standing for that shit 💜 ~TNT (she/they • talk) 19:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unsourced name needs removing and there's and error or two with some citation tags StarryNightSky11(talk) 22:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you express your proposed changes in a "change X to Y" format please? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
His unsourced name of 'Aljoscha Wendholt' needs removing and <ref> tags with no reference link in-between need deleting. StarryNightSky11(talk) 07:19, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I’m not mistaken, there is a source for the name: "... der Reiseplan für eine Woche von Josh Cahill, der mit burgerlichen Namen Alijosha Wendholt ..." ("... Josh Cahill's travel plan for a week, whose real name is Alijosha Wendholt ...")[33]. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Indeed the name is sourced...I'll leave the citation tags to someone else Lectonar (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name on the page is spelled wrong, it should instead be Hem Raj BC. Souliam (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The page has been moved back to draft space where it must stay until the issues that have been identified have been dealt with. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Noting that Hem Raj BC is salted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The persistent submission attempts are becoming disruptive at this point... most coming from IPs and ignores the comments at the top of the draft page. Magitroopa (talk) 05:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further proving the disruptive submission attempts... one IP completely ignored me, using two edit summaries ([34] [35]) telling me to shut up, and one giving a middle finger emoji... Worth noting the IP is possibly block evasion- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LFAF. Magitroopa (talk) 19:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced IP additions to a WP:BLP. – DarkGlow17:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mass vandalism 1 IP and 2 accounts blocked tioday, has now moved to another IP - Arjayay (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PhilKnight (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No need of changes Londonukbanter (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Serious WP:BLP violations as soon as last protection ended. Would probably need WP:REVDEL again like last time. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:7109:3AD6:4523:87E1 (talk) 18:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism by a disruptive IP hopper. M.Bitton (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberbot I: Article has been protected by an Administrator. StarryNightSky11(talk) 22:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Canterbury Tail.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 September 2021

Reason: disruptive editing like removing upcoming TV soaps and adding unsourced information 2402:3A80:6D4:C4EA:B4C7:D2F5:BE33:F545 (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of Vandalism KanasApril99 (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am asking that there not be a Y Press Games page placed on wikipedia for my company Y Press Games. My other page, Yaoi Press, has been vandalized numerous times with false information. I have asked for this page to be taken down. Yaoipress (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism 2601:246:CF80:3990:89C:FC7D:609A:78B7 (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced or poorly sourced claims regarding distributor. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – May need protection as Multiple IP's have vandalised the article recently. StarryNightSky11(talk) 22:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant disruption. Semsûrî (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from shifting IPs. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the past month, there's been an effort by a new editor and several IP editors to add the name of a comedian to this disambiguation page. (I found it when they bragged about it on twitter). Schazjmd (talk) 00:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP/inexperienced edits leading to the disptruptive structure of the article . -ink&fables «talk» 11:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Edit rate will likely soon decline. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disrupting editing designed to illustrate a false point. Jingiby (talk) 11:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nehme1499 12:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it takes a lot of time to upadate the outdated information. PatrykSmart01 (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page has been targeted by an IP. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a content dispute. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism dating back to August 23. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Changing content which is not valid, Shebinbenson (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 12:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because he is an active wrestler and new updates are frequent. We can’t even update his recent title wins timely because of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:42:c101:5290:1900:e43f:83ab:bd03 (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably in a "change Partner salman khan to Sidharth shukla" format. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be declined. Shrutigaur44 (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of set of IP-s vandalism, edit-war, POV-pushing, etc. Jingiby (talk) 04:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Large amounts of vandalism over the last few days. User:Thatoneweirdwikier | Conversations and Contributions 10:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Showbiz826 have returned. Ravensfire (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection because of inappropriate edits made by anonymous user(s). Zarif1511 (talk) 10:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of disruptive edits this month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Clerk bot seems to have decided it doesn't like me by taking my request off the page and not adding it to the subpage, so re-requesting. Vandalism still ongoing. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Quite a few non-ECP accounts editing problematically here, possibly socks. Code Pending (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – handful of vandalism from today, various IPs; semi would be helpful. Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Renewed attempts at adding "big floppa" nonsense. Page was protected for this before—three times now. DVdm (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5 and El C: ha yes, indeed. Apparently user XVodolazx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has autoconfirmed or confirmed access. - DVdm (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. Primarily one user adding/deleting content against consensus, edit warring warnings issued and ignored. 2402:800:63B6:CE01:944F:7DCB:93F7:E361 (talk) 03:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. By Ohnoitsjamie. The page is semiprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent genre warring from the same person on different IPs. Magatta (talk) 17:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 2607:fea8:5b81:8700::/64 blocked from editing this article for 24 hours. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring; adding unsourced genres and changing the release date. Contiued by the same user whose IP was recently blocked, but continued using an account. Magatta (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06 September 2021

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Quite a few non-ECP accounts here editing problematically here, possibly socks. Note also the same accounts at Robert E. Clark II. Code Pending (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potentially political page seems to have been abused. There is an edit war risk until a better construction of the page is provided. EPEAviator (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I agree with your revert; that content you removed looked like a violationg of WP:NOR. However, protection isn't the appropriate avenue at this point. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring of genre and release date. IP was partially blocked from the article, but they've since created an account and are continuing to edit war. Woodroar (talk) 00:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indonesian DOB vandal (LTA) has been targeting the article for about a week. One of their previous IPs is blocked (Special:Contributions/180.246.18.145), but blocks don't help long as the vandal seems to have access to multiple ranges. kyykaarme (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Hog Farm Talk 07:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Anarchyte. Maybe the bot is confused; the request was for create protection, and that's what was imposed. MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Needs protection until transfer rumors are resolved BlameRuiner (talk) 08:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ips making incorrect changes by attributing medals won by neutrals to this article. SSSB (talk) 09:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The "additional citations needed" tag has now been removed 5 times without explanation or attemptto fix the issue. Link20XX (talk) 09:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Link20XX (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 03:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We are disruptive editing possible vandalism. This semi-protect have been reported. LoveRest (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 03:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:LOUTSOCKs of Pmccull975 (talk · contribs) have been spamming edit requests daily demanding the article be deleted since the AfD closed speedy keep, to the point of disruption. Requesting temporary semi-protection.A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, I see the spamming and probably sockpuppetry, but it seems to have died down, and one of the perpetrators has been blocked. We are always reluctant to protect talk pages if it isn't absolutely necessary.  MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism immediately after previous protection expired. SSSB (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Non-registered users consistently add information about a third season to this article. No citations are provided and I can't find any information on the subject outside Wikipedia. Attempting to reverse this change gets met with an unregistered user changing the article back. To prevent an edit war, protection is requested. Supertanno (talk) 22:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An ip (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:8800:801D:6800:4115:217C:9087:5722 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:8800:801D:6800:F8B0:7ABB:591A:4AB6) has been adding false information to this article both of ip's will not stoping adding false information to the article Chip3004 (talk) 04:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced (and incorrect) information from various IP users. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 01:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. Primarily one user adding/deleting content against consensus, edit warring warnings issued and ignored. 115.79.29.209 (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor insisting that this article needs Star Wars trivia; after repeatedly being advised to first find consensus. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Poor pretection level upgrade to Fully-protected to prevent vandalism. 2402:800:63B6:CE01:48AA:1010:231B:5AE2 (talk) 04:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopper re-adding PoV re outcome contrary to consensus - I can't even revert as article is under 1RR Arjayay (talk) 10:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IronManCap (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If the problem persists, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 02:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper repeatedly making disruptive edits across several articles, has been warned directly on multiple IP addresses. Ravensfire (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to #11.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to 8, 9, and 10. MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)  MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent new accounts (same person) keeps changing the marriage name to Bruce. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Same vandal as on Linda Thompson (actress). - FlightTime (open channel) 00:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs insist on changing Frank Welker's occupation again after several users reversed it several times, but apparently they do not want to assume that the veteran actor had a great career in television, film and voice acting (well all the listings you see here in the section below the filmography of the mentioned actor). 1 148.0.115.214 (talk) 01:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. User warned. MelanieN (talk) 03:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism, changing victory Infernalsword1234 (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism. CaffeinAddict (talk) 04:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Inherited from a recent move. (CC) Tbhotch 22:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Inherited from a recent move. (CC) Tbhotch 22:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 來自IP地址1.161.101.100的持續破壞,使用種族主義及誤導性言論。 Jim Skip (talk) 05:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short form translation: Sustained vandalism from IP address 1.161.101.100. Rng0286 (talk) conts (extended confirmed, rollbacker, and pending changes;) Excellent! (rights) D'oh! 06:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
這不是在中國維琪百科中請求保護的地方。請在 [36]Rng0286 (talk) conts (extended confirmed, rollbacker, and pending changes;) Excellent! (rights) D'oh! 06:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Unedited page and invalid IP. Anarchyte (talk) 08:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Currently attracting a high level of vandalism / edit warring owing to a new (seemingly well-sourced) section on possible racist actions by the article subject. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Politician in the news for doing something that lots of people really hate. Semi it until the public moves on. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Information and terminologies are fluid and being changed to be more inclusive AryaanR (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Please ask on the article talk page for an edit in the form "change X to Y" and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has experienced an unusually high volume of editing by IP users that have edited this article and only this article. From what I can tell from the logs, most of these dedicated IP accounts have pushed material with a very specific POV-based bias. Semi-protection would provide a bare minimum level of protection from such activity on this controversial subject, which involves serious accusations laid against various governments. Iskandar 323 (talk) 06:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IPs are allowed to edit Wikipedia, and neither of the two edits by IPs in the last fortnight are controversial. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is targetted by a couple of anonymous vandals the last days. Daniuu (talk) 11:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued disruptive editing by User:Nickoustic; persistent changing of release date without sources or discussion, also targeting Music from and Inspired by Spider-Man. Magatta (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Canterbury Tail. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Up protection. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected. Favonian (talk) 17:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting ECP due to back to back disruptions by new account and disruptive accounts. TolWol56 (talk) 12:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 13:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism. Controversial subject - recently ejected member of government in Ontario, Canada who is against COVID-19 vaccination. CaffeinAddict (talk) 18:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 18:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is my personal page. Only me and not even admins should be able to edit. Cjjjkscratch (talk) 01:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cjjjkscratch: This is a link to an unedited page in article space. Have you made a mistake? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I guess you were referring to your user page and have changed the request accordingly. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 13:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last three days, a user from two IP addresses has been removing the same material multiple times without explanation. Largoplazo (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Addition of dubious sources, half of which say she's dead, while others says she's not. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – At least two years of fake claims that she is married to Jennifer Morrison, her former costar in Once Upon a Time (TV series). Meters (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism by IP users. Only today, an image of the titular character was removed for the second time in two days by an IP user without providing a reason. I started a discussion on the talk page on the relevance of the image but have so far not got any replies. Tk420 (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs changing her name and/or place of birth. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The correct name is Pushpam Priya Choudhary. See the reliable sources ..I have corrected Chaudhary to Choudhary. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 07:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is not protected, Lekkala. Are you looking for someone to move the page to the correct name? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lekkala R Reddy: Pinging Lekkala. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name (Pushpam Priya Choudhary) is protected Malcolmxl5, and I am not able to move the existing article to the correct name. Request you to move this one Pushpam Priya Chaudhary to Pushpam Priya Choudhary. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 10:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Moved the article to Pushpam Priya Choudhary which is the spelling used in the sources. (Previously someone had moved the article into Wikipedia space by mistake). EdJohnston (talk) 19:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple dynamic IPs, likely same person. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users add unsourced content and their personal commentary to this article.[37][38][39][40]. Wario-Man talk 05:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users are persistently making uncited edits to the list. Rng0286 (talk) conts (extended confirmed, rollbacker, and pending changes;) Excellent! (rights) D'oh! 06:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of false information TheHotwiki (talk) 09:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Controversial BLP subject that's been getting some attention recently, disruption right after unprotection. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edits made by several contributors were removed by JonBoi199 who then subsequently had protection placed on this page. Jonboi199’s editing history at Robert E. Clark II, as well as Wesley College (Delaware) shows that they are currently engaged in persistent disruptive editing; they have repeatedly changed content back to how they think it should be, even when other editors disagree. Request this page be unblocked and the updates made by WCf-s2010, Monkbit21, and XTC7V32 be restored. Jonboi199 has been warned about their biased and vandalistic edits, and if they continue their edits should require review before posting. Thank you for considering this request. XTC7YV32 (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Pinging the protecting administrator Ymblanter for their input though clearly there is a history of edit warring (and it wasn’t JonBoi199 who requested protection be placed on this page). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was reacting on this request. What I see is edit-warring in the article, where many non-extended-confirm accounts are reverting Jonboi199 multiple times, whereas Jonboi199 is accusing them in COI editing. What I do not see is any discussion at the talk page of the article, or even at the user talk page of Jonboi199. I do not think it is safe to unprotect the page until such discussion has happened.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Ymblanter has spoken. Favonian (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07 September 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: make semi protection indefinite, due the sock Ajhenson21 just like Ang Probinsyano (season 8). HurricaneEdgar 09:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Disruption with possible block evasion — DaxServer (talk to me) 09:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The next target of Thai culinary nationalists (just like the article mango sticky rice was more than a month ago before being granted protection) that keep renaming the article, removing and arbitrarily altering sourced information and the references themselves and writing long essays in their edit summaries with claims they refuse to back up with reliable sources despite numerous requests. Turaids (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pamzeis (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recently deceased individual. IPs adding unreferenced edits to death section that may be BLP-violating. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 21:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – PinkNews wrote an article complaining about this Wikipedia article and disruptive editing by two separate autoconfirmed but non-ECP accounts has already begun. The article is worded the way it is based on academic sources, while PinkNews is going off of social media opinion. Crossroads -talk- 17:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see much recent disruption in the article. I would decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't. This is going to be mostly a "civil-PoV" and "slow-editwar" pattern, as in most cases of social media leading to WP:MEAT activism behavior.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  23:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... A Sept 3 request! El_C 00:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is a disruptive editing magnet, and right now an IP is edit warring against multiple editors. Bad IP edits are a constant problem. Please protect this indefinitely per the gender DS. The topic is obviously extremely controversial. Crossroads -talk- 20:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced and clearly false information by IPs and recently-created users. —El Millo (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism-only edits by IPs since protection expired recently. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Countless reverts needs to be protected from users. TheKinkdomMan talk 22:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @TheKinkdomMan: What I see is not vandalism or IP problems; it's a content dispute between two established users - one of them being you. Work it out on the talk page, please. MelanieN (talk) 23:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs adding BLP vios in Arabic. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. KyleJoantalk 00:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Content dispute/edit warring – The or several IPs do not stop changing the occupation since I temporarily request the protection of the article Frank Welker so that the IPs can not edit, but an administrator declined the protection1 and still remains the same, repeatedly changing the occupation for example: here, here where explicitly that he is a voice actor2345 and yet Welker appears in series and live-action movies, only the minority then a user intervened and reversed it by asking him kindly not to change it6, but still the IPs do not listen. 148.0.122.251 (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seeing that the vandalism was coming from a single IP, I tried warning them. But they simply came back using different addresses, so protection is called for. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More disruptive editing after protection has ended. Some1 (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Seeing vandalism due to controversial comments made by its (now-ex) CEO. Semi-protection for a day or two couldn't hurt. 2600:8803:280C:BE00:4043:4DF3:7053:EFEA (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Semi-protection - there's some kind of bizarre sockpuppetry of brigading going on in this discussion, with a load of Israeli IP's showing up in the last 24 hours to add or remove the word "keep", e.g. [41] [42] [43] [44] [45]. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by different iPs. Xclusivzik (talk) 00:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Needs to be protected 173.66.12.118 (talk) 01:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Longhair\talk 01:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: People need to know the truth about Maxime Bernier.He is a climate change denier and anti-vaxxer on the far right. Hubertgardener (talk) 02:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Longhair\talk 02:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 02:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP users. -136.158.42.180 (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs / redlinks deleting sourced content [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] over the last three days. Topic area: WP:AP2. starship.paint (exalt) 04:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 07:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 07:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is verified newspaper regd under Indian govt broadcasting department with valid RNI number which cited in article, still peoples are edited and removing this page for vandalism. Please protect it. Andlol17 (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-Confirmed Protected: It is related to the Arab-Israeli conflict and therefore must be protected due to Wikipedia's general policy of protecting all articles related to this topic. In Addition, it has been possibly vandalized the following times (I am not surprised if there are more):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1956%E2%80%9357_exodus_and_expulsions_from_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=894432814

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1956%E2%80%9357_exodus_and_expulsions_from_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=753715541 Dunutubble (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This article is about the King of Saudi Arabia. Vitaium (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Up protection. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'll keep an eye on the article. I don't think ECP is necessary at the moment. Sro23 (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Seems to have calmed down now. Sro23 (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nate Speed sock puppets. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Protection has expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same reason as before. Nate Speed. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Protection has expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection, IP disruption and edit warring. Snowflake91 (talk) 08:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:17, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent adding of unsourced/ references from IP users. L1amw90 10:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 10:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring by an IP. Doesn't look related to the previous cause for protection, so short term should do fine for now. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 11:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 11:56, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been edited by an IP hopping vandal from the 112.198.16x.xxx range for several months, usually adding a fake list of guest stars that supposed to appear in this program. Vandal is now using IP address 112.198.168.154, bypassing the rangeblock (112.198.160.0/22) implemented on the vandal's previous IP address. - WayKurat (talk) 02:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-Confirmed Protection: Edit war with registered users, see also this, maybe is a good thing an indefinitive extended-confirmed protection--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 09:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Berig (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive behaviour, particularly from 2001:bb6:76aa:f758:94ec:5f51:ce36:48f7 and 58.11.26.250 Thescrubbythug (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 13:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Engr. Smitty Werben 10:49, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 13:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent test editing and off-topic posts from newcomers. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's not that much disruption, and there might be the odd question by users looking for help. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 12:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: This is going to and from Draft rather too often, latterly to seek to avoid AfD. It is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Vietnam. Please move protect for the duration of the AfD. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 14:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Berig (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Pamzeis (talk) 05:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 16:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently a mod has been released for the game Friday Night Funkin' by the name of Retrospecter. In the mod, an Easter Egg can be accessed by typing out the first paragraph of the Wikipedia page for this moth as stated by the mod's antagonist. Since the release of this mod, there has been an increase in edits to the Wikipedia article, mainly to the first paragraph. This can be assumed not to contribute to the article, but rather to throw off those who wish to access the mod's Easter Egg. Binzy Boi (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 07:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes. Unregistered users keep changing his name and nickname based on a trending social media meme. Dee03 09:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be multiple actors. Neils51 (talk) 12:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Including unsourced material by several IPs HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing disruptive editing from IP addresses. Recent temporary page protection does not seem to have worked. Meticulo (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and the vandals are provoking others in social media groups.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  15:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: increasing number of people removing key information about Maxime. Hubertgardener (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 14:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism over the past few days by IP users posting codes for in game currency. (In particular user 83.57.254.108 has made 7 vandalizing edits in the past 5 days alone.) EnzoTC (talk) 17:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User 83.57.254.108 blocked for a few days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing. A few days of protection ought take care of the rest. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs are vandalizing. MoonlightVector 15:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Not sure what to classify this under, but users and ip warring over potential vandalism, this page just needs to be protected in general, to stop this. Changed to more reasonable level of protection, per reccomendation. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 17:14, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend indefinite semi-protection. Several times already, LTA vandalism has resumed almost immediately after previous protection expired. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TornadoLGS: Good point, changed to reflect that, as it makes more sense. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 17:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is misinformation in this article Yjkhkul6lukhl7k (talk) 06:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @Yjkhkul6lukhl7k: Describe the problem on Talk:Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir, only this time don't dump some version of the whole article on the talk page. Favonian (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 15:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Due to a recent event — DaxServer (talk to me) 17:17, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent target of socking Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
18:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two recent serious BLP violations by what looks to be the same IP editor (from different IPs). BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 18:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: MOS:CENTURY violations by IP hopping editor. FDW777 (talk) 11:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 19:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: i want to upload own personal details and file in my wikipedia Vkrnt100 (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Berig (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changes need to be made to the labor union section on the Henry Ford page to more accurately reflect the reasons he proposed the $5 increase in wages and reduced hours.

Henry Ford did not propose changes to wages ($5 hour) or work week altruistically, but in response to a negative change in public opinion toward him and his company when his claims blaming workers attempting to unionize for his employees violent attacks on them were disputed by the publication of photos showing the violence was unprovoked and engaged in by hired Pinkerton men, and that women were attacked as well. Sources:

<https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-the-ford-motor-company-won-a-battle-and-lost-ground-45814533/> Shirltel (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done@Shirltel: Please propose this change on Talk:Henry Ford where the discussion rightfully belongs. Favonian (talk) 16:14, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. rando 16:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Berig (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm his friend. "Josh360" want to make his own wiki page for his Spotify page. Arvdevlazycode (talk) 13:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Arvdevlazycode: I have left a 'Welcome' message on your talk page. Take some time to read up on the English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly those relating to inclusion criteria such as the notability guideline, before creating an article on "Josh360". If you have any questions, you can get help at the Teahouse. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ronaldo appeared twice this season for Juventus. One start and one off the bench. Atalanta and Udinese. 92.10.34.177 (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – please propose the change on Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo, but remember to provide a reliable source for the information. Favonian (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 September 2021

Reason: Repeated vandalism - posting of unreferenced advertorial content, removal of critical content with reference. The page was locked couple of times in the past but the moment lock is removed it is vandalized using new user account or IP logins. Please lock this for longer duration, probably few months. Advait.kansal (talk) 06:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that there is a constant and persistent vandal activity is seen on this page. Some of the users and IP address that are being used are as under:

  1. IP: 182.69.80.138
  2. user:Akhaitan71
  3. IP: 182.69.88.174
  4. User:Vidhan_Sundriyal
  5. etc.

Kindly lock this page and block the users / IP that are indulging in vandalism. Advait.kansal (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – (SP might probably be enough) COVID - persistent (if low-level) disruption by IPs, including introduction of deliberately false material... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Permanetly adding unsourced information or information from unreliable sources. Lado85 (talk) 18:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. This has gone on for years and is a constant problem, so we need long-term protection. Valjean (talk) 18:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. will consider indefinite if problems recur after unprotection. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 18:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is getting ridiculous ... IP is back with the same opinion. This has been going on for over a month now, waiting out both protections to expire before striking again. A longer spell is needed. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Much longer than I'd like, but clearly need to try and wait it out. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting short-term protection as there are disruptive edits from various IP addresses. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 22:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: String of IPs making multiple COI edits on Italian Telecom companies despite repeated explanations - Arjayay (talk) 11:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a bit stale, isn’t it? Last edit: '02:23, 18 February 2021‎ Beland'. Perhaps you’re thinking of some other page? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Idk how long but keep this move protected. MoonlightVector 19:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done let's hold off for now. Editor was blocked. If problems recur we can revisit. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as a BLP, would be prudent if all edits came from accounts. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Childish vandalism today from at least 3 accounts. MB 19:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. I don't think it's going to stop as long as the Taliban is in the news. BSMRD (talk) 20:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pattern of ongoing IP disruption. KidAdSPEAK 20:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – multiple ips adding unsourced/unreliable damage estimates mainly from accuweather (which is known to put out egregiously high estimates that don’t verify). requesting semi for at least a few months until we get better info. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 21:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. BOVINEBOY2008 00:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 03:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 10:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: To move Draft:IFunny here. The sources in the draft show GNG is met and they are all post-2013, when salting occurred. — Bilorv (talk) 10:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 10:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bilorv: for the above as they are reviewing the draft too. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 10:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Amazing, thanks. — Bilorv (talk) 10:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping. HistoryofIran (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some fan of M. G. Ramachandran is degrading this FL with his amateur, biased grammar. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Happily888 (talk) 10:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. EN-Jungwon 11:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 11:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent target of socking vandal. Spike 'em (talk) 06:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Less Unless (talk) 11:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing disruption by socks of WMF-banned user WP:LTA/GRP using multiple IPs. JavaHurricane 12:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 13:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent content removals continue after last protection. Vanamonde (Talk) 11:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 12:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. And revdel.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Currently on extended-confirmed. No sign of vandalism in the history; one incident of socking was blocked 4 years ago and hasn't been repeated. The blocking admin (User:JzG) has been notified of the request a week ago, but hasn't edited for about 5 months now. I'm thinking that we can try removing protection to see if any issues reoccur. - Bilby (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"No sign of vandalism in the history" is a distinctive attribute of protection. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I'm not sure what you mean. - Bilby (talk) 11:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You’re not seeing vandalism (or socking) because the page is protected. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was unclear. I meant there was no vandalism in the history - not just since it was protected. And there is no evidence that the orginal sock has edited WP since protection was applied, to any article. The issue seems to have been that they lost their password and used a new account some years later, and haven't apparantly edited since they were blocked.. - Bilby (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. After 4 years, I'm alright with testing the waters. El_C 16:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long term semi-protection: Continuing removal of 'unsourced' tag, by changing IP GoodDay (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Suno: The protection is no longer necessary because it contains false information and this individual is not the creator of any music genre. This shouldn’t have no protection and should be allowed to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TtgDummy (talkcontribs) 12:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is protected because an IP user was vandalising it again and again. In my view, the protection has nothing to do with whether Ron Suno created any music genre or not. Thanks. Tajwar.thesuperman (talk)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is salted. I just want to make a redirect to DevOps#DevSecOps, Shifting Security Left Banana Republic (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Now sorted, I think. El_C 16:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Due to WP:AE, and the current sanction against Afghanistan, as well due to the controversial topic this is. A ECP protection shall be request until further notice. MoonlightVector 14:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 16:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... .

Panjshir Conflict This page no longer needs protection as more news has come out. Bias moderators are putting false news on the page and wont let any of us with confirmed proof edit anything. This needs to change now.

PanjshirLions (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you are discussing improvements to the article on the article talk page, which is the place where these should be discussed. That is good. I suggest you propose a specific change on the talk page with sources and obtain consensus for the change. When you can show consensus, then make an edit request; this should be done on the article talk page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. I am the protecting admin (a logged AE action) and I'm declining this request as its reasoning just isn't connecting for me. El_C 15:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I’m asking for the protection to be removed because it’s been a while since the article was protected, and there are sections that could be condensed or trimmed, and some sections that need a bit of rewriting or correction (William Shelley’s sighting of Oswald near the phone for example) and there may be IPs that want to make good faith edits as well. 80.43.197.240 (talk) 13:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. I'm sorry that this page is inaccessible to you, IP, but this is almost certainly a perennial problem that won't just go away. Something which I think the protection log bears out, seeing as every time it was unprotected, it needed to be re-protected almost immediately. So, you have two options: register an account and obtain the WP:AUTOCONFIRM tenure (whose threshold is only 10 edits / 4 days), or you could use the edit request feature. Again, sorry and good luck. El_C 16:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk to me) 16:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am not sure if I am putting this post this in the correct place, so please excuse me it is not.

The article Sexual slavery in Islam is continually being vandalized by users (often anonymous IPs), who delete large, referenced blocks of texts. The reason for this appear to be that the information is slander against Islam. These edits are always reverted by experienced users, and since these edits are never referenced and instead removes referenced information, it is easy to make the assumption that there is a religios bias from users who which to remove referenced information because they think that this information put their religion in a bad light. Recently, I myself ask for citations from certain information in the article, but this was reverted by a user who claimed these sentences had references, even if they did not. Clearly, the article attracts emotions.

Another issue has come up: the article has long had a neutrality template. Because of the consistent vandalizing, I wondered if the neutrality template was in fact placed their originally because of religious bias. I made this question on the talk page, and the template was indeed removed. It has since been restored. I have to say, that the article is large, I have not read all of it, I am not an expert in the subject, and I cannot be entirely certain whether the neutrality template is warranted or not. And since I recognize that this is a sensitive issue, I simply don't have the energy to involve myself further.

However, it is safe to say that the article is about a very sensitive subject, and I am forced to revert vandalism so often that I wonder; should not an article that are so sensitive and vandalized so often as this one have some sort of protection? Many sensitive articles who are often vandalized have such a protection, at least against IP-editing. So my question is; can this article be protected? It truly needs it, I have to revert vandalism more often on it than any of the other articles on my watchlist. Best greetings,--Aciram (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected . I have given it indefinite semi-protection. Berig (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is not a controversial page and no one is doing disruptive editing . Theastitva (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. There's been 4 protections this year already, last one in June, so I'm sorry, but I'm not seeing it. El_C 16:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09 September 2021

All article subway pages

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- for 1 year two account socks Red lava 4228 and Yellow sun 4228 has been blocked and tagged from Rgalo10 semi protection too easy for him to block evasion protect this 6 pages for 1 year. 69.94.56.76 (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That master still continued for disruption by creating a different account as a sockmaster that pages still not protected yet for 2 days ago. 174.244.145.73 (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (did them all - see how we go) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Possible sock, edit warring to add questionable material, with questionable sources GoodDay (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ched. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It has come to my attention that user Ethanf9877 has edited the Louisiana College Wikipedia page numerous times with clear malicious intent. Included in the edits were provably false statements as well as the deletion of factual information in order to cast the college in a negative light. Other editors have contributed objectively false information that intentionally reflects a non objective approach by showing a clear opinion on subject matter. Completely fabricated policies have also been listed. I would request that this page become protected so that the page can be properly written and edited without editors deleting information and defaming the college. Legal action is being considered. User Ethanf9877 has also created a page for a faculty member, Joshua Joy Dara, that also is clearly written from a skewed perspective that needs to be corrected. Not only this, but on Dara's page a graphic depiction of male and female genitalia has been hyperlinked to the words "Pubic hair". This is highly inappropriate and records of these edits have been archived. The college has a staff of writers who will accurately and objectively include information on the college in the Wikipedia articles relating to the college. I request that this page be protected in a manner to prevent editors such as Ethanf9877 and others who wish to defame the institution and it's faculty from being able to delete and skew information once it is added, as this will without a doubt occur once changes are made. Blocking or banning Ethanf9877 would be highly appropriate as one can tell from the edit history of this user that the user is seeking to change the perception of public figures and institutions. EyesInTheSky777 (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Also, in relation to your comment of "The college has a staff of writers who will accurately and objectively include information on the college in the Wikipedia articles relating to the college", editors with a close association with the college (see WP:COI) should cease from editing the article directly and instead request edits to the article via the article talk page. You and any other editors involved with the college will need to declare your conflict of interest at your userpage(s). Longhair\talk 21:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Violent upheaval over the last month with edits/vandals/repeaters, we should protect C-Class article. Maybe for a couple weeks, until the US Open is over?. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 21:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See recent history; persistent sockpuppetry / attempts at hijacking. AngryHarpytalk 06:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war that has been going on for a while now. 2601:644:8D80:AB10:2125:5BC5:58AA:6B6F (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Reason: Revert war by multiple IPs Lembit Staan (talk) 18:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent nonsense. (CC) Tbhotch 23:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple unregistered ips and dubious new accounts. These edits are having to be continually reverted by regular reliable users. The page was protected many times in the past but after long gaps these vandalisms have resumed with continuous abusive editing in recent times. You can check yourself on the page revision history. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_WWE&action=history Dilbaggg (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

long term temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism and target of long term abuse. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

long term temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism and target of long term abuse. Pachu Kannan (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent edits from IP socks of Bttowadch. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Bttowadch sock trying to remove entire reception section because it's too positive for them. Ravensfire (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase protection, likewise Bigg Boss (Hindi season 15) where Ponyo extended protection days ago. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and the disruption continues..... ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent nazi vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Coming back from a period of (relative) absence, and taking a look at the page history, I see that the page is still subject to a constant deluge of promotional content and bare URLs. The 1RR restriction applicable to this page (cryptocurrency) means that it's difficult for editors to revert all of the disruptive additions that are made on any single day, without some sort of page protection. JBchrch talk 20:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruptive editing from sockpuppet accounts. Higher level of protection needed. ArojamDharkon (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Editors persistently adding unsourced and poorly sourced content about living persons, including minors. Woodroar (talk) 02:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: frequent addition of unsourced information and original research. 2409:4061:20C:3565:F8:17DE:BD52:40E8 (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Eridian314 (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been going on all year. Dawnseeker2000 07:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pamzeis (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 02:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least a few days. Target of recent edit-warring/block evasion. Given they have continued after being warned about this, there's a good case that protecting this right here and now is an appropriate preventive measure. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism trying to delete travel blogger Josh Cahill's real name, although a valid source is given (https://www.freiepresse.de/mildenauer-gewinnt-blogger-award-artikel10361809) Überfranke (talk) 10:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 10:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase in IP vandalism, esp. since India's squad was named yesterday. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Pending Changes Protection: As it is no longer pending changes protection anymore and has been protected by semi protection instead. 69.94.57.91 (talk) 02:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Oh, bot, you are the cutest! El_C 10:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Daily target of vandalism; mostly the alternate target because Roblox is persistently protected. IceWelder [] 09:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 12:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 16:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I request reduction of the protection level to semi or ECP. While it should be fully upload protected, there is no reason to fully protect all editing of the page. This is especially true when almost all, if not all the vandalism has been done by IP addresses. aeschylus (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What edits do you propose to make to the page? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
At this time, I'd be against downgrading just on principle. El_C 16:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, El_C, the page is not upload-protected, and full protection does seem to be excessive, so the current protection levels are definitely broken in both ways. Perhaps one of you could replace it by actual ECP and log it as WP:AMPOL action. Ping: JzG, the protecting administrator. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...ah damn. Well, perhaps they'll see the ping after their break. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ToBeFree, oh, no upload protection? Well, that's dumb. I matched it with the current protection level (for now). By all means, ECP everything. I have no objection. I just don't really see the point. I can't speak for Malcolmxl5, but if you think it's better at ECP level, well, it probably is and I'm just not seeing it right now. El_C 21:49, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Huh. Does upload protection not allow for a protection summary? Because I could have sworn I wrote something there (and it wasn't even that stupid (for once)). El_C 21:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, even indefinite semi-protection – usually of articles, granted – is already subject to the quite strict criteria at WP:SEMI, namely "heavy and persistent" disruption, no preemptive use et cetera. The same advice applies, as a minimum, to full protection. The section about full protection specifically reads,

Applying page protection as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia and is generally not allowed if applied for these reasons. However, brief periods of an appropriate and reasonable protection level are allowed in situations where blatant vandalism or disruption is occurring by multiple users and at a level of frequency that requires its use in order to stop it. The duration of the protection should be set as short as possible, and the protection level should be set to the lowest restriction needed in order to stop the disruption while still allowing productive editors to make changes.

That's three sentences full of arguments against full protection in this case. Even the words about "preemptive" use seem to apply. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ToBeFree, right, that's what I meant when I said "downgrading just on principle." I'm not talking about what usually is held as best practice, but that in this particular case, I simply don't see the practical point (pragmatically). But, again, I don't feel too strongly about it, on principle! I doubt they'd be issues with ECP'ing, so by all means, go for it. El_C 01:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah sorry El C, I actually misinterpreted that. I had read it as "I'm, on principle, against reducing the protection in such cases". I'll lower it to ECP and everyone's happy. Or so. 😊 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Because on principle being against being on principle is a fractal that's high on the stupid quotient, ToBeFree. So, yes, I'll take a bow! El_C 10:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fizzled out peacefully. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple accounts and IPs trying to pretend the school motto is "Better before Bhasin" a personal attack on the recently appointed principal Mrs Kamini Bhasin, whereas, as per the schools website here it is "service before self" - Arjayay (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Reason: Revert war by multiple IPs. I am sorry to repeat the request. The previous request was addressed by a rangeblock. Unfortunately this didn't work. Lembit Staan (talk) 16:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs —El Millo (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the trailer dropped today, there has been an uptick in vandalism (some of it includes Wikipedia:Offensive material). Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 22:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:MEDRS violations on this page can be handled by semi-protection rather than extended-confirmed protection. A few semi-confirmed (but not extended-confirmed) editors have wanted to add well-sourced information to the article but haven't been able to, so this level of protection is doing more harm than good. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 05:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: the protecting admin (2 pings in one 5 minutes!). El_C 10:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While I usually don't place such protections anymore as I've become tired of the discussions around Discretionary Sanctions, I won't unprotect such central ECP-protected pages until the community (or now ArbCom, rather) removes the sanctions in this area. Specifically, "Long COVID" may be the very last page to unprotect in this area. New editors jumping into COVID19 editing too early are likely to cause headaches to others and themselves; the amount of disruption is already tough when restricting edits to experienced editors. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was salted until I asked for unprotection yesterday to create a redirect. The redirect was created (thank you). I am now asking for the protection level to be reduced from extended confirmed because I think it is conceivable to expand the redirect into a full article (although admittedly I'm not the one who can do that -- if I could expand it I would, as I do have extended confirmed privileges). I think that if we try to reduce the protection level it may encourage somebody to expand the redirect into a full article. Banana Republic (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I've reduced the protection from admin-level to ECP for a reason. There's the WP:DRAFT approach and there's consulting Talk:DevOps, both avenues that less experienced editors can use to assess the viability of such a stand-alone page. But, no, I'm not ready to downgrade further just after a mere day. El_C 15:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The page was salted because somebody(ies) created an advertisement page(s) under that title, requiring an administrator to delete the page. Now that the page is a legitimate redirect, any attempt to turn the page into an advertisement page can be easily reverted. Hence, there is no need to have any protection on the page at all. Should the page be vandalized, we have other tools at our disposal to handle potential vandalism. Banana Republic (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I got that, but I still don't know enough about the specifics to feel confident in doing that. Just because a section exists about something does not mean it's deserving of a stand-alone page, and again, I don't know enough about this. But fair enough, I'm striking my close and welcoming another admin to take a crack at it. El_C 21:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low volume but persistent vandalism since Sep 2, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 02:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done left as indefinite for the time being due to the long term nature of issues. Can be revisited down the track. Happy if any other admin decides to try and unprotect at a later date. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of dubious sources, citations likely through the same IP socking from which it was protected in the past (see log). A temp PP is required here. Gotitbro (talk) 20:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I just wanted to see my name up in lights --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 01:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 01:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 01:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Match protection level with Module:Jcon/Template:Jcon. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IPs likely socks of the one blocked account. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi: Protection expired, addition of unsourced controversial content to this BLP happening again —valereee (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Problems have continued since the last PP expired with ongoing BLP violations, POV, misinformation, etc. Suggest an indefinite protection or until end of 2021 at least. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC). No Great Shaker (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – persistant addition of the same unsourced information by IPs, over several months. Page has already been temp protected in the past, to no avail. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 23:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and a registered user. dudhhrContribs 01:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user is removing consistently information from the article before consensus has been reached on the talk page that this information should be removed. Any attempts at discussion on the talk page are ignored or met with personal attacks. I am requesting the page be locked from editing until consensus on this content is reached. Lynchenberg (talk) 02:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 03:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was salted until I asked for unprotection yesterday to create a redirect. The redirect was created (thank you). I am now asking for the protection level to be reduced from extended confirmed because I think it is conceivable to expand the redirect into a full article (although admittedly I'm not the one who can do that -- if I could expand it I would, as I do have extended confirmed privileges). I think that if we try to reduce the protection level it may encourage somebody to expand the redirect into a full article. Banana Republic (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I've reduced the protection from admin-level to ECP for a reason. There's the WP:DRAFT approach and there's consulting Talk:DevOps, both avenues that less experienced editors can use to assess the viability of such a stand-alone page. But, no, I'm not ready to downgrade further just after a mere day. El_C 15:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The page was salted because somebody(ies) created an advertisement page(s) under that title, requiring an administrator to delete the page. Now that the page is a legitimate redirect, any attempt to turn the page into an advertisement page can be easily reverted. Hence, there is no need to have any protection on the page at all. Should the page be vandalized, we have other tools at our disposal to handle potential vandalism. Banana Republic (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I got that, but I still don't know enough about the specifics to feel confident in doing that. Just because a section exists about something does not mean it's deserving of a stand-alone page, and again, I don't know enough about this. But fair enough, I'm striking my close and welcoming another admin to take a crack at it. El_C 21:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please change Loki’s significant other from Sylvie to möbius because Loki and Sylvie are the same person and it’s incest and it’s disgusting Alana03 (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Malformed request dudhhrContribs 01:52, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dfvbkjbksb,sbdbs,jbsdfe I love you too much and I hope you have a great day and I hope you have a great day and I hope you have a great day today and I hope you have a great weekend hope your family will have a great day and I hope you have a great day today and I love 💕 so so hope your next time goes good 😌 I hope you have a great day love 💕 and love 💕 too much to hope you have a good 😌 love 💗 baby girl 👧 I miss my hope all day today hope you have a good 😊 love 💕 I miss all my hope hope you have a good 😊 love 💕 and love 💕 all of the best hope we are not together and you will love ❤️ love ❤️ I miss all my hope to hope you have a great day today hope you have a good 😊 love 💗 baby girl 👧 I miss hope so love j💕 you have to do it all this weekend but we will see if it happens and I love 💕 I miss the girls 👧 love 💕 so many great 😊 girls 👧 and love 💕 love 💕 too hope

 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 04:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring and SPA IP's changing text without discusion. Slatersteven (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And maybe socking as well.Slatersteven (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors kept on adding unsourced and sources which does not support the content claim. Cassiopeia talk 09:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced text by multiple IPs in 2401:4900::/32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) range. David Biddulph (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Minor IP edit-war. MoonlightVector 19:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yesterday, the USMNT defeated Honduras 4-1 at this stadium and since then the article is being systematically vandalized with the insertion of the names of American players and coach as "owners" of this stadium. Therefore, I think it should be protected for a while. SirEd Dimmi!!! 00:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 05:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sorry for using my alternate account to report but my main account's talk page is getting harassed by an IP (WP:TALKSTALK) who keep edit my comment. This guy also harass me on Commons. Lorenza Sforza (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Okay, I made it significantly longer this time. El_C 06:38, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
190.197.90.6 (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Empty request. (CC) Tbhotch 04:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Loafiewa (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a content dispute. Please discuss the issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Amounts of ip's and others fighting over which is right, would do pending instead of semi due to some of them being right. MoonlightVector 16:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content and vandalism by IP editors. YttriumShrew (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive unproductive edits by unregistered users. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Withdrawn: Article appears to have lulled, but I'll let you verify this. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 02:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 18:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, there are a lot of trolls from India who keep on vandalising this page, so that is why I would like this page to be protected. Thanks. A Fantasy (talk) 23:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Longhair\talk 05:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring by (mostly) IP editors ignoring consensus on Talk page. Muzilon (talk) 00:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Longhair\talk 05:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Already on PC but WP:BLP violating vandalism is still continuing, including violations of WP:NONAME. Semi protection would be more apt, especially considering the long-term vandalism the page has suffered. – DarkGlow09:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:BLP violations, namely violations of WP:NONAME. – DarkGlow09:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was salted until I asked for unprotection yesterday to create a redirect. The redirect was created (thank you). I am now asking for the protection level to be reduced from extended confirmed because I think it is conceivable to expand the redirect into a full article (although admittedly I'm not the one who can do that -- if I could expand it I would, as I do have extended confirmed privileges). I think that if we try to reduce the protection level it may encourage somebody to expand the redirect into a full article. Banana Republic (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I've reduced the protection from admin-level to ECP for a reason. There's the WP:DRAFT approach and there's consulting Talk:DevOps, both avenues that less experienced editors can use to assess the viability of such a stand-alone page. But, no, I'm not ready to downgrade further just after a mere day. El_C 15:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The page was salted because somebody(ies) created an advertisement page(s) under that title, requiring an administrator to delete the page. Now that the page is a legitimate redirect, any attempt to turn the page into an advertisement page can be easily reverted. Hence, there is no need to have any protection on the page at all. Should the page be vandalized, we have other tools at our disposal to handle potential vandalism. Banana Republic (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I got that, but I still don't know enough about the specifics to feel confident in doing that. Just because a section exists about something does not mean it's deserving of a stand-alone page, and again, I don't know enough about this. But fair enough, I'm striking my close and welcoming another admin to take a crack at it. El_C 21:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Adding a signature to avoid being deleted by a bot. Banana Republic (talk) 05:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. The page has been semiprotected for one week. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: following the cancellation of the last match due to COVID, the series result has not been announced, leading to lots of IP vandalism Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 10:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High volume of IP vandalism. Multiple IPs involved. — Manticore 11:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consecutive Vandalism by Many Different IP Address, cause of ongoing sexual harrasment case involving one of Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia/KPI) employee. EdhyRa (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and edits by IPs and new inexperienced accounts. This article is getting a lot of traffic now because of current political events (Fall of Kabul (2021)). And with it there have been a lot of editors making inconstructive or bad changes, including edits to the infobox removing sourced material of "allies/enemies" and other info in the lead. Several of these editors are clearly editing them based on their own political agendas. This is a sensitive topic in the long-term related to Afghanistan and South Asia. I strongly believe this article should get Pending Changes protection. This will allow good editors and admins to keep edits in scrutiny, which is what definitely needs to be the case for something sensitive and in current news. WR 20:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Weaveravel, it kinda looks like you reverted Nurg's changes with an edit summary that read, in part: It was edited by people following their own agendas. You joined the project in May 2020 — Nurg joined in Oct 2003 (a year before me). What am I missing? El_C 01:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This was my mistake, I admit. You can look at my talk page that it has been resolved, Nurg told me about it and I explained the error. I effectively did a "rollback" due to several bad editors but without seeing Nurg's edits that were not part of that. Anyway, I still strongly believe the page should be protected, in fact since yesterday we've had yet another new user putting a long paragraph in the infobox, yet another example, which has since been fixed by Nurg. --WR 23:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weaveravel, this article is being edited too actively for pending changes to be useful at this time. In any case, nothing recent is really standing out for me. But by all means, feel free to provide diffs (Sept only, though), if you think I overlooked something important. El_C 06:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: OK. Here's a few (all are in the lead)

  • removing sourced information in infobox [53]
  • another example from same user [54]
  • an IP removing sourced info (Pakistan) in infobox again (and covering it up by cheekly saying "fixed typo") [55]
  • this IP changing militant to 'terrorist' (even if the group is really terrorist, putting it right there in the first sentence in place of militant is inappropriate, especially as it violates neutrality) [56]
  • this user removed all the sourced content mentioning its links to Al-Qaeda, its alleged partners in infobox, and its actions. This is definitely personal agenda [57]
  • another IP changing info from source with something that again I suspect is their POV ("Denied by Pakistan government but supported by Inter-Services Intelligence ") [58]

All this happened in the space of a week or two, and there doesn't seem enough patrolling to check these, hence why I rolled back. I hope this is enough convincing this page needs protection. --WR 15:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is. Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. BTW, Weaveravel, Nurg: do you not think that militant would be a better term than guerilla? Just putting it out there. El_C 15:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 14:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism very soon after protection expired to BLP subject of rape charges. Egghead06 (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 16:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School article vandalized multiple times today by different accounts. MB 17:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 17:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2409:4063:4E16:6AB5:0:0:E60A:FA07 (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Empty request. dudhhrContribs 14:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is stating misleading facts and wrong information about religious personage. Usama4AB12 (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Empty request. dudhhrContribs 14:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Masroor Ahmed


This page is stating misleading facts and false information about religious personage. Usama4AB12 (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malformed request. dudhhrContribs 14:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP and un-confirmed vandalism. Darththorn (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This is a duplicate request. The page has already been protected. Longhair\talk 16:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent recent vandalism - different IPs, similar changes. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Longhair\talk 17:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High vandalism from 106.195.11.148,106.195.4.88106.195.12.221 etc ... and also using another IP 2401:4900:52ff:e1f:94de:2b7c:3db6:3550. 157.46.108.69 (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 19:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been getting alot of vandalism recently It has been fixed but I don't want it happeing again for the 4rd time. The furret lover (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. There is not enough recent disruptive activity to warrant protection at this time. Longhair\talk 18:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of both Ip and account vandalism. The furret lover (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Duplicate request. Longhair\talk 18:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is misleading and full of false information. Usama4AB12 (talk) 13:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Use the article's talk page to make specific edit requests. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: India-Pakistan Discretionary Sanctions protection request. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 06:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 22:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – What did you expect? This is persistently getting disrupted because COVID-19 and what else... Unlikely it will stop any time soon, anyways. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 22:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by a series of sockpuppet accounts. MrOllie (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 21:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruptive editing in the last few days by IPs and new users. One edit that was vandalism (changing researches to leaks), couple of edits that are disruptive (deleting content without explanation, bad grammar, edit warring it back in). –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 22:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
2402:4000:12CC:AA24:1:0:95A9:FB2 (talk) 18:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Empty request. (CC) Tbhotch 19:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IronManCap (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 22:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs changing birthdate, name, etc. Meters (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. For the bot. El_C 22:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk to me) 07:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 23:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism to alter DOB contrary to listed sources. — Manticore 10:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP-disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Longhair\talk 19:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Abdul Qadeer Khan has been hospitalized and may (or may not) have recently died. Recent edit history shows a large number of IP editors fighting over whether or not he has died. Frietjes (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs have been removing sourced information from the page with the edit summary of "false information". Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 21:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. El_C 00:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism - factual errors and removal of content by IPs Pax Verbum 21:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. El_C 00:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated deletions by different IP editors. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MoonlightVector 13:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalizes the list of episodes. Core2021 (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated hijacked for an article not ready for mainspace. MB 01:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previously protected page, controversial subject matter/public figure. High level of IP vandalism. CaffeinAddict (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 11:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 05:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat vandalism and questionable edits from IPs and new accounts, especially given certain recent controversy CiphriusKane (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are still vandalizing but just upgrade it so i don't have to keep undoing them. MoonlightVector 19:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Spreading of fake news about an alleged death. Serious violation of the Biographies of living persons policy. 🥷 Lukecody (→ messages) 04:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requires protection to prevent heavy vandalism that has been occuring for the last 2 days Wikivasug (talk) 04:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Cwmhiraeth. Less Unless (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More than one year [59] of IP attempts to claim that molasses contains dinosaurs. I didn't bother checking further back. Meters (talk) 04:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring and disruptive editing from multiple users and IPs. Oqwert (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say this but I find it kind of ironic the guy who was disruptively editing was the one who suggested it be protected in their edit summary (not saying you're the one disruptively editing Oqwert). Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 19:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Oqwert: It's hard for an admin here to identify why the edit warring is disruptive in the sense that ECP protection should be applied to support one side. A quick look makes me think that it is just edit warring and full protection should be used to force discussion and an RfC if needed. That's because the talk page has nothing since July. Thoughts from anyone on what should happen are welcome. Johnuniq (talk) 03:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: The page has also received high levels of "petty" vandalism since 2020; out of the last 100 edits, 47 have been reverted. While I agree a short-lasting FPP would help resolve the current content dispute, I believe a longer-lasting ECP is necessary to reduce the volume of disruptive edits the article receives. Oqwert (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Oqwert: This page needs fairly clear-cut cases to protect an article. I will watch the article for a while and take action if I notice a problem. If the current edit war continues, please start a section on the talk page and briefly set out the problem so that uninvolved onlookers can work out what's going on, state your view, and invite discussion. You can ping me from there if people continue edit warring after something new is on the talk page. Also, if semi-protection is needed, let me know. Johnuniq (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full protection request due to edit warring between extended confirmed users. Edit warring, which began in July 2021, centers on POV content, sources that are out of date or are dead links. ElderZamzam (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is not much recent activity and the contributor of the reverted material has been blocked for two weeks so protection is not warranted now. Johnuniq (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Favorite playground of sockmaster Nic.Cartagena Carl Francis (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Both you, Carl Francis and your opponent (who was cleared of being a sock) have been warned at ANI. Please discuss the content issues you have at the talk page. Less Unless (talk) 05:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. It is probably not trivial to spot, but one can notice that after the vandal's edits Japan is listed twice in the table, and Spain disappears. Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. No further vandalism since two users were blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 11:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Metinkv23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. Less Unless (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Qadri223 (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by peer from scientific field with intent to damage reputation of person the page is about. Posting speculative information about a matter that is still being resolved privately. The information is not for publishing to a public forum at this time while it is being resolved. Temporary protection for page requested, please. Rom0011 (talk) 01:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please discuss this content issue on the article talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – So once in a while an edit warrior/POV-pusher come around to add unsourced content or remove content without any explanation. When reverted, he just as quick reverts. As he goes from IP to IP, the editor is individually difficult to stop. The Banner talk 07:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The next target of Thai culinary nationalists (just like the article mango sticky rice was more than a month ago before being granted protection) that keep renaming the article, removing and arbitrarily altering sourced information and the references themselves and writing long essays in their edit summaries with claims they refuse to back up with reliable sources despite numerous requests. Turaids (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: the protection does not seem to have an effect, because the vandalizers are registered users. Once @Discospinster:'s five day block of Vanitapoy expired, he simply returned to vandalizing articles, including this one. –Turaids (talk) 08:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of edit warring and disruption by an IP immediately after previous protection expired. The IP might also well be served by a range-block. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, but I'm not doing any vandalism, it can be read from my posts on talk page on Battle of Sigetvar [[60]]. I know you don't respect me just because I'm irrelevant IP.93.136.115.120 (talk) 06:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 07:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Brojam (talk) 05:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Less Unless (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption from MariaJaydHicky sockpuppets (wide range of IPs). Aoi (青い) (talk) 09:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 10:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – So once in a while an edit warrior/POV-pusher come around to add unsourced content or remove content without any explanation. When reverted, he just as quick reverts. As he goes from IP to IP, the editor is individually difficult to stop. The Banner talk 07:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Berig (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. Firestar464 (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 11:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user who has been blocked on more than one occasion is using multiple IP addresses (from an O2 source I believe according to previous blocks) to edit this page. I have to continually undo the edits and cannot warn the user anymore because of the countless IP addresses that he/she is using, thanks. Pipesmoking Legend (talk) 11:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 11:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 04:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As noted in my protection summary: probably pre-election (on Sept 20) influx. El_C 11:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent addition/alteration of sourced content mostly by pious IP users. Wretchskull (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article hasn't been edited for almost 2 weeks. Longhair\talk 08:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruption, unsurprisingly given the date. FDW777 (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OMG, Callanecc and Longhair (from just before now): I'm taking too long to write my protection summaries, still. El_C 11:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and disruption Snowflake91 (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Profuse vandalism by large numbers of IP editors. YttriumShrew (talk) 07:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 12:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has frequently been edited with false and misleading information about Paul Draper's career. I'm requesting protection so that we can keep the page factual. robskarin (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 10:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX violations by IP editor, disruption started again as soon as the previous semi-protection expired. FDW777 (talk) 09:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 11:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC) ←11:11, 11! (UTC) — El_C 12:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, shit, Longhair. Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I guess it took me a while to write that protection summary. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ See also AN3 close. Anyway, so, what do you want to do? El_C 11:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also add that while, in my view, both of our positions are legit, your firmer one likely more so than mine, seeing as I am stretching WP:AGF quite a bit with all these WP:PACT and WP:DISRUPTSIGNS red flags. El_C 11:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: I based my longer protection on the fact it was previously semi-protected for 6 months, the article stabilised before disruption arrived again upon protection expiry, it was then briefly semi-protected, then the disruption continued shortly after that second protection ended. It's an ongoing issue there. Let's roll with your protection settings and see how things pan out in a week from now. -- Longhair\talk 11:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, Longhair, thanks. This is the 2nd protection-edit-conflict we've had recently, and the 2nd time you deferred to my protection. I appreciate that. Thanks again. Best, El_C 12:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: I'll see you here in a week :p -- Longhair\talk 12:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll bring the beers. :D El_C 12:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ugh, try 2 hours, Longhair. Well, thanks for humoring me, anyway. Looks like I'll be buying beers for the rest of the year. El_C 13:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:CF80:3990:34B9:CB54:A5D4:64F5 (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA leaving denigrating messages. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Callanecc is administrator and currently active (edited 20 minutes ago). I have blocked three IPs for personal attacks and, absent further development, this must be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I won't do it myself but I'm happy for this to be declined. It looks like the IP hopper has found something else to do. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Happy to oblige. El_C 11:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Block evasion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Berig (talk) 14:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I’m asking for a reduction of protection to pending changes for iCarly because it’s been a while since the article was protected for having persistent vandalism, and there may be IPs that want to make good faith edits as well. -Rng0286 (talk) conts (extended confirmed and rollbacker!) Don’t judge a book by it’s cover (check rights) D'oh! 02:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Connormah appears to be in transit atm, so testing the waters. El_C 14:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent test edits and misuse as a help page. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 20:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Sdkb, it's like an edit a month, what am I missing? El_C 22:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C, it's not that it's an active page, but that the proportion of edits appropriate for the page is very low. It's helpful for newcomers to not be able to misplace their Teahouse question there, since then they get redirected to the actual Teahouse, where they'll receive better help. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure, maybe a note with a link to the Teahouse...? The activity is more fitting for pending changes, but that would be dumb in this case. Soliciting further input, for now. El_C 22:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure it's possible to make the present note any bigger. The problem may be partially WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, I meant in the protection summary, which may have a wider reach wrt the mobile wall of garbage (not sure). El_C 23:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yeah, that sounds fine. There are a bunch of other talk pages that are protected for similar reasons (e.g. Help talk:Introduction) but the comments from the protecting admin vary widely. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 01:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a sidenote: pages like these (and other WP:) pages can't be pending-changes protected. As for protection of these pages: I tend not to protect them, because, as a rule, activity, and therefore disruption, isn't usually that great, and they are talk-pages of "help"-pages. People can be be directed to the teahouse, e.g.. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, indeed they can't, Lectonar. Weird how I never noticed that. Anyway, I'm fine going along with the activity argument (intuitive), so closing accordingly. Also, ping Sdkb (due to rapid archive). Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – A sockpuppeteer using multiple accounts, i.e. a fan of the subject, is engaging in an edit war with an established user over the page's content. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Plus User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Random users are removing the sourced content and adding what ever they think is correct. So I request kindly to protect this page. Thank you. - MRRaja001 (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism BattleshipMan (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Berig (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Berig (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Large amounts of pre-election vandalism. I recommend protecting this page until after the election (which happens on Sep 20). Username6892 19:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism across many IPs/new users over many months (long-term). czar 19:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it has never been protected before, let us try one year first--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12 September 2021

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Home Lander (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Noo, bot, you're too fast! Your hunger for treats has made you a machine (machine). Erm: Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Maybe I'm missing some WP:BLP stuff. No harm in erring on the side of caution, I suppose. El_C 00:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Second strikethrough! Resolution reached. El_C 12:16, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP seems determined to delete vast sections of this without explanation, has continued despite reversions Elemimele (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Berig (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: There's currently someone with ECP who is posting porn images onto the page repeatedly. Please ASAP protect the page and purge the history. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. The article was fully protected until an investigation led to the conclusion that it was ok to reduce it back to ECP. Johnuniq (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Being repeatedly vandalized by someone with ECP, needs attention immediately. Zeroground7 (talk) 22:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. The article was fully protected until an investigation led to the conclusion that it was ok to reduce it back to ECP. Johnuniq (talk) 03:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's some porn vandalism going on on 9/11-related pages, including this one. This needs to be protected. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. The article was fully protected until an investigation led to the conclusion that it was ok to reduce it back to ECP. Johnuniq (talk) 03:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Severe disruption of archive by banned user GRP using VPN service allowing him to hop IPs at will. JavaHurricane 15:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GRP refers to the WMF-banned vandal WP:LTA/GRP. JavaHurricane 02:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: After an editor was blocked for the third time for adding material against consensus, an IP pops up to revert to their version. Sockpuppetry case filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User4721, it looks like a duck. FDW777 (talk) 21:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Look at the date and guess the caliber of edits being made anonymously to this and other 911 articles. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 22:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors adding nonsense. Schazjmd (talk) 00:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since April 2021, IP editors have tried eight different times to add additional locations without citation. I have checked each time I have reverted, & there is no information that I have found to indicate that Big Fish has anything to do with the added locations. I would therefore request requiring auto-confirmed editors only for the next few months. Peaceray (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What, I was writing it, bot! No treat! Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Near constant disruptive IP editing. Amigao (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to her unusual heritage as American, British, and Argentine there is no consensus yet on how to word it, with different reliable sources saying different things, and it doesn’t help when IP users take it upon themselves to put their own spin on it without discussing first. So I think this page should be extended confirmed protected indefinitely as a BLP. Trillfendi (talk) 23:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably needs long-term but temporary protection; see protection log for past history. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 04:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 04:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Procedural request for Wikivasug who asked at WT:TV. Reason given: "The view history shows a lot of attempts of Vandalism wherein genuine references previously cited by editors were removed by a group of people for their own benefit. Information regarding an actor from the cast (Paras Arora) was also removed from the page which was later retrieved." There have been a lot of IP edits on this page of late. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 16:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs BlameRuiner (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism based on fake club transfer rumors.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  18:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry and vandalism. Higher and longer protection is needed, since, whenever an article's period of protection is over, it is immediately vandalized again, and whenever the user is blocked, they immediately create a new account and vandalize the same thing on multiple Five Nights at Freddy's-related articles. It would also help to block User:Jenn881 as well. ArojamDharkon (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Crossroads -talk- 05:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What, I didn't make a Darth Tyrannus joke RE: Sauriaphilia! El_C 06:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unconstructive edits by IP. Vitaium (talk) 05:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Not temporarily! Quoting my protection summary (in full): perennial problem. Protections well into the double digits. Last protection was for a year (2020-2021), and the one before it was also for a year (2019-2020), and the one before it was also for a year (2018-2019), and the one before it was also for a year (2017-2018) — I'm gonna run out of space! El_C 06:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove comments [2] Grousset 1991, p. 165. and [3] Janhunen 2006, p. 114. Reading the corresponding book (The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia.by Rene Grousset,1991/The Mongolic Languages,Juha Janhunen,2006), Grousset only quoted Bartold’s guess instead of confirming Kara -Khanid speaks Chinese. "Barthold even believes that the administrative language may have been Chinese.", and Janhunen did not mention Kara-Khanid related situations 诸葛彻 (talk) 12:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @诸葛彻: Please make this proposal on Talk:Kara-Khanid Khanate. The page is only semi-protected, any regular editor can make the change if it is deemed necessary, so administrator action isn't required here. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Coordinated transphobic vandalism is currently being planned on 4channel. Inanna K (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Inanna K: Sorry but preemptive protection is not applied. Request again (or try contacting me if I'm active) if the trolling occurs. There is a disagreement at the article at the moment but that's from established editors and there is an unanswered post about the issue on article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 03:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This may also be related to the Arab-Israeli conflict and if so, should be extended-confirmed protected, like the article Naftali Bennett. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 06:54, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 07:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. FDW777 (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA, see User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA. FDW777 (talk) 07:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant adding of false, unsourced information by a suspected LTA in the past few days. wizzito | say hello! 00:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing, I'm writing, bot! Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low volume but persistence vandalism since Sep 1, 2021. Editors kept on adding unsourced and vandalism edits. Cassiopeia talk 03:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it appears the page was mistakenly flagged for vandalism. However, upon closer look into matters, admin continuously removed factual data that was backed up by legitimate sources. Therefore only admin kept vandalizing page and flagging users for posting accurate information about a relationship status 195.200.221.89 (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Frivolous request. El_C 04:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A number of constantly disruptive IP edits. Ronherry (talk) 07:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SSSB (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes disabled. Longhair\talk 10:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the first game against Manchester City a few weeks ago, the same disruptive edits continue to happen. Request more permanent protection. Govvy (talk) 10:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 10:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article used to be salted because editors used the article name to create an unambiguous advertisement page. A few days ago the article was created as a redirect. The article could potentially be expanded to an article in its own right, but the current protection level may prevent non-extended confirmed users from expanding into a full article.

Since the article now exists as a redirect, any attempts to make it into an advertisement page can be easily reverted using much simpler tools. The request was previously made, with the admin who created the redirect declining to act and seeking the opinions of other administrators. A bot keeps deleting the request ([61] and [62]), necessitating this new request. Banana Republic (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: huh, that's weird. Refactoring original discussion below. El_C 14:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previous discussion

Reason: The page was salted until I asked for unprotection yesterday to create a redirect. The redirect was created (thank you). I am now asking for the protection level to be reduced from extended confirmed because I think it is conceivable to expand the redirect into a full article (although admittedly I'm not the one who can do that -- if I could expand it I would, as I do have extended confirmed privileges). I think that if we try to reduce the protection level it may encourage somebody to expand the redirect into a full article. Banana Republic (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I've reduced the protection from admin-level to ECP for a reason. There's the WP:DRAFT approach and there's consulting Talk:DevOps, both avenues that less experienced editors can use to assess the viability of such a stand-alone page. But, no, I'm not ready to downgrade further just after a mere day. El_C 15:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The page was salted because somebody(ies) created an advertisement page(s) under that title, requiring an administrator to delete the page. Now that the page is a legitimate redirect, any attempt to turn the page into an advertisement page can be easily reverted. Hence, there is no need to have any protection on the page at all. Should the page be vandalized, we have other tools at our disposal to handle potential vandalism. Banana Republic (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I got that, but I still don't know enough about the specifics to feel confident in doing that. Just because a section exists about something does not mean it's deserving of a stand-alone page, and again, I don't know enough about this. But fair enough, I'm striking my close and welcoming another admin to take a crack at it. El_C 21:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. For the bot. El_C 14:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The Semi-protection is no longer necessary because there is not much vandalism. Vitaium (talk) 06:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: why do you assert that it is no longer necessary, Vitaium? El_C 14:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion by User:Sweetindian to restore WP:FAKE content added by older socks through 157.49.*.*/16 IP range. If possible, please protect, Dharapuram, Tamil inscriptions in the Malay world, Tamil Malaysians as the same disruption is happening by the same IP. Thanks. - SUN EYE 1 11:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: An IP from the 157.49.*.*/16 range removed this above request.[63] - SUN EYE 1 13:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism, needs longer protection than last time as vandal is persistent. Skyerise (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked an account and a /64. Because of how persistent they are, the article has also been Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Template-protection may be a bit too much since this page isn't high risk and isn't used in a lot of pages. Requesting to be downgraded to semi-protection. Poppytarts (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Eep, a request languishing for an entire week. Not great. Ivanvector (the blocking admin), the transclusion count says 104, so why did you go with WP:TPROT? Not sure even WP:ECP is warranted here, tbh... Possibly I'm missing something important/obvious. El_C 14:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: three years ago when I protected it we had a sockpuppet frequently vandalizing this and other Phillippine history pages and semi wasn't cutting it, and at that time ECP was not approved for use on templates (it may not have been available at all in 2018, I don't remember when the community approved it for general use), hence TPROT. The case has been inactive for a couple years now, I have no objection to whatever protection level you think is appropriate, or if you want to remove it altogether. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ivanvector, I confess to have ECP'd a couple of these kind of content templates, because that rule was dumb (shh, don't tell). Anyway, downgrading to semi seems fine to start with, I think, so I have Done this. El_C 14:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think protecting a talk page for 3 years is a quite extreme measure and I don't think the subject attracts enough disruptive behaviour to justify it. 31.26.85.7 (talk) 23:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AmandaNP: the protecting admin. El_C 04:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember ever seeing a talk page being protected. Who / how would talk page get vandalized? With the exception of minor formatting changes, or adding the {{unsigned}} template, any user who modifies another user's comments should be blocked. I don't see the logic behind protection of talk pages. Banana Republic (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected It was to deal with an oversight issue at the time that I can't speak to, but it should be over enough to unprotect. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 14:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of negative edits from a user, look at revision history. 9Revolution (talk) 08:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 09:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nitesh003(TALK) 11:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – block evasion, persistent disruption and addition of WP:FAKE references through multiple IP's (157.49.*.*/16) and socks by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sweetindian. Very likely WP:COI. The user also had a previous sock named User:Amritauniv.- SUN EYE 1 11:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: An IP from the 157.49.*.*/16 range removed this above request.[64] - SUN EYE 1 13:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism based on rumours.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  12:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Welcome aboard! El_C 14:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Thanks! I don't think I protected that one, though . --Blablubbs (talk) 14:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That you didn't. Welcome to RfPP, then, where my fuck ups are legendary! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Vsa111 (talk) 12:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 13:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 13:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: According to the sources, she has dual citizenship of United States and China, but there are no other sources that specify whether it is the People's Republic of China (commonly known as China) or Republic of China (commonly known as Taiwan). This unclear status of her nationality has caused many unregistered users to constantly change the content of her nationality, causing vandalism. Cisdine (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurring IP vandalism. The subject of the article, Pamela Uba, has reported online racist abuse (https://news.sky.com/story/pamela-uba-first-black-miss-ireland-reveals-shes-suffered-racism-and-bullying-since-win-12403312) and recent edits to her Wikipedia page suggest she will be a target of similar activity on Wikipedia. I believe the article requires temporary semi-protected status. GeneralBelly (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption by the IPs of multiple blocked sockpuppets. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 16:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite move protection was applied 2.5 years ago, no evidence of persistent move warring. Protecting admin Dekimasu has not been active since February. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: well, the move protection is at admin level, so of course there's no longer any move warring. What am I missing? El_C 14:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C There wasn't evidence of persistent move warring before the protection was placed. Just a single incident of warring, and nothing that would seem to warrant indefinite protection. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 02:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I get that it was inherited from Oath Inc. (logs)/Verizon Media (logs), but again (and not to hammer the tautology), I'm not sure what evidence of persistent move warring you're expecting to find post-protection. I'm not declining your request yet, I'm just having a hard time parsing it, still. El_C 04:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C I'm saying that pre-protection, not post-protection, there wasn't enough persistent move warring to justify indefinite protection in the first place. On December 20th, 2018, one editor moved it from Oath, and then a move request was filed to move it back. Then on January 8th, 2019, someone else moved it from Oath and it was immediately moved back and indefinitely protected. Dekimasu should've initially applied a time-limited move protection that would've expired after the current corporate rebranding effort had had a change to settle out, since it was just two editors jumping the gun on a corporate rebranding. We wouldn't indefinitely fully protect a page after two reverts, and while I understand that page moves can be somewhat more disruptive than edits, that still doesn't seem to meet the level of move warring that would warrant indefinitely protecting it so that only administrators can move it. This sounds like a catch-22, where you can never unprotect a page because you need evidence that it won't be vandalized, but you can't get evidence that it won't be vandalized because it's protected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, @Ahecht: Extended confirmed protected downgrade applied. El_C 17:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, for the bot. El_C 17:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, recently I myself contributed quality content to article Panevėžys (1, 2), which is about the 5th largest city in Lithuania. However, by glancing at the edit history of this article, I soon noticed that over the past year it almost constantly was subject to vandalism and childish disruptive editing (1 - mass removal of content and added words which says that Zinka has big boobs, 2 - it says that Panevėžys is shit, 3 - self-declaration of non-notable person, 4 - random person name and surname added, 5 - childish editing, 6 - same editor (in Lithuanian myliu tave means I love you), 6 and 7 - another childish editor, 8 - most likely self-declaration of non-notable Counter-Strike:GO video game player).

Seeing such nearly constant disruptive behavior of multiple editors, I request to apply permanent Semi-protection to this article in order to avoid disruptive childish IP editing and to protect quality content of this important Lithuanian article. I'm planning to expand this important article with even more quality content and it would be too difficult to constantly monitor if some childish IP editors will perform disruptive editing, especially as some time will pass by. -- Pofka (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pofka, before your series of edits, the last edit was in March, so the disruption is very Stale. And, honestly, as someone whose watchlist has countless cities from around the world, for better or worse, it's kind of par for the course. Oh, and that CS player is probably a camper. El_C 15:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Similar story to the 2021 British Grand Prix; a contentious collision between the two leading competitors for the championship is leading to disruptive editing, such as Special:Diff/1043891358 or Special:Diff/1043887914. Given the persistent disruptive editing at the aforementioned 2021 British Grand Prix article I feel it is appropriate to request some level of protection be added to this page. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A racing protection request with an actual explanation. You win a prize, HumanBodyPiloter5. El_C 18:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of information that does indeed pertain to the page (per the demographics section). The IP's arguments are clearly of nationalist nature and the page also falls under the decisions placed on Kurdish-related subjects Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan. Semsûrî (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 18:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Ufukantro (talk) 10:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. OP indeffed. El_C 15:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, unblocked. Other user indeffed. Fucking up shit, as is custom. El_C 15:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no need necessary because this is not a spam, and self advertising "Matru Pal" is an Indian singer for more information please search him on Google. (Url for Matru Pal - Matru Pal https://g.co/kgs/cnccfC) Theenimy (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Unsurprisingly, the OP has been blocked as a sock of the user whose actions caused the page to be salted in the first place. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism. Multiple disruptive edits from IP addresses. Particularly, after the cancellation of final Test in IND vs ENG. Kirubar (talk) 13:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially, this is 202.xxx. Lectonar (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism / hoaxing. MrOllie (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Shivajitheking (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Tbh, I don't see vandalism; article has been nominated for deletion. Lectonar (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 September 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - The IP editor has been putting the occupation again in the infobox of the comedian and actor Patton Oswalt several times, but despite all this the IP does not understand that voice-over actor and actor do not go together in the tab and remain in the same with its edit patterns where the other IPs helped them. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 148.101.41.83 (talk) 21:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP addresses have been disruptive editing non-stop since yesterday. — YoungForever(talk) 00:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 02:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to edit the handcuff page, handcuffs haven't been changed for over 100 years until now, a new company called 21 Century Cuffs (www.21cc.biz) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1QEu2n1Mfc has completely redid the handcuffs as we know it, this is the future for all law engorcement!! 100.12.109.57 (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP disruption. KidAdSPEAK 23:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GABgab 23:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of promotional content by multiple sockpuppets. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Renan Luis Moraes. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 02:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long term coi / promotional editing. Longhair\talk 02:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the redirect to Dream smp to allow editing/ updating about the content creator.


Pleas change/remove #REDIRECT Dream SMP to allow updating of page for youtuber https://www.youtube.com/c/GeorgeNotFound Gogysimper (talk) 23:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Muboshgu (talk) 23:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeorgeNotFound closed as delete. Any attempt to recreate the article in mainspace will result in WP:CSD#G4. Work on it at Draft:George Not Found if you wish. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Long-term abuse of a user adding derogatory insults toward McManus. (CC) Tbhotch 15:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Looks like he's just had his leg or ankle broken by a red card challenge. High levels of editing expected. Requesting page protection in anticipation of IP content dispute in regards to the challenge. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive brand new WP:DUCK account restoring edits of indef banned user (and banned proxy using IPs). Most likely sock of this user Volunteer Marek 07:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please discuss these content issues on the talk page. The editor concerned is autoconfirmed so semi-protection would be ineffective. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive brand new WP:DUCK account restoring edits of indef banned user (and banned proxy using IPs). Most likely sock of this user. See Battle of Praga request right above. Volunteer Marek 07:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please discuss these content issues on the talk page. The editor concerned is autoconfirmed so semi-protection would be ineffective. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:52, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steady on bot, give an editor a chance! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - same pattern of vandalism resumed shortly after previous protection expired. PohranicniStraze (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Upcoming movie being vandalised by unregistered and new users Interesting Geek (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism 2603:8081:2105:89B9:204D:ED50:EA6:FACE (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing, addition of unsourced content. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of persistent disruptive edits from IPs. Ronherry (talk) 08:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent disruptive editing and vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Plenty of activity, little vandalism. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP unconstructive edits. Vitaium (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: for unauthorize edites and remove content 103.21.166.40 (talk) 08:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems the fandals of the LA Galaxy will find new ways to attack the article, and since they edit without accounts, it seems blocks will not work. Either a lock to new and unconfirmed accounts or ECP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 06:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (talk to me) 07:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 11:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Redirect to a template-protected Template:BLP others. —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please list the page/template you want to be protected...redirects work in both directions :). Lectonar (talk) 16:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Chidananda Kampa (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One user, alternating between a single-purpose account named Fixitrightnow and various IP addresses, has been adding a massive amount of cruft to the BLP article. Most of it is unsourced, and one massive section that uses Daub's book as a source merely copy-pasted the exact text from her book (copyright violation, I believe). Myself and User:Jjj1238 have explained to that editor why their edits are inappropriate and I have tried to engage the user multiple times to ask them to discuss their changes, but they are apparently uninterested in discussion, preferring to revert many times instead. I am hoping that adding page protection might prod them into discussing their proposed changes. Wes sideman (talk) 12:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum - I just noticed that Rwgutmann, an account that originally added the cruft and hasn't been active for 7 years, just weighed in on the talk page of a user that I was discussing the changes with. It seems obvious to me that this is the same person, so now I think there's a sockpuppet issue too. Wes sideman (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and disruption. Full protection needed. Sinwawtaha (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: All seasons of the show need to be protected. The progress tables were recently changed to remove a bunch of policy-violating WP:OR, and now there is a sudden spate of new editors creating accounts solely to revert the change. Daundelin 14:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daundelin: Please give an example of one article where there has been a recent problem and preferably give a diff of an edit showing the problem with a brief explanation of how someone here could recognize that it is a problem. Johnuniq (talk) 07:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: see the histories for example:
That's just three of the many pages. The basic problem here is that Drag Race (like many pop culture properties, I suspect) is absolutely riddled with fans who are convinced that whatever they want is therefore encyclopedic. There was a discussion here Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race#It_has_been_a_while which is where the consensus for the changes was made; you can see the stark difference between policy-based argument and "but I like it so it should stay" argument. After posting they were going to make the changes, @Thijslandsmeer: waited quite some time before implementing them. It was only after implementation that there has suddenly been an influx of brand new accounts trying to editwar the changes away solely because they don't like it. They largely appear impervious to how policy actually works, and so protection is necessary to stop the endless disruption to the articles. Disruption which was even worse before the change, because there were constant wars over who was 'high' or 'low' with various editors clinging to their own personal interpretation of what a 'positive' or 'negative' critique is. Which quite neatly encapsulates the problem: brand new and/or single-purpose accounts are edit-warring to maintain a preferred version over which they can edit-war. Daundelin 11:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Daundelin: Are you asking for semi-protection of all articles like RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12)? The history of that article shows some recent turmoil but nothing that semi-protection would stop. WT:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Progress tables across all seasons is far too long and complex for interpretation regarding what can be enforced by administrative action. There seem to be two issues. First, whether the "Contestant progress" table should be in a template that is transcluded to the article, or whether the table should simply be in the article. I have to warn you that people roam Wikipedia looking for single-purpose templates such as {{DragRaceProgressTable/12}} and nominate them for deletion saying that such content should be in the article. I'm just letting you know and am personally happy with the idea of a template. The second issue concerns details of what the table looks like. I think you would need a separate RfC on each issue where a simple question is asked. If a good consensus resulted, anyone editing against consensus could be warned and sanctioned if necessary. If there is anything that would benefit from semi-protection, please link to it and identify a problematic edit with a diff or the date/time of an edit in history. Johnuniq (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Johnuniq per your comment "I have to warn you that people roam Wikipedia looking for single-purpose templates ..." see this discussion from less than a month ago. Frietjes (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It's unfortunate that such a lot of time wasting comes from these kinds of articles and if I were Jimbo they would all be ECP protected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: see here, for example, observe the edit summaries: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race_All_Stars_(season_2)&curid=47327453&action=history
It's just ridiculous. Fans of the show (and, for the record, I am one) are doing the usual thing where they are unable to distinguish between encyclopedic content supported by policy, and what they want. There was consensus for the change; the user who initiated the changes made an announcement after much discussion and then waited a week before implementing. The nonsense needs to stop. Daundelin 02:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That article has now been semi-protected by another admin. If more is wanted, please answer the question in my earlier comment and be specific about exactly what is wanted. I pointed out that semi-protection would not help in at least one case and that a clear RfC would be needed to settle that page. Johnuniq (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This is a problem that can't be solved via protection, all in all. Lectonar (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over a decade of IPs and new accounts removing Cyrillic from the lead and infobox. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only 1 IP in the last week. Lectonar (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Addition of content against MOS by IPs — DaxServer (talk to me) 10:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced additions by IPs and autoconfirmed accounts. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption I see is from IPs. Editors need to be warning any disruptive editors - be they IPs or named accounts - so that they can be blocked if their disruption continues. Some of these look to have earned blocks, but if no one has given them any warnings (especially if it's for unsourced content, or anything that could be interpreted as a content dispute rather than pure vandalism) there will be delays in us being able to take action. - CorbieVreccan 19:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sudden influx of IP vandalism, apparently in response to a youtube video. CMD (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 18:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 18:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I know, bot, but I had a lot of revdels to go through. Here, you've earned this treat! El_C 19:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2021

Reason: Vandalism, directly after a contentious Subway Series game. CybeastID (talk) 05:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Past protections for two years, one year, one year, wash rinse repeat. Every time they expire, the vandalism starts immediately. It's time for indef. I edit the page regularly so I'm asking someone else to push the button. Thanks!. - CorbieVreccan 17:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 20:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ip vandalism. Crboyer (talk) 22:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 00:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently deceased person with joke edits and BLP vios by some IPs. Isabelle 🔔 22:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Isabelle Belato: seems to be a coordinated attack by vandals against recently deceased person (Sidharth Shukla had the same vandalism). El_C 00:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 00:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC) 00:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 00:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC) 00:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 00:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC) 00:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 00:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC) 00:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruption started again as soon as the previous semi-protection expired. A (page?) block of 71.201.59.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) might be a possible alternative. FDW777 (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Right, longer then. El_C 00:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Well cited content within the article is being reverted constantly, specifically start of third paragraph in lead. Calls for forming a consensus in the talk page are not met. DriedGrape (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ECP: Removed edits by a blocked user who has pro-Palestinian views. This must be protected under ARBPIA. —142.112.224.127 (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Moxy- 21:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism after most recent game. Alyo (chat·edits) 00:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – non-stop IP BLP violations relating to a political cartoon he did re Covid19. Meters (talk) 17:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 00:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User talk page of this sockmaster is a redirect to the user page, resulting in misplaced messages ending up here. Home Lander (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 00:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 00:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PewDiePie claims he is the owner of this now. (CC) Tbhotch 18:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 00:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Target of IP hopping COI editor who has attacked multiple Italian Telecom articles, which has already led to the semi-protection of TIM - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 01:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. El_C 01:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: long-term problems by SPA editors in a BLP to promote the subject Hipal (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent influx of anonymous edits due to the recent passing of the group's founder, Abimael Guzmán. Anonymous editors refuse to engage on the talk page, nor acknowledge their contradiction of Wikipedia policy, specifically MOS:TERRORIST. CentreLeftRight 00:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lomrjyo (public) (owner) 16:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Lomrjyo (public), it's the sandbox, watched by countless admins. Also, next time you list a page this exceptionally active, you should add pertinent diffs so that the reviewing admin can tell the disruptive edits in question. El_C 01:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism. Deleting content and claiming "fake news". Notfrompedro (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. By way of WP:AIV. El_C 00:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Doraemon25 (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 01:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism (reverting) from multiple user pages likely tied to the same person/IP address, with no explanation for the edits and contrary to the group consensus regarding a character table. TNstingray (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. TNstingray, they've been blocked on Sept 6 for one month. The last edit to the page was on Sept 6. El_C 01:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Atricle reason is any one others page sentence add this article . I requested that full protection to this Article . High level of IP vandalism. Muchiram Hansdah12 (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Muchiram Hansdah12, looks like the matter is being attended to. Feel free to relist if problems persist. El_C 01:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is someone who keeps's on deleting relevant info and is not engaging in a talk post, which has been requested for him to do. Lectrician2 (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 01:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Actually, make that the ubiquitous fuck up by yours truly! Anyway, Lectrician2, let's see if the 3RR warning did the trick (they haven't edited since). El_C 01:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There have been ghost accounts made to edit this article I suspect, see Special:Contributions/CaringChicagoan . He was registered today, right around the edit war, and I suspect it is Cdan2710's ghost account. These are unfounded accusations, but it's just a suspicion. Lectrician2 (talk) 01:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 69.94.57.91 (talk) 02:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive edits to remove controversies section by autoconfirmed users. — IVORK Talk 05:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THE DEFINITION REGARDING FASCISM IS MISLEADING AND INACCURATE: According to Webster Dictionary Fascism is 1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition....... . Tmc7 (talk) 23:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GABgab 02:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users TheHotwiki (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ― Tartan357 Talk 09:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopper trying to force mass of unsourced changes Arjayay (talk) 09:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 08:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add the following redirect categories:

#REDIRECT [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]

{{Redirect category shell|
{{R from alternative spelling}}
{{R unprintworthy}}
}}

Kleinpecan (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Anarchyte (talk) 13:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add the following redirect categories:

#REDIRECT [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]

{{Redirect category shell|
{{R from miscapitalisation}}
{{R unprintworthy}}
}}

Kleinpecan (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Anarchyte (talk) 13:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add the following redirect categories:

#REDIRECT [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]

{{Redirect category shell|
{{R from ligature}}
{{R from move}}
{{R unprintworthy}}
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Encyclopaedia Dramatica}}

Kleinpecan (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kleinpecan: Unprotected all. Anarchyte (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Anarchyte (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
47.200.187.153 (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

they should be "considered to be one of the greatest kid bands of all time"

 Requesting immediate archiving... Anarchyte (talk) 13:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase in vandalism in recent days. Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 07:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I'm not seeing any significant vandalism, but I am seeing recent good-faith and unreverted edits by IPs and a non-autoconfirmed account. I also note that this was a wildly inappropriate uncivil edit summary. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (Please tag me in replies) 11:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism; one IPv6 range has already been blocked, but they user has presumably returned with an IPv4 address (same geolocation). intforce (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The page is about bevavioral guideline. Vitaium (talk) 03:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 13:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is a level 5 article that involves contentious issues pertaining of the national origin of certain foodstuffs. It should be semi-protected to ensure that brand new IP users do not carry out disruptive changes. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 13:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – From Ashwin prathap 34. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism + possible meatpuppetry. Beshogur (talk) 07:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 12:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eridian314 (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To fix Misnested tags lint errors, please change:

<s>Two IPs have done linking sprees of adding this site to multiple articles ... in many cases replacing existing valid links in favor of the site they're spamming.

The site being added is a WordPress (blog publishing) page, using adsense account #ca-pub-6831750335119417. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 00:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)</s>

to

<s>Two IPs have done linking sprees of adding this site to multiple articles ... in many cases replacing existing valid links in favor of the site they're spamming.</s>

<s>The site being added is a WordPress (blog publishing) page, using adsense account #ca-pub-6831750335119417. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 00:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)</s>

and

<s>*{{LinkSummary|imuslimz.com}}
Spammed by:
*{{IPSummary|99.243.231.216}} Level 4 warning on August 14 2008.</s>

to

*<s>{{LinkSummary|imuslimz.com}}</s>
<s>Spammed by:</s>
*<s>{{IPSummary|99.243.231.216}} Level 4 warning on August 14 2008.</s>

The latter change will change the appearance slightly but restore the original intent of striking out a bulleted point rather than striking out an asterisk that was, originally, a bullet. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Anomalocaris (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To fix missing end tag lint errors, in

→ ''<u>See also</u>: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2007_Archive_Jun#http:.2F.2Fspam.squidoo.com]] <br>
→ ''<u>See also</u>: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2007_Archive_Jul#http:.2F.2Fspam.squidoo.com]] <br>
  • append '' at the end of each line

To fix stripped tag lint error, in

in *[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Stickymap.com, yet another googlemaps hack]] (permanent [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=152724491#Stickymap.com.2C_yet_another_googlemaps_hack link])</small>
  • remove </small>

Anomalocaris (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Anomalocaris (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – COI recreated 3 times in the last 24 hours. All creations were practically identical despite being posted by different users. Needs at least temporary salt imv. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Longhair\talk 20:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected per suggestion at my talk page. -- Longhair\talk 21:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 20:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – at least 3 different vandals in the last week only. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 17:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recently deceased, high level of activity with vandalism sneaking in. Citing (talk) 19:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Semi-protected for 2 weeks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated drive-by category adding by IP Users. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 19:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Poppified talk 13:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dudhhrContribs 18:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Grapepinky (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 09:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or a rangeblock (2804:431:C7CB:AF3E:4459:E8F6:9484:63D9/48 (talk · contribs)). Persistent addition of unsourced content. (CC) Tbhotch 17:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ip Traffic N1234567 (talk) 18:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. See [65], [66], [67] and WP:COVIDDS. 2402:3A80:6CF:987C:399C:EB63:24DB:E775 (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15 September 2021

Reason: Initially protected against persistent disruptive editing. The semi has ensured that the lone contributor to the page has almost unilateral editing power with a heightened sense of WP:OWN enforced by edit-warring. 2405:201:4013:802D:2C1D:40C1:793D:F535 (talk) 23:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The company has gone through radical structural change in the past few years, from leadership to customer base.

To list a few reasons why the page needs updating:

+ It’s stated that Santa Fe Relocation is listed on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange, that is not true since the company is now privately owned; + Santa Fe Relocation is no longer affiliated with WridgWays like shown this being a subsidiary. We are not doing business with them (they are a separated company based in Australia), even if historically related; + Accreditations are outdated and not limited to those listed.

31.124.17.38 (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done The page is not protected. (CC) Tbhotch 20:10, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User "Acroterion" requested protection so that false information would stay published. Gijoegotogo (talk) 06:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I protected it due to repeated editorializing and removal of sourced material. See the talkpage concerning the references. Acroterion (talk) 09:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Hello, It seems an administrator have locked the page Anand Mishra and now it requires administrator access to recreate it. But now problem arises because I want to create an article name Anand Mishra but he is a different person with same name. I can guarantee you that I can prove his notability. Now my subject Anand Mishra is a Indian Commissioned police officer from Assam. He is a Superintendent of police of a particular administrative region. Please help me regarding this by removing its protection. Jogesh 69 (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Declined You can go through the Articles for Creation process. If someone reviews your draft and determines that it meets notability guidelines, we can then proceed with unprotection of the mainspace article. I think you're going to have an uphill struggle to convince anyone that a regional police superintendent is notable. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a good amount of IP vandalism recently with 11 vandal edits in the past hour. IP may be using a proxy to hop around, so semiprotection would help. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing (changing Indonesia's income group to be incorrect); pending protection not effective from past events (apply temporary semi-protection for a year, starting now, pending update on Indonesia's IMF income group) ᐱᔌᕬᐱɭᕮ ᐱᒧᐱᕬ (Talk) 13:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Redirect it to adults only. 26zhangi (talk) 00:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done See RfDs. Anarchyte (talk) 01:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ECP While this editor deserves a block for making 5 reverts in 4 days for re-adding same controversial/rejected content by falsely marking his reverts as 'minor' and saying nothing more than "Edits reverted to restored to its originality", this article has seen disruption this month mostly by unexperienced editors thus it needs ECP. Srijanx22 (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There appears to be some kind of content dispute going on here. I would say it would be best to protect it until the dispute can be resolved. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001 (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is attempting to obfuscate this person's age by reverting edits referring to her age. Her age is given as 34 in a January 2015 interview with the Daily Record newspaper. Yet someone is repeatedly reverting this to "her age is given as 30s". Gallus Alice (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Three incorrect CSD nominations in less than a day from three different Indian IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been constantly plagued by disruptive IP/new account edits for years now. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruption and vandalism. User (I assume the same one) has been using a proxy for months to consistently delete referenced sections and text and add unreferenced claims. ExRat (talk) 22:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was semi-protected on 16 May 2021 by User:Drmies due to persist disruptive editing. Shortly after the page was unprotected on 16 August 2021, the disruptive editing began again. It has come consistently from IP addresses in Bratislava, Slovakia. Every indication is that it's by a previously banned editor; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SmalforaGiant. Eb.hoop2 (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To fix a plethora of lint errors, including misnested tags, please replace the contents of that page with the contents of User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC) Anomalocaris (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris: Unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected (CC) Tbhotch 20:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has become subject to a lot of aggressive POV pushing since the individual's recent involvement in a high-profile prison breakout in Israel. Iskandar323 (talk) 05:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Semi-protection would not be effective. Please discuss issues on talk page.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing made by an IP user with COI which engages in edit warring. Andra Febrian (talk) 10:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Single IP editor has received final warning and can be blocked if they persist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High importance, as well as common vandalism/low-quality edits Luxtaythe2nd (talk) 17:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Danish Sheikh. GPL93 (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of ~3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by bots. Rackshea (talk) 12:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: After reviewing the protection log, it seems as though this page was protected indefinitely in 2011. Around that time Ciara was a more mainstream artist with recurring singles and album releases in the public eye, which is why I am guessing it was protected. However, with her being independent and less mainstream now, there are much fewer page updates than when she was at the height of her career. Unprotecting the page would make it easier for editors like myself to make edits as needed. You can see by the edit requests on the talk page that there is some lag in updates due to the protection. 2601:42:900:BEF0:7483:EAB7:D736:F22E (talk) 05:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Anarchyte (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PH Television Series

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP users. -136.158.42.180 (talk) 19:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done for the second two. Anarchyte (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full-protect until the edit war is resolved. Destroyer (Alternate account) 22:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reports to EWN can still be made. Anarchyte (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Helen(💬📖) 22:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More of the same edits that caused the page to be protected recently, but all from IPs this time. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 10:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khaliwarriors. Other than the article creator, only edits are by sockpuppets and editors reverting them. FDW777 (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely Semi Protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- I know why it was Rgalo10 from IP socks obviously that curse words looks similar to sockmaster (Example here 1 [68]) at Rgalo10 talk page and (Example here 2 [69]) happens on the Arizona Diamondbacks page that's the problem. 172.58.227.201 (talk) 23:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I added a paragraph citing the article by physicist, Dr. Johan Hansson, published in the peer reviewed and reliable journal called Physics Essays. Some editors have continued to revert my changes making false claims that Physics Essays isn't reliable, when it clearly is. Wiki cites Physics Essays in at least 4 articles and Wiki even has a page on Physics Essays noting that it is peer reviewed. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_Essays I have attempted to discuss this matter with these editors, but they continue to revert my changes. Billcarson (talk) 12:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Randomly created account have been ignoring other editors calls to seek a consensus in the talk page when making edits to the lede. Hiyournameis (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Paul Erik. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – The name says it all. Just an attack page. MoonlightVector 16:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continuously deleting referenced information without discussion or reason. Notfrompedro (talk) 12:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This edit should resolve the issue. Anarchyte (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this is an archive of a user talk page. User was an admin who protected their own talk page archive. Has since stopped editing and has been desysopped for inactivity. I've posted on their talk page a week ago, but I'm not expecting them to return any time soon. --rchard2scout (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No reason to disturb the protection unless the user requests it. Anarchyte (talk) 13:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, can you remove the archiving settings ({{User:Miszabot/config}}) from that page, so it disappears from Category:Pages where archive parameter is not a subpage? --rchard2scout (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple silly vandalisms from IPs and newly created accounts. Ifnord (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 20:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatly recreated by socks, draft is salted. dudhhrContribs 15:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 20:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by ips. I have never seen a single stub rated article with over 1000 edits. MoonlightVector 15:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 20:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption by IP sockpuppets, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PlainAndSimpleTailor. Page recently semi-protected due to this. FDW777 (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patrolling admin: this has already been protected via ANI. Cambial foliage❧ 18:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 20:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Malaysian nationalist who forced the last lock is back and continues to add misinformation and generally make a mess of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 20:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopping anon with a history of adding false info to this article (for some reason) has returned. Trivialist (talk) 01:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism from numerous accounts/IPs. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs messing around with the article. Would probably be a good idea to protect it. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry | Discord: Blaze Wolf#0001 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 IP blocked and content revision-deleted, I'll leave the call on whether to already protect to someone else, but will semi myself if I see any more vandalism. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. (CC) Tbhotch 20:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Self-Request, just due to ips trying to vandalize my page. MoonlightVector 16:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, so a couple of points here:
  1. It is not possible to apply pending to talk pages, the software doesn't allow it. Pending changes can only be used on pages in the main or wikipedia namespaces.
  2. Your talk page hasn't been edited since the 10th
  3. The IP that was vandalising has been blocked 192.76.8.74 (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 people fighting over the same page, on the same ip. MoonlightVector 18:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, resolved with a TPA yank by EL C. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To fix a plethora of lint errors, including misnested tags, please replace the contents of that page with the contents of User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test. Then, at the very top, change

<!--{{pp-protected|small=yes}}-->

to

{{pp-protected|small=yes}}

I have to do it this way because if I leave it uncommented, a bot comes along and removes it. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC) Anomalocaris (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected @Anomalocaris: Anarchyte (talk) 13:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of IP messing about and edit warring almost immediately after previous protection expiring. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This massively popular article right now needs a couple days time out for disruptive editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Longhair. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Érico (talk) 04:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism resumed from 112.198.16x.xxx IP range after semi protection expired a day ago. - WayKurat (talk) 05:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest: I suggest to make the protection "extended confirmed" because it is edited by the sockpuppet of Annika Casillan. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edits are being done. I want this page or article to be only accessed by Rafida03. Some unnecessary informations are being input and people will try to disrupt the whole article for their own enjoyment. Editing it everyday won't be possible to keep the good name of the great poet. 103.217.111.167 (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I don't see any evidence of severe disruption, which is what protection should be used for. Contributors do not own articles, and we cannot grant editing rights to individual people. And please log in to edit (see our policy on sockpuppetry). Thanks. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article was turned into a redirect because it was created by a sockpuppet of a blocked user. However, it has been recreated because despite the user who created it, the article has substantial secondary sources of a decent variety that actively talk about the character in more than just passing mentions, and has had substantial edits by users unrelated to the sock. Unnamed anon (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: Thoughts? Anarchyte (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel strongly either way regarding the removal of the semi-protection of this article, though it should be noted that the article was turned into a redirect in part because it was "90% summary and [had] no real world relevance". As noted above, it was created and restored continuously by a prolific sock. Unnamed anon, please be aware of WP:PROXYING, as the responsibility of any issues from the article should they arise, such as notability issues and copyright violations, will be shifted to you. plicit 14:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done in part. Reduced to 1 month semi to prevent any ongoing sockpuppetry. On 16 October, the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuation of IP vandalism after previous page protection 114.10.16.66 (talk) 05:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 08:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continous addition of false information from IP users TheHotwiki (talk) 09:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - SUN EYE 1 11:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users add her kayfabe husband as her real spouse to both infobox and Personal life section. Wario-Man talk 13:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 14:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anon ipv6 range Special:Contributions/2A04:4A43:497F:E04E:B978:F88D:FD10:3843/64 refuses to follow WP:FILMPLOT and keeps bloating the plot section with unnecessary and verbose paragraph about the credits sequence. (I'd prefer if you could block the anon but locking the page would do.) 109.79.172.43 (talk) 16:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just keeps doing it,[70] and ipv6 address keeps changing. This is the second day of it.
Temporary semi-protection for a few days would be enough to stop it I hope. -- 109.79.172.43 (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war and POV-poshing. The Banner talk 17:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Many people think that this is an fan page, so much so that the Controversy section removes what I recently brought back to this and change the name by IP addresses. I think semi-protection must be done for a long time to avoid this vandalism. Thanks!: High level of IP vandalism. Xpërt100 (talk) 06:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New user adding disputed information repeatedly. No use of citation as well as using old citation on new information. I have edited article with neutral information and appropriate citations Zaydbinumar (talk) 09:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Pax Verbum 23:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I wrote out a SPI request without realizing one was already here. Instead of letting it go to waste, I'll just add it.
This page has been seeing plenty of sockpuppets over the last day. Before that, there were considerable COI violations and other editing disruptions by (supposedly) the article subject. See the SPI here.
What warrants page protection, though, is what threats were made in the edits by recent sockpuppet accounts:

"My followers on Twitter such as Mikemikev will raid this place and close down Wikipedia. Communists."
Emil Kirkegaard 1488[71]

"Please delete this article or my followers will ruin this article."
Emil Kirkegaard 1488[72]

This seems to indicate that the sockpuppetry has the potential to continue further and disrupt the article. So I think a temporary semi-protection would allow the article to be edited while weeding out any future puppets. RFZYNSPY talk 00:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Liz. --Blablubbs (talk) 07:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page does who any proof of why he erroneously spoke about Ivermectin. 71.198.86.196 (talk) 22:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page is not protected. Anarchyte (talk) 04:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. HiWikiEdit (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection because of vandalism and adding fake information by anonymous user(s). Zarif1511 (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism attack? Ip and user vandalising. MoonlightVector 14:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism after unprotection. MoonlightVector 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Maybe some people will edit and destroy my article Rakeem Abdiel Gunawan (talk) 02:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is tagged for speedy deletion as a hoax. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. --Blablubbs (talk) 07:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I actually just pulled up Kai's announcement of the No. 1st album, and he never refers to it as his fourth album, or even a studio album. On the other hand, he has officially referred to = as his fourth studio album. Regardless of whatever conversation took place on the No. 6 talk page, I believe that given the announcement from Kai today, we should go back and simply change what we had labelled it as. It was very clearly meant to be just a collaboration album to tide fans over until his next official studio album. How anyone doesn't get that is beyond me. 183.88.127.86 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

In addition to all of this, has been changed on both Ed's main page and discography page as a collaboration album, not a studio album. Literally the only thing left to change is calling "=" his fourth album, not fifth, as it no longer makes sense to call it his fifth.183.88.127.86 Kaiphyoaung200 (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 12:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many many vandalism edits from 2 IPs. EdNg07 (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. El_C 12:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (Please tag me in replies) 06:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A single user, I realize, but I'm making a judgment call. El_C 12:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasingly disruptive editing by 90.186.224.59 and previously 90.186.249.193 (which had been blocked). 114.10.17.103 (talk) 07:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Autoconfirmed protection failed; article was severely vandalised. KingErikII (Talk page) 08:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 12:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Warring between editors over the possibility of Chris McKinstry faking his death. One editor uses unneutral language ("which has led to “internet sleuths” to believe that Chris is not dead, while all evidence proves the alternative").

A recent video on the topic has sparked up this discussion, and that video discusses the warring and particular reverts by a particular user on this Wikipedia page. Matthyis (talk) 09:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – A number of IP users have been adding non-neutral commentary about an apparently recent event of whaling (?), including calling it a "barbaric act of cruelty", changing the religion to "Satanism", and describing the population as "evil people" and "killers". None of them appear to have been willing to discuss the changes, though it's not clear whether they have been asked to do so other than in edit summaries. Proposing pending changes as the current description of the event in the article (which seems relatively neutral) was also added by an IP editor. — LauritzT (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 12:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from ip users Abvayad (talk) 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued disruptive editing. Previously protected page, controversial subject matter. User:SSChangfacts is currently engaging in repetitive disruptive editing. CaffeinAddict (talk) 04:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Destructive editing by User:220.245.20.205 (and less frequently 14.203.13.213). Rsk6400 (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every September this page needs reverts, 50 of last 500 edits. 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 21:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 13:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Resumed immediately after last protection expired BlameRuiner (talk) 22:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing BlameRuiner (talk) 22:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP activity inserting unsourced information. Recommend temporary protection for one month. Addicted4517 (talk) 00:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various ip users are adding actors to the cast list without including a source that says they are in the cast. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Regular article hijacking.HiWikiEdit (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kind of wary of messing with that (/32) range, tbh. El_C 13:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits by an anonymous editor. Hunterb212 (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 13:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent genre warring from multiple IPs, half the first page of the history has been wasted with this nonsense. Victor Lopes Fala!C 18:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent genre warring from multiple IPs, half the first page of the history has been wasted with this nonsense. Victor Lopes Fala!C 18:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent genre warring from multiple IPs, half the first page of the history has been wasted with this nonsense. A longer period of protection will be required. Victor Lopes Fala!C 18:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extraordinary amount of IP vandalism. To be honest the article probably should be deleted but until there is a discussion it keeps getting attacked. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 13:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 20:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Please see this page. Even after protection by Titodutta once here, the IP and unconfirmed users continue to change his birthplace from Hajipur as referenced by many reliable sources to incorrect Attabira, Odisha. See it's talk page for further information. This page needs to be semiprotected for few months atleast. 🌌Zoglophie🌌 17:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Dynamic IP vandalism. – DarkGlow12:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (Please tag me in replies) 12:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two edits in September. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Big dinners! El_C 13:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued dynamic IP vandalism from when protection expired. – DarkGlow17:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ppdallo (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute, and your opponent is a confirmed user--Ymblanter (talk) 11:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  15:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Promotion of personal agenda.HiWikiEdit (talk) 03:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two disruptive edits ≠ high. El_C 12:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User:65.73.183.96 made an edit[73] that is effectively vandalism, and reverted twice[74][75] to restore their version. Requesting semi-protect for a few days. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 05:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Cuñado, warn the user first about edit warring so that they know about its existence. El_C 12:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This person was recently forced to quit his career in China. All his social media accounts were closed by Chinese Communist Party. Someone kept adding his page with rumors to slander him. Lilyinvalley (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Lilyinvalley, I think you linked to the wrong thing. El_C 12:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by single-purpose editor. Citobun (talk) 07:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 12:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi protection. Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by IP's - basically every edit over the two or three years that I checked has been IPs vandalising the article followed by other editors showing up to fix it. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 17:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hinduhindu108 (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 13:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 12:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Rapid edit war by two editors, one autoconfirmed and one XC so full protection is needed so as not to privilege either. Both could also be blocked for 3RR (particularly CatCafe, as they are more than aware of 3RR as a bright line rule). Partial blocks of the two editors from this article would be another solution. — Bilorv (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on BLP page following on field incident. Hobomok (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Specifically, 92.40.168.0/23 partially blocked for a month from editing this article. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring by various new accounts/IP editors 205.154.245.36 (talk) 18:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I'm aware it's unusual to indef-semi a page that's never been protected before, but I think it's warranted given the circumstances. I seem to be the only person who monitors this page for the serious BLP issues that arise due to the fanbase of the convicted child abusers it discusses. Twice, now, I've overlooked something, and something has slipped through for an extended period of time. First it was the doxxing of one of their underage victims, which stuck around for over a year. This time it was unfounded allegations (violating WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPCRIME) that a related party was an abuser, which made it two months. All of this content comes from IPs or non-AC editors, so I think the best course of action would be an indef semi under WP:NEWBLPBAN.

Courtesy pings @TheresNoTime, GeneralNotability, and CaptainEek, who have all revdelled content here before. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., pls ping me in a year if disruption resumes--Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption after last protect expired. Dynamic IP, same person. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Copyvios by IP. dudhhrContribs 20:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 21:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17 September 2021

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 20:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of vandalism has recurred. Geoff | Who, me? 22:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dj10403 (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Empty request. dudhhrContribs 20:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and continuous vandalism without legitimate sources. Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and unsourced additions. Dman170 (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from IP addresses. Request semi-protection. Pyramids09 (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 01:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all non-ac edits have been disruption. Pahunkat (talk) 18:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 01:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism and disruptive activity. Suggest temporary semi-protection for one month, after which point the game will have been out for one week and vandal activity will likely decrease. Cyberlink420 (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. El_C 01:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from block-evading User:Raxythecat Skyerise (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and unsourced additions. User:Thatoneweirdwikier | Conversations and Contributions 15:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. El_C 01:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism or DE after previous release of protection. Destroyer (Alternate account) 15:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been attracting an IP-hopping POV pusher for the past week. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 14:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – So... XC due to edit wars and other disruptive stuff, there is way too much stuff going on. And semi cant cut it anymore. MoonlightVector 15:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war between multiple people, sanctions are also placed on some, XC for now. MoonlightVector 15:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism 205.154.245.36 (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users are persistently adding unsourced information to the page and keep changing a simple cast list into an unnecessary table for a show that only ran for one season. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite move protection - move warring against a recent RM — DaxServer (talk to me) 14:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 01:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Right, bot, the page listed is the redirect, while I move protected Rajasthani languages. Still, treat, why not? El_C 02:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit war. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Biased editing by IP address 12.37.123.234 who made the article come off as Kurdish Nationalism see here which as of right now has been reverted. But I ask to put a page protection because I fear this article is now vulnerable to biased editing and I feel it is only safe to add protection in order to maintain a neutral point of view. 108.24.161.233 (talk) 22:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is not a protection matter, but I did warn the user, so let's see how that goes. El_C 00:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Despite a recent page protection being granted two weeks ago, the problems have started again since the protection has expired. I'm now requesting indefinite full protection until these vandals stop editing this page with absolutely no basis for their claims. Supertanno (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users are persistently adding an actor to the cast list without citing a source. I have asked in their individual talk pages and on the page of the series talk page but they refuse to do their part in adding a source or even replying to messages. I have done a Google search with the actors name and the series name and nothing comes up. I also searched the series title along with the supposed character name and no results come up. This page has been protected in the past because of persistent addition of unsourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 04:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Telenovelafan215: I commend your actions in trying to protect this page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by shifting IPs, for about a week now. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits like this. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: The subject of the article is currently featured in a Google Doodle, at least in the United States. Over the past day or so, several instances of vandalism have been reverted. 73.3.58.200 (talk) 06:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Significant levels of IP vandalism and potential sock puppetry in the past few weeks, including an editor who was banned for disruptive editing. At least one IP editor has also made undiscussed removals of properly sourced citations from the article and a newly created account appears to have continued with the edit warring. Likely the same disruptive editor who made it necessary for a related article within the same topic area, Roy (Fire Emblem) to be placed under protection. Requesting temporary protection with access for autoconfirmed users only for editing. Haleth (talk) 03:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Some IPs are making constructive edits. Please discuss the issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA article. Shrike (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – draft being moved repeated without the notability of the future film established. recommend some level of create protection. – robertsky (talk) 06:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page need protection from spamming and Vandalism, but please unprotect this page for a few days and let me complete the incomplete Plot summary and Production details. I assure that I won't harm the page and won't add any wrong information and complete the article. 103.205.130.21 (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page do need protection from spamming and Vandalism but please unprotect the page atleast 5 days at the end every month so that, I can complete the Plot summary every month. I assure that I won't add wrong information which would harm the article. 103.205.130.21 (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page requires protection from Vandalism and spamming. But please unprotect the page atleast 5 days at the end of every month so that the page would be updated. I assure that I won't add any misinformation in the article or harm the page. 103.205.130.21 (talk) 11:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism occurred as a humiliation to the institution. Blackgoat159 (talk) 05:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Dear Sir/Mam, I need to do a request to please add a semi-protection (10/4, greylock) to the article Kabir Singh. because people are making wrong edits to the article which is totally illegal like many of the anonymous editors are removing the names of original Music Composers and Actors so this is my appeal to please add a semi-protection (10/4, greylock) to the article told above.

Regards BeingAlwaysHappy (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BeingAlwaysHappy: You need to provide sources when you add cast members. Anarchyte (talk) 08:13, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, I'm an art historian and I used to be able to access the artist Jacqueline Humphries's page on Wiki. She is a renown artist with many galleries and museum exhibitions in the past 3 decades. She also has an upcoming exhibition at the Wexner Art Center, which lead me to research Jacqueline's career and history, and I realized this page is no longer accessible. I'm not sure why this page is protected, but I would like to request a reduce page protection for this page. Zwayy (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - @Zwayy: The page is not protected. You must have 10 edits and 3 days of tenure before you can create articles. Anarchyte (talk) 08:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 82.2.0.208 (talk) 02:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done malformed request. Anarchyte (talk) 08:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP and new user disruption since September 14. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 13:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – BLPVIOs started again after precious protection expired. Woodroar (talk) 10:44, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Not a BLP page itself, but unsourced insertion of BLP material being made. Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – regular addition of unsourced content. INDT (talk) 11:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Looks like one IP editor was causing the recent disruption, blocked for 31 hours. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Otterslort (talk) 13:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent date vandalism from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism. Also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cujo171. Jack Frost (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unexplained removal of the same content by different but closely related IPs Piotr Jr. (talk) 15:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 16:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war going on in this article and it doesn't seem to be stopping any time soon. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 15:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP editors vandalising the page recently. Nathanielcwm (talk) 16:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: MOS:DERRY violations by multiple IPs, including apparent legal threats. FDW777 (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unhelpful edits from IP users, including the addition of false cast members ([76], [77], [78]), an inaccurate production company ([79], [80], [81]), an unsourced budget number ([82]), and unexplained cast reordering that goes against the verified credits ([83], [84]). Other examples include the following: [85], [86], [87]  AJFU  (talk) 16:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption has started just days after protection expired. - SUN EYE 1 17:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Chlod (say hi!) 18:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Amounts of vandalism is enough for pending but not enough for semi, and you know i have edit this. MoonlightVector 18:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 18:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Individual has been involved in a recent serious event, being targetted by vandalism. Agent00x (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated extremely disruptive vandalism by various IP editors. YttriumShrew (talk) 18:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To fix lint errors, please replace the contents of that page with the contents of User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test. Then, at the very top, change

<!--{{pp-protected|small=yes}}-->

to

{{pp-protected|small=yes}}

I have to do it this way because if I leave it uncommented, a bot comes along and removes it. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Anomalocaris (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Anarchyte (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 2 weeks would be good. - The9Man (Talk) 19:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP vandalism, its confusing but PC should do it MoonlightVector 19:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by Monegasque100, I'm trying to keep this site stable. MoonlightVector 19:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. El_C 21:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Have Noted random edits without providing any proper sources Hence requesting to Protect the page. Thoufiq313 18:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was August 12, so quite Stale. Also, we rarely if ever indef semi an article talk page. El_C 21:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sock vandalism. SPI has been reopened. Skyerise (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 21:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. aeschylus (talk) 21:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP running amuck with unsourced additions. Also removing references. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Coolperson177 (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Page has been vandalised numerous times by IP users CrystalLemonade (talk) 00:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism with reverts for not coinciding with MILMOS#INFOBOX.

Same user is an IP user, likely a sockpuppet/alt of user Haughtonbrit after being banned where he skims through these articles daily. Would like protection over this page please. Noorullah21 (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - going for this time period first as not protected before but protracted period of disruptive editing. Feel free to ping me if silliness continues after unprotection. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP repeatedly insists on adding controversial self published material. Given the racial sensitivity of the content extra care is needed. Possible the IP is also the author of the self published content. 4meter4 (talk) 07:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by 157.49.138.126, 157.49.140.33 2409:4072:6E05:5B97:4177:9A20:BAD2:6F6 (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. see if editing from named accounts makes more stability. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Ferien (talk) 08:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blablubbs, are you going from the top or the bottom? Let me know so we can meet in the middle. El_C 12:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: I'm about to log off, so you can start wherever you'd like. More generally speaking, I still have my RfPP training wheels on and tend to go through and pick out the requests I'm comfortable acting on; I can start adding  Checking... or similar when I notice that multiple people are patrolling RfPP, if that's helpful? --Blablubbs (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Blablubbs, just didn't wanna protection-conflict as I go up/down the list, as I do. For sure, you choose whatever requests you wish to attend to in whatever order, and pay no mind to my nonsense. Anyway, I'll clear this backlog now. Take care. El_C 13:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 08:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor repeatedly adding unsourced / hoax content. Even if it were accurate, it would be in violation of WP:TVINTL. MrOllie (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ––FormalDude talk 12:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some levels of Vandalism. Repeated adding of controversial material, which have a bias towards a side.

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. Note: over 30 previous protections! El_C 12:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow moving edit war with removal of valid, cited content. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from IP user, unsourced content that conflicts with WP:NOT policies Ajf773 (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Best to talk over editwar. Moxy- 13:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking and edit warring by an IP who is only concerned with promoting his own publication. TolWol56 (talk) 13:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing but disruptive edits from non-AC editors since the protection expired. Pahunkat (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Semi-protected for 1 month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, posted the Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected... in the request below for some reason. Well, more treats for the bot, at least. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ El_C 13:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism that always lasts several days before being reversed, causing much confusion and spreading totally false info. 2001:14BB:C0:FCBB:AC49:6985:7DE2:F9B8 (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 15:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone has been hijacking the subject repeatedly, changing it to be the page for a non-notable entrepreneur. --- Possibly 14:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and putting fake info when all the references are present 154.179.250.24 (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is formula 1 race car driver, with racing season going on. They maybe in the news. IP hopper are vandalising the page. Requesting semi protection for two weeks. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent SCP-related edits without reliable sources casualdejekyll (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 15:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Only two reverts, and it does look like a discussion has started. Feel free to relist if problems persist. El_C 13:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fade258 (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pamzeis (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 12:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing, adding unsourced content to BLP. Eevee01(talk) 17:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Sock-puppetry, also included on the British protectorate page which was protected, please protect this page so it can not be constantly harrased by Sockpuppets of HaughtonBrit. Noorullah21 (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous violations of MOS:TERRORIST by IPs and a new account in the last few days. FDW777 (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of churn last two days by multiple accounts. MB 19:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Screenshots of the vandalised article are going around social media - for example - with lots of IPs and new editors adding or re-adding similar stuff. It's a WP:BLP so we could live without this. ◦ Trey Maturin 19:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption, on expiry of protection, of disruptive campaign by multiple-IPs, contrary to WP:DONOTFIXIT and WP:BRD. Mutt Lunker (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: MOS:TERRORIST violations by multiple IPs. FDW777 (talk) 19:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:40, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The furret lover (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Both vandalism & disruptive editing by IP editors. Peaceray (talk) 20:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page protected at 2021-09-18T22:42:26. Peaceray (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 23:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Personal attacks & reversions by IP editors. Peaceray (talk) 20:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 23:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The article has seen an unusual number of BLP violations and unsourced edits by IPs today. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism in recent days and some BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from unregistered/IP user. Dotx3 (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:51, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone or a group of people keep changing my page inaccurately. Rudo392001 (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Rudo392001: Please explain any problems at article talk: Talk:Rudi Dharmalingam. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 23:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sitting MP switched parties, causing edit warring and high level of IP vandalism. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 22:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:52, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pages need correcting KayteeSeemthDWs (talk) 15:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is patently the latest sock of the blocked editor that has waged a sustained campaign at this article, per the edit history. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – OP blocked as a sock of Lam312321321. Favonian (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 23:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Shifting IP is edit warring to change pronouns despite not citing any sources. Crossroads -talk- 23:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs adding "scam artist" and other BLP-violating unsourced claims. Schazjmd (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 03:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Registered and IP editors kept on claiming subject as Armenian but sources indicate he was born in Georgia and a Russian citizen. Cassiopeia talk 01:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – By multiple IPs over the past few days. Seems to be a new TV series, so likely bored kids, so this probably needs a few months or so. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent Sockpuppetry – By multiple IPs of LTA Nate Speed the past few days. Keeps on restoring article with different IP's. 126.60.255.230 (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection – Persistent WP:DE at this article by IPs and others: addition of usnourced, unverified content. I think this might be the second or third protection request about this at this article. --IJBall (contribstalk) 03:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 03:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 03:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. KidAdSPEAK 03:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent uptick in vandalism by anonymous editors due to the upcoming Canadian federal election on 20 September 2021. Request temporary protection for a week or at least until 22 September 2021. CentreLeftRight 03:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – just unprotected and already more addition of unsourced BLP statements. Joeyconnick (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent IP vandalism / BLP policy violations from IPV4 & IPV6 addresses. Jack Frost (talk) 07:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor / socks of Vallabharebel. Spike 'em (talk) 08:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SangrurUser (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP and unregistered user disruption based on recent news events. KidAdSPEAK 18:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KidAd: There is a lot of activity but I don't see many "reverted" tags. Please identify specific problems requiring protection. Johnuniq (talk) 23:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Johnuniq, I think the repeated effort to include a link to Missing white woman syndrome here should be enough, along with off-the-wall material like this. KidAdSPEAK 23:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's only one link of adding Missing White Woman Syndrome and the other editor would not be affected by semi-protection and they gave a reasonable if idiosyncratic explanation of their edit. Johnuniq (talk) 23:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – repeated moving draft that is not ready for mainspace by a possibly COI editor. – robertsky (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Tachash had an article of its own. There is enough material to support an article separate from Tabernacle (of 15 usages in the Bible, 12 are about the Tabernacle's covering). Nine years ago the edit warring was "solved" by a LOCKED simple redirect to a section in Tabernacle named Plan. This request to remove the protection on the redirect is based on a recommendation- please see my talk page for specific wording. User_talk:Pi314m#Your submission at Articles for creation: Tachash (September 6)? Pi314m (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Does the draft article meet Wikipedia's standards for an article in article space? You do not appear to have addressed this in your review. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Malcolmxl5 - I haven't really reviewed the draft, and am not planning to review the draft while the title is a locked redirect. One of the first things that I tried to do was to tag the redirect with {{R with possibilities}}, which was not possible. There is a history of sockpuppetry with the title, and administrator User:Drmies locked the redirect. I advised the submitter to take one of the following actions: 1. discuss with the locking administrator, User:Drmies; 2. request page unprotection, which is where we are now; 3. request Deletion Review. As a reviewer, I don't want to make a one-person judgment that overlooks a history of disruption. I will say that the article content is satisfactory for an article; what I haven't reviewed is the quality of the references. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, the problem wasn't edit warring, it was the persistent recreation of a crazy article by a set of socks. I saw no indication in the efforts by this editor that made me think it was going to be any better--and they actually used some of the same weak sourcing, and wrote similarly weak content. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Procedural close. Lectonar (talk) 12:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death - subject to vandalism and incorrect information by numerous IPs. Egghead06 (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evading vandal now using v6 ip. MrOllie (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ip vandalism. Someone is obsessed with making up that he's dead - using a falsified source, even. Said source is someone else's obituary that they falsified into the subject's. Crboyer (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 17:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: temporary move protection - apparent move-warring in recent days Dl2000 (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs. Subject has just won a national football award Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Less Unless (talk) 18:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
13:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Less Unless (talk) 18:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and hoaxing at article from IPS and newly registered accounts. Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 18:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to ask for temporary EC for the edit warring, involving some AC accounts. Pahunkat (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 18:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Wretchskull (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edits were more than a month ago. Deor (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – obvious reasons. Wretchskull (talk) 13:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Less Unless (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Enough is enough on the vandalism to this article!. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan 22:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20 September 2021

Reason: Persistent vandalism (MOS:GENDERID/WP:BLP) by IPs after a new user was warned. Beccaynr (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the criteria of MOS:GENDERID I am considering protection. However, where are the warnings? I'm not seeing where the vandals were warned. You have to warn them for us to block them. I just warned one of the IPs myself. Please show me where the others were warned. - CorbieVreccan 22:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CorbieVreccan, I will plan on being more proactive in the future, but had only warned via DS alert and a note about WP:BLP and MOS:GENDERID to the new user at [88]. Thank you very much for the semi-protection of the article. Beccaynr (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, now I see the warning for the named user. It's good that you put the DS alert on their page; sometimes I forget to do that. Warn the IPs, too, so there will be a paper trail. It's because I only checked the IP vandals that I didn't catch the warning you gave. (Apparently I need to be more thorough, too ;) ) Best, - CorbieVreccan 00:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only due to MOS:GENDERID. Warn the vandals. - CorbieVreccan 22:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism of the date changing kind. Crboyer (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As soon as prior AC protection ceased on Sep 1 [89] and Pending changes on Sep 18 [90] (both 1 month), vandalism immediately resumed: [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] including subtle changes re: exact death date ([100] [101] [102] [103] [104])

Requesting ECP and longer duration (given persistent vandalism and new accts)— Shibbolethink ( ) 16:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced content by IPs. Nehme1499 18:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced OR to the article despite previous warnings. But the problem is that this appears to be a dynamic IP; compare with the ones listed here; so SP might be the most relevant method due to the IP hopping. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs after established user was warned, including repeated attempts to add unreliable sources, WP:BLP issues. Beccaynr (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Update: established user continued to post unreliably-sourced content and BLP issues, was warned again, and then attempted to post similar content on the article Talk page. Beccaynr (talk) 19:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary ECP needed on top of the SP; since there is persistent addition of unsourced content (by AC users) owing to the launch of a new series of this. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 01:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous IP users removing sourced info and making no attempt to use the talk page. Docktuh (talk) 18:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Citobun (talk) 02:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced stadiums for future matches. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs in different ranges. Politanvm talk 05:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anti-Semitic trolling from shifting IPs. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection - IP-hopping racist vandal(s) is/are vandalising this thread, either by removing it wholesale or altering what Historyofiran's saying; in either case edits are accompanied by nationalist invective. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 14:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like they've moved on Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent, disruptive, unsourced edits to birth date for several months now. Several IP's all suspected to be the same person. Hunterb212 (talk) 19:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This seems to be almost exclusively one editor on a /64 range. Please warn the user appropriately and report to AIV if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M.Bitton (talk) 23:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So many IP addresses and new accounts are trying to change the strength of the rebel group without providing any source. Thanks. Zaww8 (talk) 07:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. A temporary ban was put in place and removed on 3 September. From 14 September onwards vandalism has increased again, including vandalism from newly created users. With the NRL Finals currently occurring, I would like to request a higher level of protection for the next month, i.e. until about two weeks after the Grand Final. Jaguar83 (talk) 08:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous WP:Vandalism by an IP user, adding controversial content without source, reason or description. Merangs (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive IP

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unceasing disruptive POVPUSH editing mostly by IPs and new accounts who refuse to engage in ongoing discussions on Talk pages. Going on continuously for quite a while. A mid-term semi is the need here. Gotitbro (talk) 09:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent page history should speak for itself. AngryHarpytalk 09:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Page is constantly having to deal with vandalism from unregistered users. Usually aggressive content about the subjects views on LGBT rights so almost always a BLP violation. Pending changes protection to prevent the majority of disruptive edits from going through. John wiki: If you have a problem, don't mess with my puppy... 12:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. El_C 13:08, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protection: Persistent vandalism.  69.136.133.100 (talk) 12:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. - Daveout(talk) 07:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Most of the edits on the page are either vandalism or unsourced. Page suffering from repeat vandalism today. John wiki: If you have a problem, don't mess with my puppy... 11:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 13:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like the protection did stop it, but now that it is gone, vandalism gone widespread again. MoonlightVector 13:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ––FormalDude talk 10:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. El_C 13:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism from IP users over past few months. John wiki: If you have a problem, don't mess with my puppy... 11:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to BLP by numerous IPs following game yesterday. Egghead06 (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding unsourced content and vandalism, see the history of the page. Kiro Bassem (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent MOS:JOBTITLES violations by IP. FDW777 (talk) 10:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well they were appropriately warned at User talk:2401:4900:51DE:880E:A274:DF06:34A2:628E since both IPs saying Do not edit my corrections. Wikipedia Page Incharge. FDW777 (talk) 10:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs, also noted that this is sensitive and may be used as a political tool. MoonlightVector 14:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased Vandalism due to the Gabby Petito case (which has been criticized for being a case of MWWS). Eridian314 (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too intensively edited for pending changes now--Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's (likely same person) keep citing single unreliable source for content not verified by other reliable sources. Armegon (talk) 10:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to the Disappearance of Gabby Petito this is getting a lot of IP editing from people evidently new and not understanding Wikipedia. I noticed a request at the talk page and came here - as I've just removed a bad source I thought I shouldn't handle it myself Doug Weller talk 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ymblanter. See duplicate request immediately above. Deor (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All IP edits (=vast majority of all edits) are vandalism as far as I can tell. ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 16:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP insistent on adding disputed content without discussing merit. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 14:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Long term abuse. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Drmies. Favonian (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being harassed by a VPN User. MoonlightVector 18:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Bttowadch socks. Ravensfire (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 14:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page covers a controversial topic, and has frequently been a source of past vandalism both by pro-whaling and anti-whaling groups. From my own recent attempts to add updates based on recent news coverage, the addition of notable material is being obstructed by infrequent editors that have only come online, after long periods of dormancy, to stop new material being added - this is a clearly obstructive editing pattern that is only likely to be stopped by extending extended confirmed protections to the page. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced genres by IP's. Robvanvee 20:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism due to announcement of new partner and owner. 2601:642:4302:C650:3C0F:DFF3:8D4:7E8E (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse as URGENT - large number of IP editors rapidly adding rude (and unsourced) claims about a living person, impossible to keep up with reverts, there are so many editing it. Schazjmd (talk) 21:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorsement - Current events (TimTheTatman signing with Complexity) are leading to mass changes (mostly vandalism) of the page of the team. This will likely stop within a few days, but it would likely be wise to make vandalism a little more difficult in the meantime. Meditator90 (talk) 21:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Endorsement - High Level of Vandalism from twitch/youtube stream from TimtheTatMan's viewers. Samuel.farrell31 (talk) 21:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. En-dorse! El_C 21:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism, first by User:The NeoTheist Experience (now blocked indefinitely) and then by IPs, all adding the same unsourced nonsense. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I recently rewrote Draft:Dhar Mann and the AfC reviewer (Nomadicghumakkad) told me the article needs to be unsalted so that it can accepted. Mann's YouTube channel has been covered in much more depth since past AfDs and creation protection in July 2020. I think that points to his notability when combined with coverage on his weed business, legal issues, fraud charges, etc. For reference, I sent a similar request to the protecting admin (Black Kite) before I submitted the article to AfC: User talk:Black Kite/Archive 86#Dhar Mann. Thanks! Aranya (talk) 11:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SO YOU SEE... El_C 13:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Reviewed, moved to the mainspace. El_C 20:24, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because some unsocial elements have published false information which is misleading and needs to be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChPiyushGurjar (talkcontribs) 17:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Changed subject to Mihira Bhoja. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Protection still relevant, considering the current activity, and referring to editors, with whom you disagree, as "unsocial elements" won't get you far – apart from quite possibly blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. This user is indefinetly blocked Starship SN20 (talk) 18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The user being blocked is not a legitimate reason for protecting the talk page, especially not since it's a soft block caused by an unfortunate choice of username. Favonian (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently deceased. The death date and age have been changed numerous times throughout the day. 2pou (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Leave me be, bot, I was here third! No treat! El_C 21:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple BLP policy violations in light of current events. Many edits have had to be reverted and in some cases deleted. Many of those edits were made by IPs and not confirmed users. Contrawwftw (talk) 21:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for approving this. i'm kind of new to this process, is a year the typical length of protection? Contrawwftw (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism, exclusively from IP editors. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A 3 month semi protect of this talk page expired earlier this month and the LTA (See Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Jinnifer) is back. 3 sock accounts so far today. MrOllie (talk) 17:12, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rangeblock is only possible if we know the IP range. Since this user is using registered accounts, semi-protection and blocking is a good deterrent. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs from a blocked user continuously add messages to the page requesting edits be undone while there has been a consensus that these edits not be undone. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#0001 18:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism, continuous introduction of unsourced content since previous semiprotection expired August 28 e.g. [105]Bri (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned immediately after protection expired. KingErikII (Talk page) 19:24, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months (again), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Block any edit from Armegon. 52pd (talk) 21:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That isn't how protection works, 52pd. El_C 21:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 September 2021

Temporary semi-protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. This user is blocked for 6 months Starship SN20 (talk) 18:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @Starship SN20: A block is not a legitimate reason for protection, least of all for ephemeral IPs. On a related note, please see my reply to a similar request of yours. Favonian (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent unnecessary edits CitationIsNeeded (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I would like to request that my talk page be protected until the socks on Jun Matsumoto stop being created. I've been contacted by socks at least twice now and would prefer it don't happen again. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#0001 18:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection will be fine, I simply selected indefinite as I have no clue how long this will last. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#0001 18:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's just one edit. El_C 21:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It appears two of us were handling this simultaneously, and came to different conclusions. There is definitely more than one edit, if you look further down in the edit history. But, I admit there isn't much disruption. I already semi-protected the page, but I'm fine if anyone wants to override that decision and unprotect it, since it's a borderline case. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Scottywong, aside from the Sept 20 vandalism from that IP, the only other recent'ish disruption I saw was the Sept 9 {{deceased}} vandalism by you-know-who that's been going around. I got two of those myself even less recently, on Aug 8 and on Aug 14. Still, no objection, though a month does seem rather long for so little recent disruption. But, sure, np. El_C 00:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Failure of editor to allow for mention that Joseph Carraro is a US Army Vietnam Era Veteran. He has honorable discharge papers as well as photograph of Veteran license plate approved by State of New Mexico. 2601:8C2:8080:2820:302B:C7AD:95BF:155 (talk) 21:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 21:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Block my talk page to ban Armegon for bully my in my talk page. 52pd (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No one is bullying you. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 21:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Individual is in current news; there has been recent vandalism to this entry. Clevelander96 (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Clevelander96, I'm seeing, like, one disruptive edit that's recent. El_C 22:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Pamzeis (talk) 00:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 00:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely Semi Protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- Because it was Rgalo10 from IP socks obviously used that curse words it looks similar to sockmaster (Example here [106]) at Rgalo10 talk page and (Example here [107]) happens on the Tampa Bay Rays page which already deleted and remove it that's the problem. 69.94.57.75 (talk) 01:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: HIgh level of IP vandalism and edit-warring over including Taiwan (vs China), whether it is a Chinese vs. East Asian festival, etc. Right now is the holiday time, the IP editor bombardment started about 2 or 3 days ago. I figure a week or so protection should do it. M.boli (talk) 02:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued persistent disruptive edits... Adolphus79 (talk) 03:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 04:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs immediate attention, recent high-volume vandalism constantly inserting the phrase "Marcos apologist" etc. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 08:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding this request, as it is being attacked by socks and IP hoppers. jp×g 08:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 08:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisms very similar to My Amnesia Girl above. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 08:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I was not able to find violations by confirmed users--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing at MTR was carried over here. Citobun (talk) 08:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. mentions of untruth information deliberately Karuppannantamil (talk) 08:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. BOVINEBOY2008 08:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 12:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 12:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seem to get a lot of trolls recently. Govvy (talk) 11:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. DanCherek (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not fair, bot. I had to do so many things! Erm: Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 13:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated recreation by sock-puppets of banned User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated recreation by sock-puppets of banned User:Xayahrainie43, following deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smarandache number. JBL (talk) 14:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated recreation by sock-puppets of banned User:Xayahrainie43, following deletion discussion. There will never be a Wikipedia article at this title. JBL (talk) 14:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Redirect to Streetwear#Hypebeast culture. Page was deleted multiple times in the past as an article. You can semi-protect if you fear inappropriate content will be re-added. wikinights talk 22:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done This seems more akin to a request for an edit to a protected page. I have created the redirect without disturbing the protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – also sockpuppetry. DanCherek (talk) 12:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Users have been blocked. Report back if the disruption recurs. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:39, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 13:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has major NPOV flows as detailed at Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_Lithuania#The_article_does_not_adhere_to_NPOV. It is particularly biased in relation to the history of this coat of arms as a Belarusian national symbol. Nieszczarda2 (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article is currently extended confirmed protected as arbitration enforcement: WP:BALKANS. Pinging the protecting administrator El C. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. These are not sufficient grounds to lift or otherwise adjust the protection. Striking the right NPOV balance should be attempted on the article talk page. El_C 14:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove

{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(14d)
|archive = User talk:Example/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s
}}

so that this page stops showing up in Category:Pages where archive parameter is not a subpage. rchard2scout (talk) 08:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism and added hoax. MRZQ (talk) 11:27, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 17:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User Ward330 has repeatedly edited this article with disruptive edits, and other users are editing this article to cut out body references to a statement the find politically objectionable. RobotGoggles (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – An example stub category redlinked from the high-profile (50k views/month) Wikipedia:Stub project page (to which all stub templates point). {{u|Sdkb}}talk 22:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Sdkb, can you point to a recreation? All I'm seeing is a singular creation. El_C 23:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
El C, I only saw that one instance, too. I wouldn't want to see full protection, but I think autoconfirmed protection would be a net plus, as there's no plausible reason a nonconfirmed editor would want to create the template, whereas it's fairly probable that it'll be subject to more test creations in the future if left completely unprotected. Better to just have to apply protection once than to have to deal with the speedy deletions in perpetuity (not that it's hard, but it adds up bit by bit). {{u|Sdkb}}talk 23:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sdkb, I'm not necessarily declining this preemptive protection request, but I don't really understand the kind of damage that re-creation would bring about in this instance. El_C 00:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Very little; just a bit of work to clean it up. But, per my previous comment, there's even less prospect of damage being done by semi-protecting it, so I figured protection would be a small net positive and made this RPP. It's not a big deal either way, though, so if protecting it would require going out on too much of a limb, feel free to decline. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 00:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for explaining. I admit to being a bit wary of going ahead with it right now. I'd welcome another admin's view on the matter. El_C 00:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm...this is not what protection is for. In the end, it would be a preemptive protection; these we do not do. If we wanted pages to be protected to have less work with them or prevent vandalism, or permanently prevent re-creation, we would have had automatic semiprotection for all pages for a long time. Perhaps also see Prosecutor's fallacy. I would decline this request. Lectonar (talk) 09:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it was the late hour, but Lectonar was able to put it in context for me (thanks). We do in fact preemptively protect WP:HRTs, but this doesn't look like it qualifies as that. Declined. El_C 11:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C:Well...I only use template-protection for existing templates, not the redlnked ones :)...that's why I didn't see it as relevant for the case here. Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, it exists... in my mind. El_C 13:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wait...I just realized that this already has semi-protection, given WP:ACTRIAL, so trout Self-trout to me. (That also explains why there wasn't as much test editing as I expected.) {{u|Sdkb}}talk 16:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am sure I knew that, but didn't make the connection because we were talking about templates. Wonderful Wiki World, lost in details.... Lectonar (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: due to family disputes some users have entered untrue information about the wife of the character to whom the page is entitled. The errors were corrected by restoring the first wife (from which there was no divorce) as well as the mother of the heir to the throne as usual on the wiki

2001:B07:6463:C859:5C99:29F6:BBF:7BB2 (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Activity of changing IP ownership to Kevin Comadran has been found more than once, and has been found to be untrue and fraudulent, as Imagineer still owns the IP for the series and has not lost or forfeited it. Requesting lock to prevent further page vandalism. 71.70.22.131 (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Now with an obviously dynamic IP adding the same thing over and over again. @Mjroots: FYI. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done (for the bot) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced addition of "mouth DJ". Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 21:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22 September 2021

Reason: Subject's occupation repeatedly changed to 'Geographer' in main text and infobox. This is not a disambiguation issue because there are no other 'Jack Colwell' pages on Wikipedia. Jack Colwell is a well-known Australian musician and I will be expanding and updating other parts of this page shortly. Akkeri (talk) 13:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deor. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Trademark dispute issues. Kevin Comadran keeps claiming to own the IP, a claim clearly untrue as Imagineer still owns the series and is making content for it even now. A section talking about the copyright dispute perhaps should be added, as he has *some* ground to claim he owns the Name Medabots (The english name of the Medarot franchise, which fell into disuse due to the lack of any material being brought overseas), but clearly not the intellectual property, which he tries to conflate it with. Should be locked to prevent further vandalism. 177.179.163.125 (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Attempting to accept draft Draft:Baldi’s Basics in Education and Learning from AfC queue. It meets WP:GNG and is ready for mainspace. -Liancetalk/contribs 18:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Came here to request the same. There are two pages with this title (albeit differing apostrophes) that are create-protected, so I added the other as well. The draft should be moved to the one with the straight apostrophe ('). IceWelder [] 13:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the correct apostrophe title. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MRZQ (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MRZQ (talk) 11:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. DanCherek (talk) 12:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was salted in 2015 but the subject has subsequently become notable. Draft:Father (rapper) clearly demonstrates the subject's notability—four album reviews from Pitchfork, as well as profiles in Highsnobiety, Fact, and Billboard. Additional sources not cited in the draft include [108][109][110][111]. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pinging the protecting administrator HighInBC. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have already been approached by this user about this article and have advised them to take it to WP:AFC: User talk:HighInBC#Requesting unprotection for Father (rapper). I have told them if it passes AFC I will unsalt it. My advice remains the same. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 21:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Per HighInBC. Follow AFC procedures. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MRZQ (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MRZQ (talk) 11:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. DanCherek (talk) 12:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was salted in 2015 but the subject has subsequently become notable. Draft:Father (rapper) clearly demonstrates the subject's notability—four album reviews from Pitchfork, as well as profiles in Highsnobiety, Fact, and Billboard. Additional sources not cited in the draft include [112][113][114][115]. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pinging the protecting administrator HighInBC. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have already been approached by this user about this article and have advised them to take it to WP:AFC: User talk:HighInBC#Requesting unprotection for Father (rapper). I have told them if it passes AFC I will unsalt it. My advice remains the same. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 21:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Per HighInBC. Follow AFC procedures. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-standing, low-attention target of banned sockpuppeteer User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 14:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption since last protection was lifted. MB 15:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced info by IPs. Nehme1499 16:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Perennial vandalism target; 10 of the last 12 IP edits (over a period of 5 months) are clear vandalism. Protected during the season in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. Unless there is concerns that high edit volume after a high-profile game will break PC, I think this (and probably all NFL teams) are excellent candidates for indef pending-changes. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. User/s continue to revert editors and ClueBot from different IP addresses despite several warnings. – Rhain 04:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: As far I can tell, this was just one vandal, who was jumping around a fairly wide IP range (which has since been rangeblocked for a year). Maybe if there is more vandalism later it would justify a semi. jp×g 05:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring target by an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Same situation as above, see my note. jp×g 05:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Same situation as above, see my note. jp×g 05:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Please protect ECP according to ARBPIA. This is major figure in Arab-Israeli wars. Geshem Bracha (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 05:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and WP:BLP violations. KidAdSPEAK 17:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Kingdom Come: Deliverance copypasta keeps getting added to the lead page. BlackYaroslav (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 06:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Kingdom: Come Deliverance copypasta keeps getting added to the lead page. BlackYaroslav (talk) 02:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 42.118.117.15 (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Same situation as above, see my note. jp×g 05:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How sure are you? [116]. 42.118.117.15 (talk) 05:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's definitely the same "any body can get on wiki and type liesssssss Bye Barney b" string; that IP range seems to be blocked as well (albeit only for a week). Upon searching that string, however, I find an LTA page, where I guess the same person has been doing this for a very long time. jp×g 05:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User 166.205.141.57 has taken ownership of the article and disallowing any edits of which they don't approve. They have participated in edit wars with several different editors, and has re-added the same content, also removed by several different editors, no fewer than nine times in less than 24 hours. Either protect this page or block 166.205.141.57 from further disruptive edits. Proper notices and warnings have been placed by another editor and myself on the user's Talk page. MarydaleEd (talk) 23:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cwmhiraeth. El_C 06:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death. Brojam (talk) 23:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. — Goszei (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of disruptive edits have been made recently, mostly by unregistered IP users TheVHSArtist (talk) 01:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by multiple IPs. Politanvm talk 01:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruptive editing, controversial figure recently elected in the 2021 Canadian federal election. CaffeinAddict (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request six months WP:XCON due to POV pushing/edit warring (without engaging in talk page discussion) on an article covered by WP:ARBEE - this is an additional controversial Yugoslavia in WWII article that needs protection per the Sadko case. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 21:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 06:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion by Dealer07. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion by Dealer07. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's (likely same person) persistently re-adding rumors from unreliable source. IP was partially blocked yesterday (1) but has now evaded the block. Armegon (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits from shifting IPs. These edits are identical to those from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vishaal Elias Manesh. Edits include subtly POV original research and excessive image spam, often with dubious copyright status. Grayfell (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by banned User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by banned User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by banned User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated in Draft, User, Template, and article spaces. Recommend ECP create-protection wherever necessary. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 07:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Editor continues to violate WP:IMAGERES, uploading full size resolution. Betty Logan (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of text with poor grammar and almost incomprehensible wording by two IPs located to Madrid, Spain. BilCat (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, repeated changing "Pakistani-administered Kashmir" to "Pakistani-occupied Kashmir" Request Indef-ECP. Should be covered by wp:General sanctions/India–Pakistan conflict Adakiko (talk) 19:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged GS action. El_C 06:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from one user. They repeatedly removed the page, redirecting it to the page on swimsuits. The page on Swimsuits does not even contain information on the type of swimsuit this article refers to. JakeSnake07 (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that I've reverted back to the redirect, for now (diff). El_C 06:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ARBCOM/DS (AP2) - long term, persistent disruption by IPs posting "this is biased" WP:NOTFORUM rants (as one would expect for a group on the political extreme which is highly active on the internet in the US). A look at the talk page history will show it to be basically just addition and removal of such disruption. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 07:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs. Ab207 (talk) 06:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuing vandalism from IP despite multiple warnings, then by newly-created account. Also reported to AIV. - wolf 07:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 11:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – That lasted long... - resumption of disruption shortly after expiry of protection. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:27, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem like vandalism to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Over ten reverts in the last twenty four hours. ––FormalDude talk 03:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Parallel to WP:AN3#User:Scribetastic_reported_by_User:FormalDude_(Result:_both_users_2-week_p-block). El_C 06:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I assume two different editors (but it could be the same editor) have added content to the article after an AfD. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. For the bot. El_C 06:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A month should do. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. For the bot. El_C 06:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yeah, there's a huge edit war going on here. Might benefit from a bit of protection. Helen(💬📖) 01:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and newer users adding uncited or poorly cited newspapers of record to the list. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Seems to be resolved (I think). El_C 07:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by banned User:Xayahrainie43. JBL (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article was created in March 2019 right when a new organization was formed, but which changed its name before the month was out because of controversies that played out in real life, the media, and on Wikipedia apparently. Few editors have been able to change the article since 2019 to correct the name change or update information. I'm pretty sure the controversial nature of the [then new] organization has long since passed and the article no longer needs extended confirmed protection. I have drafted a change for the article to update it with the correct name and several citations (as soon as I'm able to make an edit there). Please consider dropping the protection level a notch, perhaps to semi-protection level. Platonk (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pinging the protecting administrator Athaenara --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"[Edit=Require extended confirmed access] ... [Move=Require extended confirmed access] ...
(Edit warring / content dispute: starting at this relatively low level of protection for now)".
Wikipedia:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED says, "A registered editor becomes extendedconfirmed automatically when the account is both at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits". I don't see hardship, but I won't object to other administrators changing a two-and-a-half-year-old protection level. – Athaenara 17:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Athaenara: I've been an editor for 7 months and still haven't made 500 edits. I did a flush of edits the other day trying to reach 500, but didn't make it. If the original purpose of the protection level has long since passed, I don't understand why continue to keep the protection level now. I guess I'll just go fix some typos in the hopes of clocking another 32 edits to make the 500 edits level. Platonk (talk) 22:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I unprotected the page and removed the protection template from it. – Athaenara 07:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected (for the bot) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IPs are introducing factual error Venkat TL (talk) 08:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: despite the long-term vandalism, I don't see anything that can't be taken care of by RCP. Admin is desysopped for socking Sennecaster (Chat) 14:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Under the section "Current Squad" please edit salary of Rishabh Pant to 15 crore. Here is the link from the official IPLT20 website stating that salary of rishabh pant is 15 crore. https://resources.platform.iplt20.com/IPL/document/2021/01/20/14041dab-9497-4186-a967-f6ed2148f91a/IPL-2021-Playing-Squad.pdf Spectron12346789 (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – C&P moves by Yogeshpahade9 and now an IP. Muhandes (talk) 16:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – C&P moves by Yogeshpahade9 and now an IP. Muhandes (talk) 16:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Much of the info on the page is incorrect, and being protected by a user who is falsely accusing Dr. Kimmel of wrongdoing 71.190.232.191 (talk) 17:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The negative information is well sourced, and is not a reason to protect the page. Bishonen | tålk 11:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I see you were asking for unprotection. No, that won't happen. Bishonen | tålk 11:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Declined (for the bot) Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and page belongs to a very high government official. Adc-gh (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple instances of vandalism in the last month, often from suspiciously geographically connected accounts. We at Pending Changes can absolutely handle this type of article. Cheers! Double Plus Ungood (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unlikely vandalism target that was preemptively protected. Kleinpecan (talk) 07:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you want the redirect to be unprotected? And I don't know...I don't think it is an unlikely vandalism target. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lectonar (talk) 13:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To protect from sensitive or classified information from being posted, misinformation or incorrect content. I am the public affairs officer for this general level command and we would like to control the posted content and information for accuracy. SBaer13 (talk) 13:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I'm sure the United States Intelligence Community does not need our help to safeguard classified material! El_C 14:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Oh, and OP indeffed, obviously. El_C 14:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much vandalism. EthanGaming7640 (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change section "French response": Add French foreign minister's response to AUKUS on 18 September 2021 as accusing the countries involved of "duplicity, major breach of trust and contempt".

Change section "Response from other nations" Meanwhile, Britain's foreign secretary, Lizz Truss, defended the move as Britain being "hard-headed" in its defence of interests. Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58610234 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanaya001 (talkcontribs) 00:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Since making the request, you have attained auto-confirmed status which enables you to make the change yourself. Favonian (talk) 17:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 September 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:F0D4:27E1:EBF0:D40D (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 169.204.5.0/24 for a year – school block. Favonian (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two different accounts have recently tried to hijack this redirect for an article. MB 17:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fairly obvious case of sock-puppetry. Sock blocked indefinitely, master for a week. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Tommi1986 let's talk! 23:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JimRenge (talk) 08:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-sock. The Banner talk 09:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal; resumed immediately after previous protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 12:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As part of the ongoing 2021 energy crisis in the United Kingdom, good-faith edits are confusing Green Energy UK plc (trading as GEUK) with Green, a different energy supplier which has gone into administration. Mattdawber1 (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hopping IP adding same WP:Soap and other unconstructive edits. Tried inviting them on the article talk page and left a message on one of their IP talk pages. Req semi-protection for a few days. Hopefully they will go away. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. The page has history of persistent meatpuppetry. Beshogur (talk) 15:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Youve been vandalising the page since the infobox simply because you dont like the result of the battle. Looking at your page/ contributions youre clearly a Turkish nationalist so of course you wouldnt like it when someone writes about a battle Turkey lost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.228.82.197 (talk) 16:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please discuss issues on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Widow99 (talk) 17:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 17:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandals inserting the same jokes that Norm Macdonald made against the film in the wake of his death. Low traffic page so few people are reverting their vandalism. Requesting 1 week semi-protection. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is prone to Vandalism and/or destructive edits. Extending full protection of the page to 6 months or indefinitely will be beneficial for the article. The article is currently under temporary full protection which expires in a few days. There was serious vandalism done on the article which I reversed more than once before the page was protected. Once the temporary protection expires there is a high chance that there will still be more attempts to vandalize the article. It is therefore necessary that the full protection of the page be extended for 6 months or indefinitely for the good of the article. The extension of full page protection for the article will be much appreciated. I hope you can take my request into consideration. Thank you! Nyanza Cushitic (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. The article has been full-protected for three days to encourage warring parties to engage on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Users are adding random data about an upcoming season, but the producers have not released any details. Check the last edits, editors have not provided any source. GrandMaster 16:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Users are adding random data about an upcoming season, but the producers have not released any details. Check the last edits, editors have not provided any source. GrandMaster 16:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unhelpful edits. JMHamo (talk) 21:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism by 2607:FEA8:C1D:F300:157F:DA81:13DB:CC88 . Keeps adding views not mentioned in the source and reverts the changes. Request to increase permission. Rezanaul (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism and it's in the news Noah 💬 18:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's mostly IP vandalism right? Semi-protection status for a few years or perhaps permanent might work as well. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please request protection again if the problem persists. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – While there is currently semi-protection, there appears to be back-and-forth editing/POV jockeying involving extended-confirmed editors. There is an ongoing talk page conversation about the content, but to prevent further disruption, this should probably be locked until that is resolved. There has also been some social media hype around the article and the perception of its POV, which may contribute to future page problems, but I don't know how to address that now. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I think the discussion is very civil until now, and there is not much back and forth in the article. I believe editors can come to a consensus without having to resort to full protection. Please ping me if it gets out of control. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Dynamic IP vandalism. – DarkGlow19:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism since the semi level of protection installed by GorillaWarfare expired. Too many keyboard warriors. Altair110 (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Essentially 3 edits by the same IP on September 22...apart from that, not much disruption. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editing Protection On the Page Due to impending Vandalism From Political Opponents. Primethelonegun (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Recent vandalism from various IPs with the same agenda. Chlod (say hi!) 09:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Getting a decent amount of vandalism from IPs, including content that is disparaging. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Aparently current target by a persistent self-promoter. Requesting indefinite because new users most likely don't need to edit here anyway, except when they unintentionally throught you should draft your article right here (the same reason why Help:Your first article is protected). Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuously vandalism by IP. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 10:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple vandalism attempts (POV statistics change without any support from the source), first by Ahaw Ali (blocked), and now identical edits by Afarpeople1 (requesting block in WP:AIV). Requesting protection so they don't just choose another ID and do this again. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism attempts (POV statistics change without any support from the source), first by Ahaw Ali (blocked), and now identical edits by Afarpeople1 (requesting block in WP:AIV). Requesting protection so they don't just choose another ID and do this again. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism attempts (POV statistics change without any support from the source), first by Ahaw Ali (blocked), and now identical edits by Afarpeople1 (requesting block in WP:AIV). Requesting protection so they don't just choose another ID and do this again. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Page was protected several times before but as soon as it ends the vandalism starts again. Ïvana (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page needs to be protected a bit longer as vandalism happened immediately after the protection lapsed. – The Grid (talk) 12:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. Destroyer (Alternate account) 23:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 14:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is the page of current Governor of Gujarat State, India. Given his dignified position as the Constitutional Head of the State, and a recent attempt to publish defamatory content on the page, it is requested that this page be fully protected with Extended confirmed protection to prevent any defamatory or libelous content. Yash983 (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. This is not what protection is for in Wikipedia, at least not while there is no or little disruption. Please read our protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Original protecting admin is no longer an administrator. I'm requesting unprotection as I'd like to accept Draft:Baldi’s Basics in Education and Learning. Since the last AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldi's Basics In Education and Learning, it appears as if Baldi's Basics has received far more coverage from a variety of reliable sources and now appears to be notable. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, it appears I screwed up and I didn't notice that the apostrophe in the title was actually a single quote mark. The unprotection would still be a good so I could make a redirect, but the actual article isn't. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected (by virtue of creating the redirect) — xaosflux Talk 14:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux: Would you mind unprotecting/creating a redirect at Baldi's Basics In Education and Learning as well? Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 14:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Note: this is without regards for if Baldi's Basics in Education and Learning is a good article or not, nor in regards to overturning Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldi's Basics In Education and Learning - these are on the basis that so long as the new article page exists the redirects themselves are appropriate. — xaosflux Talk 14:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing: blanking, socking. Autumn1945 (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some Vietnamese IPs keeps vandal my user sandbox and its talk page. Hankiz 15:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – see Narmin Safarova. The editor who created this article also has a history of recreating SALTed articles associated with socking in slightly different namespaces. GPL93 (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Indefinite extended-confirmed create protection. Bishonen | tålk 16:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP's vandalizing and removing content, recent uptick in removal MoonlightVector 14:58, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extensive IP vandalism The Tips of Apmh (talk) 15:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous IPs involved in edit war/vandalism in context of local politics. Semi protection should help limit and track their activity. EagleofSaladin (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It appears that someone is trying to input incorrect information to the page, that too happening repeatedly. The IP users seem to be targeting owner info, key people names, and other key elements on the page. Angeljoe19 (talk) 17:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 17:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from multiple IP addresses Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – The page is about help page. Vitaium (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does it get moved often? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Never. It's a preemptive request, which I have granted. My protection summary reads:
Changed protection settings for "Help:What links here": Highly visible page: Move protect from none to admin level. Erring on the side of caution with this highly visible page (preemptive) ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (indefinite) [Move=Require administrator access] (indefinite).
The original indef semi, which wasn't also extended to moves, remains unchanged. El_C 17:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive IP editing across several pages. Citobun (talk) 12:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Can we get 30 days of semi on this talk page? Getting disruptive, duplicate edit requests. See Talk:Mihira Bhoja/Archive 1 for a pile of examples. Many more requests were reverted or removed. The pace of disruption really picked up in early September, so I'm hoping that 30 days or so will bring us back to the status quo of consistent, but fewer, of the requests. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Hypnôs (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection expired last month and IP & recently registered POV pushers have discovered they're able to edit again. Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection expired last month and IP & recently registered POV pushers have discovered they're able to edit again. Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. see Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Some_Assam_related_pages Venkat TL (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page appears to be already semi-protected indefinitely AND pending changes protected indefinitely (which seems overkill). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5 how to check if the page is already protected? clicking the link for logs above does not show that it is protected. There are more than one pages that are reported in that discussion thread, should they be nominated separately? Venkat TL (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done removed the bad pc. The original 2018 indef semi may be viewed here. El_C 17:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Now I can see. I will remember to check next time. Venkat TL (talk) 18:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ip Vandalism. MoonlightVector 17:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Due to unnecessary edits by IP users and copying of exact text from sources: High level of IP vandalism. Pra2310 (talk) 12:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 17:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Orania is not a semi-autonomous region without South Africa. It is simply a privately held plot of land, exactly like any gated estate. I am requesting page protection in order to prevent the perpetuation of this misconception. Mzanzi sa (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The user requesting protection has refused to engage with other editors on the talk page and is engaged in an edit war. Greenman (talk) 14:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The requestor has been blocked for 48 hours for violation of the three-revert rule. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. For the bot. El_C 17:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA related. Would be nice if someone could add the edit notice too. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 September 2021

Reason: High level of new user vandalism—not IP vandalism. Thus, I request that this page receive auto-confirmed protection for 72 hours. Anwegmann (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Recent uptick in vandalism. MoonlightVectorTalk page 20:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Apparent throw-away socks disrupting the page. —PaleoNeonate22:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mistaken to be directly copied from a section another article; whereas it was in a major expansion. The section in the original article is converted according to WP:Summary style. 1.64.47.130 (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It was expanded. And it was reverted. Now you start a discussion. I suggest you do that at Talk:MTR and see if a consensus exists for what you want to do. Oh, wait! Aren’t you the "Harbour Crossing Tunnel" hoaxer? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An unregistered IP keeps adding unreferenced details to a biography. The sources they do cite are unreliable, such as Geni. I've directed them on their talk page and on the reverts to WP:RSP, but they are either not understanding or not listening that articles need RS. Unfounded claims of being poisoned don't work on WP. A revert of the added contact and needing an account to edit the article would be very helpful. Thank you! Kbabej (talk) 20:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, makes sense. Thank you, I appreciate it. --Kbabej (talk) 20:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by 79.66.209.148 Elemimele (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Nabi Mammadov. GPL93 (talk) 00:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 14:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spam by IPs. dudhhrContribs 18:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor and a registered user who repeatedly changes dates either without a source or with a source that does not support the change. (t · c) buidhe 20:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism began almost right after protection expired. No indication this will stop - suggest indef as per the COVID DS (since that is what is driving the vandalism, I suppose). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. There has been persisent vandalism by a bunch of IPs Starship SN20 (talk) 22:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The IP is occasionally a nuisance, but the last vandalism was nearly two months ago. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 02:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent childish edits by IPs who think that saying "Emptyhad" is amusing. David Biddulph (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done semi 2 weeks. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: BLP Policy Violations. He is accused of Crime. Venkat TL (talk) 10:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits since September 3rd. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP – they are over four reverts in the last 24 hours ([117][118][119][120] - the first is removal of something that was added a short time before), but editing from different IPs so this is probably easier than blocking. Unfortunately other Manx election articles have had to be protected in the past due to similar disruption (regarding the results table) from the same IP.[121][122][123]. Cheers, Number 57 11:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing disruptive editing and vandalism by users adding unsourced rumor that Geraldo's birth name was Jerry Rivers. The Keymaster (talk) 04:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Really? As far as I can see, the name conflict has fueled frequent and repetitive edits by anonymous one-time users, despite their lack of a source, and there have been several other blatant incidents of vandalism as well. The Keymaster (talk) 06:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There have been only two instances of vandalism during the month of September. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd pc, but this page is probably watched by enough editors to make that redundant. El_C 13:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Another unregistered account/s has been putting unsubstantial claims that China and North Korea are selling military weapons to the Bruneian military. The editors have asked the said person to back up his claims, but never said anything. So the edits were made, but the unknown account chose to revert the edits and make a mockery of our work. Ominae (talk) 05:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ominae, this is a single user. A nominal warning is usually required. I have done this. El_C 13:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject is imprisoned 124.47.137.46 (talk) 05:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected No. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

25 September 2021

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Originalchampion (talk) 19:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Originalchampion, how so? I don't understand what I'm looking at. El_C 18:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Special:Permalink/1046248250#Sockpuppetry - the IP's concerns seem justified. @El C: if you get to this first. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RC, I presume there will be a fruit basket...? El_C 19:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Restarted (mostly IPs) after previous protection ended. Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. Wow, WP:ARBGG at WP:GENSEX, for once. El_C 23:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users have been vandalising the page repeatedly with uncited POV pushing. Djks1 (talk) 11:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and BLP violation. Eevee01(talk) 11:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by some ips. Not all but some MoonlightVectorTalk page 13:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Appears to be the subject of consistant vandalism/disruptive editing by anons that started yesterday. Justiyaya 15:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by IPs. MRZQ (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP Vandalism. Previously protected page. Controversial figure. CaffeinAddict (talk) 16:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent joke edits. Bangalamania (talk) 18:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Flagged revs isn't enough in my view, still has high levels of vandalism. DannyS712 (talk) 22:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Someone keeps vandalising it, and it is disruptive for people who are reviewing pending changes. Semi-protection is needed until they stop. codingcyclone please ping/my wreckage 22:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. codingcyclone please ping/my wreckage 23:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Woodroar (talk) 01:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Non-stop pronoun warring on the biography of this non-binary person by dynamic, IP hopping vandalism-only anonymous user(s). Mathglot (talk) 04:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Struck; duplicate request to above. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sorry for using alternate account to report again, but I'm currently being harassed by two different people who keep insulting me on my sandbox talkpage. Please delete and protect the page from being created by IPs and new users again. Lorenza Sforza (talk) 21:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. Favonian (talk) 06:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced credits. Whatever sources they use are falsified. Crboyer (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PROFRINGE disruption by multiple IPs because of a recent development. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV pushing and removal of reliable sources. No Great Shaker (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. There has been an increased activity of changing names against existing consensus — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. After protection ended, a massive amount of IPs started to vandalize MoonlightVectorTalk page 13:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Dispute about major information, IPs are getting involved too. If it gets worse bump it up to Full MoonlightVectorTalk page 13:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced and possibly hoax content. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 19:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption and blatant POV. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending change. Despite infrequent editing, unhelpful edits, apparently either vandalism or test edits, have been reverted lately. George Ho (talk) 21:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat. Skyerise (talk) 22:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has, unfortunately, been subjected to a high level of disruptive editing and vandalism by user: MrKnowItAll-TheOG. The edits to which I have made, are, to the best of my knowledge, the most accurate information. For the sake of accuracy and to confront disinformation, I am kindly requesting that this page be protected from any further disruptive editing and allowing Wiki users the ability to enjoy the page without any propaganda. Williamcarbone (talk) 02:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection because of inappropriate edits made by anonymous user(s). Zarif1511 (talk) 03:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent edit wars in regards to subject's DOB. Kcj5062 (talk) 03:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 23:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopping to edit war with misleading edit summaries. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 06:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no misleading edit summary. These users are deliberately removing referenced information that Bakarkhani originated in Old Dhaka and reverting my edits without any explanation. I even wrote in the talk page but they do not even respond there.

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent nonsense edit requests copying something a youtuber did: [124]. Still clearly needs the protection it's had on and off. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 08:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 6th! El_C 12:45, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated creation of non-notable topic. Jan Myšák (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since Sep 23, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 03:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I rewrote the article after it was nominated for deletion because it was simply a promotional piece before. Now IP's are reverting back to that revision in an effort to make the company look good (promational sentences, promotion of the founders and removing the criticism section). I've warned a few of the IP's to no success. This has been done 4 years ago and last month, has been done on the Turkish Wikipedia (page protected there), and now they are trying it here again. Note that the founders were active on Wikipedia in 2018. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 08:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just checked to see how long they protected it on the Turkish wiki — one month (I was close). El_C 13:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. article heavily vandalized during the week, as shown in the history. Protection is required to cease destructive edits and to a content review. Pending protection is not being enough ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 12:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I bumped the protection up to semi with the same expiration date (May 2022). --Blablubbs (talk) 12:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 10:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 13:39, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of unsourced content being added; also the Demons and Bulldogs club pages have already been semi-protected for 1 day. Jeuno (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jeuno, too long, do you think? El_C 13:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – General caste silliness. Disruption started after protection expired. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. That's the point, bot. No treat. El_C 13:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. The article is a mess, and the majority of IPs are trying to make it worse (if that's possible). Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23, I'm not sure they're trying to make it worse, but certainly, that is the end result. El_C 13:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: (smiling) Good point. The article needs to be reorganized and rewritten. Unfortunately, it'd be better if it were done by someone who's actually seen the program. --Bbb23 (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bbb23, yeah, I wonder if it's any good. Yours, El_C as*___ as Comrade Bhaskaran 13:27, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 13:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disabled the pc (page is generally too active for it to be useful). El_C 13:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced edits from IP users TheHotwiki (talk) 06:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 07:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IP hopper repeatedly adding the same unsourced information. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 09:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 09:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to long-term of vandalism, disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. 49.150.116.127 (talk) 10:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 13:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced listcruft by a dynamic IP over the past several weeks despite multiple editors having removed it. Sable232 (talk) 14:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced and POV-additions by IPs and new users —El Millo (talk) 01:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Facu-el Millo: Are you sure you mean the redirect? I do not see any disruption in the edit history--Ymblanter (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A bit Stale for the main article — last edit was 4 days ago. Unlikely to be about the redirect (indeed, uneventful). El_C 13:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism Unilimited247 (talk) 05:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:06, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Time has come that this page needs protection. I would rather have the ability of IPs editing this page gone, than getting it disrupted by socks like the one currently disrupting it. 106.222.14.189 (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 14:58, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ironically the individual who is asking for protection is the one who is disrupting the article with their blind edit warring tactics and pushing a one sided opinion. Himachal78 (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated returns by IP user(s) to remove sourced content without explanation or discussion. Stesmo (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 13:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: This page should be create protected because there is already page named Aka. Vitaium (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Vitaium, created in April, it would have to be re-created before we can (should) salt. El_C 13:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism from anon IPs to a somewhat charged topic. Has been temp semi protected multiple times in the past, but they always resume eventually. OrgoneBox (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending changes protection is doing what it is supposed to do. Lectonar (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent attempts by IPs and new users to refer to the subject as Olga of Kyiv, contrary to Talk:Kyiv/Archive 9#RfC: Kyiv/Kiev in other articles. Please protect for a few months, or perhaps indefinitely. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One attempt yesterday, another one some weeks ago. I would engage the editors, and point to existing consensus as mentioned. Lectonar (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP altering/removing sourced information. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP. Lectonar (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism occurring on Maria Theresa Asmar's page with wrongful references to her memoirs and unfounded claims. These claims includes an Indian ethnicity, church adherence to the Chaldean Syrian Church, descriptions of her travels in Turkey and the way her family passed away. Asmar was in fact a Chaldean, adherent of the Chaldean Catholic Church and the niece of one of the bishops of that church. While describing her travels through many countries in great detail, she never describes Turkey in her memoirs. And not all of her family members fell to the plague, her father died a martyr for example. MrKnowItAll-TheOG (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 17:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several instances of vandalism and unexplained content removal and violations WP:NPOV over the past month. I would recommend pending changes protection for about 6 months if possible. Thank you for considering my request. Kalariwarrior (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit 9 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Recently deleted BLP – Promotional article shouldn’t create again. Breekup69 (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and new users —El Millo (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper edit warring all day. Notfrompedro (talk) 18:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Antandrus. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uranium Site (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent re-addition of unsourced commentary by multiple IPs. Politanvm talk 16:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several instances of vandalism over the past month or so. I would recommend Semi-protection, or at least pending changes protection if at all possible. Thank you for considering my request. Kalariwarrior (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like sockpuppetry continued from before the previous protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles. Hippeus (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 21:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase in IP vandalism after being featured on the main page. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 18:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. standard WP:TFA fare. El_C 21:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every IP-edit here is vandalism. Has already been semi-protected (temporarily) 7 times. - since 2020 --TheImaCow (talk) 19:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 20:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeatedly vandalized by IPs. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 September 2021

Reason: Continuously adding several unreferenced wording, self promotion, useless tables, and lengthy non-encyclopedic contents. I have reverted them, but they are keep making. GihanJayaweeraTALK 17:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism since the last two weeks WA8MTWAYC (talk) 18:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism RəşadBabayev92 (talk) 18:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @RəşadBabayev92: This page does not exist on the English Wikipedia. If you are referring to w:az:Rəşad Babayev (gizir), requests for protection will have to be directed to the appropriate noticeboard on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruption. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 02:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 05:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Extended confirmed protection. Today's Featured Article. High level of vandalism. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 05:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 22:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Suspected sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 00:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps vandalizing the infobox for shipping purposes. O.N.R. (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps vandalizing the infobox for shipping purposes. O.N.R. (talk) 03:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IMHO, there's a decent case for preventative protection for the next few days or so for this national election of a large western country which is likely to attract quite a lot of attention. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple socks of WP:LTA/GRP who uses a VPN service active on this page. As there's no reason for the archive to be edited by new users, I'd like to request semiprotection here. JavaHurricane 05:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Admin desysopped for inactivity this month, no BLP issues in recent almost year and low amount of reverts Sennecaster (Chat) 13:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 09:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many troll edits in the history and an edit warring by a block evader. Kaseng55 (talk) 06:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Look at the history of this article since 9 September. Every single edit looks follows the same pattern and looks like it has been made by the exact same person - albeit from dozens of IP addresses and user accounts. Huge amount of completely pointless sockpuppetry going on which I will report separately. Given the previous semi-protection of this article I think it's time to do it again. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mjroots. Favonian (talk) 10:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . MoundsvillePoland (talk) 01:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is like a Murphy political advert

Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism since September 16, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 06:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – page keeps getting attacked by the same user see the page history and the case page history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MarquinhosWikipediano. The emu of wiki (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Trying with ordinary semi for now. Favonian (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – see the page history and the case page history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MarquinhosWikipediano. The emu of wiki (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of "Lady" to her name. ɢᴀʙʙʏᴍɪx01 08:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 09:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - IP vandalism happening again. From same IP.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I request to apply permanent Semi-protection to article Novogrudok due to persistent vandalism and insertion of controversial statements about other country (Lithuania) history by amateur editors (now by user Susjaj, however in June another user Лобачев Владимир kept inserting them as well). These false claims were denied in this discussion as users from Belarus failed to provide WP:RELIABLE sources. As we know, Belarus has a cruel authoritarian regime, led by Alexander Lukashenko, thus governmental sources about other countries history fails as WP:RELIABLE. There certainly will be more amateur users in the future who will attempt to insert false claims and unreliable sources published by the authoritarian regime to this article. -- Pofka (talk) 20:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pofka, the WP:CONFIRM tenure is an account being four days old and hav[ing] made at least ten edits to Wikipedia, so WP:SEMI it would have no effect on the user in question. El_C 21:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Thanks for pointing that out. Then it probably requires higher protection level. But propaganda that this now-Belarusian city was capital of Lithuania at some point should finally stop in Wikipedia as such claims are rejected/ignored by the mainstream international historiography. Not surprisingly, aggressive users has failed to provide at least one WP:RELIABLE source to defend these false claims. In this discussion yet another user Johnny Moor aggressively blamed Lithuanians with ridiculous things instead of providing at least one WP:RELIABLE source because there aren't any as these claims are false. This, in their own words, parasitic myth caught an eye of the Vilnius University scientists and they even released an analysis of this myth in English (here). -- Pofka (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined That's not what protection is for (please read our protection policy, if you have not done so already); as this is actually one user, and if it is indeed vandalism, and not just a disgreement about the reading of sources, this can be dealt wih via AIV. If not, dispute resolution will be a way forward. Disruption overall is not high enough to warrant any kind of protection atm. Lectonar (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: It is an attempt by some Belarusian nationalists to rewrite the internationally recognized point of view of Lithuanian history with pseudoscientific theories, made up by themselves. It is a truly disruptive behavior. There was a civilized attempt to sort out this dispute with them by asking to provide reliable sources here: Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard/Archive_46#Original_research_at_Novogrudok, but they did not found any reliable English sources and instead spread their anti-Lithuanian hatred and absurd accusations. -- Pofka (talk) 13:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then have them blocked: that's why I mentioned AIV. Page protection is like shooting with cannons at sparrows: much too crude to deal with disruption which comes from single accounts. Lectonar (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tanbir_Ramiz/sandbox Tanbir Ramiz (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No valid rationale given, and there's nothing to protect since I've deleted the page and blocked the requester for spamming. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection due to recent vandalism and constant change of protection on the page. SoonerFan4life67 (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. At need, pending-changes protection might be reinstated; no need for that atm, though. Lectonar (talk) 13:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced info by IPs and new users. Ab207 (talk) 07:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 16:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been quite a few disruptive edits from IPs within the last few days; quite a new show so maybe between a few days to a few weeks? Semi-protection is also a viable option, although I would suggest trying pending changes for now to see how it goes. Jeuno (talk) 13:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption too heavy for pending-changes to be fully effective. Lectonar (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As soon as the page protection was take down the IP address block evasion editor resumed edits on the page. Can we please have a longer or more permanent solution for protection of this page. Thanks Pipesmoking Legend (talk) 16:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longhair\talk 16:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring by a number of newly-registered accounts some of whom seem to have a COI. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 17:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – COVID strikes yet again... Maybe SP is enough. Obvious potential for (and which has led to actual) disruption due to this group's promotion of health-related misinformation with the usual suspect [ineffective] "miracle drug". RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – see the page history. The emu of wiki (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. One (new) user in the last month. Lectonar (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Dajasj (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know why this is at PC instead of SP. It's clearly attracting nonsense drive-by vandalism and I can't see anything constructive by any non-AC in recent history. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. Like with my similar protection of Ethiopia: over 30 previous protections! El_C 19:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism continuing just 4 days after previous protection ended. May need long term or indefinite semi-protection. Link20XX (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 20:23, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This is getting ridiculous. Every once in a while there are a bunch of people changing stoning sentences to "overturned" or "never done" by pious and disruptive users. Wretchskull (talk) 19:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pages keeps being vandalized after he kicked a 66 yard field goal. Swagging (talk) 20:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator FuzheadoMelanieN (talk) 21:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 September 2021

Reason: I tried to fix this list for so many times in so many years, but everytime I take a new look on it, I have to see how so many new irredentism and wrong information gets (re-)added and (re-)added again and again. Mostly IPs and new-registered useres with only edits on this list keep adding and pushing minority right-parties or regionalist movements as "autonomism" or even "secessionism"!

Please protect this page, at some points it seriously seems like we are giving irredentist IP and/or sockpuppet trolls a voice on this list. Especially the section about Russia is very horribly wrong and worrying! Koreanovsky (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The editor you are disagreeing with is extended confirmed, so nothing but full protection would be effective. It looks as if they are listening to you; please discuss disagreements on the talk page if differences persist. MelanieN (talk) 20:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued high level of IP vandalism. L33tm4n (talk) 19:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I don't see the need to increase the protection from the current pending changes. Bbb23 (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive POV-driven editing by IPs; I would apply this myself, but am involved at this point. signed, Rosguill talk 22:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 23:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: With one exception, the cast for this season of SNL have not yet been confimed as returning to the show. Several IP editors have deliberately disregarded requests for citations to verify the edits they are trying to insert. Those responsible appear to be in clear violation of the policies relating to reliable sourcingg, the crystal ball policy, disruptive editing and the rules regarding consensus, which in this case means that, with the exception of the anonymous editors, all others who have edited the page have agreed that until there is a reliable source verifying the rest of the returning cast and the new additions, the information cannot be included. My suggestion for the request is that the page be given temporary protection that will last until at least this Saturday, when the first Season 47 episode will air. Thanks for your prompt response on this matter. Jgstokes (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent editing of users from current to former without citing reliable published sources by dynamic IP user [ Special:Contributions/2601:C4:8201:C980::/64. BilCat (talk) 23:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit-warring and violating WP:FILMPLOT. DonIago (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In some way connected to Instagram (though I can't see how), we've got a recent influx of new contributors come to change the lead image, including at least one joke and good faith inclusions of copyright violation images of Parris. I'm guessing this is somehow related to the tiresome shit we had from Richybeno, either a troll or an unprofessional agent of Parris who insisted on repeatedly violating our copyright rules rather than going through the process we explained many times for donating images. — Bilorv (talk) 21:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent IP disruption. KidAdSPEAK 01:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent genre warring without consensus, suspected of it being the same person. Magatta (talk) 01:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Back in Black is back! El_C 01:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Either a dedicated IP jumper, or some sports news just happened. Code Pending (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sports vandalism. Code Pending (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MuboshguMelanieN (talk) 03:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Had a VERY bad game today, and the IPs are not happy. ZappaMatic 02:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism in recent days. Article needs to be protected for one week, until the final episode airs on Sunday/Monday. Happily888 (talk) 03:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because it's about the Nazis EggPudding77777 (talk) 03:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sro23. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed is bothering me again. Don’t know if I want more comments from people again or not. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. A single (blue) warning isn't really enough to block this single user who reverted a single time. As far as disruption goes, pretty innocuous. El_C 11:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 11:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP socks of Ijifjsfioweief / Drawnappart12324234234. DanCherek (talk) 04:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IP socks of Ijifjsfioweief / Drawnappart12324234234. DanCherek (talk) 04:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing. Has been a common target by the Smile of a Child IP vandals. Luigitehplumber (talk) 07:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism magnet. FDW777 (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – They're fighting again over the inclusion of the pie chart. Largoplazo (talk) 11:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . A-nekemio (talk) 00:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . A-nekemio (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Use google please (talk) 06:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article not specified. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over Sam's peak intensity and hence the strongest storm of the season. If it appears to have died down by the time you review this request, please decline it as this article needs continuous updating from NHC advisories for Hurricane Sam. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I think it's okay now (?). El_C 11:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. I guess not. El_C 12:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 07:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 11:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Uness232 (talk) 09:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 10:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unconstructive, unreferenced, unexplained edits from IP users TheHotwiki (talk) 11:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I want my user page to be semi-protected indefinitely to prevent other users from damaging my user page. Vitaium (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not necessary. Base user pages (for example, the page User:Example, and not User:Example/subpage or User talk:Example) are automatically protected from creation or editing by unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP users. Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of an article deleted through AfD. Onel5969 TT me 13:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full-blown edit war between auto-confirmed users. Off to the talk page you go! Favonian (talk) 15:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Extreme level of brigading from new users, probably offwiki canvassing. Also BLP issues. DanCherek (talk) 13:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ferret. Favonian (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Protecting admin is now blocked as a sock. Semi'd for repeated recreation, but hasn't been touched since 2009. low chance of recreation Sennecaster (Chat) 01:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected The situation that led to the protection so long ago should have passed by now, giving it a try without prejudice to re-protection as needed if there is future disruption. — xaosflux Talk 14:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IPs —El Millo (talk) 14:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism/advertising has resumed. I previously requested page protection on 23 August, after which the page received pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month. Now that it has ended, the vandalism/advertising has resumed. As I said in the first request, this activity is likely to continue so so long as people stand to profit from marketing and selling these beads. Accordingly, I again suggest indefinite semi-protection. Scyrme (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 15:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I guess I forgot to do the thing. Free treat for bot. El_C 17:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This model-turned-actress has gotten a lot of attention recently due a hit Netflix series. That is no excuse for such vandalism and disruption type of things. I’m requesting temporary semi-protection. Trillfendi (talk) 15:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extra credits for 🤦🏾‍♀️. El_C 16:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk archives of inactive users

Unprotection: Requesting removal of full protection from 392 User talk archives of inactive users who have not made any edits in 2 years. Most of them are inactive former admins who had protected their own archives from years ago. My bot MalnadachBot is doing a task of fixing high-priority Lint errors in signatures per approval in Task 2. These pages came to my notice when I saw that my bot had skipped some of them due to being under full protection. There is no longer any benefit with the pages remaining full protected and is only blocking maintenance edits. The above page is a placeholder, I have included the full list below. Please see the "User:Mdd4696's talk page archives" section in RFPP/Archive 28 June, where I had made a request to unprotect a single user's archives. See also this AN thread for a similar bulk unprotection of old TFA pages. Pinging @WOSlinker: per request for agreeing to consider this. -- ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected -- WOSlinker (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Full list of pages
  1. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive II (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  2. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive III (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  3. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive IV (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  4. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive V (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  5. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive VI (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  6. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive VII (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  7. User talk:Kilo-Lima/Archives/Archive VIII (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  8. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  9. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  10. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  11. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  12. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  13. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  14. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  15. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  16. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  17. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  18. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 19 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  19. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  20. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 20 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  21. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 21 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  22. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  23. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  24. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  25. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  26. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  27. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  28. User talk:The-G-Unit-Boss/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  29. User talk:Yandman/Archive0 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  30. User talk:Yandman/Archive1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  31. User talk:Yandman/Archive2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  32. User talk:Yandman/Archive3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  33. User talk:Yandman/Archive4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  34. User talk:Yandman/Archive5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  35. User talk:Yandman/Archive6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  36. User talk:Yandman/Archive7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  37. User talk:Yandman/Archive8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  38. User talk:Kukini/Archive11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  39. User talk:Kukini/Archive12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  40. User talk:Kukini/Archive13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  41. User talk:Kukini/Archive15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  42. User talk:Kukini/Archive18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  43. User talk:Kukini/Archive22 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  44. User talk:EVula/Apr-Jun 2006 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  45. User talk:EVula/Apr-Jun 2007 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  46. User talk:EVula/Apr-Jun 2008 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  47. User talk:EVula/Apr-Jun 2009 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  48. User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2006 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  49. User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2007 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  50. User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2008 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  51. User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2009 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  52. User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2010 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  53. User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2011 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  54. User talk:EVula/Jul-Sept 2006 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  55. User talk:EVula/Jul-Sept 2007 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  56. User talk:EVula/Jul-Sept 2008 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  57. User talk:EVula/Jul-Sept 2009 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  58. User talk:EVula/Jul-Sept 2010 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  59. User talk:EVula/Oct-Dec 2007 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  60. User talk:EVula/Oct-Dec 2008 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  61. User talk:EVula/Oct-Dec 2009 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  62. User talk:EVula/Oct-Dec 2010 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  63. User talk:Riana/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  64. User talk:Riana/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  65. User talk:Riana/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  66. User talk:Riana/Archive 12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  67. User talk:Riana/Archive 13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  68. User talk:Riana/Archive 14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  69. User talk:Riana/Archive 15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  70. User talk:Riana/Archive 16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  71. User talk:Riana/Archive 17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  72. User talk:Riana/Archive 18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  73. User talk:Riana/Archive 19 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  74. User talk:Riana/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  75. User talk:Riana/Archive 20 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  76. User talk:Riana/Archive 21 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  77. User talk:Riana/Archive 22 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  78. User talk:Riana/Archive 23 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  79. User talk:Riana/Archive 24 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  80. User talk:Riana/Archive 25 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  81. User talk:Riana/Archive 26 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  82. User talk:Riana/Archive 27 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  83. User talk:Riana/Archive 28 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  84. User talk:Riana/Archive 29 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  85. User talk:Riana/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  86. User talk:Riana/Archive 30 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  87. User talk:Riana/Archive 31 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  88. User talk:Riana/Archive 32 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  89. User talk:Riana/Archive 33 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  90. User talk:Riana/Archive 34 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  91. User talk:Riana/Archive 37 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  92. User talk:Riana/Archive 38 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  93. User talk:Riana/Archive 39 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  94. User talk:Riana/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  95. User talk:Riana/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  96. User talk:Riana/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  97. User talk:Riana/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  98. User talk:Riana/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  99. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 35 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  100. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 36 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  101. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 37 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  102. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 38 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  103. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 39 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  104. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 40 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  105. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 41 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  106. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 42 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  107. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 43 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  108. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 44 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  109. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 45 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  110. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 46 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  111. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 47 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  112. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 48 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  113. User talk:Phaedriel/Archive 49 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  114. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  115. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  116. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  117. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  118. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  119. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  120. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  121. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  122. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  123. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  124. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 19 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  125. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  126. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 20 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  127. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 21 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  128. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 22 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  129. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 23 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  130. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 24 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  131. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 25 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  132. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 26 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  133. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 27 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  134. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 28 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  135. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 29 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  136. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  137. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 30 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  138. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 31 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  139. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 32 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  140. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 33 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  141. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 34 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  142. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 35 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  143. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  144. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  145. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  146. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  147. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  148. User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  149. User talk:Kyoko/Archive1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  150. User talk:Kyoko/Archive10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  151. User talk:Kyoko/Archive11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  152. User talk:Kyoko/Archive12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  153. User talk:Kyoko/Archive13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  154. User talk:Kyoko/Archive14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  155. User talk:Kyoko/Archive15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  156. User talk:Kyoko/Archive16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  157. User talk:Kyoko/Archive17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  158. User talk:Kyoko/Archive18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  159. User talk:Kyoko/Archive2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  160. User talk:Kyoko/Archive3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  161. User talk:Kyoko/Archive4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  162. User talk:Kyoko/Archive5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  163. User talk:Kyoko/Archive6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  164. User talk:Kyoko/Archive7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  165. User talk:Kyoko/Archive8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  166. User talk:Kyoko/Archive9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  167. User talk:Seb26/Archive/1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  168. User talk:Seb26/Archive/10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  169. User talk:Seb26/Archive/11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  170. User talk:Seb26/Archive/12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  171. User talk:Seb26/Archive/13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  172. User talk:Seb26/Archive/14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  173. User talk:Seb26/Archive/16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  174. User talk:Seb26/Archive/2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  175. User talk:Seb26/Archive/3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  176. User talk:Seb26/Archive/4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  177. User talk:Seb26/Archive/5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  178. User talk:Seb26/Archive/6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  179. User talk:Seb26/Archive/7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  180. User talk:Seb26/Archive/8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  181. User talk:Seb26/Archive/9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  182. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  183. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  184. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  185. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  186. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  187. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  188. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  189. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  190. User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  191. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2009 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  192. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  193. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (Apr) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  194. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (August) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  195. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (December) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  196. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (Jan Feb) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  197. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (July) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  198. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (June) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  199. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (Mar) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  200. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (May) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  201. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (November) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  202. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (October) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  203. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (September) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  204. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  205. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (April) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  206. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (August) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  207. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (December) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  208. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (February) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  209. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (January) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  210. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (July) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  211. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (June) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  212. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (March) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  213. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (May) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  214. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (November) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  215. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (October) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  216. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (September) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  217. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2012 (April) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  218. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2012 (January) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  219. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2012 (July October) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  220. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2012 (March) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  221. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2012 (May) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  222. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2012 (Nov Dec) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  223. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2013 (Jan Aug) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  224. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2013 (Sep Nov) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  225. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2014 (Aug-Oct) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  226. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2014 (Nov-Dec) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  227. User talk:Wifione/Archive 2014 (Nov July) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  228. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  229. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  230. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  231. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  232. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  233. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  234. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  235. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  236. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  237. User talk:Fran Rogers/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  238. User talk:Dcoetzee/Archive 2007 2 21 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  239. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  240. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  241. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  242. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  243. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  244. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  245. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  246. User talk:Soumyasch/archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  247. User talk:Hamedog/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  248. User talk:Hamedog/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  249. User talk:Oxymoron83/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  250. User talk:Oxymoron83/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  251. User talk:Oxymoron83/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  252. User talk:Jerry/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  253. User talk:Jerry/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  254. User talk:Jerry/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  255. User talk:Jerry/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  256. User talk:MBK004/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  257. User talk:MBK004/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  258. User talk:MBK004/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  259. User talk:MBK004/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  260. User talk:MBK004/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  261. User talk:MBK004/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  262. User talk:MBK004/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  263. User talk:MBK004/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  264. User talk:MBK004/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  265. User talk:C12H22O11/archive01 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  266. User talk:C12H22O11/archive02 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  267. User talk:C12H22O11/archive03 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  268. User talk:C12H22O11/archive04 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  269. User talk:C12H22O11/archive05 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  270. User talk:C12H22O11/archive06 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  271. User talk:C12H22O11/archive07 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  272. User talk:C12H22O11/archive08 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  273. User talk:Keeper76/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  274. User talk:Keeper76/Archive 13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  275. User talk:Keeper76/Archive 14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  276. User talk:Keeper76/Archive 15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  277. User talk:Keeper76/Archive 17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  278. User talk:Keeper76/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  279. User talk:Capricorn42/Archive1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  280. User talk:Capricorn42/Archive2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  281. User talk:Capricorn42/Archive3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  282. User talk:Capricorn42/Archive4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  283. User talk:Capricorn42/Archive5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  284. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/09 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  285. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  286. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  287. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  288. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  289. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  290. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  291. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/22 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  292. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/28 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  293. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/29 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  294. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/31 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  295. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/32 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  296. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/33 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  297. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/34 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  298. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/35 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  299. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/36 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  300. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/38 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  301. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/39 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  302. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/40 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  303. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/41 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  304. User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive/42a (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  305. User talk:Barneca/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  306. User talk:Barneca/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  307. User talk:Barneca/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  308. User talk:Barneca/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  309. User talk:Barneca/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  310. User talk:Barneca/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  311. User talk:Barneca/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  312. User talk:Barneca/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  313. User talk:Barneca/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  314. User talk:Barneca/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  315. User talk:Barneca/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  316. User talk:Edgar181/Archive10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  317. User talk:Edgar181/Archive11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  318. User talk:Edgar181/Archive12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  319. User talk:Edgar181/Archive13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  320. User talk:Edgar181/Archive14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  321. User talk:Edgar181/Archive15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  322. User talk:Edgar181/Archive16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  323. User talk:Edgar181/Archive17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  324. User talk:Edgar181/Archive18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  325. User talk:Edgar181/Archive20 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  326. User talk:Edgar181/Archive21 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  327. User talk:Edgar181/Archive22 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  328. User talk:Edgar181/Archive9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  329. User talk:Chzz/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  330. User talk:Chzz/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  331. User talk:Chzz/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  332. User talk:Chzz/Archive 12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  333. User talk:Chzz/Archive 13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  334. User talk:Chzz/Archive 14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  335. User talk:Chzz/Archive 15 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  336. User talk:Chzz/Archive 16 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  337. User talk:Chzz/Archive 17 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  338. User talk:Chzz/Archive 18 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  339. User talk:Chzz/Archive 19 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  340. User talk:Chzz/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  341. User talk:Chzz/Archive 20 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  342. User talk:Chzz/Archive 21 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  343. User talk:Chzz/Archive 22 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  344. User talk:Chzz/Archive 23 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  345. User talk:Chzz/Archive 24 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  346. User talk:Chzz/Archive 25 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  347. User talk:Chzz/Archive 26 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  348. User talk:Chzz/Archive 27 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  349. User talk:Chzz/Archive 28 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  350. User talk:Chzz/Archive 29 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  351. User talk:Chzz/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  352. User talk:Chzz/Archive 30 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  353. User talk:Chzz/Archive 31 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  354. User talk:Chzz/Archive 32 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  355. User talk:Chzz/Archive 33 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  356. User talk:Chzz/Archive 35 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  357. User talk:Chzz/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  358. User talk:Chzz/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  359. User talk:Chzz/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  360. User talk:Chzz/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  361. User talk:Chzz/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  362. User talk:Chzz/Archive 9 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  363. User talk:Flyguy649/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  364. User talk:Flyguy649/Archive 11 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  365. User talk:Flyguy649/Archive 12 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  366. User talk:Flyguy649/Archive 13 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  367. User talk:Flyguy649/Archive 14 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  368. User talk:Consumed Crustacean/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  369. User talk:Consumed Crustacean/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  370. User talk:Consumed Crustacean/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  371. User talk:Consumed Crustacean/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  372. User talk:Mabdul/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  373. User talk:Mabdul/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  374. User talk:Mabdul/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  375. User talk:Mabdul/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  376. User talk:Mabdul/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  377. User talk:Mabdul/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  378. User talk:Ceradon/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  379. User talk:Ceradon/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  380. User talk:Ceradon/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  381. User talk:Ceradon/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  382. User talk:Ceradon/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  383. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  384. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 10 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  385. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 2 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  386. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 3 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  387. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 4 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  388. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 5 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  389. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 6 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  390. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 7 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
  391. User talk:Just Chilling/Archive 8 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent WP:DE among multiple IPs- continuing to change 'actor' to 'actress', despite hidden note now added as well. Magitroopa (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing of family background. Spike 'em (talk) 14:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 14:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP user continuously reverting edits and ban avoiding OptikalCrow (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Revdel'd the nonsense. It's not fair, bot, I was writing the thing! 😡 El_C 17:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase in disruptive editing. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors keep changing the end date from "present" to "May 22, 2021" without providing citations. As far as I'm aware, there is no official confirmation that the show is over, and it has not been a full year since the most recent episode aired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 17:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Suck it, bot! Dishwater Slog is the best (probably)! El_C 18:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: no vandalism since protecting in 2008, protecting admin hasn't edited since 2017. Not even sure if they are even admin anymore. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Sennecaster: I suppose you want the redirect unprotected? If so: why? Lectonar (talk) 10:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: There's no valid reason for the protection to continue in my eyes. I don't see vandalism or disruption that it would feasibly prevent and I think a redirect that has barely been touched since the protection does not still need it. Sennecaster (Chat) 10:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well...that might be because of the semiprotection, and I see plenty of possible vandalism prevented by it. Anyway, I'll let another admin decide this, I wouldn't unprotect. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This is such an obvious vandalism target (based on the many edit filters that try to catch this term being inserted elsewhere) that it is not worth leaving open while it is a redirect; should this page ever become an article I'd support attempting to remove the protection - though suspect it would quickly become needed again. The status of the originally protecting admin's account is of no consequence here. — xaosflux Talk 14:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism/BLP violations. Beccaynr (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 17:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New editor ignoring the WP:3RR. RickyCourtney (talk) 16:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 16:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly vandalized by LTA vandal focusing on user talk pages. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

28 September 2021

Indefinite full protection: every information provided is legit and can be confirmed in www.warrikingdom.org we believe some ethnic comes to vandalize it. LordSnow242 (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: too many vandalism everything about my upload is correct i am from the royal house LordSnow242 (talk) 18:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – So many unhelpful edits. I think this benefits from protection. Scorpions13256 (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Justlettersandnumbers. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been the target of IP & newly registered POV-pushers over the past few days. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edits being made by user snoogansnoogans that violates policies and guidelines on neutrality. Altwjh (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs and some Wikipedians. Vandalism continued after page protection expired. OnewithThePeople (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)OnewithThePeople (talk) 19:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ΣΒ (talk) 19:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Massive amount of socking. See edit history. Covered under WP:GS/PAGEANT. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several editors have been edit warring for several days now. — YoungForever(talk) 20:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent vandalism on a featured article—basically the entire edit history for the last month is just vandalism. At least this needs pending changes, but at this point semi seems more fit. Aza24 (talk) 21:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Uptick in unref and vand changes by various IPs in recent days. Dl2000 (talk) 22:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Allegedly has killed someone, vandalism spiked. Protect for a week. Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism, especially by IP's, that is getting difficult for us to control, dating back almost two months. Psiĥedelisto (talkcontribs) please always ping! 05:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced, factually incorrect information from unregistered and newly registered editors. Tdl1060 (talk) 05:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism following games between the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees; as these two teams are battling for playoff spots in the final week of the season, requesting page protection through the end of the MLB regular season (October 3). Dmoore5556 (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article is about a Nazi symbol with no proven pre-Nazi history at all. It is fairly regularly edited by IPs to insert the utterly uncorroborated claim that it is an ancient Germanic symbol. No evidence (even bad evidence) is ever offered and is it pretty certain that none exists otherwise somebody would have found a reference for it by now. It is likely that the people trying to claim otherwise know this. This has been going on, with varying levels of intensity, for ages so I think indefinite semi-protection is required. DanielRigal (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive nonsense. (CC) Tbhotch 01:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. And to protect them from unnecessary changes by IP UsersPra2310 (talk) 02:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of harassment. Last protected recently for 12 hours. Longer, please. Crboyer (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Airplaneman (talk) 06:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassment. Suspect is obvious. Crboyer (talk) 06:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Airplaneman (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting for a longer page protection, as the article is frequently being unconstructively edited by IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs that probably belong to a sockfarm active here, I was advised to request RFPP at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dyhp612. Covered under WP:GS/PAGEANT. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There seems to be a single IP working constructively. Please clarify what the problem is.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Extended-Confirmed Protection due to the current ongoing events. SoonerFan4life67 (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Largely constructive edits by experienced users. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sneaky IP and new editors Trigenibinion (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 18:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 06:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Almost all IP edits are either reverted on under 10 bytes. Needs at least pending changes Starship SN20 (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a one-line page, no reason for it to be changed. Also, by nature, it is a vandal magnet since it is a Wikipedia guideline. 69.117.241.47 (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. And to protect from unnecessary changes by IP usersPra2310 (talk) 02:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 06:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No FIrst use documented that CHina promised to not use nuclear bombs first, which I have left. However, since that time, CHina has threatened multiple nations with nuclear bombs unless they back China's position. I have posted several times china's overt and covert threats, with documentation to back it up ( Chinese TV, Chinese media, and Australian media). I would appreciate it if my factual and relevant changes were rolled back in and then protected. Windbourne (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Airplaneman (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden presidential portrait.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High-profile image on Commons, transcluded on Joe Biden infobox - currently no protection whatsoever, including for upload. I don't know the right place to post this, apologies in advance LenaAvrelia (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are requesting protection of a file that is on Commons? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup - it's a high-profile file, being in the infobox for pages like Joe Biden and President of the United States, yet unprotected. The equivalent for Donald Trump has full protection for upload. LenaAvrelia (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify: This file is used/transcluded in the infoboxes of the two above-mentioned extended-confirmed pages, but hasn't been subject to vandalism. LenaAvrelia (talk) 09:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. AEL diff. El_C 13:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two different accounts have been changing this article from Taiwan to China, Taiwanese to Chinese, etc. MB 01:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: consistent and false reversions of edits based on fringe sources. Editor-in-chief at large (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing IP vandalism. ToeSchmoker (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP vandalism Laxmanthaletto (talk) 09:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism; repeated unsourced changes to DOB of BLP. Thanks. — Manticore 09:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated removal of references and/or related content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated removal of sourced (negative) content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 11:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent image related vandalism in contravention of WP:NOTCENSORED. Image has previously been kept at FFD, and use of images upheld at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles#RfC: images of Islamic clerics and/or scholars. FDW777 (talk) 12:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 13:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swag denied. El_C 13:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Antique Rose 13:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP edit warring over the actor's citizenship, plus some straight-up vandalism. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 13:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 09:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase to Semi-protection. IP's continuing to edit war and pending changes is insufficient and difficult to manage. See also talk page and WP:ANI#Akhtar Raza Khan and image. Please note I may be considered by some to be non-neutral in this assessment. This should lead to forcing talk page discussion rather than edit warring. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 14:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent Disrupt Editing and Edit Warring Kent2121 (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two edits in September. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Series of SPAs and IPs violating BLP and edit warring while refusing to listen to other editors. Sock report filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PushpaShivaram but not they are just IP hopping. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – lets try get this 2 new editors to talk over blocks for 3reverts. Moxy- 03:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Moxy: I see there's a discussion at the Canadian Wikipedian's noticeboard; there have been no edits by Ak-eater06 (talk · contribs) or Angelgreat (talk · contribs) since then. Since the discussion is ongoing, I'm not inclined to full protect right now unless edit warring continues. Airplaneman (talk) 05:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Indeed, looks the this-or-that image edit war has stopped for the time being. Relist if that changes. El_C 13:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent introduction of European bias and negative/anti-australian and anti-american sentiment. AustraliaRodeo (talk) 08:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. AustraliaRodeo, that is not a policy-based argument for protection (per the Protection policy). Also, the POV tag isn't a fire-and-forget entitlement. You need to explain the reasons for the tag in a detailed way (at the talk page), so that there's something concrete to address wrt it, specifically. El_C 13:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Took the article to GA so WP:INVOLVED. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. For the bot. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Date articles

Reset pending changes settings for all pages above, if needed. They're all semi-protected as of this writing. TheRafaMarc15 (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: protecting admin. Personally, I think it's useful to keep the indef PC as a fallback in case someone decides to lift the semis. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. All of those except one (January 24) already had indef PCP. I added it to the missing one. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's been protected since 2011. Maybe it won't get as much vandalism as it did ten years ago. The protecting administrator last made an edit in July, and his/her last edit before that was in January, so I didn't ask him/her. 64.203.186.82 (talk) 15:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting administrator Courcelles (perhaps they will respond to a ping). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. One cannot respond to pings if not logged in, and Courcelles seems inactive. I have removed the protection. Request re-protection here if vandalism resumes. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recreate as a redirect to Enos (biblical figure), since it appears as another transcription of the name of the patriarch (especially via Arabic or Mandaic). Is currently salted due to repeated re-creation of a non-notable bio. Could remain protected if further vandalism is seen as likely, although it has been over ten years since it was salted. HarJIT (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done, created the redirect. The page remains protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistant removal of sourced birth age again and again by some IP Vandals. As you can see in cited refs on the page especially "Provincial Assembly of Sindh" one, you can see the mentioned birth age is 1933 but again and again many IP Vandals are changing it. Wallu2 (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit warring by a single unconfirmed user/IP address under different names (has been blocked in the past); refusing to cooperate with the general consensus, and their most recent username has resorted to a personal attack (naming theirself "TNstinkray") TNstingray (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello all moderators please remove protection from this page as i have to add sources and clean up the page Ar1a1yan (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The article's history of repeated additions of poorly sourced information makes unprotection inadvisable. Get consensus for your changes at Talk:List of Brahmin dynasties and states and be sure to include reliable sources. Favonian (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content

Brahmans occupy the highest ritual position among the four Varnas of Hinduism. Since the Late Vedic period the Brahmins, who were generally classified as priests, mentor, teacher who were also Rulers, Zamindars, Kings, Warriors and holders of other highest administrative posts.[1][2][3] Due to their martial abilities, Brahmans were described as 'the oldest martial community', in the past having two of the oldest regiments, the 1st Brahmans and 3rd Brahmans.[4] Brahmans are recruited in Army because of their magnificent physique; their breeding and pride of race is reflected in their cleanliness and smartness on parade. They are fine athletes, expert wrestlers, and excel in feats of strength; and they have a high reputation for courage.[5] Brahmin empires, dynasties, princely states and zamindari estates in Indian Subcontinent Map of Shung Empire Map of the Brahman Sahi Dynasty of Sindh Map of Karkota Empire under Kashmiri Brahmins

Following is the list of Brahmin empires, dynasties, princely states and zamidari estates ruled by Brahmins in the Indian subcontinent:

   The Shunga Empire of Magadha was established By Pushyamitra Shunga[6]
   The Kanva Dynasty replaced the Shunga Empire in Magadha and Ruled in the Eastern regions of India[7]
   The Satavahana Dynasty - 230bc to 250ad In present day part of Madhya Pradesh, Gujrat, Maharashtra, Telangana, Rajasthan, Northern Karnataka etc[8]
   Parivrajaka Dynasty Ruled parts of Central India during the 5th and 6th centuries. The kings of this Dynasty bore the title Maharaja, and probably Ruled as feudatories of the Gupta Empire. The royal Family came from a Lineage of Brahmins of Bharadwaj Gotra.[9]
   Kadamba Dynasty (345 – 525 CE) was a Dynasty that Ruled Northern Karnataka and the Konkan from Banavasi in present-day Uttara Kannada district[10]
   Pallava Dynasty {c.285 -905 CE} was a Dynasty of the Bharadwaja Gotra, prayers were conducted By Brahmins, Pallavas Ruled Andhra (Krishna-Guntur) and North and Central Tamil Nadu.[11]
   The Chalukyas of Badami were an indigenous Brahmin Family with Kannada as their mother tongue[12]
   The Oiniwar Dynasty, based in Mithila were Maithil Brahmins[13][14]
   Vakataka Dynasty was a Dynasty from the Indian subcontinent that is believed to have extended from the southern edges of Malwa and Gujarat in the North to the Tungabhadra River in the South as well as from the Arabian Sea in the West to the edges of Chhattisgarh in the East[15]
   Brahman Dynasty of Sindh was founded By Chach of Alor, later Ruled By Chandar of Sindh and Raja Dahir
   Bhurshut Dynasty was a medieval Hindu Dynasty spread across what is now Howrah and Hooghly districts in the Indian state of West Bengal;which was Ruled By a Royal Brahmin Family
   Baghochia Dynasty was founded By Raja Bir Sen and were the ruling Dynasty of Hathwa Raj. The Cadet branch of the Family also Ruled Tamkuhi Raj, Salemgarh Estate, Ledo Gadi, Kiajori estate and Kharna Ghatwali.
   Gupta Empire [16]
   Kabul Shahi Dynasty belonged to Bali clan of Mohyal Brahmin
   Aryacakravarti Dynasty which was Ruled By Tamil Brahmins
   Jaffna Kingdom of Sri Lanka;which was Ruled By Tamil Brahmins
   Peshwai, Peshwas were Brahmin and were the De facto rulers of Maratha Empire
   Patwardhan Dynasty was an Indian Dynasty established By the Chitpavan Brahmin Patwardhan Family
   Karkota Empire was founded by Durlabhvardhana, a Kashimiri Brahmin during the lifetime of Harshavardhan[17][18]
   Utpala Dynasty a Kashimiri Brahmin Dynasty after Karkota Empire [17][18]
   Lohara Dynasty a Kashimiri Brahmin Dynasty after Utpala Dynasty [17][18]
   Yasakara Dynasty of Kashmir Brahmin Dynasty
   Aundh State, Ruled By Deshasthas Brahmins
   Bhor State, a 9 gun Salute princely state Ruled By Deshasthas Brahmins
   Gaurihar State of Madhya Pradesh Ruled By Deshasthas Brahmins
   Jalaun State of Bundelkhand region Ruled By a Deshasthas Brahmins
   Jhansi State Ruled By Newelkar House of Karhades Brahmins
   Jamkhandi State Ruled By Chitpavans Brahmins
   Ramdurg State Ruled By Chitpavans Brahmins
   Miraj Junior and Miraj Senior states were Ruled By Chitpavans Brahmins
   Kurundvad Senior and Kurundvad Junior states were rulered By Patwardhan clan of Chitpavans Brahmins
   Sangli State, an 11 gun Salute princely state Ruled By Chitpavans Brahmins
   Panth-Piploda Province a province of British India Ruled By a Deshasthas Brahmins
   Chaube Jagirs were a group of five feudatory princely states of Central India during the period of the British Raj. which were Ruled By different branches of Brahmin Family.
   Benares State, a 13 gun salute (15 gun salute local) state Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Arni estate was a jagir in the erstwhile Madras Presidency which was Ruled By Deshasthas Brahmins
   Yelandur estate was a jagir in the erstwhile Mysore State which was Ruled By Madhwas Brahmins
   Baudh State was a princely state Ruled By a Brahmin Family who adopted as successor a nephew of the Raja of Keonjhar
   Darbhanga Raj of Mithila, Bihar - Ruled By Maithil Brahmins
   Singhwara Estate of Mithila, Bihar - Ruled By Maithil Brahmins
   Rajshahi Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Rajshahi Family - (Varendra Brahmins)
   Banaili Estate of Bihar - Ruled By Chaudhary Bahadhur Lineage - (Maithil Brahmins)
   Bhawal Estate of Bengal - Ruled By Choudhary Lineage - (Shrotriya Brahmin)
   Nadia Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Roy or Ray Lineage - (Kulin Brahmins)
   Dighapatia Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Roy Lineage - (Varendra Brahmins)
   Muktagacha Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Chowdhary Lineage - (Varendra Brahmins)[1]
   Susanga Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Sinha Lineage - (Varendra Brahmins)
   Vishalgad Estate of the British Raj - Ruled By Pant Prathinidhi Family - (Deshastha Brahmins)
   Ichalkaranji Estate of the British Raj - Ruled By Joshi Family - (Chitpavan Brahmins)
   Yelandur Estate of Mysore Kingdom - Ruled By Madhwa Brahmin Family.
   Panyam Zamindari of Madras Presidency - Ruled By Deshastha Brahmins
   Arni Estate of Madras Presidency - Ruled By Deshastha Brahmins
   Bettiah Raj Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Natore Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Roy Lineage - (Varendra Brahmin)[19]
   Tekari Raj of Bihar - Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Anapur Estate of Bihar - Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Dharhara Estate Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Jogini Estate Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Goshi Estate Ruled By Bhumihars Brahmins
   Sheohar Raj Ruled By Bhumihars Brahmins
   Madhubhan Raj Ruled By Maithili Brahmins
   Simlapal Raj Ruled By Utkal Brahmins
   Maksudhpur Raj Ruled By Bhumihar Brahmins
   Pahleha Raj of Gaya
   Pakhra Raj
   Poondoi Raj
   Ratwara Raj
   Nathdwarar Estate of Thikhana, Udaipur
   Ajodhya Raj (formerly Mahdauna) of Uttar Pradesh - Ruled By Sakaldipi Brahmin
   Ausanganj Estate of Oudh - Ruled By Gautham Lineage
   Mymensingh Raj of Bengal - Ruled By Chowdhury Lineage - (Varendra Brahmin)
   Tajpur Raj of Uttar Pradesh - Ruled By Chaudhary Lineage - (Tyagi Gaur Brahmins)
   Zamindari/Zagirdari(350 villages) of Asoda(Hapud) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins
   Zamindari of Ratangarh (Bijnore) Ruled By Taga Rao Zokha Singh Tyagi Atri - He was a former commander (or Rao) of the northern branch of the Maratha Confederate Army, whose control ranged to the Tarai baselands of the Himalayas, Family of Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins
   Zamindari of Siyohara(Bijnore) Ruled By Tyagi Gaur Brahmins (Raja Raghuraj Singh Tyagi)
   Zamindari of Sultanpur(Saharanpur) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Maharaj Singh)
   Zamindari of Gannaur(Haryana) Ruled By Tyagi Gaur Brahmins of Bhardwaj Clan
   Zamidari of Nestaur(Bijnore) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Shyam Narayan Singh)
   Zamidari of Gordhanpur(Saharanpur) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Dayal Singh Tyagi)
   Zamidari of wajhilpur Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry ramrichh Tyagi, bhim singh raes)
   Zamidari of vaira firozpur(bulandshahr) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Ram sharan Tyagi)
   Zamidari of kutubpurpur Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Nihal Singh Tyagi)
   Zamidari of Rasna (Gaziabad) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Nayadar Singh Tyagi)
   Zamidari of Chhatarpur Delhi Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins
   Zamidari of Seohara (Bijnor) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Raghuraj Singh Tyagi)
   Zamidari of Sahadra Delhi Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry Mehram Tyagi)
   Zamidari of Bada Gaon(Saharanpur) Uttar Pradesh Ruled By Chaudhry Lineage - Tyagi Gaur Brahmins(Chaudhry MoolrajSingh Tyagi)
   Polavaram Zamindari - Ruled By Koccharlakota Family - (Telugu Brahmins)
   Lakkavaram Zamindari - Ruled By Mantripregada Family - (Telugu Brahmins)

Ar1a1yan (talk) 12:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per my reply to a recent, related request. Favonian (talk) 15:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, IP vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Jeez Bot, you don't have to be so peevish, just because she forgot to subst the template. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Favonian (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopping to edit war with misleading edit summaries. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 16:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 16:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure what the reason behind this is but lots of different IPs changing his name as well as other vandalism. KylieTastic (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Leonidlednev (talk) 19:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page will be blocked- Talk pages of blocked users that are abusing it will never be full protected. MoonlightVectorTalk page 19:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User talk page access has been disabled by LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article redirect to Indian Reunification which is completely opposite Ideology of what article is about. This title need page of its own. Dee606ak (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given the history of the topic, which is amply set out at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 June 9#Hadith of Ghazwa-e-Hind and includes an AfD, multiple recreations and sockpuppetry, any attempts at recreation should go through the WP:AFC process so that the new draft and sources can be evaluated. Alternatively, request deletion of the redirect at WP:RFC. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected This has been open for a week and Dee606ak has not responded (indeed they have made no other edits). Closing. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – COVID... This was split out from COVID-19 misinformation (which is also indef ECPed), and caution, as well as avoidance of misinformation, suggests the same approach here. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any disruption so far, and we do not protect articles preventatively.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I could go either way, as the disruption the split page is likely to eventually see (based on the disruption at the parent article) is probably imminent'ish. But, it has been weeks since its inception and, indeed, so far the waters appear calm. So... El_C 13:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like the consensus here, and I agree. MelanieN (talk) 19:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is perpetually vandalised. Most often involves removing the Kosovo Albanian ethnicity, and sometimes also removing Kosovar language. Requesting permanent or long-term protection. Ideally, permanent because the topic of KOSOVO will always remain contentious for the foreseeable future. DA1 (talk) 06:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is one IP, and they have never been warned.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Indeed, warn the user appropriately. If it's just that single IP, protection wouldn't really be an appropriate remedy. El_C 13:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ymblanter; El_C: I'm not really one to warn people typically, but had I not reverted him twice in just a few days it likely would have not been reverted for a long time since their first edit. He/she maybe one person but the topic is politically contentious and therefore subject to vandalism. I don't want to be manually moderating the page for changes myself, and I'm not sure anyone else is doing it yet. As a narrow disambiguation page, I don't see the need for IP edits which is why I thought a semi-protection would have been safer. DA1 (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DA1, we have to weigh the Protection and Blocking policies when evaluating requests of this nature. As admins, we are not entirely free agents to do as we will. El_C 17:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – lets get all these new editors to the talk or blocks. Moxy- 20:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

29 September 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP Vandalism. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk Circassia 16:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see two problem edits today, and before that nothing for a long time. If the problem editing continues, ask again.  MelanieN (talk) 19:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Victim has recently been supposedly identifed- users are repeatedly making edits using a source which has already been deemed not to be a primary source (social media) Sideriver84 (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The people adding this information are autoconfirmed, so semi-protection would be ineffective, and EC protection would be overkill. Keep on discussing it on the talk page, and hope that more definitive sources will come out soon.  MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three different IPs vandalising in less than an hour. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV resumed after last protection expired - changing Taiwan to China, Taiwanese to Chinese, etc. Multiple accounts. MB 18:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption from Norway IPs including Special:Contributions/2A02:2121:289:16FB:0:16:6CBE:A201, Special:Contributions/81.167.113.53 and Special:Contributions/139.164.154.161. The article The Oak Ridge Boys also needs the same protection. Binksternet (talk) 18:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks (both), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP hopping editor. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 18:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced BLP content since September 5, 2021. Cassiopeia talk 20:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As a football referee, this person's page gets vandalized every time one team or the other feels slighted by one of his calls. It has required temporary protection enough times that indefinite protection is probably warranted at this point. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 23:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't write that fast, bot! Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Does not meet the threshold for indef semi at this time. El_C 00:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppet vandalism. Spike 'em (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by IPs who make unsourced changes regarding his religion. Lux ex Tenebris (talk) 02:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lux ex Tenebris, yours is the only edit this month. Before that, there's the edits by the IP from Aug 2. Before that, we're in Dec 2020. Ordinarily, I'd say that this page just isn't active enough to even merit pc at this time, but due to the WP:BLP nature of the violation, I'll bend. El_C 02:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the period of the past decade and more, many users (mostly IPs) have kept adding/restoring the same WP:OR, non-encyclopedically written synopsis (possibly an attempt at humor) that's longer than the lyrics of the song itself. (It might also be a copyvio given the ES of the first diff that added it but am not sure). See these other diffs: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (a revert of a change to another subpar synopsis, but still) 10 11, presumably a 12th by this IP that has been revdelled, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (just today). Although infrequent, I think the total number of times this has happened warrants semiprot. eviolite (talk) 02:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Wow, that is commitment. But probably not active enough to merit semi at this time. El_C 02:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP range persistently adding unsourced content. DonIago (talk) 02:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated large additions of unsourced content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 01:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Copyright Vandalism by IP. Some might be good MoonlightVectorTalk page 17:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Revdel'd the copyvio. El_C 01:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. soibangla (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There was a long string of obvious vandalism, but all of it was done by IP accounts[125][126][127][128][129]. Registered editors were making productive edits, not engaging in edit-warring -- full page protection should be lifted so they can continue to do so. Stonkaments (talk) 21:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting administrator El C. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, well, as I explained on the talk page, I'm inclined to give another day or two for the unconfirmed accounts to make their case. But if another admin feels the full protection should be immediately converted to semiprotection, I have no objection. I honestly don't know enough about contested subject matter, so I chose to err on the side of caution. Any admin who knows more than me about this (a low bar), is welcome to act as they see fit. I need not be consulted or even notified. El_C 01:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: The protection duration is only 5 days, which is perfectly reasonable for a content dispute. I typically protect for at least 1 week in those cases. I'd let it run its course and then change it to indef semi. The good-faith IP editors can always request edits on the talk page. Even while fully protected, any editor can still request edits. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Being the current chairwoman for the NTSB, indeed, makes her an obvious candidate for a lengthy WP:AP2 protection, in the years if not indef. El_C 18:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I admit to some amount of confusion why full protection was the correct level. I don't work protection regularly so I'm not going to just accept El C's invite to just lower the protection level but thought it worth noting in hopes of getting an explanation. No issues per above with the length of protection. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
RE: Barkeep49's query: dispute over new content added on Sept 25 involving NTSB chair and Tesla. As I mentioned 2 days ago, the full protection will be converted to semi by tomorrow if opponents have yet to participate on the talk page by then. Proponents have participated on the talk page, though in fairness, that participation has consisted almost exclusively of just objecting to the protection. El_C 00:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. It's now tomorrow, so the protection has been downgraded. El_C 04:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeatedly Disruptive Editing and Edit Warring on WP:HAT on one edit Kent2121 (talk) 04:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Kent2121 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Usual after-a-major-sporting-event vandalism. Benjamin112 04:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Only neutral established editors should be allowed to create this title. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Same damn conspiracymongering and vandalism immediately after coming off protection. Because this happens regularly whenever it becomes unprotected and because of the article's history with autoconfirmed users including conspiracy material, I'm requesting indefinite XCP. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 12:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The prevailing winds are against indefinite, unfortunately. Favonian (talk) 12:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. Hopefully in three years this will quietly die down, but I'm not holding my breath for it, especially if the family's abetment-of-suicide case against Chakraborty drags on. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 12:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrator,

Could you please replace the name of the "Internation Health Partnership" page to "UHC2030"

The partnership has changed its name in 2016 as outlined on the UHC 2030's history page and on the UN sustainable development goals' website

Feel free to coordinate if you have any question.

Best regards,

Moncef Salah Bey Digital Consultant @UHC2030 MoncefSBZ (talk) 09:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a request to move the page to the title "UHC2030", which I have done. Strictly this is the wrong place for a move request but we are not a bureaucracy. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Malcolmxl5. Favonian (talk) 11:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent repetitive vandalism by IPs belonging to blocked user Harry the house. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: oh, this one, too? Okay. El_C 13:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent repetitive vandalism by IPs belonging to blocked user Harry the house. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: No Great Shaker, why are you insisting on a redirect over a piped link, I don't understand. El_C 13:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, El_C. I'm not insisting that the redirect should apply permanently and I'll be quite happy for a bona fide editor to make the change. Vandalism rollback reverts all edits done by this vandal on the grounds of persistent block evasion. If any of his edits should happen to be useful and correct, they can be handled individually. In fact, I'll attend to this one now. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No Great Shaker, I realize that this is socking/block evasion, but the reverts by you and others is flooding the revision history, which erodes the page's stability. And, you're doing so by restoring an inferior version (though, granted, in a minor way). That doesn't connect for me. El_C 13:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Do we stand aside and let this vandal do what he likes? Surely this is why these pages should be protected. You can see how frequently these attacks are occurring. Anyway, I've made some changes to the Greens page which improve the paragraph in question. I'll do the same with the Tory page. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I say I "realize" that those IPs are block evading, but actually what I meant was that I realize you contend that this is so. Are you able to demonstrate that these IPs are that master you've invoked (basically trying, and I'm sorry to say, succeeding, in getting a rise out of making cosmetic corrections)? El_C 13:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See the link to the Harry the house SPI in the protection request above. The changes being made each time are exactly the same. Some of the articles he attacks have already been protected. Reverting vandalism is no problem to me as I use rollback and I see it as good practice so, no, he does not "get a rise" out of me. I am just doing what I can, as a matter of course, to protect the encyclopaedia from an LTA case. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Great Shaker, I don't feel you're being entirely responsive here. By flooding the revision history with reverts that override cosmetic corrections (which isn't actually "vandalism," per se.) you might actually be giving this master exactly what they want. Anyway, I'm a volunteer just like you, so just providing me with a couple of diffs rather than sending me to the SPI, would be helpful; seeing as you're already familiar with the user in question while I am not, you'd be saving me time. El_C 13:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, close all four requests and I will remove the articles from my watchlist. I have better things to do than this. The articles are being persistently attacked by a known LTA case and need to be protected in the same way as your colleague RoySmith did for four other targets here. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No Great Shaker, I'm going to protect all the requests regardless, just trying to get some background and getting across some best practices for future reference. Sorry it didn't connect. El_C 14:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent repetitive vandalism by IPs belonging to blocked user Harry the house. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: No Great Shaker, same question as above, except this time you're insisting on having two redirects over piped links. Colour me confused. You can respond in either request —once, no need to duplicate— this is just for the record. El_C 13:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing returned almost immediately after semi-protection expired. InfiniteNexus (talk) 13:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent repetitive vandalism by IPs belonging to blocked user Harry the house. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: pending, as above, and above above. El_C 13:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP and unconfirmed user adding unsourced content and vandalism. Aeengath (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Insistent edits to a stub article. (See page edit history for full details) PowerStruggle05 (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done but Warned. PowerStruggle05, thanks for catching this and welcome to Wikipedia. I made a dummy edit in lieu of protection that warned proponents not to restore the BLP vio. I'm likely to deal with any further violations here via blocks rather than protection. Thanks and welcome again. El_C 11:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A very ugly loss on Sunday has led to some IP vandalism of one of the head guys in charge. ZappaOMatic (alt) 14:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Frequent repetitive vandalism by sockpuppet accounts belongs to the blocked user Helios007 since June 2021. Requesting Extended confirmed protection as user socks were all WP:SPA concentrating on one article and were all autoconfirmed. Echo1Charlie (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 17:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pov-push is recurring (see log history). There are also sanctions put on Kurdish-related subjects so hopefully the protection will be indefinite now. Semsûrî (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 17:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal has been attacking this for a couple of days. Ifnord (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content resumed shortly after expiry of recent protection... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Should be fully protected like the talk page is as its also not meant to be edited and should have the same protection level as the talk page. Lunacats (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Is this ‎Example Article Name wealthy (blue link) cousin? Lunacats, I'm asking you (for some reason)! El_C 18:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry and edit warring. The sockpuppeteer said they'd continue doing this for a while. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ifnord (talk) 21:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting decrease from extended-confirmed protection to its previous level of semi-protection. The protection level was raised due to an edit war over the intensity of Hurricane Sam, which appears to have been resolved in light of new information. See Talk:2021 Atlantic hurricane season#Sam peak intensity. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting administrator El C. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that was confusing. Done. El_C 22:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2021

Reason: This is a bit unfortunate. Apparently the USFWS has just published a national update on their species list, naming a bunch of species they have decided to regard as definitely extinct. This includes the IBW. However, we universally follow the IUCN when giving overviews of conservation (or extinction) status, and that is still at "critically endangered/possibly extinct". Now vast numbers of well-meaning newbies are flocking to the article and are "updating" it by their lights. Discussion is ongoing on the talk page, but that doesn't prevent a simultaneous merry churn of misinformation in the article.

I'd suggest semi-protection for a day or two to allow the press releases to drop off people's news feeds. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN (talk) 22:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aircorn (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also Kevin Blom. Another referee. Aircorn (talk) 23:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both protected for two days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I want to create the article after noticing there is no article of such, I've gone through the deletion log and discussions and I'm sure to address the problems the previous pages had. --Idoghor Melody (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Idoghor Melody, in light of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dremo (2nd nomination), maybe it'd be better to get a WP:DRAFT approved then relist here...? @EdJohnston: the protecting admin. El_C 02:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would favor someone creating Draft:Dremo and try to make progress from there. In the past, the article was the subject of intense promotional editing. See the text of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dremo (2nd nomination) for the past adventures. Draft:Dremo was abandoned as recently as April, 2021. The last AFC was declined in February, 2021 by User:Celestina007. I would guess that an administrator would restore the last failing version of Draft:Dremo to see if you can improve it to an acceptable level. EdJohnston (talk) 03:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@EdJohnston: There would be no need to restore old draft. I will try and do it on my own terms and own words. It's past 5am over here, I believe by this evening I will start the draft. After drafting, should I submit to AFC for review or report to an admin or report here first?@El C:.--Idoghor Melody (talk) 04:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Idoghor Melody, for my part, I'm happy to have a look. So feel free to drop me a line when you're ready. El_C 05:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Alright I'll drop it here or your talk page when I'm done probably by this evening or tomorrow. --Idoghor Melody (talk)`
@EdJohnston, @El_C, the article in question has been subject to heavy promotionalism if the article is to be created I believe it should pass through the AFC process. Celestina007 (talk) 15:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Celestina007, I am AfC (probably). But if you want to take the lead in reviewing this draft, that's fine with me (less work for me). El_C 16:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El_C, lmao. No, I think you are best suited to handle this. What I was trying to say was Idoghor Melody, shouldn’t create the article directly to mainspace but via AFC, I think you are in a better position to handle this one, giving the history of this article and how it has been targeted by possible UPE editors I believe i might be too subconsciously biased to correctly evaluate it, so yup please do handle this one 😊. Celestina007 (talk) 16:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Copy that, soldier! El_C 16:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Celestina007: How can I create directly to main space when the page is protected?? It seems you didn't follow the discussions from the top🤔. @El C: asked me to create a draft then he'll go through it, and that's what I'm doing--Idoghor Melody (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No biggie, Idoghor Melody, cross-currents happen. Carry on, other soldier! El_C 18:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: I left a message on your talk page... The draft Dremo is now ready.--Idoghor Melody (talk) 23:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Donennn. El_C 23:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator El C. — xaosflux Talk 23:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalizm Eray08yigit (talk) 18:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Eray08yigit, I'm not sure what I'm looking at. El_C 01:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Relist if you can explain better, Eray08yigit. El_C 00:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Ip vandalism from different ip addresses, requesting appropriate protection, diffs - [130], [131], [132], [133] Echo1Charlie (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Due to editors edit warring over witnesses names, there is an ongoing discussion on the talk, but still warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected upgrade. El_C 00:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism two days in a row. Please add page protection (autoconfirmed or confirmed) for 2-4 weeks. — WILDSTARtalk 02:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (@WildStar: I prefer to stick to the lowest possible protection for the minimum amount of time - please do ping me if this continues past the initial protection though!) ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous users messing with the episode list, screwing up format, adding unsourced info. Paris1127 (talk) 03:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurring disruptive IP edits regarding the release dates of songs. Ippantekina (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:25, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Quite a bit of disruptive editing by IP's following the season finale, it'll probably quiet down in the next few days but some protection might be good until then. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holy cow... multiple disruptive users and IPs, protection of some kind definitely needed... Magitroopa (talk) 03:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I second this for temporary semi-protection. RFZYNSPY talk 04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. eviolite (talk) 04:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large volume of IP vandalism from unique IPs. A temporary semiprotection would likely reduce/stop this wave of vandalism. RFZYNSPY talk 04:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent edits by newly registered WP:SPA, and edits before that by IPs, have been a problem. I suspect sockpuppetry in the case of the account, but the suspected master is too old for CheckUser, and there isn't enough evidence for SPI yet. As in the past, there is campaigning against this BLP on social media. Crossroads -talk- 05:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent news of his injury (relating to drunken behavior the weekend before) has lead to multiple instances of vandalism in the last hour. Temporary protection is requested to maintain the article's integrity. BuckBadger (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Joke edits and unsourced additions by a variety of newly registered accounts. Isabelle 🔔 00:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Yeu aga maj. Ravensfire (talk) 23:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Yeu aga maj. Ravensfire (talk) 23:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Yeu aga maj. Ravensfire (talk) 23:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Yeu aga maj. Ravensfire (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism 2601:642:4301:E530:5D14:E6F5:4548:5A9A (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive/unsourced date/year changes- also at Rugrats (film series), Rugrats, and Rugrats (franchise). Magitroopa (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 04:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent linkspamming by Special:Contributions/67.60.232.82, even after receiving several final warnings, which they blanked. BilCat (talk) 00:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and vandalism from many different IPs returned not long after the initial 3 days of semi-protection; this is also a very high traffic page. I would strongly suggest semi-protection over pending changes as almost every single IP edit is vandalism or disruptive editing. Jeuno (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I look back at this, I think it should be semi-protected until the show's popularity starts to cool down, which is probably going to be at least 3 months, although it could also be kept at indefinite pending changes. Your choice. I would highly suggest looking at the edit history first though. Jeuno (talk) 04:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like someone else has already protected the page for a month. Jeuno (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BALKANS; persistent unsourced alterations to the number of speakers. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 04:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Most of the unsourced alterations seem to be coming from a specific group of IPs, maybe try to warn each IP on their page first. They may not be aware that they need to source information from reliable sources. Also, there haven't really been many edits on the page; there seems to be a bunch of edits within a day or two, then no edits for about 1-2 weeks, then a bunch of edits again. Therefore I wouldn't say that semi-protection is required yet. Jeuno (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Frequent vandalism over the past several days by IPs Pinchme123 (talk) 07:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Eevee01(talk) 08:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eevee01 An admin has already blocked both of them for 31 hours; hopefully the vandalism has now stopped. Jeuno (talk) 11:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 12:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Article almost conpleted. Requesting protection to prevent future disruptive edits. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 10:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Articles are actually never "completed". Lectonar (talk) 12:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: This page has barely any edits from IPs, have of which have been reverted. The small amount of useful contrbitutions from IPs will still be able to go through with Pending Changes, and since there is such a small amount of edits from IPs, little interference will be caused. There is no need for this protection to be temporary. Starship SN20 (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I’m not seeing a need here. Perhaps a review of the protection policy would be helpful. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user has been continuously reverting my edits as part of my pending review process. The material added not only cites to WP:USERGENERATED content website (which fails WP:RS), but also giving WP:UNDUE weight. I make this request to increase the protection level of the page to avoid further disruptive editing. —Wiki Linuz💬 ) 11:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Site has been recently updated and another user keeps removing the content. Bronxslicer (talk) 12:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 13:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user continuously adding incorrect information. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed has resumed editing this back to how he wants it to be. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nate Speed came back once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user continuously adding incorrect information. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Last IP-edit was yesterday. Lectonar (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar Not content dispute btw, was referring to 210.186.80.213 and 210.187.10.80. Both of them (which is likely the same person) keep adding incorrect information by implying that single is part of Savage which isn't true because the track listing for the EP is already released of which Next Level, including Forever and Black Mamba above are not part of the EP. Same for Aespa article. But it's okay to declined, since the latest IP has been temporarily blocked for 31 hours. Just wanted to give more detailed explanation. Thanks you and have a nice weekend. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry..I meant Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. 1 or 2 IP edits every other day aren't enough disruption for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar Ah okay. No problem on that. Thanks you Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:55, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP VANDALISM. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk Circassia 15:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I realize this page has been protected since 2015 but the article has recently been recreated in draft form. I have examined the draft, made further edits, and now consider the article to be ready for article space. The copy violations previously noted are no longer an issue. Ipigott (talk) 06:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The submission was declined two days ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5: I had not yet edited the article two days ago. I am an experienced editor and have looked carefully at the article. It looks to me as if it is now a perfectly acceptable candidate for article space. Is there any further procedure for dealing with this case? As you may know, there is increasing interest in covering more people from Africa. I believe this should be taken into consideration.--Ipigott (talk) 15:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ipigott: click "resubmit" on the Draft. — xaosflux Talk 15:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined declining as this is still going through the draft submission process, once the draft is accepted by an uninvolved editor, no objection (please resubmit if necessary at that time). — xaosflux Talk 15:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Xaosflux: I am an uninvolved editor. I was simply mentoring a new contributor. Please explain how I can accept it. (cc Rosiestep).--Ipigott (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Other than the edits that you added I don't see that anything on that draft has changed since User:Theroadislong recently declined it. It seems that there may be a dispute between the two of you now if this meets the acceptability criteria? Theroadislong, any comments? — xaosflux Talk 16:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Religious POV push by IPs — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Parade of IPs using tweets wishing the subject a happy birthday as sourcing for birth date in article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content right after the protection expired. Nehme1499 13:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 16:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Up protection. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: That would be primarily feeding the troll with additional attention and a date for continuing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Up protection. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The semi-protection is fine; we could use a filter to deal with this specific behavior, making 10 edits in short succession after having reached the autoconfirmation date. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resuming right after previous protection expired. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The actual solution is to report these cases to WP:AIV and to wait for an administrator to revert, block and revision-delete, instead of feeding the troll with a revert war. Ping Crboyer and Kaseng55. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption by IP socks of blocked editor Ficzere21. eviolite (talk) 17:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple vandalism attempts since 23 September ... about two dozen. Multiple times per day. Kzirkel (talk) 17:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The station's largest rebrand in more than 40 years brought the IPs out of the woodwork (and sent the page views soaring), and it's been a pain to keep this article in shape. We have had section headers added that I've specifically removed, crud added to the infobox that shouldn't be there (a noted project-area problem), and so on. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of IP vandalism, making up almost all edits that aren't reverts. YttriumShrew (talk) 19:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Issues with people complaining and reverting content due to "spoilers" (the film is out in the UK) despite our SPOILER policy. Preferred protection til the release next week at least. QueerFilmNerdtalk 19:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 different IPs have vandalized in the last hour, big spike in page views over past 2 days. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 20:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been some genre warring, spurred by several IPs. One IP has also used an uncivil edit summary in retaliation to an established editor's reverts. Last I checked, the edit war is ongoing. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 20:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same reason as for Draconian Times, but the genre warring is more severe and long-term there; the warring includes some of the same editors, and further incivility from IPs. It could used with a longer-term semi-protection than that of Draconian Times, in my opinion. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]