Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/01

2021

01 January 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing contents every now and then without citing any reason. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 13:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.149.78.27 (talk · contribs) blocked by Hammersoft. Samsara 18:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. AtomsRavelAz talk 19:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 20:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of IP and new users(ie. less than 10 edits) disruptive editing. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing contents every now and then without citing any reason. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 13:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.149.78.27 (talk · contribs) blocked by Hammersoft. Samsara 18:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. AtomsRavelAz talk 19:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 20:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of IP and new users(ie. less than 10 edits) disruptive editing. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 22:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See comment one section down. Samsara 01:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 22:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: How many articles, total, are we talking about with this sock, at current count? Reason I'm asking is, if we think semi isn't enough to contain MJH, then to my way of thinking, all of them need to go under ECP, and with that, we need to make sure we're properly weighing the pros and cons of doing that. Alternatively, semi on all and do the whack-a-mole whenever autoconfirmed socks look over the wall. Samsara 01:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tbhotch - I agree with Samsara in that we're probably just playing wack-a-mole here. If we protect these pages, this user is probably just going to move to other ones. I don't think it's worth the effort. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara and Oshwah: Sorry for the late answer. Hundreds, because practically any album/song by a singer/band that performs Contemporary R&B, or whose music is inspired by it, is a target. Including, but not limited to Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Mariah Carey, Ariana Grande, the Black Eyed Peas, JLS, Tulisa, Jentina, Christina Aguilera, and Rihanna. My watchlist includes some of these targets, but not all of them. Even if they are semied, Maria finds the way to dodge that like here and here (in October/November). I think that ECP will be more harmful to everybody. (CC) Tbhotch 00:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tbhotch - No worries! Yeah, that's what I'm concerned about - that we're just playing "whack-a-mole" here and where, in the big picture, protecting this (and other) articles from this user won't do a thing. They'll just keep moving on to others, then move on to others again when those are protected, and so on... If anything, it's better to let the user stay in the same place so that we can identify them and block them quickly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
no problem. Happy new year. (CC) Tbhotch 03:07, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per the above ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, recurrence of vandalism since the end of last protection. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 18:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Some IP users change her real name without providing reliable BLP source(s). Wario-Man (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please raise the protection level: the past few sock accounts have been autoconfirmed. Cheers,. gnu57 16:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cabayi. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurring disruptive editing by various IPs, has had protection before. ....GELongstreet (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Robinson tweeted some controversial remarks re:Mitch McConnell and has since been targeted. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 16:55, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of an unsourced section from a joke made by a BreadTube streamer. SWinxy (talk) 08:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Alexjespencer (talk · contribs) blocked by CambridgeBayWeather. for 24 hours from Supercapitalism. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent socking by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bezeq1 / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr42 / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fred newman. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One month given the level of disruption here. @ProcrastinatingReader: pinging ProcrastinatingReader. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Hi Wikipedia Admins, after a link was posted to the Verified Handles page for myself and then shared by someone to a discord chat. My email inbox has exploded with notifications of people vandalising the page. I've tried slow the sharing of the link but from what I've learnt about page protection it would stop the haul of IP's visiting the page. Thanks a lot, James realjamesh (talk) 15:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: IP adding unsourced info. ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 19:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming 4thfile4thrank (talk) 03:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A set of IP addresses, possibly socks of banned user User:Ljlas20 have been reverting back their old version of this article since the semi-protection expired last November. -WayKurat (talk) 03:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to be a single editor who has now had a final warning. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing (probably a sock which has been reported for long-term abuse). Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 02:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Page is subjected to disruptive editing that includes addition of misinformation and un encyclopedic materials. 2402:3A80:1133:471:1EC7:B7C4:769A:3B3B (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page protection has expired 2402:3A80:1133:471:1EC7:B7C4:769A:3B3B (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:PREEMPT, pages cannot be protected preemptively. 36.76.232.198 (talk) 08:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Continuous vandalism by IP, removal/change of content without reason or discussion. IP was warned. Oliszydlowski (talk) 05:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., the other IP is not disruptive--Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP/low-edit account disruption (see this boasting). Nate (chatter) 07:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 08:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 08:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 08:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Prolix: Who is IP sockpuppet of this page? It is more like vandalism for me so it (IP) needs to be blocked. 36.76.232.198 (talk) 11:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's an ever changing IP. Blocking one won't help as they change quickly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users and registered users vandalized this page. Slagle1987 (talk) 22:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:07, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 02:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EN-Jungwon 05:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition unsourced content and disruptive editing. TheDeviantPro (talk) 06:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming 4thfile4thrank (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably 1 week SP should be fine. Maybe a month. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:35, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated whitewashing by IPs and accounts, removal of sourced content. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 10:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive, unsourced edits. One of them seem to have clear political affiliation and some other person using different IP address each time. DogeChungus (talk) 08:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Appears to be a series of related IPs who are evading a block, per recent edit history. MPFitz1968 (talk) 09:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Personal casteist attacks by IP socks of User:Punjabier. [6] by 2402:3A80:1004:C244:4E15:ABEE:65CA:E812, calling me a "kutta Tarkhan mistri". Kutta means dog in Indian languages and Tarkhan is a caste and 'mistri' means craftsman or worker and here by 2402:3A80:101F:3C75:D7AD:AF76:1FE7:5A07, making threats of finding my address and personal attacks/cusses again. Obvious attack by the sock here at my talk page. One can see how the socks are in a mission to establish that the Tarkhans are a lower caste [7], [8], and many edits like that. Kind of a revenge since Saini's are considered mali in the article with proper sources, which the user has problems with. They are very persistent in reverting/refuting it as can be seen in the article history with repeated requests in the talk page [9].

Adding source here source used is WP:CIRCULAR since in August 2019 (when the Times of India article was published), the Wikipedia article dated 21 August 2019 mentioned that the subject "Satinder Pal Singh Saini in a Punjabi Saini family" and it was unsourced.

Also added another [10] which is Wiki-like this WP:UGC here. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement--Ymblanter (talk) 09:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Following the closure of the MfD discussion for this page, IP vandalism has begun to occur on this page in a similar fashion to the actual MfD. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 17:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of repeated edit requests, it is becoming disruptive. RudolfRed (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – per WP:PROT, article Talk pages are semiprotected only in the most severe cases of vandalism. This is to be expected in a recent(ly announced) death and should settle down soon. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism; one Michigan user with multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Diannaa. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see vandalism there. Some IP edits seem ok, there is one IP (*2) which was twice reverted, but the first edit looks more like a technical mistake, and the second one is certainly not vandalism. I would decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I hesitate to disagree with Ymblanter, especially since there is a lot of constructive editing from IPs. But over the past 24 hours there has been repeated vandalism, obviously from the same person with shifting IPs; call them the "this is my last edit, I swear it!" vandal. Hopefully they will lose interest after a short term of semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 17:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I blocked and then reverted myself as the situation actually looks stale at this point. Watchlisted. Samsara 18:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 18:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: The disruptive user may come back, and two users were being disruptive on that page. I’m sorry, but I don’t quite understand. Happy new year! ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 19:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm with Samsara on this. The disruption is growing stale at this point being 12 hours old, and there are two accounts that committed 4 acts of vandalism. One account is at their final level-4 warning, which has not been violated. The other account made a single edit. We do not preemptively protect against the possibility they might come back. If they do come back to disrupt, a block is in order for Crestwhitestripssssss, and an additional warning for Daniel tangerino. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hammersoft: Thanks for the explanation. Happy new year! ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 21:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Offensive name – With its previous target deleted as advertising, the only remaining potential redirect target is an offensive nickname for Barack Obama. It's been deleted as an Obama redirect twice before. O.N.R. (talk) 23:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Chetsford (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky--4 times in a month. (CC) Tbhotch 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See comment a few sections down. Samsara 01:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, the current disruption level is certainly insufficient for extended confirmed, and the article is already semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant vandalism, me and User:The wub have been constantly reverting. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 22:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

02 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism from more than one IP address. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced songwriting credits; every other month a new account comes along, ignores the notes and adds unsourced credits Lirim | Talk 13:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Unacceptable move-warring. Transparency: the revert of the undiscussed move was at my request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of false information, plus these recent edits by an IP who is evading a block. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One IP editor in particular keeps adding an image in the infobox we don't have rights to use and removing the hidden comment that says "don't do this"; no idea why.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 10:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Prolix 💬 19:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Page is undergoing high levels of IP vandalism, probably exacerbated by the Old Firm match this weekend. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7f:b014:bd00:adba:4f1d:2cdb:d68c (talk · contribs) blocked by Bongwarrior. Samsara 17:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extend semi-protection: I want to anticipate any vandalism from IPs when the article is unprotected. 36.76.232.198 (talk) 13:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Watchlisted. Samsara 17:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Samsara 17:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP range, even after previous protection ended at the start of last month. Looking like protection will be needed yet again, IP range block (if possible...)- 2021 ceremony is still unknown/unsourced at this point, with no news regarding it actually happening as of yet. Magitroopa (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've given you two months, which based on the timing of past events, should expire well before the next one. I'll leave this up for consideration by an IP range block expert. Samsara 17:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Samsara. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Persistent edit-warring by an IP user involving the addition of unreliable sources and evident WP:POV material. Love of Corey (talk) 01:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined If you remove the edits of 107.190.28.8, there's very little activity on the article. You are in a dispute with the IP's edits, and escalating warnings to that IP are likely in order if the activity continues. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ashleyyoursmile! 15:26, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pochettino's appointment as manager of PSG is now sourced. I don’t see other problematic areas. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new account changing information that is contrary to sources, warning and reverting them, but semi protection would greatly help. Ravensfire (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced, teenage WP:GOSSIP-type material, about whom the subject may be dating. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 15 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Persistent addition of unsourced/air bubble flights. Prolix 💬 18:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by a IP from Greece. Weird bot-like edits with no with attempt to communicate. Xiamatt (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the unsourced section. Someone else should protect if there is a need. Samsara 04:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As activity resumed, and in the interest of shortening the back log, I've now done it myself. Samsara 18:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of speculative, unconfirmed information regarding player transfer. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giving this three days - usually crystal ball/rumour issues involving trades resolve within that time. Samsara 17:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Persistent addition of unsourced/air bubble flights. Prolix 💬 18:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by a IP from Greece. Weird bot-like edits with no with attempt to communicate. Xiamatt (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the unsourced section. Someone else should protect if there is a need. Samsara 04:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As activity resumed, and in the interest of shortening the back log, I've now done it myself. Samsara 18:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of speculative, unconfirmed information regarding player transfer. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giving this three days - usually crystal ball/rumour issues involving trades resolve within that time. Samsara 17:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increase in IP vandalism and BLP issues. Page was protected twice last month, but for only short spells. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was also protected in October under a different name, FYI. Samsara 17:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced information by IP. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 10:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous IP's making slanderous comments. Devokewater (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of Somaliland in the article, and disruptive editing from several IPs with edit summaries. MarioJump83! 08:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been numerous times was semi-protected, but they keep coming back. I suggest an indef semiprotection would be best solution. MarioJump83! 08:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sockpuppetry and BLP violations. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Another request is below. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably education-related. Samsara 17:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Rafaelchan118 (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: A sockpuppet has been editing (read: vandalizing) the article heavily, and they have made threats that they will come back to this page and continue to disrupt, like they have done in the past. They have been editing the page IP addresses for a couple days after their main account got blocked indef on December 31, so I think temporary semi protection will be good for now as it will halt IP abuse. D🎉ggy54321 (happy new year!) 16:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See also request above. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. User:Namiba 19:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 17:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two new editors recently hijacked the article to promote Bjorn Martin, a musician. See edit by Justin Smokey and MasterKP19. S0091 (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. After being thwarted in hijacking this article, the editor (I suspect it is actually just one editor) has created a draft article instead. Hopefully this means they'll stop trying to replace the text in this one, so am declining protection for now. But if the "Bjorn war" resumes there (or anywhere) let me know. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 17:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some vandalism removed. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the biography. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hariharanbalu (talkcontribs) 20:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is a content issue so please discuss it on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 08:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:49, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 11:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: current high frequency of mostly unref/unexplained IP edits, sometimes reverting each other (e.g. [11] [12]. Dl2000 (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant block evasion/sock puppetry by COI editor. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aravi0811 for details. - Bilby (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism of Featured List. SatDis (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. New sockpuppet turned up shortly after the previous semi-protection expired. FDW777 (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. New sockpuppet turned up shortly after the previous semi-protection expired. FDW777 (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of general vandalism (I believe non-autoconfirmed users). Dode222 (talk) 04:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. "Hallo, niece and nephew. It's Unnco Roger!" In all seriousness, I'd say the level of disruption does not come close to where I'd consider semiprotection necessary. I don't see any recent disruption; @Dode222: please ping me if I'm missing something. Semiprotection usually isn't applied unless the level of vandalism is ~daily, I'd say, though there's definitely admin discretion involved for each article. On this one, I don't even think we need pending changes protection. It's funny--I'd usually be quite concerned for the article for a YouTuber of his popularity, but I guess Uncle Roger's niece and nephew very good! Airplaneman (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from JackSucksAtLife's fans. 86.115.103.252 (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - not sure what happened here but a bot removed the protection, and as soon as it did that IP vandalism resumed. Abcmaxx (talk) 02:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined MusikBot II didn't remove protection from the article. It removed a template indicating it was protected when it wasn't protected. The prior protection expired 17:28, 27 December 2020 UTC. The only vandalism was by a single IPv6. Recommend warning them, and monitoring for continued disruption. If it becomes severe again, submit a request here again. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 03:26, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – additions of non-notable alumni by multiple IPs and new users. — Chevvin 06:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)se[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Must be something in the news, IP and newly created account vandalisms all day. Ifnord (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been under constant disruption for god knows how long. Some kind of long/permanent protection would really be helpful. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only looked at this for five seconds, but could not help but wonder if there's an excessive emphasis in the contested sentence. "was one of the most powerful rulers in Iranian history" would seem to me to be fine. Having "Iranian" twice in that sentence does not seem necessary, especially given that the lede goes into detail about Nader Shah's origins just two sentences later. Does the word "Iranian" absolutely need to appear in that sentence twice? Currently leaning towards marking this as a dispute. There are other disruptive edits, but three of the last four seem to have been motivated by the dual use of "Iranian". Samsara 19:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@HistoryofIran: Do you have any further comment, or should I close this? It looks like the heightened edit volume from the last two days may have subsided. Samsara 22:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It has subsided, but will definitely be back, as proven by its long history of disruption. This is not a dispute issue at all, this disruption by these IPs and new users on the article is no different than if one attempted to make Napoleon an Italian king, instead of a French one. Some sort of protection is warranted imho. Dunno about the usage of "Iranian" twice, I've never noticed that, as that's not the main issue. Most of the article needs a rewrite anyways. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 00:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection - difficult topic, and lots of POV or unsourced and undiscussed changes being inputted by various IPs; very tiresome and sometimes difficult reverting these, and the consensus reached was a concerted effort between many editors including on the relocation topic page; it would be a shame to let an IP user undo all this good work and let the article slowly erode away. Abcmaxx (talk) 02:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 03:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 22:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IPv6 /64 blocked for one month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of uncited material and page blanking. Onel5969 TT me 22:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IPv6 /64 blocked for one month. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting the re-application of Temporary Semi-Protection. For maybe around a month. Large-scale vandalism from IPs and newer accounts resumed as soon as the previous Semi-Protection on the article expired. I suspect that it may be related to the hype from the "Carp memes" currently circulating on social media. The article and all related articles should be Semi-Protected at least until this hype dies down. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian, Acroterion, and El C: Can you please re-apply Semi-Protection on this article? It's currently a vandal target. Thanks. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Hammersoft. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalised via various Malaysian based IP addresses, presumably the same editor since at least from 22 November 2020. Requesting for a IP range block may be infeasible, as it may affect legitimate editors since the editor jumps through IP addresses across the multiple ranges the ISP (a mobile operator) holds. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of recently aired episode. -- /Alex/21 20:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Activity is not super high, and most of the reverted edits look like tests, honest mistakes, that sort of thing. Samsara 22:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 22:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been vandalised via various Malaysian based IP addresses, presumably the same editor since at least from 22 November 2020. Requesting for a IP range block may be infeasible, as it may affect legitimate editors since the editor jumps through IP addresses across the multiple ranges the ISP (a mobile operator) holds. – robertsky (talk) 17:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of recently aired episode. -- /Alex/21 20:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. -- GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Activity is not super high, and most of the reverted edits look like tests, honest mistakes, that sort of thing. Samsara 22:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 22:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 22:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very considerable protection log on this article. Samsara 23:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 8 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ramy Khodeir (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) We now have Draft:Ramy Khodeir (2), which should be at this title instead. Extended confirmed creation protection, rather than full creation protection, should be sufficient to dissuade most spammers here (as well as everywhere in the draftspace, FWIW). Protecting admin. retired. Thanks, UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@UnitedStatesian: Can you clarify whether this is a move request? Samsara 02:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Once the page is unprotected, I am happy to do the move myself. Or you can. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking over this, it seems to be there exists prior consensus to delete. The draft, to my mind, does not establish notability beyond earlier versions (which I realise not everybody is able to see). Samsara 18:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Destroyeraa has nominated the move candidate for deletion at AfD, where a further suggestion not covered by the above has been made, so I think it's actually worth letting the AfD conclude. Samsara 20:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Creator of the 2nd Draft was banned for paid editing. Looks like the protection is doing its job. Below comment seems unrelated. Michael Greiner 20:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 20:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs and new users changing the recently amended lyrics back to the previous version. NJD-DE (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de: The requests seems be necessary after the national anthem of a country was changed. IP users will take advantage to vandalize it with wrong version of the anthem, like O Canada article, which also semi-protected due to vandalism. I will ask Samsara for this. 36.76.232.198 (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let's start this off at three weeks. Samsara 22:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of a WP:BLP. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has a very substantial log of past protections. Samsara 22:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 8 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Barrage of bizarre IP edits regarding ... potato salad. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Something he said, Sdrqaz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs and new users changing the recently amended lyrics back to the previous version. NJD-DE (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de: The requests seems be necessary after the national anthem of a country was changed. IP users will take advantage to vandalize it with wrong version of the anthem, like O Canada article, which also semi-protected due to vandalism. I will ask Samsara for this. 36.76.232.198 (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let's start this off at three weeks. Samsara 22:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of a WP:BLP. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has a very substantial log of past protections. Samsara 22:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 8 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Barrage of bizarre IP edits regarding ... potato salad. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Something he said, Sdrqaz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Uptick in WP:FRINGE advocacy (the page was semi-protected until a couple weeks ago, and the same activity started up with the New Year). XOR'easter (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IndefiniteSemi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, Annon IP accounts keeps using Twitter as a Source despite being warnend about WP:TWITTER.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/removal of huge chunk of sourced content from FA status article without discussion [13], [14]. Possible sock of User:U + 1F4AD, similar removal here, also note similar removal here by Rghhh. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 13:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple acts of vandalism. Starzoner (talk) 14:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP returned immediately after unprotection. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Clearly somebody is trying to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated twice by prolific AfC creator User:77.99.156.192 and User:82.41.151.124 (which is the same person). I don't want to request blocks on these people because they're competent and productive (like FloridaArmy), but this draft is a blemish on their record. MarioJump83! 06:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: OK. BTW, this user (the IP 82.41.151.124) was found to create an elaborate hoax Dyrakus. That hoax got me and snuck through AfC. Someone got through it and nominated for AfD. When I got the wind of the AfD nomination, I quickly CSD'ed that page. I honestly think that article should have been CSD'ed rather than getting it for AfD... MarioJump83! 11:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MarioJump83 - Thanks for letting me know. Let's keep an eye on this draft page, and if shenanigans continue, let me know. I think these users should be warned and reported instead of the draft page deleted. If they wanted to, they could just create another with a similar title that isn't SALTed. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. MarioJump83! 11:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations from IPs. –Cupper52Discuss! 11:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I have reverted it multiple times but my efforts were worthless. - Addie666

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased vandalism due to the on-going US election process. Kj cheetham (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Looks like 2601:680:C000:F0A0:EDEC:F9A4:647:F895/64 is causing the recent disruption. Please re-report if disruption continues. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. I have reverted it multiple times but my efforts were worthless. .💠245CMR💠.👥📜 06:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 10:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page needs to be unsalted so that AnomieBOT could create a redirect to Hero – Gayab Mode On. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ask AmandaNP first? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done by AmandaNP. Favonian (talk) 11:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 21:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of identical IP DE upon expiration of prior PP. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring by IP users involving the addition of material that violates WP:POV and WP:BLP. Deus et lex (talk) 12:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point to how BLP is being violated? At a quick glance, it looks like a dispute (with the new material being for the most part reliably sourced and correctly referenced). Samsara 17:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The material being added is almost entirely negative in an attempt to portray the tenure of the subject at Sydney University as a failure. When you read the sources they don't say what the additions to the article say, and others are backed up by unreliable sources (Honi Soit, which is the student magazine and not a reliable source other than what the editorial board thinks, is cited several times). I don't mind if material is added back that is factual but the additions clearly violate WP:POV and WP:BLP. I should also add that I have invited users to discuss at the talk page but their only response is just to add things back in the same way. I am also not the first user to delete this information. Deus et lex (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - If you want some examples, see this version. The first two paragraphs should prove my point that these edits are disruptive, make claims that aren't backed up by sources, and have a serious BLP problem:
      • The heading "Treatment of international students" starts with the paragraph that the subject allegedly used international students to prop up university finances. It cites an ABC Four Corners report that doesn't even mention Dr Spence (transcript here). The most any source in that paragraph would justify saying is that the University faced a loss from the coronavirus pandemic, which is not what the WP article says at all.
      • The heading "Concerns over Spence's response to sexual assault on campus", makes it read as if the subject of the WP article was responsible for the culture of the colleges. In fact the colleges aren't owned by the University and Spence himself was a person who initiated the report. The sources cited quote him several times as condemning the behaviour, yet none of that appears in the WP article. Deus et lex (talk) 00:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a tough one, but nothing to do here as long as IP editors are the ones updating the article, and I suspect self-regulating to an extent. Samsara 17:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 17:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP repeatedly removing information on basis that it is "propaganda". Sdrqaz (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several editors have been edit warring on the article since yesterday. I think it would best to get it fully page protected until it gets resolve. — YoungForever(talk) 00:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks (IPs and new users) keep attempting to copy paste moving the articles. Suggest page protection for the time while there is a move discussion. NJD-DE (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced content regarding boyfriends by a persistent IP over months (details at this BLP noticeboard report), and now also a new user. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User as been warned. If they persist then they can be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of spam link. Leschnei (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive editing. In October the page came off of 3 years of semi-protection; it therefore returned to PC protection. Nonetheless, essentially all, if not all, of the edits since then by IPs and new accounts are time-wasting garbage; the article is constantly deluged with single-purpose IPs and accounts who insert some personal POV or other about the definitions of pansexuality or bisexuality, sources be damned. Time to lock this crap out completely. In the rare possibility somebody new has something based on sources to say they can do so on the talk page. Crossroads -talk- 02:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, pinging Samsara as the previous protecting admin. Crossroads -talk- 02:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Combination of IP socks of banned editors (Showbiz826) and pushing caste POV nonsense into the article via edit-war from new editor. Ravensfire (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User is blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Pending changes protection is clearly not working for this page, far too many disruptive edits by IP's Prolix 💬 15:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. one a day isn't a lot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 98.25.194.247 (talk · contribs) blocked by Lofty abyss. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 00:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly adding actress in voice role from ambidguos and unlcear tweet. Been told to wait for clearer intel but ignore reverts. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism expected to rise in coming weeks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Samsara 21:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism, probably because it became an kind of "internet meme". -- Calvinsky (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 21:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and "humorous" claims of the subject's death where editors are freely admitting it's vandalism. ser! (let's discuss it). 23:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – active vandalism from multiple IPs and accounts, recommending short page protection. Martin Urbanec (talk) 01:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Austronesier (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 21:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taumata994 (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The title was salted following repeated re-creation attempts following AfDs in 2014 and 2015. A user has now created the misnamed article Miss Grand Thailand Organization, circumventing the creation protection. While the new article is problematic in terms of quality, it probably does not meet G4, and as it has been five years since the last AfD, consensus may have changed regarding the subject's notability (I believe there are sources that adequately satisfy GNG, some of them also used in the Miss Grand overview article, which I recently created). Miss Grand Thailand Organization needs to be moved to Miss Grand Thailand, and it should probably be unprotected to allow improvement of the new article (or redirecting to the overview article, or a new AfD). I asked the protecting admin Anthony Bradbury to redirect the title a few days ago before the misnamed article was created, but he doesn't appear to be very active currently. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS The creator has now also created Miss Grand International Organization, circumventing full protection on Miss Grand International. I have tagged the page as G11 as the language seemed very promotional, but I'm less sure about Miss Grand Thailand Organization. If both are deleted, a redirect (with or without protection) from Miss Grand Thailand is still requested. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done as Anthony Bradbury hasn't edited in a week. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits by IP’s. Devokewater (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Fans upset at a goalie; multiple IP editors vandalizing article. Schazjmd (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from a variety of IPs and new users. — Chevvin 18:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ifnord (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: TFA. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 20:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject has been reported dead then not dead over the past day. Please protect until it's sorted out. Crboyer (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are frequently changing the committee president without sources. Ab207 (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 18:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism today from a few IPs for some reason. Requesting semi for a couple of days. Jip Orlando (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs continuously adding unsourced promotional content. CNMall41 (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather:, wondering if you can reconsider. There have been six additions in the last two months by all anonymous IPs. Despite warnings, they all come back and do the same thing. Either way is fine, just asking if you can take a second look. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)--CNMall41 (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CNMall41 six in two months is minor in that it is easily reverted. If there were six a day then that would indicate a problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. My goal was to keep the IPs from doing hit and runs on the page but I understand. Thanks for the second look. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous editors and sock-hopping vandal. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Subpage of own userpage. PratyyaG · Talk 15:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Please read Wikipedia:Protection policy#User pages. Partial quote "User pages and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists." CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of behaviour stemming from last protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repetition of adding of non-related edits. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 06:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from anonymous editors over long-term period of time by-way of removing sourced content. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548  18:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 17:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anonymous IP vandalizing the page 5 times in the past 24hrs alone. Aeengath (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recent event provoking a NPOV response from many new accounts, especially following racist online posts on social media (referenced in last paragraph of article). BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Laiho died recently. The article keeps getting unsourced information about their death. Majavah (talk!) 16:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking, distruptive editing or plain edit warring. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SarahKhan47. Very messy case. Pahunkat (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs started vandalising/restoring to old unreliably sourced version that was rewritten recently [15], [16], [17], just after expiration of protection on 2 January 2021. It was protected last time because of similar disruptions [18], [19], [20]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users changes sourced content and replace them with unsourced and disruptive materials. Wario-Man (talk) 15:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Over the last few days this page has been vandalized, has had BLP violations added which had to be revdelled and just generally been the victim of disruptive editing by new users and IP's Asartea Talk | Contribs 15:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism and disruptive editing from anonymous users by removing, adding or changing content. This is a page about an ongoing television series season with over 100,000 pageviews. Thijslandsmeer (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 15:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued vandalism and inaccurate edits falsely stating that he has announced retirement. Politicsfan4 (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Looks like a long time vandal who returned back soon after the protection expired. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Normally I wouldn't have but a suppressed edit. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing returned back soon after the protection expired. -- Nick.mon (talk) 10:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Not entirely sure what these IPs are trying to accomplish, but it doesn't seem like they'll stop in the immediate future AngryHarpytalk 13:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated vandalism, see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ljlas20/Archive, the user of the same IP that vandalizes articles by using multiple accounts and IP addresses. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA-30/500 arbitration enforcement. New page was created in November 2020. 184.147.137.223 (talk) 03:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No disruption so far; ARBPIA enforcement via protection is not a must, but one of the possible tools to prevent disruption if it occurs. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Constant disruptive editing by IPs Prolix 💬 11:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: ongoing SPA/IP vandalism. UW Dawgs (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple users and IPs are adding a DOB without reliable sources. Pending changes isn't working. —Bruce1eetalk 13:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. –Cupper52Discuss! 13:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sporadic edits by several IP addresses attempting to make effectively the same changes, eg. changing "nilotic" to "bantu" without explanation. Appear to be very few other editors following the page. —Brigade Piron (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent history of new SPAs and at least one paid/COI account editing against consensus. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – due to Yogendra Yadav's participation in ongoing farmers protests, this page has seen disruptive edits. please add page protection. ChunnuBhai (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism and spam. Pahunkat (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated DOB being changed (to unsourced date) despite being sourced. Robvanvee 08:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 11:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued semi-protection needed, for a longer period than the last two occasions. The moment any semi-protection is lifted (it has been done twice now, for short periods of time), IP users come back and continue their disruptive edits removing sourced content about the subject being an heiress. It would be great if user 110.22.3.195 could be blocked as well from editing the page (although that won't get around them using another IP). Deus et lex (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ERA vandalisms. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article is constantly beinng vandalized, namely by user GhaznaviSix. Their vandalism has been reverted before (e.g. like here and here but they continue to persist with their vandalism. Thus would request page be protected. Also if they've since again vandalized, it could be reverted. 76.67.98.129 (talk) 20:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Needs discussion on the talk-page, too. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute with BlueboyLINY. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Since I don't see Blueboy willing to discuss edits, this may have to go to WP:ANI. Michael Greiner 03:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection Page is subject to constant vandalism due to its controversial football opinion. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Michael Greiner 03:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nigel757 (talk) 00:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mz7 (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after this page was protected in the past, it was still vandalized again with the same type of thing. Beckett28 (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Page subject to "slow-editwar" behavior, which has recently escalated into regular fast editwarring, to remove and thwart restoration of the results of the WP:CITALICSRFC decision. If necessary we can run yet another RfC on this (I think it would be the 5th RfC or similar consensus discussion on this, always with the same result), but there is already discussion about the matter open in two places anyway, including this page's talk page. People cutting out already-decided matters from the documentation because they don't like the result has to stop. This is patently disruptive.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  19:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Or whichever protection prevents IP users from editing. So first was the belief that she was born in "1999", with absolutely no evidence or source for that, now IP users are resorting to Instagram (still no birth date given even if that were a reliable source) to say she was born in "1998". They won’t stop but this is why BLP policy is in place. Trillfendi (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 03:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

high level of IP vandalism over long period of time. Suggest semi-protect for one year. - kosboot (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to article page. MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to talk page. MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Since it is just one user, consider attempting to discuss the issue with the user on their user talk page, and if they continue to edit war, you can report them to WP:ANEW. Mz7 (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protections expired, hit by IP and newly created accounts today with silly vandalisms. Ifnord (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 03:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent edit warring over the past day. Nigel757 (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the 2 main IPs for 3RR. Michael Greiner 03:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Somehow I've been dragged into a LTA issue with some IP editor, as you can see by the history of this article (and its talkpage). Some long-term protection would be great. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Constant test edits/vandalism Prolix 💬 18:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated violations of WP:DERRY by IPs. DuncanHill (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition of unsourced content, I recommend a short WP:PC protection. Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too heavily edited for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and user making unsourced additions [21], [22] or outright vandalism [23], [24]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ongoing addition of unsourced genres by LTA IP hopping vandal. Robvanvee 16:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 22:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Vandalism back almost immediately after a 6-month run of semiprotection expired last month. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple IPs, all recent non-autoconfirmed edits were reverted. Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samwalton9. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Taumata994 (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 January 2021

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple autoconfirmed users adding a death that was mistakenly reported and retracted by reliable sources. POLITANVM talk 15:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources (TMZ) have re-affirmed her death, but at the moment it hasn't been covered by many more reliable sources, leading to further edit warring. POLITANVM talk 16:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Lots of edits but not much vandalism CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sockfarm. Steve M (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined one recreation isn't repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular IP vandalism. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism, mainly by ip users. Eridian314 (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Brankestein (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued vandalism from different IP addresses as well as attempts to promote the band by their booking agent and manager. Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 14:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 17:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism of a high profile page. Per custom from previous years, the Deaths in YYYY page (linked via Recent deaths from the Wikipedia front page) is semi-protected for the entire year. Thus, I request that this page is semi-protected until 7 January 2022. Marbe166 (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 20:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The page is currently ECP, which does not seem appropriate since similar "creator" articles are all Semi-Protected, multiple edit requests by autoconfirmed, such high level protection just seems unnecessary here. Terasail[✉] 15:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring from IP users. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Banner talk 19:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP editors. HouseBlastertalk 16:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page is being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 16:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs protection against constant IP vandalism.--Visnelma (talk) 16:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP editors. HouseBlastertalk 16:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page is being targeted by IP socks of The UPN Vandal. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 16:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs protection against constant IP vandalism.--Visnelma (talk) 16:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permenant semi-protection Constant IP vandalism, has been semi-protected several times in the past but every time its lifted, IP vandals come back and this is likely to continue due to them being controversial in English football. Semi-protection is needed indefinitely here. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP addresses changing info to contradict sources. POLITANVM talk 16:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Came to request the same - repeated attacks from Sikh nationalists, trying to re-write history. - Arjayay (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives constant vandalism and needs protection. Pbrks (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 10:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs. --Obsuser (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Discuss on the talk page eh? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs. --Obsuser (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. page being used for test editing Prolix 💬 14:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP range repeatedly adding unsourced info. DonIago (talk) 17:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:RGW POV-pushing edit warring. Tgeorgescu (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 17:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:RGW edit warring by IP. Tgeorgescu (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Test editing resumed as soon as the previous protection expired; this page needs to be semi'd indefinitely, as there's no reason to think the disruption is only temporary. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 17:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — The Earwig talk 18:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Was created for test, then G8'd, then MfD'ed and finally a spam (it was meant for testing, but it links to a spam page). MarioJump83! 12:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. — The Earwig talk 17:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring by multiple editors. (There are few enough editors involved that blocks might also be effective although at least one editor appears to be unregistered or is editing while logged out.) ElKevbo (talk) 15:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Just removed vandalism by IP in the last sentence of the lede "a$$". assuming there will be more due to current events. Bobsd (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced edits by IP addresses Prolix 💬 10:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised, on average, about every four days. The article is currently protected with pending changes, but since there are rarely (not to say never) valuable edits from anonymous users, proper protection might be warranted to take away some maintenance work. For comparison, Minecraft, this article's primary subtopic, is currently indefinitely extended-confirmed protected. IceWelder [] 12:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being vandalised repeatedly, has been protected in the past. Nigel757 (talk) 02:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A single-purpose account and its logged-out IP address are strictly making reverts to edit war on this article. Semi-protection would at least deny the benefit of logged-out editing. Please advise if reporting to WP:ANEW is another or more fitting course of action. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 03:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – The protecting admin was blocked and the mentioned BLP violations are those about her arrest. PC didn't exist in 2010, so why not give it a try. (CC) Tbhotch 02:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly content and disruptive editing. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current events topic, seems to be getting hit a few times in last day with anon ip edits that don't meet WP quality. Shaded0 (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent long term vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent uptick in IP vandalism due to a current event. Looking for two-week semi-protection to outlast disruptive interests. — BriefEdits (talk) 06:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and unexplained removal of content from IP users and new users. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 01:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by IPs. (CC) Tbhotch 02:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short-term move protection (WP:INVOLVED request): Recently created article where there has been move warring over the what to call it. Discussions are going on at the talk page, with a general consensus that the original title should be retained for a few days, to allow discussion and a decision on what its ultimate title should be. -- MelanieN (talk) 04:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The moving had quieted down, but it needs to stay put somewhere. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Three months semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and adding hoaxed information about the national football team of Vietnam for trolling reasons. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I'm talking about the other users, not mine. I may not be always the best but I am serious, I don't like the current fixing in the article. You may not agree with me but I expressed protection for the page. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 08:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The block is a partial block not a site wide block. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by suspected sockpuppet. Nigel757 (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 20:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is already under indefinite semi-protection and indefinite move semi-protection. I don't see any evidence of recent page move vandalism; am I missing something?  MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: There have been two recent instances of page-move vandalism by autoconfirmed users, one on Dec 15 and one today (see logs). I believe full move protection is warranted. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Fvasconcellos. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Protection removed in deletion/undeletion of page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{RFPP}} Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't protected, because it was deleted and restored after that protection. - MrOllie (talk) 00:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Primefac . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/69.64.109.193 using the range Special:Contributions/2601:183:C602:2260:0:0:0:0/64, all from Massachusetts. The same protection is needed at Silver City Galleria. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Luk3. Wug·a·po·des 23:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. AntonSamuel (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations by IP hopper. JimRenge (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06 January 2021

Semi-protection: WP:BLP violations relating to third party being added by IP hopping editor. FDW777 (talk) 14:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – ECP create-protection will permit it to be created by a neutral editor or via AFC review. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. — The Earwig talk 22:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: High level of agenda pushing through various IPs all within the same range. This has been occurring since last year, and purportedly a little over a decade; refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoaeter. TheLionHasSeen (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Habesha peoples was protected by @Gyrofrog:. (CC) Tbhotch 19:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving...

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Disruptive edits from new users due to 2021 Georgia runoff election being called by some news organizations but not others. Leadership will not officially change until a new majority is established by the swearings-in of two Democrats to the United States Senate as well as Kamala Harris as Vice President. 09:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Disruptive edits from new users due to election being called by some news organizations but not others. Consensus is to wait until all major news organizations have called the election. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The IP has also been refusing to discuss it on the talk page or provide any reference to support their claims. The vandalism has been constant for months. The edit history of the IP also reveals a bias against the topic. Prabhanjan Mutalik (talk) 09:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The IP is removing promotional COI peacock slush. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But if they are referenced from a peer reviewed source is it not worthy of being added to the encyclopedia? Prabhanjan Mutalik (talk) 13:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Looks like a content dispute. WP:BRD --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 19:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism with possible block evasion. Aspening (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. This page is not only consistently vandalized, but most edits (as seen in hist) made by anons are disruptive insertions of personal jokes. Pending changes would help deter this greater majority of vandalism. As Pending Changes Reviewer, I am willing to adopt this page and make sure pertinent edits are validated fast. Thank you and Happy New Year! Double Plus Ungood (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I understand that preemptive page protection is not usually granted, but this page is almost certainly going to be vandalized given the trend of related pages 2020–2021 United States election protests, Stop the Steal, etc. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 20:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. May need EC protection in the future, please keep watching. Risker (talk) 20:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Page moved with protection remaining in place
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The majority of the past edits have been reversions rather than actual edits. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not even enough disruption for pending-changes protection; I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lower to template editor protection: Was fully protected by Nick for “general stupidity” and even if it is template protected none of the editors posting disappointment will edit it again. Cupper52Discuss! 12:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cupper52, there is nothing in WP:TPROT nor your user group list that explains this request.
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove current protection and put it right back again: I can't find the original protection log and can't figure out what the current protection is. The protection log only shows when the page was moved. I'm just asking you to make the current protection clearer, not to change the protection. 64.203.186.108 (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: The IP 24.170.255.67 insists on adding without reference the singer occupation in the initial part of the article. See contributions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.170.255.67. 179.52.201.223 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: The IP 24.170.255.67 insists on adding without reference the singer occupation in the initial part of the article. See contributions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.170.255.67. 179.52.201.223 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ashleyyoursmile! 14:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing including addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to the BLP by IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 14:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 11:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced content [25] [26] [27] [28] [29]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: No transclusions, so vandalism wouldn't be much of a concern. JsfasdF252 (talk) 04:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ask Jo-Jo Eumerus first as per the instructions? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by newly created accounts and IPs. More info here. --Satdeep Gill (talkcontribs 14:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: genre warring by IP socks and resumption of edits by socks of MariaJaydHicky. Blueberry72 (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Oshwah, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unknown IP. Prabhanjan Mutalik (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Content dispute the IP makes a case for their edits in their edit summaries. Please continue discussing --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 23:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page title has been created and then deleted four times at the beginning of this year. Please salt it to prevent further recreations by IP users. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Pages with this title are created by users following Help:Introduction to Wikipedia. It seems the way we pick the titles isn't great; it's random, but only when the help page is purged or the server cache is cleared, so many different users will try to create pages in the same "random" sandbox. In any case, it doesn't make sense to protect them. I'll start a discussion on the talk. — The Earwig talk 22:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is a constant vandalism target. Constant monitoring is a waste of editor resources. Montanabw(talk) 22:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Montanabw:  Done, Semi-protected indefinitely. Been wanting to do that for years! ~Anachronist (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5-year semi-protection: An article about a pejorative term newly popular on the internet has unsurprisingly turned into a magnet for vandalism. – Uanfala (talk) 23:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this request. In fact I came here to request semi-protection for this very page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi-protected indefinitely. Some version of an article or redirect at that title was previously indefinitely semi protected. I have applied indefinite semi protection to that article, instead of 5 years, due to the previous protection and the large amount of vandalism. Any admin has my support to reduce this protection length to 5 years. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Nah. Anything over 3 years is effectively indefinite. I'd say indef-semi is appropriate after 1-year protection has failed to work. Unprotection requests are down below, if it ever comes up. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An editor has continuously added promotional edits over and again, has been reverted accordingly but has continued to add promotional material despite 3 warnings left at his talk page and this has become very disruptive. Celestina007 (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. They have been blocked from Mercy Eke. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated promotional attempts. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the IP for 48 hours. Please let me know if the person returns from a different IP, or come back here if I've logged off for the night (in a couple of hours). Bishonen | tålk 20:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: IP Vandalism/Revert warring. Vandalistic, destructive edits by IPs and edit reverting and edit warring. Three day semi-protection would definitely be appropriate. --75Broncos (talk) 14:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sockpuppets do not have the standing to make requests. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated vandalism. Found5dollar (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent uptick in disruptive/unref edits by variable anon-IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: no need for IP access. Moxy 🍁 19:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fuzheado | Talk 19:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent promotional edits by staff members of the school in question. JayPlaysStuff (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. These were copyright violations too; all revdel now. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The protector isn't very active and making a talk page EC protected leaves out any edit requests made by autoconfirmed accounts. Do not fully unprotect it because of WP:BLP. 🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 18:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Courcelles protected the page as an arbitration enforcement, and such are not lightly lifted. Furthermore, this is Gamergate territory, and that issue is far from dead. Favonian (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Quale (talk) 09:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please consider protecting this page from IP edits. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Cliffmore (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – addition of unsourced content and vandalism as a result of transfer speculation. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Edit warring is out of control at this page. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, edit-warring is edit-warring, and in this episode some of the warriors are extended confirmed.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 17:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Has been deleted and recreated 5 times over the past few years. –Cupper52Discuss! 12:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would've made more sense if it was in 2015. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 12:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Come back if it gets recreated again after having been deleted via AfD just now. Lectonar (talk) 12:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Temporary) Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the last few months. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 09:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Two spikes in January...for the lulz it seems. Before that, not very heavy disruption. Lectonar (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Blanked at [30]. I've reverted it to the preceding version. Please semi-protect. Sai ¿? 13:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Non-constructive edits by sockpuppet IP Prolix 💬 07:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't see non-constructive IP edits in the history. If this is a case of sockpuppetry, please report it at the appropriate noticeboard. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 08:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fvasconcellos, the sockpuppetry has already been reported in detail here: [31]. I have dealt with the same user before multiple times, they do not reply to any warnings or attempts to discuss. I do not enjoy writing up paragraphs for dispute resolution especially when I have a slim to zero chance of getting a reply from the IP in question. Evidence of sockpuppetry is pretty clear in that page's history. I've already been told on SPI that nothing can be done about this since the IP's change too often and are mostly stale within a day or two. Kindly let me know what I should do from here on. Prolix 💬 10:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Highly visible page. There are now have a discussion regarding the renaming this page (2021 United States Capitol protests), and consensus has reached. In order to prevent any users from moving the page unilaterally, i want to request that only administrator can move this page. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 12:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Opal|zukor(discuss) 13:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Changing of title to "Minority Leader-designate". ― Tartan357 Talk 04:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The user responsible for the edit has agreed to respect the result of the relevant RfC. Furthermore, the user is extended-confirmed, which would have made this mode of protection ineffective, even if it were appropriate. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fvasconcellos, that seems to be related to adding a successor to the infobox, not changing the name of the position to "Minority Leader-designate", which is a title that doesn't exist, and a politically-charged edit. ― Tartan357 Talk 06:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tartan357: It is more like content dispute for me as it awaits for official certification of Georgia election. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No it doesn't. The Democrats both won in Georgia. That doesn't confer an imaginary "Minority Leader-designate" title on Mitch McConnell. Who is "designating" him that? The Senate has to vote on its leaders. That's incontrovertibly true, regardless of the decision on page protection. That title is made up and violates WP:V. ― Tartan357 Talk 09:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Changing of title to "President pro tempore of the United States Senate-designate". ― Tartan357 Talk 05:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – see above. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fvasconcellos, it just happened again from someone not extended-confirmed. This will keep happening, and protection is very much needed. Party leaders of the United States Senate is already protected for this exact reason. Please reconsider. ― Tartan357 Talk 06:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging Johnuniq, who put ECP on Party leaders of the United States Senate. ― Tartan357 Talk 06:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tartan357: I don't know so I asked here at WP:AN. Johnuniq (talk) 06:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ShelteredCook (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Changing of title to "Minority Whip-designate". ― Tartan357 Talk 05:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – see above. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Changing of title to "Majority-whip designate". ― Tartan357 Talk 05:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – see above. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Changing of title to "Majority Leader-designate". ― Tartan357 Talk 05:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – see above. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Changing of title to "President pro tempore emeritus of the United States Senate-designate". ― Tartan357 Talk 05:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – see above. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock master keep creating new account to evade block. Already reported new sockpuppet to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gfstudent21. However, it's very troublesome to keep filing report as sock master would likely keep creating account to evade block and continue disruptive editing. Hence, would like to request protection for few months. Thanks. – Paper9oll (📣📝) 06:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. –Darkwind (talk) 07:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increase of IP vandalism and BLP issues, esp. about his ancestry. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 07:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Politics Section:

Sentence to edit:

"Warnock has long opposed the death penalty, having advocated for death row inmate Troy Davis, who was executed in 2011 for killing a police officer despite evidence that supported his innocence."

Proposed edit:

"Warnock has long opposed the death penalty, having advocated for death row inmate Troy Davis, who was executed in 2011 for killing a police officer."

Justification:

The reason for this is because there is absolutely no proof or evidence, whatsoever, that supports his innocence. The article that was used as a citation https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-execution-georgia/clemency-denied-for-georgia-death-row-inmate-idUSTRE78J2NP20110920 clearly does not state anything about him being innocent, not at all. The only statement on his innocence is a quote from a 3rd party in Europe that has no familiarity with the case whatsoever. Reading Wikipedia's article on Troy Davis clearly states there were 34 witnesses from the prosecution, 9 of which identified Davis as the murderer. 7 of them recanted but where deemed by the courts to either A, be unreliable or B, not really a recantation. There were also witnesses who claimed they were hounded consistently for years to recant using coercion. He also had many trials with different Judges and under all that scrutiny the final appeals Judge stated it was "smoke and mirrors" and found them not to be credible. On top of that, they didn't have a single witness who recanted testify in court, not one and the other 2 witnesses refused to recant. There is about as much evidence he is innocent as there is evidence that there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 US election. May as well just put in Joe Biden's page that "Joe Biden still won the 2020 election despite evidence that supported mass voter fraud". https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2011-09-07/execution-set-troy-anthony-davis-convicted-1989-murder-savannah-police https://www.savannahnow.com/article/20111006/OPINION/310069763 Sawyermade (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection; Temporary: Numerous editors came out of the woodwork after I made the initial entry of today’s insurgency of the US Capital. Particular users are throwing in their baseless conspiracy theories then removing someone else’s to put theirs in. This should go back to the earlier entry that was correct and then protection to prevent editing for a couple weeks. Some of the users have had accounts for 10-11 months but made no edits until today. Possible sleepers. 2600:387:C:6D14:0:0:0:C (talk) 02:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2600:387:C:6D14:0:0:0:C: You mean this article need to be semi-protected. 36.76.232.198 (talk) 02:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@36.76.232.198: I will leave that to the admin who handles this. It’s related to other pages that received protection today to so whatever they feel is needed. 2600:387:C:6D14:0:0:0:C (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – the situation appears stable and I see nothing in the history to justify full protection. Semi-protection may be necessary in the coming days; we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Up protection, especially in light of today's events. Also request for WP:BRD enforcement. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. The activity on the page doesn't seem disruptive enough to justify protection. Also, BRD is not a policy, so there's nothing to enforce... not sure what you're asking for there? –Darkwind (talk) 03:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection/Archive 9#Mass request on pages related to Arab-Israeli conflict(s) which applies here. Also if EC due arbitration enforcement is applied it is not temporary but indefinite. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: More or less the entire revision history is just IPs vandalizing. This protection would instantly fix the problem. Yes, I recognize there is time in between these edits, but why prolong this pattern when it can so easily be fixed?. Aza24 (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected – vandalism is neither heavy nor regular enough to justify semi-protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. EN-Jungwon 17:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Aurora-mng (talk · contribs) blocked by Oshwah. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of Fuerdai vandal (WP:LTA/BMX). See also this diff. JavaHurricane 03:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: In the last 10 days or so there have been multiple acts of vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Only two IP users involved. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is subject to long-term disruptive editing from IP editors repeatedly removing the same sourced information. Popcornfud (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:- vandalism. Thechased (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs keep adding unsourced and false claims that the White House was stormed during today's events in Washington D.C. NJD-DE (talk) 02:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP/unregistered vandalism and disruption based on recent news events. KidAd talk 02:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by sockpuppet IPs. CrazyBoy826 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent blanking of reliably-sourced content by IP editor whose IP changes every time. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: IP editor expressed here no interest in discussion, further reinforcing the need for protection. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing by IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 16:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent violation of the biographies of living persons policy (persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 16:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition of unsourced material to page. Joeyconnick (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing for ZOE Broadcasting Network and vandalism for TV Patrol. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Everytime when TV Patrol was unprotected after the protection expires, IP users are keeping on vandalizing the article and changing anchors without citing a reliable source. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 10:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by PoV-pushing IPs. — Czello 14:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Potentially subject to page-move vandalism temporarily. Jeuno (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I don't see any evidence of page-move vandalism, and the other candidates' articles are not move-protected. — The Earwig talk 22:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – That obsessive Happy Tree Friends fan is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP Vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by several IPs. A slightly longer duration of protection would be beneficial.  LeoFrank  Talk 04:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from multiple non-AC users. Aspening (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – I don't see any vandalism. Recent IP edits have been constructive. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new users keep changing her birth year without sources [32] with comments like "I am her relative", removing reliable sources from Pakistan Today, Gulf News in the process [33] [34] or using unreliable sources like IMDb [35]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing continues [36], [37]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article on the main page experiencing disruption from multiple IPs. Aspening (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note, now off main page. (CC) Tbhotch 00:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined no vandalism since this dropped off the Main Page. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP disruption. Aspening (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs editing disruptively. Aspening (talk) 18:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. I ttried to reason with the user on article talk and user talk, my comments were ignored. I have already made 3 reverts. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Prolix 💬 18:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This will be a popular article, and also highly vandalized. UnguidedEmperor (talk) 01:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. — The Earwig talk 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the article is under attack; anonymous IP addresses and new accounts that ignore warnings in their Talk pages. Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 21:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced artist additions continued even beyond the last pending changes. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 22:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An disruptive IP keep adding unsourced or poorly sourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing in recent days by various IP addresses. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sock/vandal edits after last protection. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 20:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – seems to have died down. Report to the EW noticeboard if the user persists Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by IPs and new accounts, goes back quite some time on a frequently targeted page. Gotitbro (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 22:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. DuncanHill (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 22:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism related to ongoing political events Hotshot977 (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 23:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08 January 2021

Indefinite semi-protection: Repetition of vandalism since the past months. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and WP:OR by multiple WP:SPAs, likely one user. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and users (mostly new users) keep adding an individual w/o own article to notable people list with reference to the events that took place in DC. NJD-DE (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 10:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Where is the sockpuppetry. Are there any investigations who could prove this? If so, please linkt to them. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, Link to the relevant sockpuppet investigation can be found here Prolix 💬 11:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Still, the disruption is not pronounced or frequent enough for protection of any kind to be warranted or effective. In olden times we would have said: just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, thank you for your response. I've been trying to revert these as much as possible. I do not revert all of them because at times the sock's edits are constructive, but I've been worried about being called out for edit warring. The IP's keep changing and warning them does no good, they also do not reply to any talk page discussions. I absolutely detest having to revert these edits constantly but I cannot think of any other way to deal with this. Prolix 💬 13:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is built around/with the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors (and even the hopping IP does contribute positively once in a while). Therefore, protection is the exception, not the rule. These articles aren't simply getting disruption enough to warrant any kind of protection, and articles will never be "stable". My advice as a very long-time editor: take them off your watchlist, and don't look at them. You can be sure it will ease your mind. Often it doesn't pay to edit or watch pages which are too close to your interests (or to your heart). Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, I suppose that's for the best. Thank you for your advice, I'll do my best to adhere to it from here on. Prolix 💬 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Steve M (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. User blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple vandalism and BLP violations within a very short amount of time (the entire page is just the past half hour). Garnarblarnar (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 10:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Where is the sockpuppetry. Are there any investigations who could prove this? If so, please linkt to them. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, Link to the relevant sockpuppet investigation can be found here Prolix 💬 11:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Still, the disruption is not pronounced or frequent enough for protection of any kind to be warranted or effective. In olden times we would have said: just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, thank you for your response. I've been trying to revert these as much as possible. I do not revert all of them because at times the sock's edits are constructive, but I've been worried about being called out for edit warring. The IP's keep changing and warning them does no good, they also do not reply to any talk page discussions. I absolutely detest having to revert these edits constantly but I cannot think of any other way to deal with this. Prolix 💬 13:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is built around/with the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors (and even the hopping IP does contribute positively once in a while). Therefore, protection is the exception, not the rule. These articles aren't simply getting disruption enough to warrant any kind of protection, and articles will never be "stable". My advice as a very long-time editor: take them off your watchlist, and don't look at them. You can be sure it will ease your mind. Often it doesn't pay to edit or watch pages which are too close to your interests (or to your heart). Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, I suppose that's for the best. Thank you for your advice, I'll do my best to adhere to it from here on. Prolix 💬 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Steve M (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. User blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple vandalism and BLP violations within a very short amount of time (the entire page is just the past half hour). Garnarblarnar (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 18:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced edits by IP addresses Prolix 💬 10:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per my previous decline of Lava International and Lectonar's declines below. There is not enough recent activity to justify protection. Warn the user appropriately and report to the relevant noticeboard if necessary. One addition of unsourced content is not "persistent disruptive editing". Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fvasconcellos, the problem is that there isn't a particular user, the IP keeps changing so warning's are unnecessary, like I mentioned in my previous reply to you, I had already reported this earlier to no avail. I would really like your help with this
@Prolix: I understand this can be frustrating, and I apologize if it seems unhelpful, but the low level of changes really does not meet the threshold for protection, and does not constitute persistent disruption. I am the third administrator to decline protection to these articles on similar grounds in the last couple of days, and I believe this remains the most appropriate course of action. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fvasconcellos, thank you for your response. Dealing with dynamic IP's has been a real pain, it seems like a serious loophole that can't be plugged as of now. I respect your judgement, I'll avoid requesting page protection with respect to this particular issue unless absolutely necessary. Prolix 💬 13:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding names from Red Dead Redemption 2. Tommy has a great username (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only added every few weeks. Lectonar (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 16:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, BLP violations. —Sarvatra (talk, contribs) 17:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit to the article about a week ago. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Note that there is addition of mostly unsourced content from IP addresses over a long period of time and the article appears to have low watchers. Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption too low for pending-changes; I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Pending Changes: Several instances of vandalism by IP addresses in past 24 hours, some blatant (with edit summaries acknowledging rules violation). Lereman (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – seems to have died down. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is getting hit sporadically with different IP addresses each adding him making the pro bowl which he did not. Rockchalk717 22:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very sporadically. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 23:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. All vandalism is from a single unregistered user, 125.165.104.36 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. 8693 transclusions P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined — the template has been semi-protected indefinitely since 2017 without any vandalism. No reason to increase the level. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still getting vandalised. Please check the protection log. Opal|zukor(discuss) 22:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary increase from Extended Protection to Full Protection As this disruptive behavior started at same time when Trump supporters riot attacked Congress. Stop these bogus disruptive misinformation about Donald Trump. Kent Bargo (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is already subject to discretionary sanctions in case of disruptive editing. Full protection is not required at this time. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 10:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Where is the sockpuppetry. Are there any investigations who could prove this? If so, please linkt to them. Lectonar (talk) 11:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, Link to the relevant sockpuppet investigation can be found here Prolix 💬 11:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Still, the disruption is not pronounced or frequent enough for protection of any kind to be warranted or effective. In olden times we would have said: just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sockpuppetry by IP Prolix 💬 10:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Where is the sockpuppetry. Are there any investigations who could prove this? If so, please linkt to them. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lectonar, Link to the relevant sockpuppet investigation can be found here Prolix 💬 11:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Still, the disruption is not pronounced or frequent enough for protection of any kind to be warranted or effective. In olden times we would have said: just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: disruptive editing – A newly registered user (first edit January 6) keeps editing the page to copy the Spanish version of the page leaving many parts in Spanish rather than in English. The version I reverted it to before it was changed back is the same style used across every national league system on English wikipedia. For example, Italian football league system, French football league system, English football league system, etc. The female league system is in the correct format, since the editor is only editing the male section, for whatever reason. RedPatchBoy (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RedPatchBoy: have you tried talking to them before coming here? Not everyone is wiki-savvy when they start editing: how should they know about all theses nooks and crannies, or that it "is the same style used across every national league system on English wikipedia"? Declined for now. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~RAM (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: The topic of this article is now in the news, so it may be best to temporarily add pending changes protection to prevent vandalism and spam from new and unregistered editors. I have already had to revert one such edit by an unregistered user. For context, see this article: https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/7/22218989/signal-new-signups-whatsapp-facebook-privacy-controversy-elon-musk. Dodi 8238 (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Please relist if it really picks up. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Steve M (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Seems to have stopped after last warning, though. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute regarding use of character's gender and persistent identicial edits by numerous Anons and some registerd users (i.e. editors changing the correct term her to "they", "him", "his/her" etc.) -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 16:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. From IPs and new users. MarioJump83! 22:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One or two instances of disruption per month do not even warrant semi-protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 11:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. BOVINEBOY2008 10:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recentism - Significant increase in traffic due to recent events, leading to the article having been overwhelmingly changed by unregistered users including new sections/format changes; some of which (unreg users) have warnings for repeated disruptive editing practices. Changes likely need review as well, was previously listed as a good article. OfficerManatee (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is completely unnecessary. There's been only minor disruption and the article's already under PC. EEng 11:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Also see directly above. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Steve M (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Seems to have stopped after last warning, though. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute regarding use of character's gender and persistent identicial edits by numerous Anons and some registerd users (i.e. editors changing the correct term her to "they", "him", "his/her" etc.) -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 16:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. From IPs and new users. MarioJump83! 22:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One or two instances of disruption per month do not even warrant semi-protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 11:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. BOVINEBOY2008 10:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recentism - Significant increase in traffic due to recent events, leading to the article having been overwhelmingly changed by unregistered users including new sections/format changes; some of which (unreg users) have warnings for repeated disruptive editing practices. Changes likely need review as well, was previously listed as a good article. OfficerManatee (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is completely unnecessary. There's been only minor disruption and the article's already under PC. EEng 11:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Also see directly above. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various users editing page to reflect a transfer rumor rather than an officially confirmed transfer (at the time of writing). Benjamin112 (talk) 03:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep edit-warring in Jon Ossoff as a successor in the infobox against Template:Infobox officeholder/doc, and are removing the warning comment against doing so. Additionally, multiple IPs have made edits falsely contesting Ossoff's victory over Perdue. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until January 20 per the RfC on use of Template:Infobox officeholder. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. unsourced changes by IP's Prolix 💬 05:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High amounts of IP vandalism. User:Thatoneweirdwikier | Conversations and Contributions 08:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One of the IPs has been blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Edit warring by sockpuppet IP Prolix 💬 14:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 04:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until January 20. There will be some unfortunate collateral damage to productive IP edits, but there is really a lot of vandalism and disruption. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 11:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Clearly too much for pending changes. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 09:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 04:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced birthday [38] [39] [40]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by random IP addresses. Jadugar9211 (talk) 06:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This person is gaining media coverage at present for career reasons and there has been all sorts of disruptive and counter-productive activity within the article over the last day or so. Needs protection for WP:BLP reasons, really. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 07:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks NGS - was just about to log this myself for the same reasons. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism (addition of factual inaccuracies) by multiple IP addresses.  dummelaksen  (talkcontribs) 11:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 04:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Unsourced additions by unregistered users Prolix 💬 05:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: no need to be unprotected. {{subst:User:JediMasterMacaroni/sig (talk) 04:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Are you referring to Wikipedia:Silly Things or to the WP:SILLY redirect? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Moderate IP Vandalism. Political topic with US news coverage, it attracts anonymous edits. DenverCoder9 (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. However, thanks for reporting this.— Newslinger talk 03:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps hopping IP addresses and trying to put profanity in this article. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on personal details due to recent 2021 elections. Hariharanbalu (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ~RAM (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Looks like one IP, primarily. I've filed an WP:ARV report for said IP. ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋21:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2601:981:c280:f9f0:6991:eaf:cd07:59df (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Unnecessary redirect: Redundant to its intended target for searching purposes, and would be awkward to link to in prose. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page has no history. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Sro23 (talk) 03:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC): Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See edit filter. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC): Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Sro23 (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Sro23 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Sro23 (talk) 03:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC): Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See edit filter. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC): Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Sro23 (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: WP:DENY. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Sro23 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Sro23 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 20:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Extended Confirmed Protection: Continued vandalism by autoconfirmed users despite previous protection Builder018 (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done By Lee Vilenski. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection. (talk) 00:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism: see "SPA editing" and "Other candidates" sections on the Talk page. There is persistent IP/new editor vandalism around conspiracy theorist Brian Rose standing as a candidate. Bondegezou (talk) 12:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I blocked one IP for edit warring but at heart, this seems to be a content dispute. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. agreed. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Some disruptive editing from IPs, but also some constructive edits. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 12:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ARBAE2 enforcement isn't needed for basic disruption. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Multiple autoconfirmed editors falsely declaring Loeffler to no longer be in office immediately after ECP lifted. ― Tartan357 Talk 15:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357: it is more like content dispute for me. I have this to be fully protected until there are consensus on the talk page, at least until the election results was certified. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How is it a content dispute? This has nothing to do with the election result. Loeffler is still in office. One does not cease to be in office immediately after losing an election. Please stop commenting on these requests, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Currently semi-protected. Is that sufficient? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5: Yes it is sufficient, at least for now as vandals subsided. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 20:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How is it sufficient when both vandals are autoconfirmed? Please stop commenting on these requests without even looking into the situation. ― Tartan357 Talk 04:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Editing seems to have slowed down with only a handful of edits since midday. Semi-protection is in place for a few days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09 January 2021

Taiwanese presidential elections

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing (Examples #4: does not engage in consensus building). Tjs2012 (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The user is making such a request only because I don't agree with them. 219.68.190.213 (talk) 02:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 11:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: I hate LuK3 4 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 11:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same issue that required page protection on 04:24, 2 December 2020 has continued on a periodic basis. Zealot editors let some time pass, and return to inject their POV again into list after protection expires. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 11:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't see any kind of sourcing standard being enforced in this article. Pretty much everything has a citation needed tag. It would be pretty hypocritical to protect any particular version here. Samsara 12:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 12:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

US Senators

Temporary semi-protection: IPs and new SPAs making identical DE/BLP edits re recent events. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced claims of treason or sedition. Meters (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Used on >100 pages. Nardog (talk) 12:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 12:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leon Jackson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent BLP vandalism.–Cupper52Discuss! 11:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Second reporting. Declined a few days ago but has since sustained additional IPs adding unsourced and promotional information. Has been consistent (but not constant) for the last few months. CNMall41 (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: invasion of low-count Ukrainian-speaking editors who are removing sourced info from the lede. It is probably externally coordinated, a few days should be sufficient.Ymblanter (talk) 23:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't think ECP will do the trick... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, an extended confirmed user joined the disruption. Probably needs to be full-protected and reverted to the pre-war verson--Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor, I filed an ANI request instead Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 05:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I think protection at this point will do more harm than good.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced, likely false, potentially defamatory edits from two newly created accounts. Edits are ongoing. warmly, ezlev. talk 08:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and/or addition of fictional content in the TV series, Diriliş Ertuğrul, which was based on the life of Ertuğrul. Limorina (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Probably unnecessary to protect this article now that it has left the main page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been heavily vandalized by multiple IPs for the past day or so. PC protection is currently in place, but another type of protection is necessary. CycloneYoris talk! 05:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. The Little Platoon (talk) 08:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I've been trying to clean up Category:Medical schools in Bangladesh pages after recent socks have inflated them and inserted a lot of uncited things. This editor keeps reverting me and I'm trying not to edit war (even though uncited statements can be challenged and removed by any editor). However, in good faith, I request full protection of the page so neither I nor the other editor can continue this dispute. ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined I'll leave a note to the other editor about citations, but for the most part, not a dispute that needs protection. Plus, it's semi protected due to sockpuppetry and the temporary full protection would mess that up so I'd prefer other solutions first. Wug·a·po·des 06:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs and new users. Ashleyyoursmile! 14:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems stale, but come report again if the problem returns. Wug·a·po·des 07:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 10:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 16:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I considered indef, but let's see if a rolling protection works. If it starts being vandalised again early next year, indef may be the final option. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – SPA + IP vandalising the page. Devokewater (talk) 08:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP,s + blocked user vandalising. Devokewater (talk) 09:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for a period of one year: This page has been attracting the Hanoi vandal for months, since September 2020. The vandal has been making useless minor edits without edit summaries, which is one of their trademarks. Lover Fest and My Gift are examples of pages that were also hit by the HV, and they were both semi-protected for a period of one year, so I think a one-year semi would be good for this page too. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 15:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, the edits by the vandal are infrequent, and there are some good IP edits as well, so I think pending changes might work in this case. Let us see.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, mostly from IPs. Requesting temporary protection until the event is completed. The Kip (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Nearly every other edit in the page history is vandalism. Has been protected 3 times in the past. Opal|zukor(discuss) 18:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 07:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit-warring. Doug Weller talk 19:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 07:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We're going to need a longer block on IP editing than the last two. The same user continues to delete masses of content against consensus. Largoplazo (talk) 20:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @IanDBeacon and Engineerchange: This is only speculation, but I can't help thinking that when Jack Evans himself (self-identified) was editing and objecting to material in the article, he had a great deal of trouble figuring out how to comment on the Talk page, with a bewilderment I've never seen from anyone on Wikipedia. This user, objecting to material in this article, is also bewildered over how and where to comment on the talk page. Coincidence? Largoplazo (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 06:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 06:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption. ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 20:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GABgab 04:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs and new accounts vandalizing the article, mainly by changing date of birth/date of death. [41], [42]. NJD-DE (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking from IPs and accounts. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 14:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing over several days. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock of Patiparmeshwar persistently vandalising the page. Satrar (talk) 21:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. History of sockpuppetry. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and new users. —DanCherek (talk) 03:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Noting several periods of protection in the log. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unusually heavy spate of "Hamilton" fan vandalism. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article's protection recently expired and the article has since experienced a lot of disruptive editing from IPs. Given that it doesn't seem to be letting up and the subject is a very popular YouTuber, I think indefinite protection may be needed.

I'm also confused, because Twinkle says the protection put on January 4 is going to expire January 18, but it's not protected. Is this a MediaWiki bug?. Ovinus (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ovinus, the history merge caused the page to become unprotected, all the IP edits add unconstructive BLP issues due to being a popular YouTuber accused of cheating, so this should really be re-protected. Dylsss(talk contribs) 00:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I’ve restored the protection that was lost in the history merge. If disruption continues when protection expires, make another request for protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent transfer rumors nonsense. --BlameRuiner (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @BlameRuiner: May need some cleanup. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. UnguidedEmperor (talk) 14:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 23:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dispute over adding storming of the Capitol and Donald Trump to this article, without accompanying discussion on the talk page. Most of the participants are new accounts. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content. (CC) Tbhotch 23:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on birth/death dates by various IPs and users. NJD-DE (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of unsourced content regarding similarities between this event and United States Capitol storming this year. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm sorry that this will hit productive IPs as collateral, but the edit rate is really quite high for PC. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs playing silly buggers again. DuncanHill (talk) 02:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 17:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheBushranger. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pretty obvious that most, if not all IP contributions are still disruptive after the page protection was removed. Jeuno (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. This article was extended confirmed protected, but the protection just expired and it no longer has any protection level (not even semi). It's a very exposed and high profile article (700,000+ readers yesterday), and will be very hard to maintain without some kind of protection. I would propose extended confirmed protection for at least 2 weeks. --Tataral (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was also thinking about possibly extending the move protection to probably at least a few weeks too since it is set to expire on Wednesday. Jeuno (talk) 00:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Non-admin comment: It is probably need to be permanently semi-protected and move protected by administrator only indefinitely. I believe this request is resonable but due to persistent vandalism in the page, indef semi-protection and move protection would be considered. It see some IP add Gunpowder Plot to this article which they thought similar. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've added 5 days of semi, and 10 days move protection. I don't expect these parameters to remain, but they'll do for now. -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-autoconfirmed accounts are repeatedly altering the rendering of the subject's name against talk page consensus. This page has been protected before; protection recently expired and the disruptive editing has returned. I think semi-ing for a month would be reasonable. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 00:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sro23 (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute relating to a quotation between various IPs, a logged-in editor, and ClueBot. Hopefully protection will encourage use of the talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 02:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not a content dispute, plain old vandalism mistakenly reverted by ClueBot. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Arb enforcement. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment IMO, semi protection seems is more likely given the high traffic of the article himself. Doesn't you see have evidence of vandalism from IP?. If don't, the protection can't be justified, whether semi or pending changes. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Furthermore, pending changes would not be the appropriate level of protection for arbitration enforcement. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption. Shawarsh (talk) 14:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent introduction of unsourced speculation by IP editors. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption. Shawarsh (talk) 14:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent introduction of unsourced speculation by IP editors. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Is being continuously vandalized by this user, They are abusing it with the account and multiple IPs despite repeated warnings, I have already launched a SPI, Seems to be highly motivated and persistent, I can only revert so many times, Request that this page be semi-protected for atleast a month so they dont come back in some other IPs-- KindCowboy69 10:22 AM January 10, 2021 10:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 11:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP-hopping edit warrior who also resorts to racist edsums talking about "racial insult" and "silly little Taiwanese". Austronesier (talk) 13:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous vandalism. Denisarona (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Casting aspersions on subject's character with no reliable sources to support them. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There are no BLP violations in the recent history—the last instances were in December, while under pending changes, and both were reverted quickly. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unconstructive edits. RoxySaunders (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 21:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Temporary) Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 21:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EN-Jungwon 15:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting 30 days semi-protection. This is a recent event in Ireland, with misinformation and lies being spread online by racists (as mentioned in the article itself), including disrupting editing of this article. It resumed after previous protection had expired. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP vandalism by IPs and new users. Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. N.J.A. | talk 13:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. UnguidedEmperor (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. At the moment, vandalism is at a low enough level for pending changes to suffice. If it picks up do feel free to request again. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: No reason for any non-admin to edit this page. Preferably also re-enable the bot if necessary. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 16:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike Rosoft. ClueBot II has been down for maintenance for many, many years, and the page has not been edited since 2017. No reason to re-enable the bot or change the protection level. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: A redirect to a template-protected template used on hundreds of thousands of pages. –Cupper52Discuss! 11:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected for a period of indefnite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 15:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 13:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 15:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Right wing POV pushing from IP. MrOllie (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 15:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A number of anonymous edits added blatantly wrong information from November to early January. WuTang94 (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Darkwind (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 08:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (partial) –Darkwind (talk) 09:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Darkwind: I appreciate that but as he appears to be jumping between IP addresses I feel a temporary semi-page protection would be more effective. — Czello 09:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: This is the third time my email inbox has exploded after the page is unprotected. Please protect the page, sorry about this.realjamesh (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update Already done so no need to. realjamesh (talk) 11:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – this is a content dispute. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 06:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unending string of IP editors and throwaway usernames changing to wrong numbers and too much praise. Binksternet (talk) 06:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits are vandalism after protection expired. Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 07:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 09:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated disruptive edits by IP hopping sock as soon as page becomes unprotected. Robvanvee 07:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (duration per previous escalating protection periods) –Darkwind (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Hot media topic greatly increasing edits and vandalism. TruthBuster21223 (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection or temporary pending changes protection, sysop to auto-accept: The album is certainly not notable per WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM, which I have stated multiple times in edit summaries. Yet, the redirect has been removed three times in the past day. There might be a potential competency issue, as I have made it clear as day that the album is not notable, yet the article keeps being created with no improvements to sourcing (GNG) or anything in NALBUM. There have been XC editors who have participated in this, so there isn’t much else that can be done other than the two options I have detailed above. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 16:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Clearly others disagree with you. I suggest you nominate the page for deletion and/or redirection at WP:AFD if you feel the subject is not notable. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – cursory research shows this clearly meets WP:FUTUREALBUM. Concerns about notability should be brought to AfD. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Last time problem was entirely different. The user was putting unsourced or using WP:SYNTH for caste glorification. Heba Aisha (talk) 18:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by creationists. The Discovery Institute is actively recruiting members to "fix" the page. Guy Macon (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Not enough recent activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP editors; most of whom rely on imaginary speculation instead of verified sources. Areaseven (talk) 09:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruption by IP editors especially in the {{infobox writer}} template present within the article. — Amkgp 💬 13:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced edit warring by IPs over national origin of the food. IamNotU (talk) 14:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Continuous disruption by IP editors. After the last temporary protection expired on January 1 the issues started again. - Ïvana (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 16:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. iAdnan (talk) 03:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock master User:Gfstudent21 have created another sockpuppet by the name of Double-Butts Team. Sockpuppet decided to play punk by pasting the entire list table from List of awards and nominations received by GFriend onto Awards and nominations section after List of awards and nominations received by GFriend was protected to prevent sockpuppetry. Hence, requesting temporary semi-protection for GFriend article as well. Thanks you. – Paper9oll (📣📝) 04:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate the spirit of this nom, it's really a single incident at this article, the account was blocked, and activity has not resumed. Samsara 12:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Noted, I listed it because the revert wasn't done until 8 hours later by me. In between, around 2 editors likely confused even decided to improve the list table instead of reverting it. If the sockmaster even happen to start disruptive editing on GFriend article again, I will request protection again. For now, just reject it. Thanks – Paper9oll (📣📝) 12:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes-protection: Intermitent IP vandalism since at least October 2018 [43]. Major waste of time to deal with these edits. Dentren | Talk 15:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one IP, which can be blocked if it resumes. GABgab 01:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, especially in the Contestant progress chart (BTW, editors at WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race seek help resolving this issue across articles, if any admins are able to please help). --Another Believer (Talk) 23:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Considering the hideous edit warring I can see in the history/protection log of RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12) and the high edit volume, I am WP:BOLDly applying indefinite protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Over the last couple days a rotating cast of IPs have been breezing through to blank parts of the page and replace sourced content with (what appears to be) copyvio from the site's ad kit. Chetsford (talk) 00:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – He was on board of the Sriwijaya Air Flight 182. Unconfirmed casualities. (CC) Tbhotch 03:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism at this article lately. The suite of Mickey Mouse Clubhouse articles seems to be a long-term target of IP vandals. --IJBall (contribstalk) 04:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 05:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous semi-protection expired. RoxySaunders (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 21:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Brankestein (talk) 21:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:23, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Is getting targeted for petty vandalism from multiple vandal IPs acting in quick succession. ex1, ex2, ex3. Paultalk16:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on BLP by IPs. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruption/BLP violation resumed as soon as the article was unprotected from last time. 6 Month+ / Indef semi requested, because this is unlikely to go away anytime soon. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits like this (removed nationality) or outright vandalism [44] [45] buy IPs since December. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prevent banned users + IP’s making abusive comments on this talk page. Devokewater (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Large increase of vandalism. – DarkGlow () 19:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow () 20:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant and ongoing vandalism and BLP violations. Neiltonks (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: disruptive editing – A newly registered user (first edit January 6) who then switched to an IP keeps editing the page to copy the Spanish version of the page leaving many parts in Spanish rather than in English. While, I believe the edits are being done in good faith, the version I reverted it to, before the user keeps changing it, is the same style used across every national league system on English wikipedia. For example, Italian football league system, French football league system, English football league system, etc. The female league system is in the correct format, since the editor is only editing the male section, for whatever reason. I had previously left a message on the user's talk page, but it was ignored and they just returned as an IP address. I reverted twice already, but don't want to break WP:3RR so am asking for page protection. RedPatchBoy (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Users blocked also. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of non-selected or non-confirmed players to pro bowl rosters. I think it's probably best to protect until at least February 1 (the day after the scheduled day of the Pro Bowl was supposed to be held). GPL93 (talk) 14:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Full-protected back in 2010, before TPE. Lowering a bit might help encourage improvements. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 14:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done – see the talk page, though. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2021

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 10:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, but with a note (mainspace dummy edit) attached, reminding participants that working to finalize a resolution on the article talk page before continuing to engage in the disputed edits, would probably be best for all involved. El_C 18:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Content Dispute: Including editors accusing each other of vandalism. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs changing DoB [46], [47], [48], [49]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edits, attempting to remove building's most common non-English name, "Harmandir Sahib". RoxySaunders (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsourced and POV against Indian government here, jab at Indian ruling party BJP and an oragnization RSS here; dubious edit summary on "spelling correction", but in reality unsourced POV Hindu vs Sikh propagada here. Done again after a revert here. Also not following WP:COMMONNAME and long-standing version [50]. The version is as per multiple discussions in the talk page. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Embarrassingly bad playoff loss for a head coach on the hot seat means IP vandalism. ZappaMatic 04:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is still receiving consistent vandalism. This is likely to continue as long as Kennedy is in a high profile position. Nemov (talk) 13:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change redirect target to DWBA-FM, callsign rebranded until the shutdown of ABS-CBN. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 07:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sean Ethan James D. Querubin: Because both DWAI and DWBA-FM redirect to DZRR, it is not clear to me what you are asking for with this request. — The Earwig talk 04:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Earwig:, What I meant is DWAI should be redirected to DWBA-FM not DZRR because DWAI is the former callsign of DWBA-FM. The callsign rebranded until the shutdown of ABS-CBN. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 05:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sean Ethan James D. Querubin: That would create a double redirect, which should not be done. DWBA-FM does not have an independent article and does not seem notable enough to have one (based on multiple attempts to create it by an IP user). If this is confusing, it's possible DZRR needs some discussion of these alternate names, though I don't know enough about how we write about radio stations to say if this is a good idea. — The Earwig talk 06:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Earwig:, Agreed! Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 08:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Per the above, editors are welcome to refine the proposal further, if they so choose, and upon doing so, resubmit the revised request. El_C 17:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EN-Jungwon 01:06, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EN-Jungwon 01:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden interest from multiple IPs including an IP-hopper from Tunisia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Now-indeffed editor User:LittleMemories has been waging a persistent edit war and gaming autoconfirmed to persistently and unilaterally make changes that are currently the subject of an RfC. Autoconfirmed sockpuppets appear on a regular basis to make the same change. Reporting and reverting are getting tedious. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I could understand "not appropriate" or "not supported by policy" but "not required" seems factually incorrect. Or is there some >3 autoconfirmed disruptive sockpuppets rule for ECP I'm unaware of? Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There have been precisely two sock edits since the page was semiprotected and the original user was blocked. I would also not consider that sufficient activity to justify a change in protection level. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 18:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring and disruptive editing from IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 14:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It is a very visible page, with roughly 120k page views per month, so I don't think vandalism is ever going away. The page has been under Pending changes protection since 2013, but I find it just generates pointless work for reverting editors and pollutes watchlists. I've counted 14 edits from IP users since December 1, of which only one was a constructive edit. Ironically enough, one of the vandalisms was removing the {{pp-pc1}} template, which was done on December 11 but I only noticed now. Tercer (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Indefinite pc converted into indefinite semi. El_C 18:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Now-indeffed editor User:LittleMemories has been waging a persistent edit war and gaming autoconfirmed to persistently and unilaterally make changes that are currently the subject of an RfC. Autoconfirmed sockpuppets appear on a regular basis to make the same change. Reporting and reverting are getting tedious. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I could understand "not appropriate" or "not supported by policy" but "not required" seems factually incorrect. Or is there some >3 autoconfirmed disruptive sockpuppets rule for ECP I'm unaware of? Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There have been precisely two sock edits since the page was semiprotected and the original user was blocked. I would also not consider that sufficient activity to justify a change in protection level. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 18:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring and disruptive editing from IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 14:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It is a very visible page, with roughly 120k page views per month, so I don't think vandalism is ever going away. The page has been under Pending changes protection since 2013, but I find it just generates pointless work for reverting editors and pollutes watchlists. I've counted 14 edits from IP users since December 1, of which only one was a constructive edit. Ironically enough, one of the vandalisms was removing the {{pp-pc1}} template, which was done on December 11 but I only noticed now. Tercer (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Indefinite pc converted into indefinite semi. El_C 18:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protect - again request this GA be protected against a disruptive, edit-warrinng IP-hopper editing against talk page consensus and sources. Asking for 30 days. Thank you - wolf 04:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-administrator comment Do you see any persistent vandaliam in the page, Thewolfchild? 110.137.164.146 (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent vandalism being perpetrated by none-registered member 2604:3d09:37a:9900:509e:7922:b21a:1fe4. This isn't the first time this page has been vandalised. Request it be protected indefinitely, and this user be blocked from adding any edits to any page.

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by either an account hopper, or some sort of social media. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:06, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Ole Miss football fans, inserting AJ Brown as mayor. Jacona (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Now used at Template:TFA-editnotice, which is TE-protected itself, so protection should cascade. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 11:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 13:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 12:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what to ask for but mainpage links here and the article is a mess with warring, fast edits going back and forth. Also a mess in other ways, the lead is extremely long, and I am seeing a lot of POV: e.g. "The riots and storming of the Capitol were described as treason, insurrection, sedition, domestic terrorism, and an attempt by Trump to carry out a coup d'état or self-coup." (That happens to be my own POV, but I still don't think we should link to my POV from Wiki's main page.) People coming to Wikipedia for information deserve better than what we have to show them there. HouseOfChange (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article is already semiprotected. ECP would be useless, as the vast bulk of edits—including controversial ones—is coming from extended-confirmed users. Full protection would be completely inappropriate, as it would exclude all but a small minority of productive users from editing what is now a vital article. Any page on a subject this fraught and this fresh is bound to get bogged down in recentism and POV—protection is not the way to deal with it. I would personally decline but am happy to hear other admins' takes on this, perhaps in a more appropriate venue. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fvasconcellos: I agree to this. In addition this request cannot be parsed. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Yes, the article is kind of wild and crazy with constant editing, but that is to be expected for a high-visibility event like this with new information coming out all the time. The new editing is NOT vandalism. The vast majority of it is constructive.  MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Daily posting of a personal grievance from IP hopper. Please redact the last re-addition as well - Arjayay (talk) 10:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also revdelled. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Daily posting of a personal grievance from IP hopper - as above report. Please redact the last few re-additions as well - Arjayay (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also revdelled. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Increase in disruption in the form of attempts to remove content achieved via past consensus and drive-by tagging. Most likely related to a spike in attention on alternative social networks following Trump's ban from Twitter, etc. GorillaWarfare (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a content dispute. So i want to ping Ymblanter to resolve the situation. Elsewhere it needs to be fully protected. There are not reason why arbitration enforcement is apply on it because there actually a content dispute that involving ECP user as well. Jorm and Neo139 is ECP user and also involve in edit warring so ECP wouldn't be necessary. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 08:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., pretty clear edit-warring which features extended-confirmed editors at both sides. Whereas the article is amenable to arbitration enforcement, I do not currently see anything which would specifically require extended-confirmed protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Ymblanter because believe there as edit warring between all users. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 08:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or confirmed protection: Continued disruptive editing. This is the second time I have reported this page in a week (see diff here for first request which resulted in an IP user being blocked). There is a continued level of disruption with another IP user 129.78.56.174 continuing to add unduly negative material that is not supported by the sources and in some cases doesn't talk about the subject of the article at all. I added a warning to their talk page but got no response. The IP comes from Sydney University which suggests a WP:COI edit. After the last request I cleaned up the page and added in material that was sourced, so these edits are just reverting back to what it was like beforehand. Deus et lex (talk) 07:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also a further edit by 2405:6E00:1125:1F00:5C79:4150:82C9:FDBC. Deus et lex (talk) 08:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 08:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 09:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 02:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page was protected on 9 December due to disruptive editing by a block evading IP. Protection ended on 9 January and the block evading IP has resumed the disruption. 2.O.Boxing 03:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Up from the previous one month protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 03:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edits, trying to remove Donald Trump from list of presidents who have been impeached. Chamberlain2007 (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow-motion edit war. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mvcg66b3r, Full protection seems kind of harsh for an edit war. Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 00:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. As one of the involved parties, instead of requesting protection, why not try and... stop? If you guys can't work it out, escalate to ANI. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page has a long history of being a target for LTAs and drive-by vandals, including an LTA who targeted the page just earlier. Requesting the reapplication of Semi-Protection for another 6 months. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Favonian, El C, and ToBeFree: Can you please take care of this one? Thanks. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High-traffic page (still), IP disruptive edits. ~ Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸 00:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP user (177.13.121.220 , 177.13.127.107, etc.) keeps removing parts of the article for no reason, especially parts which contain negative feedback about Elton John's performance in the song. This has been going on for months now. I suggest a permanent protection on the page. Sricsi (talk) 16:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP account. Possibly WP:COI. The IP accounts are removing reliably sourced text, as well as adding unsourced text about the nature of the subject's relationship with her father. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Semi-protected for two days. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – See [51] [52] [53]. Shadow4dark (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 02:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by different IPs. — JRDkg (talk) 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. BOVINEBOY2008 00:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Mikezarco (talk) 11:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn as the request made from a compromised account (someone other than Mikezarco made this request from their account). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 14:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent, slow-moving edit war from an IP, with single reverts by several editors. --Pinchme123 (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Arbitration enforcement. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 20:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a handful of disruptive edits this month so far. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a set of IP numbers. The IP numbers have regularly come back to the article since mid-December to remove consensus text. The accounts do not participate on the talk page. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:48, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very hot topic full of vandalism right now. Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 00:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12 January 2021

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Possibly due to high traffic (and the fact that this is in ITN), persistent vandalism (just some include this, this, this, this, this, and this disrupt the page where many readers seek accurate information. Protection could be removed once it's out of ITN. GeraldWL 08:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page is being too heavily edited for PC protection to work effectively. MelanieN (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent reverts to a promotional version, by socks of the organization described in the article. Possibly (talk) 08:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by an admin. Possibly (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Fences and windowsMelanieN (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is seeing constant vandalism with unsourced edits or very obvious cases of intentional/conscious non-constructive additions. I would request extended confirmed protection but for now semi seems like the right type to put on this page. Most of the edit history on this page speaks for itself. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 10:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. AngryHarpytalk 10:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This seems to be attracting some shenanigans. The latest was a claim that the 2020 Donald Trump campaign had been deemed a terrorist organization. Jdphenix (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. This page is a warzone. Xiamatt (talk) 17:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s also a WP:BDP, so that should be taken into consideration. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 17:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: disruptive POV editing of the article persisted for months, but is also more recently happening daily (or almost) by IP-hopping editor(s). Thanks, —PaleoNeonate19:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – target of socking vandalism by Vallabharebel. Spike 'em (talk) 15:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Vallabhasesss (talk · contribs). Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection People are having to revert some clearly partisan anon editing. PatGallacher (talk) 15:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from at least 4 IPs today. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 04:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected – As an arbitration enforcement, per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Users adding information from Fox News opinion column without any additional sources. C5mjohn (talk) 07:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalising notable people. Devokewater (talk) 11:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalising by IP + sockpuppets. Devokewater (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent target of socking vandal. Spike 'em (talk) 12:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. This seems like it can be the target of warring. There already seemed to be some earlier SuperHeight (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please re-report if disruption escalates. — Newslinger talk 05:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unreferenced age. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7F:A1E:7700:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Blocked for 1 week. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 05:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – It seems likely to be ongoing tensions between Arab-Israeli conflict and Antisemitism in Poland. 2001:4452:4AE:8A00:185E:CD99:DA35:72CA (talk) 04:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Newslinger talk 05:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warring. Group harassment by multiple users based on contentious subject matter. Have been asked to speak to concerns on discussion page and ignored them to simply destroy my edits. I am relatively new at this, but I spent an hour or more with subject matter expertise meticulously fixing the article's lack of factuality and neutrality in good faith only to keep having them scrubbed without due cause. DeweyDecimalLansky (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeweyDecimalLansky has reverted 4 different editors who have undone their edits on this article in the past few hours, and has not substantially discussed their changes on the talk page, just making platitudes about neutrality. If anything they should be blocked for edit-warring. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: DeweyDecimalLansky (talk · contribs). Blocked for 48 hours for edit warring. — Newslinger talk 05:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Same returning vandal. Edit summary need to be removed as it called others rapists. Walrus Ji (talk) 07:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolling. Misinformation. Crboyer (talk) 03:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't see the point in specifically asking for that to just be temporary; an indefinite semi-protection would prevent IPs from vandalizing the page period. One user appears to be socking with multiple addresses to re-instate their disruption. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated misinformation. Crboyer (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding unsourced puffery and unnecessary glorification in a list article. Also keeps edit warring. [54], [55], [56], [57]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Newslinger. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. same vandalism as last week as soon as protection was removed Aeengath (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is still experiencing vandalism, page has previously been protected which greatly cut down on the vandalism. –DMartin 04:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this, and please re-report next year if the vandalism persists. — Newslinger talk 06:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IPv4 and IPv6 vandalism with force passages. --Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. /64 blocked one week. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption and persistent re-creation. KidAd talk 19:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (partial block ISP-wide for charter IPv4 and the involved IPv6 /64, two weeks) –Darkwind (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Editor continues to vandalize after multiple reverts and warnings. HeartCat1talkctrbs 00:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

High level Spam edit on Omar Lulu

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Onmyway22 (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Darkwind (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. –Darkwind (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring: IP user made edit to article several days ago to include MrBeast's unofficial YouTube rewind video under 'Series Videos' section, as well as editing infobox to reflect stats from this video. Upon reverting this (reason for not including should be obvious, given article reads "YouTube Rewind is a video series produced and created by YouTube" (emphasis mine)), same IP user repeatedly edits article to restore this information that clearly doesn't belong in the article. Thecarterclan1 (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also blocked the IP for 24 hours for edit warring. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 21:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See protection log for this page....let's just semi forever. Moxy 🍁 23:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. The page seems to attract edit warring SuperHeight (talk) 00:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 18:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Bowling is life (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: users are moving the article to various titles without discussing (kindly see move log, and previous protection log). Requesting extended confirmed move protection for a month. Regards,. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – She has remarked about her GPA in a TV programme which led to people coming and vandlaizing her page. It should be protected for sometime from IP vandals. USaamo (t@lk) 18:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 19:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 21:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism violating WP:BLP by citing rumor and speculation of criminal behavior. NedFausa (talk) 21:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP issues. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing insertion of unsourced/poorly sourced material. Misleading edit summaries. Lack of use of talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The user Idontremember2012 has been partial blocked from editing the Saltash Community School page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. –Darkwind (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repetitively recreated over the past month. –Cupper52Discuss! 18:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – One recreation does not seem like "repetitively recreated" to me. If it happens again, OK. — The Earwig talk 21:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given Mooney's objection to impeachment of Donald Trump we can expect continued vandalism and BLP violations. Sjö (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recurring sockpuppet user restoring their preferred version of the article. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. –Darkwind (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long term vandalism here. – DarkGlow () 14:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Darkwind (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by sockpuppets of banned editor, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarveyCarter. FDW777 (talk) 14:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. –Darkwind (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Frequent vandalism and likely to receive a lot more over the next few days due to the perpetrator of the crime being scheduled for execution tomorrow. Case is controversial and is highly likely to receive lots of vandalism from both anti and pro death penalty supporters in the coming days. Requesting temporary semi-protection for at least four days days until the execution has passed. Inexpiable (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. –Darkwind (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New user vandalism from at least 2 accounts in a span of a few minutes. Please also revert back to any of the good edits. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 23:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 23:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 17:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Darkwind (talk) 23:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of unsourced changes happening, most likely due to news coverage of alt tech websites including Parler and Gab. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Urve (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 January 2021

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 19/31 edits in the past month have been reverted or are reverts of other edits, usually involving IPs or new users. Due to its high pageview count, it is likely that this is a recurring problem. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Wug·a·po·des 22:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This page falls under discretionary sanctions for the Israel-Palestine Arab-Israeli conflict, including the 30/500 rule, and yet it is frequently edited by IP users and non-extended-confirmed users. Many of these edits are nonconstructive. warmly, ezlev. talk 18:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC), edited 18:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please note that per WP:ECPGUIDE, "Administrators may apply indefinite extended confirmed protection at any time to any page in the conflict area at their discretion... Many administrators will only apply ECP in circumstances where there have been editing disputes involving accounts that fail the 30/500 rule." There have been editing disputes on this article involving acounts that fail the 30/500 rule, including one which is potentially ongoing. warmly, ezlev. talk 18:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Wug·a·po·des 22:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired today at 11:39 PM, but vandalism continues. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 22:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 21:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Probably she said somewhere recently that she likes to be called "Annie", but that is not her birth name. (CC) Tbhotch 20:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 22:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive IP edits continue after last semi-protection. No reason to think they'll stop anytime soon, either. Tamzin (they/them) | o toki tawa mi. 21:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wug·a·po·des 22:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. signed, Rosguill talk 20:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High volume of reverted edits by new users since the last protection expired in November. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently User:Vellayil was vandalizing the financial figures [58][59]. After their block, IPs started maing the sae type of unsourced changes [60], [61]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism continues here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An IP is repeatedly claiming the subject has died. Either the page should be semi-protected or the IP should be blocked. P-K3 (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has now created the account RIPShimanoumi to continue the vandalism.-- P-K3 (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring from Cancún, using multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP accounts. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 21:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 21:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Topic gets (and given the subject, will continue to get) a significant number of joke edits. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 23:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite is an extreme step that we need to work up to. Chetsford (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kashmorwiki (talk) 17:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edits with poor grammar and against MOS from multiple IPs/new users. — MarkH21talk 14:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent childish vandalism. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Editors have been warned and blocks will likely be in order if behavior continues. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism, disruptive edits, edit wars. Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 17:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Elder's Pen repeatedly add a "synopsis" that is actually not a synopsis. They've been warned at Teahouse and edit summaries, but kept on reinstating it. GeraldWL 06:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see a little edit warring by one individual a few days ago. Nothing in the last couple of days and certainly nothing to warrant indefinite protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Shift674-🌀 contribs 15:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shift674, I don't know if I am allowed to comment here. But it seems like it's only vandalized cause it's on the Main Page. Now it's not, and there's been no 13 Jan edits as of time of writing. So probably unwarranted. GeraldWL 05:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Gerald Waldo Luis, yes, you are certainly welcome to comment here. — The Earwig talk 16:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Also notable person and must adhere to WP:BIO AussieCoinCollector (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — The Earwig talk 17:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated blanking by IPs, who have no need to edit this page. RolandR (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This vandalism continues. There have been two three more cases of complete blanking since this report was filed - please act to protect the template! RolandR (talk) 11:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 16:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism introducing POV. Also notable personality and must adhere to WP:BIO. --Muirofsara (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 16:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This has become a place for trolls to whine. This is not a place for airing grievances. Firestar464 (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 12:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increase of IP vandalism and BLP issues. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is substansial edit warring between users, i see that in the history of this page. They adding disputed information regarding the social networking network about recent events. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am not seeing a content dispute. I am seeing POV attempts to remove content by several extended confirmed users (at least one of whom has now been blocked). MelanieN (talk) 16:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increase in IP vandalism and BLP issues. Page has been protected three times since October due to the same. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 06:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs continue to make non-neutral edits based on unsubstantiated claims. Attempts to discuss have failed. Idell (talk) 07:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Pretty substantial uptick in disruption given that it's been in the news following the events at the US Capitol and Trump's Twitter ban. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is now an edit war, with an editor blanking large swaths of text. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Non-administrator comment This article need to be fully protected due to involvement of extended confirmed user in edit warring. This is a content dispute so i want to ping Ymblanter or MelanieN to resolve this situation. This article is not suitable to require extend confirmed protection only due to arbitration enforcement, even ECP user Lemonpasta also involve in a edit warring as well so ECP don't necessary. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Repeated disruptive editing by extended-confirmed users. MelanieN (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection of Realme and Oppo and Indefinite semi-protection of Toyota Fortuner. Persistent vandalism. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 10:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Realme and Oppo. MelanieN (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to Toyota Fortuner. MelanieN (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: being vandalized by an ip user who will simply not stop. This protection is needed ASAP. Thanks. UpcomingPurse (talk) 22:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Page has been deleted. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism (addition of unsourced material) over the past week, mainly from IPs and newly-registered accounts. Protection is needed quickly to prevent further vandalism. Johnnyconnorabc (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism after protection lock was lifted. Tfess up?or down? 02:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. With thirteen separate protections in the log, upgrading to indefinite. — The Earwig talk 02:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly attempting an RFD without actually going to WP:RFD. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Certainly disruptive behaviour. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content removal and attempts to remove well-sourced information about the company, which has recently been in the news a bit due to providing domain registrar services to the recently-deplatformed Parler. Parler was just ECP for a month; I wonder if semi-protection for the same time would be sufficient for this article (most of the disruption has come from IPs). GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 21:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Barkeep49. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs repeatedly attempting an RFD without actually going to WP:RFD. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Certainly disruptive behaviour. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content removal and attempts to remove well-sourced information about the company, which has recently been in the news a bit due to providing domain registrar services to the recently-deplatformed Parler. Parler was just ECP for a month; I wonder if semi-protection for the same time would be sufficient for this article (most of the disruption has come from IPs). GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 21:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Barkeep49. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2021

Indefinite pending changes protection: Article became a Wishlist. Us readers/editors don't know where did they get the programs without announcing from the said channel, an IP editor also keeping on adding unsourced timeslots of programs since the past days. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 01:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yes it has. @Cyberpower678: in case there's something up with the bot. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Adding of unsourced or poorly content. It will be better if its pending changes aside from semi-protection to review everyone's edits if they were changes that was said by the channel. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Now that the NHL season has started, this article has seen quite a level of IP vandalism. PKT(alk) 20:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes and vandalism by many newly created accounts and IP. Edit warring over the unsourced changes over several days (the RS cites have embedded quotes). An attempt to welcome a discussion on the talk page has yielded no response. Requesting a short semi-protection to start with. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RexxS. Samsara 19:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism for the past few days. Un assiolo (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The only vandalism since June 2020 has been from a single IP, which has been given a level 3 warning. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Un assiolo (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IPs have vandalized recently; one is blocked, the other has been given a final warning. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Was previously protected, but it expired and vandalism has continued. Only constructive IP edits are counter-vandalism. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 19:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Despite SemiProtection, some are still managing to change the infobox with unsourced speculation. Paultalk15:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent additions of unnecessary and unsourced content and changes and removals to existing content. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random IP (likely the same person) continues to remove a chunk of content without explanation. It started in September 2019 and is still happening this week. — TAnthonyTalk 17:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chuka Chieftalk 17:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent disruptive editing  - wolf 17:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – 2001:4451:8614:5d00:e833:5b9:36c7:d3c9 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is a confirmed sock of and 2001:4451:8685:AD00:C8EB:A2A2:54F9:45F0 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is the same host and location. I would like to prevent further action against the editor. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: I'm not sure what you're asking for here. At first glance, it would seem to be a rangeblock request. What do you mean by, "preventing further action against the editor"? Samsara 15:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I indicated in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gwapong Chikoy, the range is very large. To catch both 2001:4451:8614:5D00:E833:5B9:36C7:D3C9 and 2001:4451:8685:AD00:C8EB:A2A2:54F9:45F0, we're looking at 2001:4451:8600:0:0:0:0:0/128 or even larger, which would be much, or possibly all, of the Philippines for that ISP. If we lock that one page, but not its talk page for a week or possibly a month, it would likely keep the sock away long enough to offer the editor some perspective. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I've given it a week, don't yet see the need for more given there have only been three incidents, and only a few days since the first one. Next time, lead with the relevant information - when we have backlogs, we don't usually want to chase through your contribs to figure out what the something is going on. Thank you. Samsara 16:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent ip vandalism. Spike 'em (talk) 10:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Samsara 15:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing effort by IP editors to vandalize article - mainly echoingm claims of fraud. Geoff | Who, me? 15:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA; editors with less than 30 days and 500 edits should not edit this page. Firestar464 (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 14:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism . Especially changing birth and death dates. Kpgjhpjm 11:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EastEnders articles

Indefinite semi-protection: Dynamic IP vandal has targeted these three articles for a very long period of time. They do tend to vandalise other articles, but time after time, they return to these three articles to introduce incorrect and disruptive edits. Rather than an IP range block, these articles need to be protected since there is information regarding BLPs on all three of these articles. – DarkGlow () 18:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected, with slight reservation for Fox as there was only a single incident since expiry. However, I took into consideration the argument that the incidents at all three articles are related. Samsara 14:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected Samsara 14:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long protection log and continuous activity. Samsara 14:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Long term magnet for vandalism that isn't always picked up particularly quickly, controversial figure within the BTCC scene. 2A00:23C7:31A4:E400:94E1:264F:22C1:785C (talk) 11:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and other disruptive edits. – I think we should temporary protect the page, especially during this period of crisis within the Italian government, in which the page will probably be heavily edited. -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Please see the editing history of User:2.29.238.24. Normchou💬 10:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC). Normchou💬 10:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The IP concerned looks like a CoI editor. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism and unsorced changes after the end of the last protection (at the end of december)--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 08:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just about to log this myself. Lots of BLP issues in the past 8 hours or so. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 14:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 12:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of (SPA) IP (and new SPA) vandalism, making the same POV changies. Slatersteven (talk) 13:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This has same request as Ahmetlii, which also request the protection of the same page. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 13:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Silly me.Slatersteven (talk) 13:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 14:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant increase of IP vandalism in a event where Donald Trump was impeached for the second time. They (IP address) blanking an information regarding Trump Impeachment. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Crossroads -talk- 07:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idell (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent ip6 disruptive editor. —blindlynx (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users adding random numbers, on infobox. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Onel5969 TT me 12:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – An IP editor has been adding links to this article across a large number of music-related articles, claiming "Ajay Owen" has writing credits in various songs, of which he does not. Hoax editing. – DarkGlow () 22:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DarkGlow, Its only been created once, and that was in 2017. Am I missing something? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 22:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CaptainEek Hi – thanks for the fast response! The article was recreated via Template:Ajay Owen, and there is also a draft. This person has no songwriting credits whatsoever, therefore do not belong on Wikipedia per GNG/NMUSIC. – DarkGlow () 22:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DarkGlow, I have opted to just delete the pages and block the users responsible. If the pages get recreated, report again :) CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 23:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CaptainEek: Thank you, that will do for now – I believe an upcoming SPI is on the cards here. – DarkGlow () 23:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Alternative action taken. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection from further IP vandelism in relation to the subjects role in the debate over the name of Coon cheese and subsequent announcement of the change of the brand name on 13/01/2021. 1.136.108.140 (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarahSV (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is no consensus on if the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol should be listed as terrorism and I don't want to run afoul of 1RR. Jdphenix (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RFC in progress. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of slander in edits. 2600:1700:FFC0:EC60:D8FD:D64D:3012:1667 (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP violations. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection from further IP vandelism in relation to the subjects role in the debate over the name of Coon cheese and subsequent announcement of the change of the brand name on 13/01/2021. 1.136.108.140 (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarahSV (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is no consensus on if the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol should be listed as terrorism and I don't want to run afoul of 1RR. Jdphenix (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RFC in progress. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of slander in edits. 2600:1700:FFC0:EC60:D8FD:D64D:3012:1667 (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP violations. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This is a high profile event development. There has been vandalism and disruptive editing. I request that this page be protected temporarily . IR2017 (talk) 02:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@IR2017: Do you see any persistent vandalism in the page? I don't see any persistent vandalism conducted by IP. If IP vandalism doesn't appear, pages cannot be protected preemptively. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 04:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Page has been moved and the new title is protected. — The Earwig talk 00:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-protection: The full-protection for the page will expire tomorrow (24 hours later), so I request an extended protection due to the fact that the page will be vandalized after the protection expires. (see the talk page vandalisms as evidence)Ahmetlii (talk) 08:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Page will have PC protection indefinitely after full-protection expires. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 08:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, after full protection expires, indefinite PC will be apply for this article, so from that time Ahmetlii, let see whether in PC protection there are vandalism conduct by IP unless these edits are constructive. It also needs to be a warning for all users especially IP who intend to vandalize the page. 110.137.164.146 (talk) 09:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks.Ahmetlii (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Chetsford (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs mass-removing content from plot. ~ Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸 21:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Destroyeraa, this is a content dispute—and I agree with the IP. The plot summary is absurdly long and the IP's trimming is sensible. — The Earwig talk 21:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Seven reverts in a week, one to edits by a registered editor and six to IPs from a variety of ranges. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, disruption seems to have subsided shortly before this report was filed. signed, Rosguill talk 20:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Infrequent but persistent vandalism and violations of WP:BLP There are many examples in the page history.--EAWH (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I count one instance of vandalism since May 2020, on December 27. signed, Rosguill talk 20:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The impeachment of Donald Trump has just been formalized. The activity, especially from IP users, has gone up drastically. GyozaDumpling (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Missvain. Wug·a·po·des 22:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Missvain: Do you have any thoughts about extended protection under discretionary sanctions? Dolotta (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Steve M (talk) 13:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as leaving the article unprotected at this time is more beneficial to detecting further sockpuppetry. And a very happy New Year to you as well Cyphoidbomb. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. page was attacked again as soon as previous protection was lifted, user has been warned Aeengath (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: BSkwi (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of garbage IP edits recently. Crossroads -talk- 06:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There is a single IP that is edit warring to include their preferred version, but they have now been warned by Ohnoitsjamie. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think this article should be under some sort of content-protection for at least a month, at least until after the US Presidential Inauguration if not beyond. It's been receiving renewed interest from multiple IPs since the January 6th Insurrection. Some of these accounts seem interested in making useful/thoughtful/sourced contributions and some are obvious SPA/POV-pushers. Shearonink (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one recent POV comment by a single-edit IP, which happened to be mostly reverted by another single-edit IP. Per WP:SEMI, semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for looking in on the situation anyway. I'll check in on the article, see if it gets any funfunFUN edits... Shearonink (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All IP edits are disruptive/vandalism. Steve M (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dreamy Jazz. Samsara 22:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism. Cupper52 (talk) 17:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, this appears to be a content dispute and the edits do not meet the criteria for vandalism, Cupper52. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lettlerhellocontribs 18:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indef. There is a long term dispute surrounding all the churches in this area, apparently about history and theology. EdJohnston (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He last edited on July 25, 2013. Can someone update the talk page notice to say that instead of September 27, 2007? Steve M (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – pointless. The user ceased editing a long time ago. The precise date is of no real importance. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism. Cupper52 (talk) 17:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, this appears to be a content dispute and the edits do not meet the criteria for vandalism, Cupper52. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lettlerhellocontribs 18:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Elizium23 (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indef. There is a long term dispute surrounding all the churches in this area, apparently about history and theology. EdJohnston (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He last edited on July 25, 2013. Can someone update the talk page notice to say that instead of September 27, 2007? Steve M (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – pointless. The user ceased editing a long time ago. The precise date is of no real importance. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent POV edits and vandalism by IP addresses and new accounts. Article newly moved to mainspace. Requesting protection for 1 year. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can't protect an article that has only existed in article space for a day for an entire year as there is not history of disruption to support such an extended period. Even one week is pushing it at this time. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Subject is in the “rumor mill”, if you will, about becoming the head coach the Atlanta Falcons, and since the report came out about this, IPs have been prematurely editing the page before the official announcement is made, as is required by NFL Project policies. Rockchalk717 18:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinoy pop and redirects

Semi-protection: The article and redirects have been a target of User:Philippinesfan and a bunch of IP and sockpuppet accounts. -WayKurat (talk) 06:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of Oshwah's previous protections had expired, so Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. BOVINEBOY2008 10:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content on the one hand, and BLP violations on the other, by supporters and detractors of a controversial figure. Has been temporarily protected before, but problems return on expiration. Requesting at least 3-months protection. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bastun: This is not distruptive editing, but is actually vandalism. Due to high level of vandalism by IPs, semi-protection seems is more likely. IMO, this article doesn't need ECP because vandalistic behaviour from IP users and it would be overkill. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🔥LightningComplexFire🔥 16:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LTA target : Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The (Dutch-only) article has been subject to severe vandalism following a Belgian radio presenter demonstrating how easy it was to edit the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.34.173.69 (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We are not able to do anything about articles on nl.Wikipedia. You will need to ask at w:nl:Wikipedia:Verzoekpagina voor moderatoren/Beveiligen. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass vandalism attack over the past few hours. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I want to edit the page more carefully and with resources. Please unprotect the page. Deryakayaer (talk) 02:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Deryakayaer[reply]

@Cyberbot: Accidentally Protected. He is a well-known singer in Turkey. I want to add to Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murat_Ekşioğlu Deryakayaer (talk) 03:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Deryakayaer[reply]

Not unprotected Page isn't protected. Michael Greiner 05:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Greiner: Thank you for your answer. Could you please review it later if you create it if I develop it? English Biography: https://kimdeyir.com/who-is-murat-eksioglu-whence-biography-of-age-height-crest-sign-life Google: https://g.co/kgs/5us3G5 Do you create it? I'll contribute and you can review. Okey? Deryakayaer (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Deryakayaer[reply]

@Michael Greiner: In the meantime, I see that it is under protection. Please check again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murat_Ekşioğlu Deryakayaer (talk) 06:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Deryakayaer[reply]

Not done The page is not protected. However, because you are a new editor who is not yet autoconfirmed, you are not able to create new pages in article space. I suggest you use articles for creation. If you have any questions, ask at the Teahouse. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 21:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Subject is in news. IP Trolls are vandalizing her page. Walrus Ji (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SpacemanSpiff. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 21:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Subject is in news. IP Trolls are vandalizing her page. Walrus Ji (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator SpacemanSpiff. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and a couple of registered editors making bizarre micro-edits. DonIago (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Pending the open SPI case. Michael Greiner 05:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 07:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., one side is not discussing anything and is just reverting. I hope one week semi should be ok. I have also reverted to the last good version.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. EN-Jungwon 07:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: This page was recently fully protected for a few days due to disruptive editing, mostly attempts to remove sourced content. Semi-protection has been reapplied for a period of three years, which I imagine should soon be sufficient, but it is not currently sufficient. Gab has been in the news due to the recent decision by Twitter/Facebook/etc. to suspend some high-profile conservatives (including Donald Trump), and due to fellow alt-tech social network Parler being taken offline by its service providers. This has become a highly-viewed page and disruption has been quite high as a result. There have also been attempts by Gab itself to encourage their supporters to brigade the page. The recent editing history shows semi-protection is not currently sufficient. If I was not involved with the page, I would ECP for minimum one month, under AP2 DS. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so from my experience, the standard way we would approach this is to ask whether blocks are insufficient for dealing with the disruption that's occurring beyond semi. Again, from experience, if it's three or more autoconfirmed accounts causing trouble after semi has been installed, we go ECP. In that case, I would be happy to say we should go for three months of ECP. If I'm reading the history correctly, we're currently one strike away from "quorum". Another point - would this be a page we can easily put under 1RR? GorillaWarfare? Samsara 17:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I'm a pessimist, but the fact that we've had two autoconfirmed accounts making disruptive changes in under two hours after semiprotection was applied leads me to believe trying to rely on blocks alone will be an exhausting game of whack-a-mole. If you would like to wait for a third account to begin disruption, we can; I imagine it won't take very long. However due to the high viewer numbers I would rather we prevent the disruption rather than react to it. As for 1RR, I don't know if that would help. The disruption has been coming from so many different accounts that it seems like it will be the people reverting back to status quo that will be caught in the 1RR rather than those reverting against consensus. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there's one account that would already have had to cease editing, or now be blocked, that's why I'm bringing it up. "Having to wait" for warnings to go unheeded does take extra time. I'll have my eye on it every few mins for the next hour or two. I'm not necessarily more optimistic than you, just more process-wonky. ;-) Samsara 18:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It need to consider edit warring noticeboard. I believe it should be used when a users conduct edit warring with each other. Gorillawarfare request is fine but edit warring noticeboard needs to be considered because there are situation where ECP who also conduct edit war. I don't want it to be full protected it again only because that. I also believe it is a content dispute that needs a precaution against them. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks to me it's more like some users suddenly wanting to change a long-standing consensus. It's part of Wikipedia's culture to then discuss and see whether the consensus has indeed changed. Right now, we seem to be at the stage of people just pushing words around. I don't see any substantial discussion yet. Samsara 18:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than GorillaWarfare request, i would refer to request indefinite semi-protection for this article. IMO, semi-protection for only 3 years is ineaquate, and it is possible for it to vandalized this page again after 3 years. You see in Facebook, the article is indef semi-protection rather than only effect in years. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gab (social network) is already under indef PC1. That should be sufficient for now. We can re-evaluate the need for semi in three years, or when ECP ends if it comes to that. Samsara 18:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Samsara, IMO three year semi-protection followed by indef PC1 should be sufficient for now in order to prevent vandalism from users. I believe it should be a warning for all users where they must not intend to vandalize the page. Any user that are to vandalize the page needs to give a warning for them. Thank you. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 18:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I'll give you a ping if disruption continues (if you haven't already seen it). GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: Just FYI. Samsara 19:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to reply here but Samsara beat me to it.
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruptive activity and edit warring have involved multiple non-EC editors and show signs of continuation. Although I have participated a bit on the talk page, I have had almost no activity in the article (looking through the history, I see myself making a minor edit and then reverting myself), so I felt my involvement was distant enough to act in an administrative capacity to preserve the stability of the article by applying the protection. I have no objection to another administrator undoing it if there is disagreement. The previous protection was 3-year semi, which may as well be indef. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I agree that we don't necessarily need to decide between 3 years or indef semi-protection at the current moment. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Michael Greiner 04:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection, please. IPs claiming to be the subject have been changing the text since at least 2019, e.g. [62]. Currently, the IPs are adding more detail about a lawsuit the subject has started against named individuals, which is causing BLP issues. SarahSV (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather, pending changes is a nuisance, requiring someone to check and accept or reject. I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not willing to do it. What is wrong with semi-protection? SarahSV (talk) 06:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SlimVirgin The amount of BLP on there is low but consistent. It does not reach the level required for semi. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism continues after first protection expired. It requires an increase protection up to June 2021. SpectresWrath (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is under attack by IP users and new users. Again.   Aloha27  talk  03:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations from IPs Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 04:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since 13 January, a total of 26 of the 29 edits in that time have been vandalism or a reversion of that vandalism. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 01:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the vandalism has been done by various IP addresses, so blocking offending editors probably won't fix the problem since people seem to be independently deciding to vandalize this page. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 01:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 04:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 01:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by User:Deor Michael Greiner 05:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; non-notable students removing valid content and adding their names to infobox. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 05:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption of sourced content to DOB and birthplace by IPs and new accounts. Started as soon as the previous protection expired. Has been going on for years now (see Talk) and unlikely to stop anytime soon asking for a long term PP here. Gotitbro (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 15:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, joke edits and disruptive editing by IP addresses in the last month, due to the recent discontinuation, constantly ignoring Wikipedia guidelines (like MOS:TENSE), consensus, warnings on talk pages and the very strong warning included on the page ([63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], etc.).

Many of these edits come from an edit-warring IP hopper:

So if an admin could find an IP range to block, that would help, too. The related Adobe Flash article has been a target of this disruptive editing and sock puppetry, too, and I think it could be protected as well.—J. M. (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. But come back if it doesn't stabilise. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell: You are completely wrong on this. This is not a content dispute. Please look more carefully. Many of the edits are plain vandalism ([83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89] etc.), and as for the "content dispute" edits—again, this is a single IP hopper edit-warring against everyone else and against a clearly stated Wikipedia guideline, intentionally ignoring and removing clear warnings (and some of the edits by this user on this page are plain vandalism, too, as you can see in the diffs—the user is clearly trolling). "Content dispute" does not mean a single person abusing multiple IP addresses, ignoring everything and everyone else, vandalising the page. The IP hopper has received multiple warnings for the disruptive edits by multiple editors, and everyone keeps reverting his/her edits. The issue was already discussed on the talk page. The vandalism itself would be a reason for protecting the page, and the IP hopper definitely deserves a range block. Please reconsider your decision.—J. M. (talk) 00:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple BLP violations by various IPs and new accounts. Meters (talk) 03:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – There seems to be a persistent, co-ordinated effort by likely meatpuppet / sockpuppet accounts to add badly referenced lenghy personal life details that have not been of interest to any reliable source as far as I can tell. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the interest of clearing the backlog, I've granted ECP here, but a combination of warnings and blocks in combination with semi should be pursued in the longer term instead. Samsara 15:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined looks like a sudden spike rather than a persistent problem. Come back if it continues. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Year starting on day

Semi-protection or pending changes: Most edits since 2018 are cosmetic: an IP-hopper repeatedly changing the example year in the calendar. Certes (talk) 00:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see how that's disruptive, especially to the point of requiring protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by anonymous IPs. ☎️ Churot DancePop 05:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined there are lots of edits there but not many seem to be being reverted. Feel free to re-file with a more detailed explanation if you disagree. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Official name of "Maria Ceplinschi" (per FIG license/results & Romanian federation) consistently changed to her nickname of "Mara" instead. Sunnyou31 (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Edit wars and agenda pushing. Certain users have been including content that comes from unaccredited sources. Blesingri (talk) 00:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. Nigel757 (talk) 01:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ECP would be overkill anyway, but the editor is now engaging. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EN-Jungwon 01:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. ChristusX (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes there's been a sudden spike, but it doesn't appear to be persistent. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruptive edits by anon IPs. Vjmlhds 04:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA; editors with less than 30 days and 500 edits should not edit this page. And please impose 1RR in this article. 110.137.127.103 (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The last activity at this article that seems to relate to the conflict is a year old. Would like some second opinions. Samsara 14:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of verified same content by different IP editors and new account editors. — Amkgp 💬 18:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idan (talk) 18:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only one IP and edits are not vandalism. Try discussing with them. If they persist without engaging, we can consider a block. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Edit warring & disruptive editing, but some constructive contributions from IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 18:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP cautioned. Escalate if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A few week. It seems the party's publicist is removing WP:NPOV content and WP:RSes that have been added to support content that paints this fringe Canadian political party in a poor light. The editor continues to add WP:PRIMARY sources. Both the registered and previous anon is adding this content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 20:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But come back if it persists or gets more frequent. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection for all: High level of sockpuppetry done by an IP sockpuppet of Zhmailik. Please refer to the open SPI case at WP:Sockpuppet investigations#Zhmailik. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 22:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by new users. AussieCoinCollector (talk) wish the entire world's COVID-19 status was like WA, 275+ days of no local cases :) 00:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. — The Earwig talk 00:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Requesting unprotection of A2Z (Philippine TV channel) because since the programs transferred to List of programs broadcast by A2Z (Philippine TV channel), the article calmed down. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 09:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This might also be because the article is protected. @Callanecc: last protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc:, please unprotect A2Z (Philippine TV channel), your the last protecting admin who protected the article. Thank You! Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 01:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –Piranha249 23:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16 January 2021

Semi-protection: IP edit warring. 2A02:C7F:BE04:700:1508:9DAD:50E:CC13 (talk) 16:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is essentially a content dispute, related (God and all the saints help us) to WP:ARBINFOBOX. Favonian (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 18:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Woody. Favonian (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent spamming of WP:SELFPUB content by a WMF-banned user using numerous proxy addresses. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 21:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to the Arab-Israeli Conflict (Battle of Jenin). Train of Knowledge (Talk) 21:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to the Arab-Israeli film about Battle of Jenin (Jenin, Jenin) which also requested for protection by Train of Knowledge. 36.65.38.213 (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant tit-for-tat dispute (usually by IPs) over the person's nationality being Polish or Lithuanian. ShelteredCook (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible page. OhKayeSierra (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent long-term abuser (who in the past has employed many socks) has picked back up vandalizing, using numerous IP addresses. - Purplewowies (talk) 15:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism even after page was unprotected due to expiry of my previous request. Nsnandan2635 (talk) 13:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see hardly any vandalism during the month of January, since the last protection expired. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by an IP editor, ongoing edit war since January 10, 2021. Vacant0 (talk) 13:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Woody (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-time disruption by series of socks, and now an ip's. Onel5969 TT me 13:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism even after page was unprotected due to expiry of my previous request. Nsnandan2635 (talk) 13:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see hardly any vandalism during the month of January, since the last protection expired. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by an IP editor, ongoing edit war since January 10, 2021. Vacant0 (talk) 13:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Woody (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – long-time disruption by series of socks, and now an ip's. Onel5969 TT me 13:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury22:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of factually incorrect errors 3 days after page was unprotected. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 22:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. See if it reoccurs first. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs, and addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ashleyyoursmile! 13:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Woody (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 10:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not see a need for extended confired. If there is a disruptive confirmed user, they must be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, addition of unconstructive content, and poorly sourced information. Limorina (talk) 11:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. Le Deluge (talk) 11:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals are spiking today for some reason. GyozaDumpling (talk) 07:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – addition of unsourced content by an IP. Sid95Q (talk) 07:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs have spent at least nine months adding the same unsourced POV/puffery decsription: [90] last April, and [91] today. No response to warnings, talk page discussion, IP blocks and previous one-month page protection. Meters (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is about a Hindu deity; so it should be protected otherwise it is very difficult to deal with daily IP vandalism. JRDkg (talk) 09:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new users. Cupper52 (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 06:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Dbmikus (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changes by IPs inflating the numbers. Looks like long term protection may be needed. McSly (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnj1995 (talk) 05:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. Robvanvee 06:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism starting in September 2020 (diff) and continuing. Typical recent activity includes changing the maker of a 1969-2006 Russian/Soviet animated film series from Soyuzmultfilm to Lubin Manufacturing Company, a U.S. live film company who operated 1896-1916, and addition of large amounts of fanciful garbage. Diffs 15 Jan 2021 (the ES copies that of earlier vandalism reversion in 10 Jan 2021), 7 Jan 2021 and 31 Dec 2020. The IP range is 2a00:1fa1:8240 to 2a00:1fa1:c4d7, which looks to me too broad for a rangeblock (feel free to block if it isn't), and each IP is only used on one day.

I've reverted vandalism on this page twice - 11 Dec 2020 and 16 Jan 2021. It isn't on my watchlist, but I tend to notice vandals who add links to DAB pages. Narky Blert (talk) 07:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All IP edits are disruptive/vandalism.--Tenebrae (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Regularly returning vandalism by various IPs, has had protection before. ...GELongstreet (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated reversion of edits by Vietnam-based IPs to user's preferred version [92], [93], [94], [95], despite citing no sources for their edits. Editor is known as the Hanoi vandal and has a long history of restoring Boney M album articles from redirects, despite providing no sources and numerous warnings, resulting in many of them having to go to AfD and being deleted or redirected with protection (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Time (Boney M. album), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate (Boney M. album), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best in Spain, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of Paradise – The Greatest Hits of Boney M. – Vol. 2 and others. Richard3120 (talk) 23:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – ongoing repeated addition of unsourced info/disruptive editing. Joeyconnick (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 02:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 03:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism SpectresWrath (talk) 03:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated addition of an unsourced contentious claim which is contradicted by sourced information in the article. This is directly related to the depraved state of current American politics, so the editor adding this material is unlikely to stop any time soon. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 05:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman (talk) 05:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing despite consensus on talk-page regarding dispute on ethnic background. Semsûrî (talk) 12:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is one IP edit warring, so I've partially blocked them from the article for a week and directed them to the talk page. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued funcruft from previous protections. -- /Alex/21 13:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. UnguidedEmperor (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been getting hit with unsourced content for months by anonymous users, and has a history of the same issue dating back almost six years. Requesting indefinite protection to put a stop to this, although I am fine if the administration team contempts to temporary protection as well. --ZLMedia 19:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IP addresses. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 22:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all of the edits (aside from the creation of the article earlier this week and initial editing) have been unexplained content removal/vandalism, or reversion of the unexplained removal/vandalism. The edits have not all come from the same address, so I think blocking users won't do the trick. By the way, in case more vandalism occurs between now and the protection, I think this version is the last stable version of the article. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 06:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of geographical article – All IP edits are disruptive/vandalism. Either adding or removing information randomly.--Adinew56 (talk) 06:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP users have returned and change her middle name again. This article was protected for the very same problematic edits. Wario-Man (talk) 13:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by ip users. Shadow4dark (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content by various IPs from Fort Worth, Texas. All are likely socks of User:Colemanhull. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 01:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article has a long history (stretching back to 2013, or nearly three-quarters of the article's existence) of obvious self-promotion edits via the subject creating new accounts, and a more recent history of IP edits that cannot be confirmed to be, but match the pattern of, the logged-in WP:SPA edits. The article has since seen substantial revision and improvement to totally eradicate the COI issue, but the risk remains of new IP or unconfirmed account edits; the pattern demonstrated by the edit history shows that the subject can go several years between COI edits before returning to make them again. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. There hasn't been a reverted edit in over a year. Michael Greiner 02:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent distruptive editing and BLP violations by IP and non autoconfirmed users. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman (talk) 05:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anon editor from India appears to have an issue with this group and has use three IPs from two different ISPs to make the point. perhaps a week will do. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same anon editor from India on Hillsong Worship appears to have an issue with this group and has use three IPs from two different ISPs to make the point. perhaps a week will do. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – repeated addition of unsourced birthdate to BLP article. Joeyconnick (talk) 04:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 13:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 02:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Deceased user. Steve M (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Confirmation at w:da:Wikipedia:Wikipediajournalen/Arkiv/oktober 2018/PerV er død. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. – DarkGlow () 00:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, block evasion. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring is continuing on this article, editors have now started playing pingpong with 30k+ of content, the first edit of which was a mass reversion of previous edits. Mirokado (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No objection, but to clarify: today's first edit was me [96]. WT:ELEM has a larger history in this. Again: no objection, just noting there is more background. -DePiep (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question: It seems that vandalism only occurs in one IP, and Flix11 is the only major contributor in that article. IMO, because it only deals with one IP, it needs to be reported to WP:AIV. 118.96.188.169 (talk) 22:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 6 months. This page is under WP:GS/COVID19. EdJohnston (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@EdJohnston: Why not make it indefinite semi? IMO, This article should be indefinite semi-protection rather than Flix11 requested, at least until the pandemic has "ended". 118.96.188.169 (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protection against editor who had just got banned for vandalizing the page again and again. Aeengath (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The previous protection having expired, the previous disruption has resumed. DuncanHill (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was coming to make a similar request for the recent protection which ran from 9th-11th January to be restored for a longer period, given the ongoing IP vandalism. AllyD (talk) 21:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Favonian (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – One user with a vendetta keeps showing up to restore their edit as soon as protection expires. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 13:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs are constantly changing the person's nationality from "German" to "German-Lebanese" or a similar variant. There is a well-established consensus at WP:FOOTY against hyphenated nationalities. Also, he was born in Germany, lived all his life in Germany, has only played for Germany internationally. There is no apparent need to add "Lebanese" for now. Nehme1499 (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP subject to vandalism and addition of unsourced material following press speculation over possible transfer between clubs. Egghead06 (talk) 15:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. signed, Rosguill talk 20:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent falsification of figures - rangeblock would probably be too wide - Arjayay (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be constantly vandalised of late. Govvy (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent updating of stats changes before the end of the match. Please protect until 19 January, when the match will have finished. Mrmariomaster (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The vandal has already been blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And has created a new account... semiprotected for 3 days. Bishonen | tålk 18:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism repeating over 2 days now... Geoff | Who, me? 17:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the 2607:ea00:105:801::/64 range for three months. Please let me know if they come back using some other IP, Geoff, and I'll semi. Bishonen | tålk 18:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishonen: Many thanks!! Say hi to the Bish family! Geoff | Who, me? 18:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The case of CSA Steaua vs. FCSB is pending judgment, no definitive legal decision has been spoken. Edit wars that plagued ro.wiki thereupon moved to en.wiki. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection:Temporary full protection Persistent vandalism – IP restarted vandalising/editwarring immediately after lifting of the protection. And now an account had joined the melee, doing the same edits as multiple IPs.The Banner talk 18:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Upgraded The Banner talk 18:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-shifting vandal. Guy Macon (talk) 18:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The independent governor is not a member nor has ever joined the right-wing party. Alternatively, a block to 2806:107E:1E:2929:619E:8427:DAC0:D9F/50 (talk · contribs) can work. This IP range has been disrupting multiple article during since April last year. (CC) Tbhotch 18:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism. Ïvana (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent updating of stats changes before the end of the match. Please protect until 19 January, when the match will have finished. Mrmariomaster (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The vandal has already been blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And has created a new account... semiprotected for 3 days. Bishonen | tålk 18:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism repeating over 2 days now... Geoff | Who, me? 17:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've blocked the 2607:ea00:105:801::/64 range for three months. Please let me know if they come back using some other IP, Geoff, and I'll semi. Bishonen | tålk 18:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishonen: Many thanks!! Say hi to the Bish family! Geoff | Who, me? 18:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The case of CSA Steaua vs. FCSB is pending judgment, no definitive legal decision has been spoken. Edit wars that plagued ro.wiki thereupon moved to en.wiki. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection:Temporary full protection Persistent vandalism – IP restarted vandalising/editwarring immediately after lifting of the protection. And now an account had joined the melee, doing the same edits as multiple IPs.The Banner talk 18:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Upgraded The Banner talk 18:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-shifting vandal. Guy Macon (talk) 18:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The independent governor is not a member nor has ever joined the right-wing party. Alternatively, a block to 2806:107E:1E:2929:619E:8427:DAC0:D9F/50 (talk · contribs) can work. This IP range has been disrupting multiple article during since April last year. (CC) Tbhotch 18:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism. Ïvana (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs deleting large part of the article. McSly (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least until AfD completed. Persistent vandalism and page moving. Spiderone 13:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined (Non-administrator comment) Procedural close, AFD has completed result was delete Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 14:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of persistent, ongoing IP vandalism, disruptive editing, removal of sourced content and references (already warned multiple times).--GenoV84 (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandal attack, coordinated on Russian Stalinist publics (local version of Holocaust deniers). Various IPs, and newly registered SPA accounts. Examples: [97], [98], [99], [100], [101] [102] --Nicoljaus (talk) 13:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 16:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Xexerss (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 16:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Map controversy that was discussed Walrus Ji (talk) 09:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring--one IP user keep trying to add that it's an Irish name, and account holder is removing that. Largoplazo (talk) 13:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to none. There is no comprehensible reason I can locate for a nine year salting of this article. The admin who salted it is on the inactive sysops list. It has some significant media coverage lately and dating back to 2014 2013, which I have included in Draft:Deplatforming of AR15.com. - ☆ Bri (talk) 00:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected the protection probably made sense at the time because after this was deleted at AfD in 2007 there was a lot of vandalism from people unhappy with the deletion, but I don't think this will be a problem 14 years later. Hut 8.5 15:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please restore the protection that expired a few days ago. —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 15:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article was protected for one week. The edit warring has resumed now that the protection has expired. Since the edit warring resumed, only one new message has been posted in the article's Talk page. Several of the editors participating in the edit war edit this article exclusively or primarily. I think it's time to begin blocking those editors and others participating in the edit war. ElKevbo (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new users. NJD-DE (talk) 12:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Explicit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please restore the protection that expired a few days ago. —Mᵒdᵘlᵃtᵒ.📩 15:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article was protected for one week. The edit warring has resumed now that the protection has expired. Since the edit warring resumed, only one new message has been posted in the article's Talk page. Several of the editors participating in the edit war edit this article exclusively or primarily. I think it's time to begin blocking those editors and others participating in the edit war. ElKevbo (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new users. NJD-DE (talk) 12:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Explicit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism in the past few days by IPs and newly registered editors. ☎️ Churot DancePop 15:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 07:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same request as the previous one formulated by Vacant0 : apparently a block evasion of Obsuser currently blocked for 3 months via IP located in Bosnia (see my request for SPI here). We must intervene quickly, this user imposes his wishes, blanks notices in his talk's page and pursues his disruptive edits without trying to discuss for days. @Vacant0, Vif12vf, TheHonchoMindset, Materialscientist, Ashleyyoursmile, and Woody: --Martopa (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. by several IPs B732 (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Was going to request this, I don't know what's going on but this needs to be locked ASAP. JayJayWhat did I do? 06:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (not by me, but figured I'd mark it). Page has been extended-confirmed protected indefinitely. warmly, ezlev. talk 06:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: 150+ edits, most of them IP vandalism, in the past 40 minutes. Dan Bloch (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Already reported, see above. JayJayWhat did I do? 06:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. Favonian (talk) 10:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. B732 (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Social distancing was being vandalized by an influx of IPs and new users and has since been ECPed. The same vandalism is spilling over to this article, which is not protected. Jimfbleak, just want to make sure you see this since you were the protecting admin at social distancing. warmly, ezlev. talk 06:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ezlev., thanks, pinging User:Igarnish too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. Favonian (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals are now coming here after Social distancing has been protected. Peaceray (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak. Favonian (talk) 10:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 07:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This craze of adding 2020 to the "See also" section is becoming too annoying now, especially when they come with no reliable sources. Note that a few news outlets, such as Axios, have contended that there were much worse years than 2020. Minoa (talk) 18:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Constant spamming of unreferenced material in violation of WP:NOR, including consistently reverting edits designed to document and address WP:NOR violations, lack of references, and vague language. 71.227.21.209 (talk) 20:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I have partial-blocked the user from editing this article for 48 hours. MelanieN (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: User doesn't want their own userpage. Showiecz (talk) 01:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want a user page, don't create one. There is no need to protect it. MelanieN (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined according to the explanation from MelanieN above. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. I don't know much about Given, but she seems to be a frequent target of hatred on Twitter (for things she may or may not have done). Unregistered editors repeatedly add unsourced claims: accusations of bigotry (common) or plagiarism (also common). If sources are added, they are blogs and Instagram posts. Protection for a month or so would be helpful; I'll make a post on the article's Talk and ask if anyone can try and make the article a little bit less fluffy (it was obviously written by a fan, but has been trimmed significantly). — ImaginesTigers (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed parsing issue for bot Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 03:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 22:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. (Non-administrator comment) Pending-changes protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 03:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User talk archive, shouldn't need to be edited; LTA target. DannyS712 (talk) 23:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Antandrus. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 03:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 19:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFreeMelanieN (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Edits to the article continue to consist almost exclusively of disruptive changes to the national origin of the dish by IPs and new accounts. IamNotU (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's already protected, but I'm requesting an extension until February 8, after the Super Bowl. –Piranha249 23:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 03:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short duration semi-protection: Talk:Parler is getting a lot of disruption. Could we please have short term semi-protection of the talk page until a few days after the January 20 inauguration? Guy Macon (talk) 14:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – I understand the frustration, but locking down the Talk page of a protected article (ECP, even) would be an extraordinarily restrictive action, justifiable only in case of severe vandalism. I think some heavy-handed denial of edit requests and reverting/blanking/collapsing WP:NOTFORUM posts should suffice for now. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuation of prior protection as disruptive IP editing is still present over character reports. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would just like to add, the past protection on this article just ended, and the disruptive editing came back immediately. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that temporary semi-protection needs to be reinstated due to high level of IP vandalism from IP users. 118.96.188.169 (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Right now I am not seeing a need for ECP protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent genre-warring. (CC) Tbhotch 18:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18 January 2021

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently created accounts (looks like socks) adding unsourced puffery, removing sourced content and also edit warring. [103], [104], [105]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war continues to add unsourced content and removal of sourced content [106]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – hoax. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 15:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem to be a correctly formatted title in any case, so I'm giving it indef. Samsara 19:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism is already getting bad again. The protection expired less than an hour ago. Scorpions13256 (talk) 19:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Scorpions13256. I believe the vandalism is going to bad when new user getting edits that equal to vandalism. Requesting semi-protection for 10 days or report that user to AIV like Real American Joe and Flickbit. 118.96.188.169 (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from sock accounts everyday. Ashleyyoursmile! 19:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It will probably end up under long-term semi or ECP, but let's stick to the usual pattern of escalating step by step depending on the severity and longevity of the disruption. Samsara 19:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 15:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent removal of sourced content by varying IPs. Jacona (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of audience scores by several IPs contrary to MOS:FILM given recent release of the film. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – vast majority of recent edits vandalism/reverts, previously protected/target of school based vandalism. Will120 (talk) 16:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protections start in 2012, so apparently a long-term concern. Samsara 18:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 8 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism immediately after page was unprotected. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite or Long-term Semi-protection: Page sees persistent, constant disruptive editing by numerous IPs. The flow of vandalism would be slowed down if the page was semi-protected or given page-confirmation.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IP and new editors attempting to add a claim of an illegitimate child (unsourced, although a few mention tiktok). Schazjmd (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Children's Favorite Songs

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent and ongoing IP vandalism since October 2020; some of which has been difficult to find and repair, because it was necessary to find a good version and make a visual comparison. The vandal's main style is to replace nursery songs by rap songs and their songwriters by rappers. The IP has a wide range, from 2600:8800:3080 to 2600:8800:3b80. Narky Blert (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all four. MelanieN (talk) 16:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 13:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – ip user ignores source and adding random numbers, i can warn them but they come with new ips. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two new editors are edit warring. Cool-down period needed. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Samsara 18:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 15:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What an interesting article! MelanieN (talk) 16:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC protection will persist. MelanieN (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade from autoconfrimed to template editor protection: This template has been autoconfirmed protected since 2010. That, however, hasn't stopped editors for mistaking the template as a place to try and create a new article. For some reason, these editors seem to be thinking that adding their information to the parameters in the template's documentation will somehow create an article about them. Since most of these edits appear to be being made by new editors who simply don't seem to understand the purpose of the page, perhaps it isn't the type of mean-spirited vandalism that warrants and upgrade in protection. FWIW, I did suggest an WP:EDITNOTICE be added per Template talk:Biography#Edit notice might be helpful but never got a response. Maybe a friendly edit notice would work better and be more helpful than an protection upgrade since the latter would prevent more editors than just newbies from directly editing the page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: : as this template is technically never transcluded, I don't think template protection would be appropriate. ECP might curb this behavior further, but I'm not sure the level of disruption warrants it. I am inclined to agree with an editnotice, but welcome other admins' views. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I added an editnotice using the AfC template: Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:Biography. I view this as preferable to protection because it at least gives the user some advice on where to go. If it doesn't help, ECP seems reasonable. — The Earwig talk 08:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks The Earwig and Fvasconcellos. — Marchjuly (talk) 09:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 10:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/unreferenced changes by new editors, previously semi-protected three times because of this. FDW777 (talk) 11:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for a few weeks, or until a consensus has been reached on the Talk page regarding certain details and edits: Both edits and consensus are just circling the drain on this BLP, to the point where no meaningful work is being done on the article because X editor is too busy reverting Y editor's work, only for Z editor to add it back again. It's disruptive and fruitless, and I'm hoping a higher level of protection might force some consensus into view on the Talk page, with the then-restricted pool of editors able to conduct some useful edits. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Ineffablebookkeeper: Sorry but protection (per WP:PROT) is mainly for blatant vandalism. A couple of recent IP edits that I checked were not vandalism and there weren't enough of them to be disruptive. It just looks like a content dispute so WP:DR is needed. Johnuniq (talk) 06:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Thank you for the help anyway! I'll have a look at that policy and see if I can figure something out. :) --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 10:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This is my user page, so please protect it. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn I forgot how the protection policy works for a second. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 13:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, despite multiple protections in the past..💠245CMR💠.👥📜 10:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Addition of unreliable sources and information by User:Pugazhssp. -BALA. RTalk 11:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. As I said above, the existing semi-protection seems to be doing the job. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There has been some level of IP vandalism with the changing of awards/nominations to an incorrect amount. Unsure if this requires page protection. Maxwell King123321 08:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 09:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. BEN917 (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 09:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. BEN917 (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 09:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. BEN917 (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 09:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. BEN917 (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 09:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. BEN917 (talk) 09:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 09:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 12:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism -BALA. RTalk 05:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed formatting for bot Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 14:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The existing semi-protection seems to be doing the job.  MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and article hijacking by IP [107], [108] and new user adds unsourced non-encyclopedic content [109]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is only one IP, and they have not edited after the warning--Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please ask again if problems resume. Johnuniq (talk) 06:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, there is an ongoing content dispute/edit war; pending-changes protection would be inappropriate. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. please see the editing history of 103.205.9.224 Normchou💬 00:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly longer temporary semi-protection: The previous semi-protection has just expired and a new IP is back adding fringe content. CMD (talk) 03:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editor with changing IP numbers. JlACEer (talk) 04:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most edits by new users have been reverted. No prior protection on these grounds. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. already pending-changes protected indefinitely, current level of disruption doesn't appear to require any increase in protection. signed, Rosguill talk 20:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Disruptive IP edits, appears to be one person changing IPs after warning... - Adolphus79 (talk) 04:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 07:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 21:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The page has always been subject to occasional IP vandalism - recently there have been repeated IP edits to the behavior section to say leopard geckos are cathemeral without adding citations in support of said assertion, and using existing citations that say the opposite so it appears the assertion is cited. No response to talk page thread despite repeated attempts to direct the editor(s) to the talk pageConnorlong90 (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will attempt to warn users as requested, but these are IP edits so I am not optimistic it will have the desired effect as they may or may not have a consistent IP address. The problem is more multifaceted than I initially explained: As leopard geckos are common pets, many third party websites and blogs pull information from wikipedia to guide their discussion of these animals, often taking assertions at face value without checking citations. Misinformation then ends up spreading across the internet, and these third party websites can even end up cited back again in the wikipedia article backing the original claim that is incorrect, even though the "citation" got its information from Wiki itself (this has happened and is outlined on the talk page). A more recent example: https://www.inaturalist.org/guide_taxa/1242594 now asserts leopard geckos are cathemeral, citing wikipedia, despite wikipedia never having actually had a citation supporting that conclusion. This propagation of misinformation could potentially be mitigated by semi-protection, as editors would then be accountable. Connorlong90 (talk) 06:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... I mentioned how to proceed on article talk and will assist. Johnuniq (talk) 06:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Elizium23 (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Black Kite. FASTILY 06:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Doing GA Review, reviewing page stability, this page has had persistent vandalism over time. Last 30 days page has had 17,118 page views. Come Holi, (Indian festival) more views are expected. Extended semi protection requested. Whiteguru (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:, I believe a semi protection for few days be granted so that atleast IP disruptions like changing spellings due to AmEng and IndEng be avoided that happened after expiry of protection. See thisAmkgp 💬 18:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @Whiteguru and Amkgp: The most recent IP edit was to use "Honours" not "Honors" and the IP's edit summary mentioned Indian English—sure enough, the talk page header includes "This article is written in Indian English". I don't see anything relevant on talk. If there is a problem needing protection, please spell it out. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @CLCStudent: Which edits are vandalism? Many recent IP edits in history are not tagged as reverted. There is nothing on talk. Please do not make vague requests. Johnuniq (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is currently being reconstructed, and some IP editors have been disrupting and vandalizing the page during the process. Vacant0 (talk) 13:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Vacant0: Sorry but there are not many recent IP edits and several of those are not tagged as reverted. Most appears to be from one IP and there is nothing on article talk or the IP's talk about the problem. The article has never been protected and only a short period would be possible anyway. Johnuniq (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same problem as last year. The pandemic is affecting the IB exams and multiple IPs and SPA named accounts are adding unsourced complaints. No response to talk page thread. Meters (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Barely a week ago I asked for this get to protected - declined. What about now? Honestly, it's really a no brainer that this needs a indefinite protection, looking at its history of constant nationalistic disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Kpgjhpjm 02:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Eagles247. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Temporary pending changes for block evasion, disruptive editing, but some positive IP contributions. Giraffer (Happy·Wikipedia Day!) 11:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bit unusual to do this but it seems desirable in an attempt to discourage the block evader. Johnuniq (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Since at least October 2020, one editor has been determined to add North Korea to the list of ASEM countries without citing any sources. This editor has been reverted multiple times since the sources provided on the page do not include North Korea. The edit summaries from this persistent editor demonstrate unverifiable speculation, saying NK "will join" ASEM in the future rather than that they have joined. CowHouse (talk) 11:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @CowHouse: If it happens again, please put a brief explanation on talk mentioning the source and verifiability requirement. Then try to direct the IP to engage there. After that, request protection again. Johnuniq (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Since April 2020, one editor has repeatedly added countries that are not major non-NATO allies to the page, such as Brunei. This has been addressed on the talk page and reverted by multiple editors but the disruptive editor appears to have no intention of stopping. CowHouse (talk) 11:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks, IPs of banned User:Jagdeep singh bittu again started adding copyrighted images. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I went through most of the edits from the last two days. The massive majority of the edits were a) constructive/good-faith and b) performed by IP users. The collateral damage of protection would by far outweigh the benefits. Please refer vandals to WP:AIV as needed. Thank you, caknuck ° needs to be running more often 21:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 77.243.28.84 (talk · contribs) blocked by caknuck. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism by multiple IPs. POLITANVM talk 23:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of unreliable sources and information by IP users. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 09:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IPs and SPA vandalizing the article. NJD-DE (talk) 23:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anachronist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing IP fabrications with time. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brown Chocolate (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same editor adding fancruft to A Court of Thorns and Roses, which contributes nothing but unsourced wikia-level content. Linked article has been protected multiple times due to this vandalism, and the two articles are experiencing the same vandalism. -- /Alex/21 07:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. HawkAussie (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations. JimRenge (talk) 08:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Taylor Swift is a huge celebrity, and I think it would make sense to make this page, Evermore, semi-protected. Swift's other album page, Folklore, is temporarily semi-protected until April something. Another reason why I think this page should be protected is that this album was a surprise album, and many people can manipulate it if it isn't protected. I just don't want this page to be messed with because it wasn't protected against unverified users. Jack Reynolds (talk to me!) (email me!!) 16:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see an edit war between editors with extended-confirmed status that should be resolved on the talk page or reported to AN3. I don't see recent disruption by IPs or new accounts; increasing protections per the recommendation in this report would be premature at this time. Declined signed, Rosguill talk 20:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Darren-M talk 22:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mz7. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19 January 2021

Temporary extended-confirmed-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and autoconfirmed users. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 01:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected provisionally until 5 March, the supposed release date. Samsara 10:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing for promotion. JRDkg (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (Plus the main editor causing the disruption is blocked). Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Canadian IP vandal replacing sourced content with "Punjabi" here, here. It is probably the same person who did this in the Rajasthan page before [110], [111], [112], for which the article was protected few weeks back. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – She was announced as Biden's nominee for Assistant Secretary for Health today, and so the article is getting increased attention, including attempts to add her WP:DEADNAME without consensus. ([113], [114], [115], [116]) GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done @GorillaWarfare: I modified your semi-protection to EC. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently unprotected article. IP users are ignoring the WP:BRD cycle and adding a non-notable award ("winning" an online poll for the best player as a result of a troll campaign) in the infobox without first getting consensus in the talk page. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 18:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are some good IP edits here too, but there are also vandalism edits slipping through the cracks, hence the pending changes. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Caknuck: We edit conflicted as I declined this request. The reporting editor was restoring unsourced personal info as well and the other editor, Andreaofanatic, is autoconfirmed. The semi-protection doesn't really serve any purpose, especially given I've removed the unsourced content both parties were reverting over.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo: I chose to semi the article b/c Andreaofanatic has edited it at least once from an IP. This will leave more of a paper trail in case they persist enough to warrant a block. Can't hurt, right? caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair though, CLCStudent was restoring unsourced personal while reverting Andreaofanatic's edits and incorrectly labelling them as vandalism. Regardless, I'll keep an eye on the article for a bit.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Poydoo can talk and edit 15:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible module now implementing Template:old move. Should have the same protection level as that template. --Trialpears (talk) 16:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MusikBot II. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: High level of IP / new editor SPI vandalism. Seems to be a perennial target. Generalrelative (talk) 03:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IP edits in the last two months. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruption from Barbados, including IPs in the ranges Special:Contributions/64.119.200.0/21 and Special:Contributions/64.119.192.0/21. The same protection is needed for List of sopranos in non-classical music. Binksternet (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-administrator comment Binksternet, Because the distruption appeares in the same IP range as 64.119.xxx.xxx, i think these IP users need to be reported to AIV. Semi-protection is also an alternative if IP blocks doesn't sufficient to stop vandalism. There is not need for this to ECP due to fact that distruption occurs in IP users. 118.96.188.169 (talk) 04:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for both List of mezzo-sopranos in non-classical music and List of sopranos in non-classical music.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It seems a user by the name of Josh joachim has placed a speedy deletion nomination claiming the article is a hoax. Evidently, this was a claim made without substantial evidence. The article has ample citations from reliable sources and has been written without any trace of any made-up information. The article also meets notability criteria listed by Wikipedia. Furthermore, recent edits made by unregistered users only listed by their IP address have also tried to edit information without citations and proper reason. Please consider protecting this page. Thank you. SenyorOtter (talk) 07:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism changing pronouns in the article. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent BLP violations, nearly all vandalism happens from different IPs with very little coming from new user accounts. Due to the level of disruption and the vandalism continuing after multiple previous semi protections I think this should be semi-protected at least while Binotto remains in his current job position. FozzieHey (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 18:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP DE re head coach rumors. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Opal|zukor(discuss) 07:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Opalzukor: I see that two admins are on the scene, and they seem to be content with the situation as-is. Given that Cyberbot tells me a previous request was declined, you may have to be more specific about what you see as the problem here. Thank you. Samsara 10:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Talkpages can't be pending changes protected anyway. Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new editors. Pamzeis (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP addition of unsourced claims. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an editor editing this page being unintentionally disruptive by evincing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the American system of government works. Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 00:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 08:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/new editors adding constant speculation. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors adding wrong/defaming content. Has been protection previously for same reason. -ink&fables «talk» 12:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed almost immediately after previous protection was lifted. Ionmars10 (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Subtemplate of a semi-protected template {{Calendar/month/link on}}. Certes (talk) 12:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 13:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations and disruptive editing. JimRenge (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TheVaughano (talk) 10:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting indefinite extension pending changes protection: The protection expiry is set to expire on 19 January 2021, 07:12 (UTC). I want to extend the pending changes protection to INDEFIINITE. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 11:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: last protecting admin. Imho, disruption during the 2 weeks pending changes wasn't that great. If at all, an extension for 2 more weeks should be enough. Lectonar (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It would be better if it is 3 months or indefinite pending changes. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 11:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Protection expired: Please protect again the page, the protection already expired awhile ago 07:12 (UTC). Still pending changes but now indefinitely due to disruptive editing. I request any admin to do the protection. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 10:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 17:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 11:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:NPA. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: amd admonished. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 11:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Please semi-protect this article for atleast 6 months because an election shall be held within six months. And this political party is a major player in the election. Semi-protect until election gets over.--Adinew56 (talk) 05:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – High visibility article, long term disruption from IP addresses. Tayi Arajakate Talk 06:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. KyleJoantalk 08:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing since January 17, 2021. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We just need to be careful with all the barriers we're raising against SM Maragkina (the reported hoax) that we remove them if it does turn out to be real. Samsara 09:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring over whether this is Somalia or Somaliland. Blablubbs|talk 00:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – subject of breaking news due to nature of off the field behavior. Will120 (talk) 04:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism is continuing. I support this request. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 05:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Months long ongoing issues of blocked sock and their block evading IP addresses making unsubstantiated and exaggerated album sales figure claims. Robvanvee 09:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Samsara 09:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop edit warring and disruption by new account and their IP. Wario-Man (talk) 09:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 21:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: Persistent vandalism for many years. This article has a long history of being vandalized and Semi-ed, and it has recently suffered another spate of vandalism. I honestly do not understand why an article that is so highly visible and has such an extensive history of vandalism does not have an active Semi-Protection right now. At the very least, this article should be Semi-Protected for a minimum of 1 year if an indefinite Semi-Protection isn't applied here. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope future admins will let this one stick as previous unprotection attempts have not worked out well. Obviously a constant target not worth revisiting in the foreseeable future. Samsara 08:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations. JimRenge (talk) 07:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism due to coaching job rumors.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant target for LTAs/vandals, this is getting out of hand! Enough of this!. ~ Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸 23:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 01:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: We're dealing with an LTA here. Iota's page has been constantly attacked by vandals, LTAs, and disruptive editors. As Wikipedians, we have gained attention on Twitter from the LTAs messing up the page from the beginning. This needs to stop. I cannot stress this more. It's up to you admins to defend Wikipedia. I have changed the request to temporary. ~ Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸 01:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The amount of recent disruption to the page does not match up with your claims of "constant vandalism". Why are you so against warning the vandals and reporting them to AIV? -FASTILY 02:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs over the past hour. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. He may move to a different club in future but at the moment there are just rumors. Jaellee (talk) 07:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. The article was just moved to a new name, so I am retitling the listing here (lest it confuse the bot). MelanieN (talk) 16:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. This party is highly controversial, we get a lot of IP vandalism and I can't see it stopping anytime soon. Bacondrum 22:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 01:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Certain IP users remove a certain verified information about the said article. Please refer to the article history for more. Jayjay2020 (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 01:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Perokema (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is a draft about the subject that meets the guidelines for approval from AfC. See Draft:Corey Worthington. There is currently indefinite protection on the page. User:NuclearWarfare, the protecting admin, looks to be inactive. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected FASTILY 01:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption; alteration of sourced information. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changing of them/they pronouns by IP editors. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.
SSSB (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. IP SPA repeatedly restoring BLP violation and other inappropriate content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection. Recent undiscussed/unref page moves, possible joke moves. Dl2000 (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long protection log and basically protected non-stop since March 2018. Chompy Ace 22:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. –Darkwind (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Oops - edit conflict, Darkwind and I reached opposite conclusions, and I was protecting it while Darkwind was replying. In this case I felt that indefinite protection was called for, even though there hasn't been time for vandalism to resume in the very brief time since the previous protection expired, based on the need for virtually continuous protection for the last several years. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption; alteration of sourced information. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changing of them/they pronouns by IP editors. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.
SSSB (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. IP SPA repeatedly restoring BLP violation and other inappropriate content. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection. Recent undiscussed/unref page moves, possible joke moves. Dl2000 (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long protection log and basically protected non-stop since March 2018. Chompy Ace 22:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. –Darkwind (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Oops - edit conflict, Darkwind and I reached opposite conclusions, and I was protecting it while Darkwind was replying. In this case I felt that indefinite protection was called for, even though there hasn't been time for vandalism to resume in the very brief time since the previous protection expired, based on the need for virtually continuous protection for the last several years. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP/new user vandalism. Larryzhao123 (talk) 17:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 18:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: What seems to be one user from a range of IP addresses is consistently reverting the proper name of the article to a literal English translation. All these edits come from the 2001:16b8:1400::/40 range, used by the German ISP, Versatel. The edits have been made consistently over the past 3 months. Eilidhmax (talk) 22:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Hi, I'm an AfC reviewer and I've come across a draft for the newly notable Wyoming state senator Tim French (Draft:Tim French). The AfC gadget tells me that target page has been salted by Jarry1250. Since they don't seem to be very active at the moment, I'd like to request that the page be unprotected so that I can allow the draft to enter the mainspace. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected @Modussiccandi: I've unprotected the page. The original protection in 2007 was to prevent some kids from recreating a hoax article about their buddy.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant, thanks! Modussiccandi (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20 January 2021

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over Donald Trump's current status as President of the United States. Goose(Talk!) 17:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined should calm down now that the inauguaration is complete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mass deletion of references and referenced information. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been constantly vandalised, even in the past. The "view history" button shows pretty much nothing except vandalism and reverts. Wretchskull (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done doesn't seem to be much recent vandalism —valereee (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Flix11 (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Flix11, I'm not sure it would help -- most of those editing are EC, and most who aren't EC don't seem to be being disruptive? Which editors are being disruptive? I'm thinking maybe p-blocks would be a better solution. —valereee (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, i doesn't necessary for it to help Flix11 because most of all editors are EC and they don't have intention to vandalize. Flix11 also requested protection without seeing evidence whats happen about "persistent vandalism" or "distruptive editing" in the article. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per Valereee HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. FASTILY 22:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and new user adding unsourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only one or two users. Try discussing with them then escalate if appropriate. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Anonymous0929 (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The only edits in the last few days are yours. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed after expired. (CC) Tbhotch 16:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of constant IP vandalism. Maxwell King123321 04:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined most recent edits are not vandalism. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: an IP hopper removes the Russian name of the raion, whereas the long-standing consensus is to list Russian names in the Ukrainian localities where Russian is spoken by a significant part of the population.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The infobox quite clearly says "senior club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only". However, despite repeated warnings and pointing this out, IPs keep changing the numbers to reflect all appearances, which is against common practice for footballer infoboxes and avoiding communication. Since warnings have not helped and I do not want to risk 3RR/edit warring, I request protection to prevent further disruptive changes along these lines. ComplexRational (talk) 13:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a Mobile editor. GoodDay (talk) 20:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IPs trying to declare that he is a Senator despite have not sworn in yet. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 20:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Samsara 22:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Reduce to semi, as there is no disruption in a while now, and this isn't the kind of page that is controversial. Steve M (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham Beards: this request seems reasonable and I'm inclined to lower the protection to semi or unprotect altogether but this is a courtesy in case I've missed something. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User should consult protecting admin first (who is active), as it clearly states in the instructions above. Samsara 21:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 21:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will remove the protection. There was a problem with an educational project last year.Graham Beards (talk) 22:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Samsara 22:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: As other templates and category's are also like this. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 13:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sean Ethan James D. Querubin: The transclusion count tool shows me only four transclusions for the template. That's not indicative of a high-risk template needing ECP. What am I missing here? Samsara 14:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: The missing ones is the Usage, Printworthiness, Template Data, See also and Templates for redirects. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 00:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please semi-protect the talk page. There is an IP sock army reinforcing each other's commentary and removing criticism. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm loathe to protect a talk page if it can be avoided, and this looks like a temporary spike on an otherwise quiet page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High degree of IP vandalism in the lead up to the day (26 January) each year has started. Melcous (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Spotted vandalism after his team won todays match Kichu🐘 Discuss 18:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Pending-changes protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP adding of unsourced content this month (January). 108.56.139.120 (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 18:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP edit warring.

Note: At 10:49, 20 January 2021, administrator Malcolmxl5 blocked IP 24.107.11.252 for 31 hours due to edit warring at this WP:BLP. However, the IP vandalism persists. Please, the solution here is not to block individual IP vandals, but to protect the page as I requested. Thank you. NedFausa (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, by way of explanation, this vandalism and edit warring is the direct result of a tweet from John B. Wells to his 40.5K followers complaining that he could not change his own bio because his IP address had been repeatedly blocked. His solicitation obviously worked. NedFausa (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 12:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary persistent vandalism from a YouTuber. SWinxy (talk) 16:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Joe Biden is now the U.S. president. What if somebody redirects this page to his article again? (see Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_March_2) JsfasdF252 (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, there's zero reason to ever need to create this page —valereee (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – A redirect to a template used on tens of thousands of pages. Cupper52 (talk) 16:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cupper52: I don't see any uses of this template redirect; am I missing something? — The Earwig talk 16:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I literally have no idea why many different ip's keep changing team name, they are wrong. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: While infrequently edited, most of vandalism has been performed mostly by IP editors and newly registered users, especially within 12 months. George Ho (talk) 07:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 05:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful not to confuse IP editing and vandalism. Samsara 12:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 12:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 15:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: I have written an article on the subject - which I have placed on the Heather Ripley Redirect's Talk Page here. At present she only has a Redirect to the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang article. It is surprising that one of the four main cast members does not have an article; indeed, she is the only person on the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang page cast list not to have an article. Adrian Hall (Jeremy Potts) has a stub and I think his notability is borderline, which has been an argument against an article for Ms Ripley. Also, in the past she has not been keen on the publicity garnered from the film, which was another reason for her not to have an article. However, in recent years Ms Ripley has had a change of heart - if only for the economic benefit - tv interviews, documentaries, signings, etc. Also, even in her publicity-shy years she was not averse to using her fame to support her various causes. I have put a lot of hard work into writing a piece about her and I think it deserves a place on Wikipedia. Thank you. Jack1956 (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected This was deleted by an expired PROD, so there's no reason to object to this and if someone still wants it not to exist, the proper venue is AFD. Courcelles (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple instances of IP and user vandalism - the controversies section of this page is being deleted continuously. The subject and affiliates of the subject of the controversy section have been making an effort to remove public mention of the allegations despite multiple reputable sources. Cloverfieldlion (talk) 03:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have removed the WP:BLP violation. Johnuniq (talk) 04:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of BLP violating vandalism. (t · c) buidhe 09:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 15:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 03:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this as a matter of urgency, thanks. Rodney Baggins (talk) 11:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 05:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE ATTEND. This is getting out of hand. NedFausa (talk) 07:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs everyday. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of IP vandalism following recent news about the subject. Username6892 00:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Username6892: I get that the subject is awful but "racist" is a very strong word even when disguised with the weasel "alleged". The two refs are not adequate IMHO. There is nothing on talk apart from an old complaint from an IP. Has this been at WP:BLPN? If so, please explain on article talk where "racist" was approved. If not, refactor the article. At any rate, it is not satisfactory to protect an article under circumstances like this when there is no explanation on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 04:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Move-warring from draft space into article space while MFD is pending. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Move protected by Ohnoitsjamie.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editwarring by IP and new accounts to remove sourced information. Jack Frost (talk) 07:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Boing! said Zebedee. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Template:Pp-main-page is currently fully-protected. That is a redirect here which has no protection at all. Template:Pp-main-page probably does not need full protection, template protection at both would be sufficient (as this is not actually transcluded on the main page). Edit also applies to Template:C-uploaded, which is fully-protected.

Alternatively, applying full protection here would be fine. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 20:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. FASTILY 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The protection log includes an edit summary from 2014: "protection not necessary, it only affects the image description, not the actual image". Johnuniq (talk) 03:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced and poorly structured content. Bazonka (talk) 22:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Requested by @Hashim Tariq bhat: without rationale. (CC) Tbhotch 01:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I can’t see a need for protection here. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued WP:BLP violations from multiple IPs over the past several days, so a block alone probably won't do the trick. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 05:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced material by IP-hopping vandal. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. If necessary range (2605:b100:330:bd30:59:5ee5:c30c:f71f/65) can easily be blocked. FASTILY 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IPs repeatedly adding marketing copy. Warnings have been made, but they keep jumping to new dynamic IPs, making the warnings likely worthless. OrgoneBox (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've parblocked the range from editing the article for 1 week.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. per above. FASTILY 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent removal/change-of-meaning of content that is supported by some cite and talkpage by IPs. DMacks (talk) 17:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A number of new users and IP addresses which can be changed are participating in the AfD without providing valid reasoning. . TwinTurbo (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection of one week for college football coach, re ongoing WP:CRYSTALBALL DE speculation about hiring elsewhere. UW Dawgs (talk) 20:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The range is small enough to block. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jmertel23 (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious vandalism by anon IPs. Vjmlhds 23:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent edits to page, as a popular influencer by the name of Technoblade posted a screenshot of a section of this article. DrawWikiped (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Potential incoming transfer to Marseille; several IP vandalizing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent deletion vandalism, mostly by various IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 23:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 00:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 02:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ViacomCBS Global Distribution

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent cut & paste page moves. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry/block evasion- mostly seems to be stemmed from IPs related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drewpalazzolo. Magitroopa (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 22:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing sourced content [117], [118], [119]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs disruptively blanking whole sourced sections or part of the content [120] [121] [122] [123] [124]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruptive editing. I see also a number of edits have had to be oversighted and an oversight block handed out. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Red Phoenix talk 01:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A slew of IP and one newly created accounts have been adding joke, non-notables to the list of residents. Ifnord (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been the target of disruptive edits. Dolotta (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Alli now meets notability criteria including WP:GNG, WP:NMODEL and WP:SINGER. She has appeared in a variety of TV shows including I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! Australia, Filthy Rich and Homeless and Hacking High School. Happily888 (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, IMDB page. Looking at the history of this, it seems various attempts to use Wikipedia for her to get attention have been made since 2010, when she was 12. @Happily888: Her TV career looks borderline to me, based on multiple minor appearances, but I'm no expert. You say she's now a notable model and singer. What are those assertions based on? Samsara 11:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Happily888: Please provide examples of in-depth coverage in reliable sources so we can evaluate the request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell and Samsara: Alli has appeared in a number of Australian television shows, including her tenure on the current season of I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! Australia.[125][126][127] Some other reliable sources include [128], [129], [130], [131], [132] and [133]. Happily888 (talk) 03:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered users, removing relevant information. Probably same person, but with different IPs. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 13:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's not a high-traffic page, but a very large portion of the edits to it are vandalism. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 13:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 18:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – No source added for an unofficial transfer. See history. Constant disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The football transfer rumour mill is open. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yes it had. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by constantly changing IPs. — The Only Zac (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HickoryOughtShirt?4. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE ATTEND. This request has been pending for over two hours, and disruptive editing has only gotten worse. NedFausa (talk) 21:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Appears to be some larking around, adding non-notable people to lists of notable people. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption, ongoing in the news article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Donald Trump has talked with aides about starting his own Patriot Party and now editors, mostly IP users, are trying to add info about Trump's plans to this article. It is not suitable for this article as it is an entity completely separate from Trump's proposed party. lovkal (talk) 16:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – (GRP). --IWI (talk) 09:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing issue with GRP here, would appreciate protection as soon as a sysop sees this. Thanks a lot, --IWI (talk) 12:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Protection until the end of the month when the potential for a transfer ends would be beneficial. Wolvesweb (talk) 10:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection. Deceased editor.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  14:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by Moneytrees. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 02:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 10:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Xiamatt (talk) 03:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 11:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection. Despite invisible comments and some pleading, users—both registered and unregistered—continue to change the bold part of the lead to a name that currently has no confirmation (as the article states). There's also an unusually sustained level of general vandalism. Of the past 50 edits, 30 have been reverted (Article history). Some protection would be really appreciated; I think PCPP for a month or two might be a good start, until the game is announced (it’s slated for a release this year). — ImaginesTigers (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ImaginesTigers: Whether it is semi or Pending changes protections, it needs to be continously protected. I believe i will support to configuring indefinite PC (pending changes protection) for this article. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 13:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I considered PC but it isn't really a good fit in this situation. Once the name is formally announced, feel free to pop back and request unprotection or a switch to PC. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors prematurely stating Senate has already convened. ― Bluegrass35 Talk 20:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is actually a content dispute that also involves ECP users as well. It needs to be address via dispute resolution on talk page. In addition, Senate will be reconvened less than a hour from now. I also use the similar content for Mitch Mcconell and Chuck Schumer. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely not a content dispute; reviewing admins should ignore this comment. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a comment from an IP-hopping editor who often hangs out at RFPP, falsely claiming that protection requests for political articles are "content disputes". ― Tartan357 Talk 20:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Despite finishing two days ago, there is still a high level of IP vandalism. Recommend protecting for a week? Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Idell (talk) 10:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 04:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Slow moving BLP vandalism (13 instances in last two weeks) by a rotating cast of IP and newly registered accounts. Article is lightly trafficked enough that it's becoming increasingly difficult to police. Chetsford (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm tempted by the idea of PC protection given the slow nature of this, but let's give semi-protection a whirl and then maybe reassess afterwards. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring has been occurring for the past day or so by various IPs and users. Requesting semi-protection (or ECP if one deems it necessary). SkyWarrior 05:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ip 83.110.204.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has many fake accounts like Thanjavr siva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார் (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). All three added the same non neutral caste pride content and i restored it to a neutral version by other editors and all these accounts are also edit war one after another without explanation that is why I edit war. The content is full of dangerous caste pride. It may lead to violence against other caste..please understand. Also block all these fake accounts.2409:4072:6C8A:C8A5:A8E2:C43C:328B:C33C (talk)
Update: He is now using Ip address 94.57.71.93. 2409:4072:6C8A:C8A5:64EF:8709:DBCA:78AD (talk) 05:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 07:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A page maintainer requested I assist with an IP who has been modifying details about the band members. It's not clear if lock or ECP is the best option. I have no horses in the race. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors prematurely stating Senate has already convened. ― Bluegrass35 (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP-hopping disruption. Blablubbs|talk 02:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP editor who repeatedly removes references without giving a reason; I can't figure out why. (t · c) buidhe 03:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Restore the previous indefinite semi protection after temporary full protection has expired. Chompy Ace 22:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. FASTILY 22:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: This request isn't a request for pre-emptive protection, it's a request to deal with the broken mechanics of how protection expiration works. Unlike PCP, which works in parallel to other protection types, if protection is temporarily increased, it's reasonable to fall back to the previous un-expired protection level when the temporary protection expires. It would be great if all protection types were independent and had their own expiration times, but that isn't how our admin toolbox evolved (except for PCP).
That said, it seems silly to make this request prior to expiration of a temporary protection, and in that respect I agree it's pre-emptive. However, the full protection appears to be expired now. Hopefully the PCP already in place can handle things. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Restored the previous protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute about whether to include the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol in the list of coup attempts. I could protect it myself, but I've already responded to an edit request to remove the entry, and have reverted its restoration once due to WP:BURDEN, although I don't consider myself a party to the dispute. An edit war appears to have started, between a handful of editors. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Very public figure within the Biden administration, already received a few disruptive edits since the inauguration. Also received some persistent vandalism in 2016 when she was the Deputy Press Secretary. Lastly, the previous Press Secretary (Kayleigh McEnany) had semi-protection on her page. ChipotleHater (talk) 00:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption has resumed shortly after previous protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nardog (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. FASTILY 22:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple user accounts, probably socks, removing sourced (but negative to the subject) material. Admin has already blocked one of the accounts but they keep coming back. Requesting 7 day semi. ManuelLopezz talk 21:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. FASTILY 22:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. FDW777 (talk) 22:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. FASTILY 22:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. Article recently semi-protected twice to deal with this vandal. FDW777 (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. FASTILY 22:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 22:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors prematurely stating Durbin is Majority Whip. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination as the transition has already passed. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:02, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Samsara 22:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Editors prematurely declaring McConnell Minority Leader. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357: Please stop to adding an ECP request for this article and Chuck Schumer. As far as i know, this is actually a distruptive editing that also involves at least one ECP user, so having ECP-ed for this article doesn't necessary for me as there already have involvement of ECP users on that pages. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are wrong, there is an editor who is not extended-confirmed doing this. And I really don't care if having ECP is "not necessary for you", because it's necessary for Wikipedia. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Red X I withdraw my nomination as the transition has already passed. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Samsara 22:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Editors prematurely declaring Schumer Majority Leader. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination as the transition has already passed. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Samsara 22:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors prematurely declaring Loeffler has left office. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination as the transition has already passed. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Samsara 22:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors repeatedly adding successor who has not assumed office to infobox, against Template:Infobox officeholder/doc. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination as the transition has already passed. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Samsara 22:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors prematurely declaring transition has occurred. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination as the transition has already passed. ― Tartan357 Talk 22:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Samsara 22:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ivermectin as an anti-viral medication has been discussed ad-nauseam. There seems to be a continuous push against consensus to add content that is poorly sourced and is frankly becoming a waste of time to deal with. Jdphenix (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ECP would be of little use, and it's only one editor, who is likely to be blocked if they continue edit-warring. In the meantime, try to continue discussion on the talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption has resumed after the previous week-long protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2021

Temporary full protection: Multiple instances of people removing incumbent or putting in other people based off reports incumbent may resign. In reality incumbent remains in office until officially replaced. Last stable version: [134] trackratte (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: IPs have disrupted the page over the last month. -Shift674-🌀 contribs 13:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was initially protected because someone IP-hopping was adding contested material without engaging on the talk page. Literally 1 day since the protection has expired he's resumed his edits. He was clearly counting down the days. Requesting a longer-than-normal semi-protection. — Czello 17:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See edits from Illuminati Exposed. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bishonen | tålk 14:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See edits from Illuminati Exposed. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bishonen | tålk 14:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 16:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; one user, multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:A138:DD39:2B64:7F79 (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NJD-DE (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The said institute has been in news from last week and is being widely criticized in the country over a notification it issued this month. This vandalism is possibly the result of that, though it has been reverted but it may last for sometime. Therefore I request the protection of the page from IPs for a week aor two. USaamo (t@lk) 12:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The page has been vandalized four times as per history within a week time and moreover it is the subject of media attention and has been widely criticized in news, so I believe that justify temporary semi-protection of the article as per criteria in WP:SEMI. USaamo (t@lk) 06:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Four in a week is nothing, especially when those are the only edits at all since last November. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for the bot. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new users. Cupper52 (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a rumoured transfer. Kante4 (talk) 13:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 00:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IPs of the same nature as before. —El Millo (talk) 01:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A substantial amount of vandalism and disruptive editing during the current month of January 2021. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism. Bestagon (talk) 04:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – please add permanent PP to this article. article is subject to WP:GS/Crypto and any admin can add permanent PP. article is subject of TE by new and unregistered users. thanks!. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtbobwaysf: I agree with your request for protection, but as far as i see in the page, vandalism does more conducted by IP and new user. I suggest it become permanently semi-protection and indefinite move protection instead, due to fact that it is highly visible page. I also can request the same protection for all crypto-related articles including U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and even Gary Gensler, which i see more crypto-friendly and Janet Yellen, which all of them are Biden-nominated secretary. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry this is authorized by WP:GS/Crypto specifically to tamp down on WP:TE. As the next crypto bubble starts, so does the interest in this page and corresponding promotional edits. The articles you have mentioned are not subject of the GSCRYPTO consensus. @MER-C: and @JzG: FYI. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. FDW777 (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:NOTFORUM comments and BLP issues. (CC) Tbhotch 08:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Only extended confirmed, but it ought to suffice. Favonian (talk) 09:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The film has little information, save for a synopsis, but voice actor and additional fake characters continue to be added to the page by IP users, often the same edits on multiple IP addresses. ZootyCutie (talk) 21:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 21:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page sees persistent vandalism from IPs and account users, mostly trying to insert meme and offensive vandalism, also original research and unsourced nonsense.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch 22:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism from a couple of sources today. PKT(alk) 22:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP addresses. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed shortly after page protection expired. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 08:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:A138:DD39:2B64:7F79 (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. IHateAccounts (talk) 04:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 08:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — The Earwig talk 06:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs removing parts/modifying the reference quotes in the article [135] [136], [137], [138], [139]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP range block is necessary it seems since the last two were blocked, but new ones keep showing up. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fylindfotberserk: Now the fourth IP vandalize the article, not only three IP. Because it, i want to ping Ohnoitsjamie to request this page to be semi-protected because block doesn't sufficient to prevent vandals. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 08:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. I've also reported the new IP to AIV, with links to previous vandalisms. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 08:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs. POLITANVM talk 04:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism by several IPs and new accounts. Bestagon (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:A138:DD39:2B64:7F79 (talk) 04:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page has been protected for over 10 years, let's try unprotection. NASCARfan0548  21:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected With pending changes. Watching. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring by sockpuppet, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Derbyboy2890. FDW777 (talk) 19:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined deferring to SPI. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP disruption. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User and IP changing name of the place. After Anonymous Bond was blocked for similar vandalism [140], [141], this this IP comes and does the same [142]. Suggesting it to be the same person. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined seems to have stopped, but come back if it persists. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It may just be a redirect but it is constantly reverted by IPs with identical behaviors per WP:LOUTSOCK. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14.0.180.170 and Wikipedia:WikiProject_on_open_proxies/Requests#124.217.128.0/18, and it is the same IP user behind the situation here with Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong, where it was also requested to be semi-protected. ShelteredCook (talk) 12:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: From the edit history, ShelteredCook prod'ed this article. When it was undeleted he/she only merged a tiny proportion then enforced a redirect, disregarding almost the entire length of the article. He/she didn't even allow merge tags nor talk page discussion. IMHO this article needs no protection since ShelterCook already patrols it and owns it. It isn't just a redirect it's an article he/she wants to kill and hide. If it's indeed going to be protected, pick the right version. 124.217.189.34 (talk) 21:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined only one editor. Use dispute resolution or ANI as apropriate. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page seriously needs at least a semi protection as it is constantly being vandalized by a new user, @JaMongKut. The sources are being constantly manipulated. Unreliable sources have been included instead of reliable sources. The person is here just to make an edit war and manipulating facts according to what he wants things to be "claimed". Thank you! Naveen Ramanathan (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs adding unsupported details. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive edits from IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mass content removal from IP. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Come back if that doesn't work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Cliffmore (talk) 03:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined insufficient activity for now, but come back if it persists. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Flix11 (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined there's a lot of activity there; a little bit of disruption is to be expected but I can't see what's going on. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit war that ignore and not waiting Rfc outcome. The stable version use Kowloon City. Matthew hk (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined no activity in >14 hours. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous change in religion of Chandragupta Maurya inspite having citation and Jainism is being removed from the list despite given citation. Rishabh.rsd (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Please this page seriously needs at least a semi protection as it is constantly being vandalised by a new user, @JaMongKut. The person is here just to make a edit war and manipulating facts according to what he wants things to be "claimed". I hope someone would put this page under protection. Thank you! Naveen Ramanathan (talk) 09:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined protection is not for combatting one editor. Use dispute resolution or ANI for conduct issues. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs manipulating reference quotation. After Special:Contributions/184.155.92.27 was blocked for a week for changing source quotation [143] [144] [145], this new IP (possibly the same person) started doing it again [146] [147]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: Doesn't it is IP 216.161.238.43 that manipulate the quotation content? I believe it is same person as IP that was blocked and it needs to be reported to AIV or ANI due to clear indications of vandalism in the page. Let see whether this IP was blocked or not. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'll file a complaint at AIV, after they do it again. I've already issued a level-4 warning. This report is for protecting the article. We never know how many IP ranges and users will be lurking. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: The page has been just edited by an IP (87.0.170.158) whom I believe (due to the ideas expressed and style of writing) to be to the globally blocked user Football Missionary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Football_Missionary).

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 23:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs and newly created accounts have been vandalizing the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: There is no edit warring or disruptive edits, contrary to what the admin had erroneously suggested in the edit summary. Abuse of admin's powers? 219.76.24.211 (talk) 22:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to anyone unprotecting anything I've protected. —valereee (talk) 23:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Actually, that was an error...too many redirects lol, unprotected HKG —valereee (talk) 23:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EN-Jungwon 10:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Showbiz826 pushing preferred image. Ravensfire (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Showbiz826. Ravensfire (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by IPs and new accounts in the past few days. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 19:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeatedly targetted by socks of Bttowadch. Ravensfire (talk) 19:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NedFausa (talk) 20:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another page hit by the increase in notable resident vandalism in the last 48 hours (see edit filter #1112). Dolotta (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dolotta (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption of vandalism after expiration of previous protection. Blablubbs|talk 22:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Users with different IP addresses are attempting to remove the controversy section of this page. I would gander they work for the company. ChipotleHater (talk) 03:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 20:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant notable people vandalism in the last 48 hours. Dolotta (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs having an edit war about whether or not to mention Miss Keeler's profession. None of them using the talk page. DuncanHill (talk) 22:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 20:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – globally banned user ip-hopping. --IWI (talk) 19:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KızılBörü1071. New sockpuppet turned up as soon as the previous semi-protection expired. FDW777 (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Dreamy Jazz. Favonian (talk) 11:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced addition of contentious information to BLPs without citations. FozzieHey (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This list has seen a high level of vandalism from a variety of users this week. PKT(alk) 17:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Flix11 (talk) 09:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption by IPs. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalizing. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protecction: Reverts film's plot to the announcement per the studio's website but I would've prefer it to be paraphrased and the addtion of unconfirmed castmastes WITHOUT reliable sources. NoobMiester96 (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Michael Greiner 05:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – With the Australian Open coming up, once again the IP and new editor vandals are swarming this article. Can we get a one week ecp protection (unless you think a different protection would work better). Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpgjhpjm 08:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. AngryHarpytalk 12:28, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. North America1000 05:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user with a frequently varying IPv6 address keeps adding the same name to the notable people section, with a different description each time. Largoplazo (talk) 02:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kuru. Michael Greiner 05:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason, several US cities have been targeted by vandals. (CC) Tbhotch 19:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 04:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NJD-DE (talk) 20:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 04:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP users leading to edit warring. KaitoNkmra23 talk 00:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 01:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs removing content without explaining why. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell: What are you taking about? You clearly didn't look at the article's history that good [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153]. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
TheAmazingPeanuts, four sets of edits by two IPs in two days, then no vandalism for weeks. That's not nearly enough to justify protection, unless it's extremely offensive or libellous vandalism on a BLP. If it gets worse or becomes a persistent problem, by all means come back. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HJ Mitchell: Wow, you clearly didn't bother to look at the diffs that I show you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 02:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 19:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 19:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 19:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Rotating IPs changing wording from what the source uses. Protection might cause them to join the conversation here Talk:The_Talons_of_Weng-Chiang#IP_edits. MarnetteD|Talk 19:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Range 2a01:4c8:1463:a967:8c89:1312:e3ca:8e77/64 is small enough to block. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. KidAd talk 20:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArmanAfifeh, this page is frequently created disruptively by socks under this name and others. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Mahmoodi. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArmanAfifeh, this page is frequently created disruptively by socks under this name and others. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Mahmoodi. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and newly created account silly vandalisms today. A brief respite, and a lengthy school block, should clear it up. Ifnord (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Users changing dates that are different from cited sources. One user and a few recurring IPs populate the article with false information as well. Findingnewo (talk) 21:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Steven (Editor) (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Users and IPs continuing to use WP:NOTRS sources to add new episodes, possibly WP:COPYVIO episode summaries as well. Magitroopa (talk) 21:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. FASTILY 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ShelteredCook (talk) 08:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ShelteredCook (talk) 08:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ShelteredCook (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shorthand voting template names

Indefinite create protection: The English Wikipedia is against voting templates, so salting these titles should make them harder to implement. JsfasdF252 (talk) 12:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The pending changes are obviously not stopping the vandalism - edit history for the last several months is full of vandalism followed by reverts. A more permanent solution might be in order... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs (same user perhaps) making unsourced changes, changing the settlement type from City to Metropolis. [154] [155] [156] [157]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broke 3RR here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent disruption by IP:s and new accounts. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; vandalism and unsourced content. 2601:188:180:B8E0:A138:DD39:2B64:7F79 (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 16:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recurrent addition of unsourced contentious BLP material; now continued after related page Abraham Aiyash was protected. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Range 2601:240:da00:5d20:59c1:b25c:cca8:b021/64 is small enough to block. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: Persistent vandalism - IP Address removes linked source in the voice cast section, constantly revererting. NoobMiester96 (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent BLP violations/disruptive editing by IP editors. Jr8825Talk 18:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. FASTILY 01:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Multiple IPs add cause that his death is due to COVID-19 or his vaccination, which IMO is unsourced. This article also having attention due to his death and posted in ITN. The another option is Pending changes protection needs to be extended beyond 18 February 2021 in order to filter edits that conduct by IP users. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. FASTILY 01:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism not letting up. 🦠🌀𝕾𝖚𝖕𝖊𝖗 𝕮𝖞𝖈𝖑𝖔𝖓𝖎𝖈 𝕾𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖒 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖓𝖆🌀🦠 13:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. FASTILY 22:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dolotta (talk) 23:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lettlerhellocontribs 16:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 18:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism over the last several days from many accounts. Yosemiter (talk) 03:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Additions of non-NPOV against consensus. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This template should be increased to full protection because the redirect target is fully protected. Cupper52 (talk) 14:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. @Cupper52: That redirect has had no edits since 2017. The redirect is already protected so that only those with the Template Editor right may edit it. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Ahmetlii (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. FozzieHey (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Michael Greiner 20:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Mrcooljdje (talk · contribs) blocked by caknuck. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same protection is needed for The Beginning (Mercyful Fate album). Somebody using IPs from Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada, has been persistently genre warring for 18 months, using various IP6 groups such as the recently rangeblocked Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:F225:CE00:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: i don't believe many multiple IPs are trying to evade the block to vandalize the article because there many issue that is happened in a single IP range. It seems more likely that this article to be indefinite pending changes or semi-protection. 180.242.50.227 (talk) 04:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Binksternet: I don't see anything in either article warranting ECP. ECP is needed only to protect against disruptive autoconfirmed editors, and all I see here are IP addresses. I also see some constructive edits in the early history, so I protected both articles with 6 month semi. If disruption resumes, or starts coming from autoconfirmed editors, then we can consider escalating the duration and/or the protection level. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 17:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A look through the page history reveals the vast majority of edits by new users and IPs are reverted (the page seems particularly prone to list-creep...), so an upgrade to SP appears justified to me. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This is a clear case where pending-change protection is ineffective (and it rarely ever is, IMO). ~Anachronist (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page has been semi-protected multiple times, and whenever that protection expires, there are frequent waves of vandalism. LeBron4 (talk) 14:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. There is a prior 1-year protection in the log, and evidently it ceased to be a deterrent when it expired. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same person keeps making an unsourced change (including some unsubstantiated allegations/descriptions of a real person, Braxton Mitchell) that I removed and have been removing each time. My attempts to discuss with the person on their talk page were not answered. They recently returned to make the same unsourced changes but this time from a different IP address. Benicio2020 (talk) 15:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temp Semi-protect: High level of IP vandalism. —blindlynx (talk) 22:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article has severe BLP issues and the "vandalism" here appears to be removing unsourced negative claims. --Michael Greiner 05:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I attempted a clean-up of the article, restoring the bit about his sentencing, but removing the "guilt by association" claims. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There has been a user repeatedly posting edits with non-ideal grammar and formatting, from a different IP address each time. On the rest of the Internet there seems to be an almost-subculture of people believing in misinformation and arguing about things like whether or not it hurts for women and whether it's more or less painful than childbirth. I think that reflects on the article because in general the page has a long history of low-quality edits, such as those with misinformation such as thinking "dels" are a real unit, and I think they are going to keep coming without semi-protection. In the past the article had notices about both lack of citations and original research, as well as nominations for deletion because it "has never been an article that reflects particularly well on us"; the talk page contains some examples of misinformation and the types of debates found on the rest of the Internet. PBZE (talk) 08:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've partially blocked the /48 IP range, which catches all of the dodgy edits since November with no collateral. Let me know if protection is still required. GirthSummit (blether) 09:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 16:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism on basis of religion of Chandragupta Maurya. 2409:4040:406:963B:C9B6:6532:DF24:8129 (talk) 10:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The disputants are all autoconfirmed so semi-protection would be pointless. This is a content dispute, so please discuss on the talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 01:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking at the protection history and the page history, this BLP seems to be a magnet for rubbish. (Any admin who feels otherwise, feel free to lessen.) - David Gerard (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 03:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Amory (utc) 11:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated by TheMultimediaHub socks, please see histories of Corey Johnson (songwriter) and Corey Johnson (music producer). MarioJump83! 04:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. - David Gerard (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. It is getting crazy - non stop vandalism - pls help. Cassiopeia(talk) 01:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I second this request. Protection for this page expired today, and there is a crazy amount of vandalism now. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 04:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia(talk) 03:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency Temporary semi-protection: Persistent very high activity of vandalism in this very popular event. Kent Bargo (talk) 04:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very little vandalism at Jessica Eye, and Conor McGregor was already protected. The rest are Done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd talk 03:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs and new users repeatedly adding same unsourced information. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 05:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as pointless. The page is already under indefinite PC, and the edit rate isn't very high. -FASTILY 02:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attacks from Montreal Canadiens fans. dannymusiceditor oops 06:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so maybe not entirely from them but a number of vandalistic edits have been made the past few days. dannymusiceditor oops 06:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and a new (likely the same) making unsourced and disruptive changes, changing the settlement type from City to Metropolis. [158] [159] [160] [161] [162], with lame excuses like "Bikaner is way better to be called a city only and also having a population more than udaipur ajmer your so called metropolis so Bikaner is well deserved to be a metropolis" here. Also Broke 3RR (combined as IPs and user). Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ShelteredCook (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page was keep on attacked by meatsock . See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14.0.180.170. Their other target Talk:List of lighthouses in China is protected already and please review the previous decline. Matthew hk (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most recent edits have been reverts, and there is no reason to regularly edit this. Steve M (talk) 22:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Range is small enough to block. -FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 00:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 00:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/MRY. Steve M (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Range is small enough to block. FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 01:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent removal of sourced content. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. -FASTILY 02:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed immediately after protection expired, and this is a rather highly visible page given the recent storming controversies. Steve M (talk) 22:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Steve M: Vandalism now becoming more persistent as multiple IPs also adding unsourced content. Requesting long-term semi-protection or even indefinite. 36.65.43.72 (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Long-term, 100%. However, the storming controversies will soon die down, and then protection will likely no longer be needed, so I'm not sure about indef. Steve M (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – (Temporary as in a few months or a year) Except for a brief period when the page was semi-protected, nearly all of the edits by IPs and new users have been removed; PC is obviously (to quote the protecting admin back in 2018) "not making the cut". RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd hinge towards even longer term because the subject is an actor in a popular series, so vandalism is unlikely to die down rapidly. Just saying, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Replacing indefinite PC protection with indefinite semi-protection. As noted by the admin who semi'ed the article for two years in 2018, PC is not sufficient for such a heavily-edited article.  MelanieN (talk) 02:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; an IP keeps vandalizing the page redirect the Black Lives Matter link (related to the 2020 American athlete strikes) to the Ku Klux Klan page, among other deeply problematic edits (the IP also changed Shooting of Jacob Blake to say "justified shooting"). Such edits constitute vandalism. Av9 (talk) 18:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article seems particularly popular with recent "notable people" vandals. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 00:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 00:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 01:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Well-meaning IPs altering details that should be done at the 117th Congress instead. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

25 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Disruption resumed once the 4 months of protection expired. Upping to 6. - CorbieVreccan 21:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors adding unsourced claims, reverting edits after getting warned. Vacant0 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 20:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan 21:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Disruption resumed once the 4 months of protection expired. Upping to 6. - CorbieVreccan 21:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors adding unsourced claims, reverting edits after getting warned. Vacant0 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 20:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan 21:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ☎️ Churot DancePop 03:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy 🍁 09:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy 🍁 09:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)`[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring despite ongoing discussion in Talk. Two editors are the primary culprits so blocking both of them is also a feasible approach. ElKevbo (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ElKevbo: As long as i see the page, there is actuallt and edit warring between two editors combined with vandalism from IP. IMO, either full or semi-protected would be used to prevent the behaviour but i see it needs more likely semi protected due to increase of IP vandalism regarding your request. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The edit warring continues; can an administrator please step in and help? ElKevbo (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 03:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is too heavily edited for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same day semi-protection expired, more IPs (and non-confirmed editors) tried to remove historical information, such as the Republicans' Senate majority in January etc. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 18:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent edit warring despite ongoing discussion in Talk. Two editors are the primary culprits so blocking both of them is also a feasible approach. ElKevbo (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ElKevbo: As long as i see the page, there is actuallt and edit warring between two editors combined with vandalism from IP. IMO, either full or semi-protected would be used to prevent the behaviour but i see it needs more likely semi protected due to increase of IP vandalism regarding your request. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The edit warring continues; can an administrator please step in and help? ElKevbo (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 03:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article is too heavily edited for PC to work well. MelanieN (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The same day semi-protection expired, more IPs (and non-confirmed editors) tried to remove historical information, such as the Republicans' Senate majority in January etc. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 18:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism from IPs over the last few hours. Belwine💬📜 14:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple different IPs (unless its all the same person) making similar unsourced changes, PC has obviously not stopped such things. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. RE: frequent removal of "pseudoscientific" against consensus Jonathan Deamer (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Subject in the news Walrus Ji (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps reporting the death of subject, without sourcing. I cant confirm the death. Roxy the happy dog . wooF 00:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE has now provided a twitter source, I think its unreliable. -Roxy the happy dog . wooF 00:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Roxy the dog: I reverted you edits, because i restore the previous revision with KHOU source. [163]. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 00:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Access Denied" -Roxy the happy dog . wooF 08:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Roxy the dog: I'm not sure what to do about this. I see the khou.com story which says he died, but I can't see it specifying a date of death. Any thoughts? Johnuniq (talk) 09:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If that story is from an RS, then problem over, obviously. I cannot tell, though it probably is. I reckon we'll know better in another 24 hrs, and I haven't reverted the edit on the actual article. -Roxy the happy dog . wooF 09:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
actually withdrawn -Roxy the happy dog . wooF 10:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor per above. FASTILY 10:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. ☎️ Churot DancePop 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - no sign of disruption on talk page - any reason for this other than them being banned? If they vandalise their own page, TPA can be revoked. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. ☎️ Churot DancePop 10:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - could you link to this use? I can't see any edits from the account newer than two months ago. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Expecting more WP:SPA making WP:FRINGE edits without RSes, see, e.g., [164] Normchou💬 01:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Normchou: A sockpuppet like Paula Beers needs to be blocked or warned due to fact that it appears only one user who adding this at least for now. Aside from this, i believe it cannot be justify semi-protection due to fact that a pages cannot be protected preemptively. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 01:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NO-PREEMPT is under the "full protection" section, and I thought requests for "semi-protection" would be handled differently. At any rate, Thank you for pointing that out to me. Normchou💬 01:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC); edited 03:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 09:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Reported signing has not officially been announced. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Resumption of WP:CRYSTALBALL DE speculation upon expiration of prior PP. Additional 2 weeks of PP should cover re ongoing head coach search. UW Dawgs (talk) 10:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: String of editors who all write in a curiously identical style adding ill-cited promotional content. Eligible for permanent semi or ECP under WP:GS/Crypto, but a week should be fine for the moment - David Gerard (talk) 11:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most of the disruptive editors appear to be extended-confirmed. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. FozzieHey (talk) 11:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been recreated three times. Cupper52 (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 11:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from es.wiki that is moving to Wikidata and en.wiki. (CC) Tbhotch 01:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 100+ reverts since the last semi-protection expired on 17 December 2020 (and in spite of being pending changes protected already). Recommend reinstating 1-week long semi-protection. Thank you. History DMZ (HQ) (wire) 02:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent IP Vandalism HurricaneEdgar 08:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The organization recently won a prestigious international tournament and has subsequently seen a spike in IP vandalism in the past 24 hours. The vandal edits should die down within a week or two with page protection. CentreLeftRight 08:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed-protection: Persistent disruptive edits were made 10 ten times alone today to the page from 4 diff ips/new/low edit count users, especially while I was in the middle of updating it. Ips have previously consistently disrupted the page from Jan 11–15, as well as another time before that. I am requesting ext-conf protection to help prevent further vandalism/edit warring on the page as semi-protection is not effective enough to deter them. Carlobunnie (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ip editor just reverted my most recent revert after I warned them in my edit summary. I cannot undo this as it will exceed the revert limit and they never go to the talk page to discuss anything. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Crossroads -talk- 05:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. An IP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.242.137.210) is constantly removing the wikilink to Ed Mundell and seems to have a personal agenda against him. Another user (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Atomicchris), who probably is the same as the IP, is reverting constructive edits and claiming that it is "his band". Xiamatt (talk) 07:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 04:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 04:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 03:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Otddung sock editing

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive and persistent sock-puppetry from a half-dozen accounts (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Otddung and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Otddung) over the course of a few weeks continued at several articles (e.g. Manchuria after the expiration of the last semi-protection). — MarkH21talk 00:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Mongol invasions. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Applies to North Korea and Revolutions. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to Manchuria. MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: I have no reason to edit this page in my own userspace again and don't want any other users to edit it. Requesting indefinite full-protection on the page. Thanks, --IWI (talk) 11:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ImprovedWikiImprovment, since you transclude the page content anyway: Can you create (not move to!) User:ImprovedWikiImprovment/Committed identity.css with exactly the same source code, then transclude this instead? If you like the idea, feel free to notify me about deleting the old page afterwards. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ImprovedWikiImprovment: Also, since you already have the Extended Confirmed editor right, it can be extended-confirmed protected, which would give only you and a few other experienced editors the ability to edit it, but would block any other editors with less than 500 edits from making changes. If you are concerned about vandalism, it's no problem to protect your user page and any other page in your space (except your talk page) at extended-confirmed protection level. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: Yes, it slipped my mind that this wiki has that function. In that case, please apply indefinite 30/500 protection. Thanks, --IWI (talk) 17:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. @ImprovedWikiImprovment: I also applied this protection to your user page, as it comes in handy in the event you get into a dispute with a less experienced editor who would vandalize it. I have always felt that user pages should be protected by default at the maximum level that allows the owner to edit it. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Sorabino (talk) 18:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 00:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Šaban Šaulić, Sinan Sakić

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent editing wars about ethnicity. Upwinxp (talk) 17:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to both. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Permanent semi, please. This page is consistently trolled by new accounts an IPs to add POV pushing content. Slow but steady ongoing problem every time protection gets lifted. Montanabw(talk) 05:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Range 174.215.128.0/18 is small enough to block. -FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Walrus Ji (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing immediately after protection expired on 20 January 2021. IPs (possibly the same person) restoring to the old version of the page that was poorly sourced and was up for rewriting [165], [166] , [167] [168]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent editing by random IPs. Meloras (talk) 12:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the period of around a week. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: As we are having a case of editwarring on Commons regarding some Somalia/Somaliland related files I suggest full protection for, say, 2 weeks. Cheers, Achim (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 19:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 20:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 23:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 20:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 23:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing stuff. Huldra (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 23:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 20:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -FASTILY 23:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 21:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor reverting my edits without adding references. Vacant0 (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -FASTILY 23:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already under PC, not seeing an excessively high edit rate. FASTILY 23:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Mischief from IPs and account users alike. Crboyer (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not sure what good PC would do. Looks like a major, nationalism-based content dispute. I just got read off, so recusing. May need much more intervention than I'm willing to undertake. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Agree PC would be worthless, the article is too heavily edited. Looks like you have your hands full with this one for lack of more reliable reporting - good luck. MelanieN (talk) 01:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – (1 week) - Persistent addition of trivial gossip in the past few days about the article subject's marriage despite the PC protection. Since that is apparently happening today, it should die down relatively quickly. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that, the problem has only gotten worse since yesterday. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Way too much stuff going on right now for PC to handle. The underlying PC protection will persist when the semi-protection expires MelanieN (talk) 00:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 19:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism, claiming subject is still alive. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot the page links, my bad. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Weird. Is this some kind of internet meme? MelanieN (talk) 01:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is severe edit warring (and multiple 3RR violations) taking place regarding the image on the article, so I believe that protection is needed. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 02:01, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn It seems like the semi-protection has dealt with the issue for now. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 02:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry and vandalism. Requesting some level of page protection while sockpuppetry investigation is happening. ChipotleHater (talk) 03:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn Sockpuppet investigation closed. ChipotleHater (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The protest is ongoing for couple of months. IP addresses are randomly adding or removing information's. Semi-protect for 6 months.--Adinew56 (talk) 12:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism immediately after the expiration of protection [169] by the same IP range. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism continues [170]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started immediately after page protection expired [171], by the same IP range that previously did that. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - Thus far the only edits the talk page has been seeing this year is murder conspiracy theories from drive-bys, which are reverted on sight due to them having been thoroughly dismissed (to the point there is an FAQ specifically explaining that these theories are bunk, which constantly gets ignored and its header vandalised with more conspiracy theories). It's picked up somewhat as of late as well. The talk page had to be semi'd last year for more of the same before we got the FAQ up and started to basically treat the drive-by conspiracymongering as vandalism. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 21:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not this again. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption from the ongoing Guillermo Gonzalez (astronomer)#Discovery Institute and intelligent design campaign. Guy Macon (talk) 22:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Requesting full protection of User:Wikipedia. and User talk:Wikipedia.. Editor blocked in 2005. I reverted all post-2005 edits to both pages. Both have been mis-used. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Lots of IP vandalism, claiming subject is still alive. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Michael Greiner 20:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection Currently on pending changes, getting a raft of vandalism from IPs and new accounts. PohranicniStraze (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Only template editors can edit editnotices anyway, this is lingering protection from 2009 and unnecessary. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 15:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected FASTILY 23:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

26 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent deletion of references to Smith's family and personal connection to a puppy mill by anonymous editors. Eponymous-Archon (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Eponymous-Archon: No way does a WP:BLP of a politician feature a section on the sins of his mother. I'll watch the article for a while and see if there is any reason that editors repeatedly adding that should not be blocked. For example, a reason would be that the matter was discussed at WP:BLPN where consensus was in favor of the undue material. Johnuniq (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: thanks for the action. I think part of the mitigation here is that the politician himself owned the establishment in question, so the “sins of the mother” are, in this case, his as well. -Eponymous-Archon (talk) 12:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Silly vandalisms from IPs and newly created accounts. Might be something in the media, a brief respite is in order. Ifnord (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article is seeing attention again by socks of Agt2008fan. See relevant SPI. NJD-DE (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increase in IP vandalism and BLP issues. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a lot of vandalism going on since January 4. However, it has been pretty bad for the past couple days. Scorpions13256 (talk) 13:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 13:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: It's a current event that's receiving frequent IP vandalism. The article could use temporary semi-protection for a week or two. Grnrchst (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Grnrchst: Please find evidence that this article has received a high level of IP Vandalism, because it needs to justify semi-protection. Unless than that, this article cannot be protected preemptively. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Three IP edits have been reverted in the last hour due to disruptive editing and false information. There were also a reversion of an IP edit on 23 January due to Vandalism, 3 reversions of IP edits due to Vandalism and 2 reversions of IP edits due to unsourced information on 24 January and 2 further reversions of IP edits today on 25 January. Grnrchst (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. It's close to needing protection but I'm not seeing it quite yet. Ask again if it gets worse. BTW it looked to me as if some of the problem edits were coming from auto-confirmed editors; if that keeps up you might need to request EC protection next time. MelanieN (talk) 00:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Frequent edit warring by multiple editors linked to discussions on the talk page over the last week, as shown by the article history. A period of full protection would likely be helpful in encouraging a resolution of these discussions. Nick-D (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have slowed down and I left a message on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 08:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent "updates" which meant rewriting the article to a POV biased in favor of the EASL (the subject). Persistent conflict of interest editing. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Steve M (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that extended confirmed protection would be better, given what's going on with the persistent sock/vandalism attack on this page. Nsk92 (talk) 02:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, after the article is AFD-ed, it needs to be fully protected in order to prevent any user that repeatedly created the article per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HOAX. This article about biden impeachment inquiry is more like hoax to me. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 08:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism by unregistered users adding misinformation Drackonic (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked the IP range 109.197.204.0/23 from editing that article only, for 1 week. There seem to be constructive edits from other anonymous IP addresses so I don't believe semi-protection would be a good idea at this time. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple protections enacted in the past, vandalism flared up again after each one. I recommend permanent semi-protection this time until further notice. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 08:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs for the last few days. Armegon (talk) 04:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 04:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch 05:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of IP DE after expiry of prior PP, related to WP:CRYSTALBALL speculation. Additional 2 weeks of PP should cover (as was already done on Tennessee Volunteers football). UW Dawgs (talk) 06:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP and now I assume same IP but with account is trying to restore unreferenced information to article. Has made legal threat that will most likely get them banned as well. NZFC(talk)(cont) 06:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection : BLP policy violations – And edit warring. Wareon (talk) 06:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I've also seen what's going on in the article and have reverted an edit or two, but I believe Full Protection is unnecessary, a sysop will obviously see it and Semi or at most ECP should do. Bingobro (Chat) 06:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 08:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Longterm disruption from SPA wanting to create an oddly incomplete article about the subject (rd to Barney & Friends was decided years ago by an AfD as N was not met). Nate (chatter) 08:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Every year on 26 January, this article receives high level of IP vandalism, see in many reversion on 25 January. Requesting temporary semi-protection only for 24 hours time, after that, pending changes will persisted. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 00:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsPugle: Today is 26 January, and in Australia Day, vandalism incrase the article, i see that majority of edits are vandalism and reverts and not constructive. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 06:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing potential football transfer: typical IP disruptive editing. protect for just one week, until end of transfer window (which is sunday). Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

temp Semi-protection: High level of IP/ip6 vandalism. —blindlynx (talk) 01:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Steve M (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. For the bot. (CC) Tbhotch 05:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 04:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: As we are having a case of editwarring on Commons regarding some Somalia/Somaliland related files I suggest full protection for, say, 2 weeks. Cheers, Achim (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. FASTILY 23:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon me, I should have asked you to have a look at the page history. Now we have the 5th revert. --Achim (talk) 09:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I'm only counting 3 reverted edits (1, 2, 3). Also, I see there's an open ANI thread on this matter, so please propose your desired solution over there. Requests for page protection is not a forum for resolving complex content disputes or behavioral issues. -FASTILY 10:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I see that we have crossed. @Fastily:, you may undo my protection if you wish. My motivation was that templates are not a venue for edit-warring, and we clearly have one occurring there (although not yet high-intensity).--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I think it should stay unprotected because there are only two users involved (both can be blocked if necessary). I'll unprotect the page and warn both. -FASTILY 10:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter User talk:Fastily Thanks for the help amigos. I was notified by the change when all the other maps were effected. Could you kindly check the talk page for further elaboration on the issue. This module page effected all the other pages I was working on and found out that a user changed the map file. I simply reverted the change and went back to the 2009 file. Once i reverted the change, i made a talk page and to discuss why the other users felt the need for the change but was given no response. I then notified the admins in the talk page about the issue. Thanks Hurbad (talk) 11:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Stucked. (CC) Tbhotch 05:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection for drafts and creation protection for mainspace articles: Both subjects fail WP:NMOTORSPORT. Since I thought it was a case of WP:TOOSOON, I moved them back to draft (someone did it before me as well), but the creator keeps moving them to mainspace. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 11:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to the mainspace articles. I made it one month, rather than indefinite, so that they can resubmit it in a reasonable time. MelanieN (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User:Styyx, I have added the "Draft article" template to the drafts so that they can submit them through the article review process. That's something you should do when you draftify an article. You should also disable the categories; drafts are not supposed to have categories. You can disable them by adding a colon before the word category. MelanieN (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Stucked. (CC) Tbhotch 05:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. This has become a favorite of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. (CC) Tbhotch 19:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While this article has probably suffered enough for the time being, and I'm therefore elevating the protection, I would suggest taking a less personal approach to the LTA. Simply revert, report, and see the block happen. Samsara 20:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Stucked. (CC) Tbhotch 05:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - just the one registered account doing it. Have been warned and stopped. If they start again, the account can be blocked. No need for protection. Daniel (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 92.51.221.169 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel. Vandalised again after final warning. Daniel (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's get these editors to the talk page....looking at the history we have a month long editwar going on with no end in site. Moxy 🍁 01:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We have many logged out edits...but I just noriced an admin on talk so hopefully all will be solved soon.--Moxy 🍁 01:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been protected twice already just this month. We're well beyond article protections; the serial edit warriors need to be blocked until they agree to stop edit warring. (An open SPI looks like it might take care of some of them in a different manner.) ElKevbo (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Controversial nature of the article due to the violent and partisan nature of the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol, and the growing possibility of Trump's conviction, will tempt users to vandalize the article once the trial proceeds. Already the article's talk page has one or more users protesting it as a "crucifixion" and others who believe so will seek to vandalize the article and trash it. Requesting semi-protection in advance. Phillip Samuel (talk) 19:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Phillip Samuel: You need an evidence that this article suffered a high level of IP vandalism. As far as i see in the article, i don't see any vandalism conduct by IP for now until 8 February. Please read WP:NO-PREEMPT (Pages cannot be protected preemptively). It means that a pages can only be protected if there are persistent vandalism from multiple IP users which is deemly impossible for block. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Wug·a·po·des 21:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-Term Semi or Semi-Indef: Yes, we're back. Fastlily declined, saying to warn and block the dynamic IP at AIV. But the range of the dynamic IPs has gotten larger, and there have been a handful of new SPA accounts. I am sure they are socks, but as they go dormant, we haven't taken the time to do a full SPI. I guess it's time. Meanwhile, the disruption has continued since the last report, and has been ongoing for several years. The repeating pattern is for two new accounts to show up, along with a couple IPs; they edit-war up to the third warnings, then go dormant for a few more months. Wash, rinse, repeat.

The members of the Indigenous Wikiproject are sick of having to deal with these POV-pushers every few months, especially when well-meaning editors who are unfamiliar with these fake tribes (who are attempting to use the 'pedia to perpetrate a WP:HOAX) don't understand the problems with the edits and sourcing. I'd protect it myself but I've edited the article. Protection is best as the disruption is always from new accounts and IPS, and editors unfamiliar with Indigenous topics would probably OK edits that can be confusing to those inexperienced in the field. Please just semi this so we can make better use of our time. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan 20:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting temporary semi-protection due to ongoing unsourced / poorly sourced edits by anonymous users. Dmoore5556 (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Due to the increased interest due to the news. Unsourced additions coming in from all angles. Daniel (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dmoore5556, I totally forgot about him. You can ping me on the article talk page or my talk page in the future for baseball transaction protections. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – History of recent disruptive editing by COI editors; subject is in the news due to recent action by President Trump commuting 845-year sentence. Note recent disruptive SPA and IP editing on this page and IP posting on my user talk page. Coretheapple (talk) 03:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect from moving to draftspace (that was done just twice (today/yesterday) - cf. my discussion page) or deleting (even if "only stub"); the object is crosslinked with the same objects in german and alemannic WP. Btw: it is important to have this article visible to not confuse it with the also existing Chall Pass which is another pass, also connecting both swiss cantons of basel-landschaft and solothurn - and that article is the same kind of stub. --ProloSozz (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not about to interfer with the new page reviewers or AfC reviewers. Please discuss with them. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Agree with Deepfriedokra about not interfering with the article review process. But the issue may be moot, since I see that administrator Malcolmxl5 has now edited and short-described the article; that suggests he has accepted it. MelanieN (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same old vote stacking from ip of Hong Kong just likes the condition in Talk:List of lighthouses in China. High likely another off site canvassing or even sock. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14.0.180.170. Matthew hk (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It's unclear what you are asking to be protected from. It looks as if this talk page - for a Featured List - has languished for years with little or no input from regular editors, just an occasional burst of activity from IPs. I see that you are archiving those many-year-old threads. But there is no indication that the IP input is disruptive or vandalism. Meanwhile the list article itself looks to be OK. MelanieN (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing & addition of unsourced content by various IPs for the last few days. Armegon (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Armegon: You messed up the article. I honestly don't know what to restore. As a long-registered user in good standing, I trust you to sort it out. Thanks. Samsara 11:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: It's fixed.
Thank you. Looks like there's not much else happening now. I've put it on my watchlist. Samsara 19:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 19:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 23:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: disruptive editing This page is being updated constantly with no sources being added to back up newly added information on class 321 units going for scrap despite me asking for such when reverting edits.

Of the edits I reverted 2 were made from IP adresses and 1 was made from a “sock puppet account” this is why I am making this request and one came from a user who just needed a little reminding of policy. Due to the frequency of these edits I ask for temporary page protection.Maurice Oly (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The users making the edits all seem like IP addresses. Semi protection can handle that... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 02:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guessing this is an LTA. May change topics. Samsara 12:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 136.158.28.11 (talk · contribs) blocked by Longhair. Samsara 19:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 136.158.28.53 (talk · contribs) blocked by Alexf. Samsara 19:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: unconfirmed IP persistently reverting edits by autoconfirmed users and pushing POV, has been going on for weeks. (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is seeing persistent vandalism given the current events associated with this person. Andrew Henderson (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Thanks for your feedback. It’s still getting a lot more today but I will try and keep up with it myself. Andrew Henderson (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Hendo: I agree that several individuals are editing the article, but they are not vandalizing it, and fortunately, you are there to keep an eye on things. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 19:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article is subject to WP:GS/CRYPTO and has persistent problems with vandalism. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not much editing going on there... Samsara 04:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not hearing any disagreement, I'll decline this one. Samsara 11:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 11:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A TikTok user has posted a video of themselves editing this page with inaccurate information and encouraging others to do the same across wikipedia and this page. An increase in vandalism is evident in the article's edit logs. The video in question is available at https://vm.tiktok.com/ZSKPWQoh/. DawidGiertuga (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and newly registered users disruptive and biased editing. WP:SPA, WP:NOTHERE. Jingiby (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple recent examples of IP and new user vandalism, likely to continue given current market events and particularly concerning due to article's BLP status. RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs messing about. Pipsally (talk) 06:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 08:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article has been repeatedly vandalized since it is TFA. Especially considering the subject matter, please protect and set to unprotect after TFA is over. (t · c) buidhe 07:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 08:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP dispute over whether she was/is classed as a pornographic artist, and the templates to go with it. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fully protected to stop edit war, and left a warning on talk. The subject died in 1999 so BLP does not apply. Johnuniq (talk) 08:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Crossroads -talk- 08:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 08:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High level of IP vandalism over the last few days

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing, specifically from user 2001:8003:5022:5E01:D064:CEB7:621C:116A. Thescrubbythug (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose talk page - disruption being caused by the reporter interfering with consensus and violating WP:BIAS in the process. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:D064:CEB7:621C:116A (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The only disruption that has been taken place has been that of YOUR behaviour on every page you have contributed to so far - and your false claims of a consensus. --Thescrubbythug (talk) 06:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So what do you call your attempts to censor me? Disruptive is the word you're looking for. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:D064:CEB7:621C:116A (talk) 06:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already explained that the removal of the new section on the Talk page was an accident, whether you choose to believe it or not. While the dumpster fire that was the report section consisted of you responding to my report against you in an inappropriate forum, which I tried to explain to you when I initially attempted to remove your response.... and was ultimately justified when the admin removed everything and backed me up in saying that it was NOT the forum for such an argument. --Thescrubbythug (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No it was not a forum for your report in the first place! I merely made that obvious! Again, thank you for proving me right. I have no problem with the main page being protected. But I will not be censored from putting my case for inclusion on the talk page - something that you have been disrupting (and your removals on that report page shows you are willing to remove so you have form for it). 2001:8003:5022:5E01:D064:CEB7:621C:116A (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was the appropriate place to file a report against disruptive behaviour - what was not appropriate was your argumentative responses at a forum which was inappropriate for such debates. As I even said on one of my edit reversion responses, either back off or file your own report rather than directly responding to mine. Nobody was attempting to censor you on the Talk section of the 2021 page itself, and I've already explained that and admitted where I made my mistake - and frankly it doesn't bother me one bit if you choose not to believe it. Thescrubbythug (talk) 07:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was NOT the appropriate place as Daniel Case told you - and you are STILL not getting it! And yes you did censor me. Your reversions on the report page show you have form - it was no accident. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:D064:CEB7:621C:116A (talk) 07:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case only went ahead and said that because you disruptingly went ahead and began to argue there, causing the entire page to derail - just as you have done everywhere else, including here. I'm not going to dignify the second part of your comment with a response, given that I've already explained myself. Thescrubbythug (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gee you really have no grip on what's really going on do you? Total denial = hallmark of a guilty person. I don't need to say anything else. It all stands up by itself above. Thank you. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:D064:CEB7:621C:116A (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is all precisely the kind of disruptive behaviour that I have been referring to, and which has essentially vandalised every page you have contributed to so far. Thescrubbythug (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 08:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection needed in order to prevent future vandalism as with all articles on major cities(e.g. New York City, London, Hong Kong) have semi protection. Stonksboi (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stonksboi: Please read WP:NO-PREEMPT for Tokyo, Shanghai, Beijing, etc. Pages are not protected preemptively. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 02:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 04:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. User:189.216.167.235 continues to remove sources from the page claiming it's "misinformation" Thus saith findanegg. (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 04:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 20:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism over the last few days. I'd say a week's protection should be sufficient at this stage. Damien Linnane (talk) 21:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There have now been 4 different sockpuppets trying their best to disrupt this AfD. Please consider protecting it. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection needed in order to prevent future vandalism as with all articles on major cities(e.g. New York City, London, Hong Kong) have semi protection. Stonksboi (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 04:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection needed in order to prevent future vandalism as with all articles on major cities(e.g. New York City, London, Hong Kong) have semi protection. Stonksboi (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 04:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Protection needed in order to prevent future vandalism as with all articles on major cities(e.g. New York City, London, Hong Kong) have semi protection. Stonksboi (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stonksboi: Per WP:NO-PREEMPT, unless there are evidence of vandalism, pages cannot be protected preemptively. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 03:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 04:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There seems to be rewriting of history in recent weeks on this page using unreliable sources. One user was recently blocked after sock puppet investigation, a newly registered user, Prem Mathurr is peddling the same content. Jonathansammy (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I'm not seeing it. Looks like they are editing constructively and not getting reverted. MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Blinken was just confirmed, yet people keep adding he assumed office today, yet don't provide a source for his swearing in. Snickers2686 (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend that all the Biden cabinet & cabinet level nominees bios be protected, until each are sworn in. Many editors tend to jump the gun, upon US Senate confirmation. GoodDay (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GoodDay: @Snickers2686: But a pages cannot be protected preemptively per WP:NO-PREEMPT. An article needs an evidence of persistent vandalism or distruptive editing before it can be protected. As far as i know, i don't see any persistent vandalism in some Biden Cabinet and cabinet-level nominee articles for now. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. He has now been sworn in so the issue is moot. MelanieN (talk) 02:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: @ThaThinThaKiThaTha user authoritative over the page. Not ready to accept any additions or any constructive changes with sources or any links to make the page richer in information. Constantly requesting for sources even if it has been given before hand. Seems like the person is trying to prove his point. Naveen Ramanathan (talk) 09:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The problem editor actually appears to be Yaakohv, who has been warned about adding unsourced content by several different editors. I gave them a final warning; if they do it again they should be blocked. MelanieN (talk) 02:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism, removal of reliable WP:PROWRESTLING sources by anonymous contributors who are choosing to add unreliable sources, removing spoilers which are allowed, and being generally disruptive by deleting important information about the event in question. Pokkeballs17 (talk) 11:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It was just one editor, and it looks they have agreed to stop doing it. MelanieN (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP overwrote BLP. Crossroads -talk- 21:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An outbreak of vandalism today after vandalism earlier in the month. Last protection period was three days, but the persistent nature might warrant something longer. Richard Nevell (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – This article is not vandalized at a super high frequency but when it is, serious blp violations are introduced, which sometimes stay in the article for hours due to low number of watchers. [173][174]. (t · c) buidhe 23:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Khiikiat (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mz7. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. This seems to be the favourite target of an IP-hopping vandal who appears to be abusing open proxies and who shows up every few days to use it (and other articles) to probe edit filters. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 02:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IP editors keep adding false information about Ms. Lewis' personal relationships. The page was protected in the past because of this; the disruption has picked back up again now that the protection has expired. gnu57 21:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP keeps removing and/or reverting a long-standing redirect that I recently changed from Westinghouse to the proper CBS article. The IP is not just reverting me here, they're doing it at the CBS article as well, so it also needs PP as a result. I created a UTP for them, but it doesn't do any good because it's not a static IP. If this doesn't help, I'll nominate it for an AfD because this little bit of history is already in the CBS Corp article. Atsme 💬 📧 23:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC). Atsme 💬 📧 23:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Atsme, the IP is engaged in good-faith editing, not vandalism. Rather than edit-war with them, I suggest humoring them a bit and let them finish what they started. They did stake out a spot on the talk page (since deleted) so I wouldn't assume they aren't willing to talk. The corporate histories here (CBS, Westinghouse, Viacom) are rather complicated. Arguably a short stub for a short-lived incarnation may be helpful to readers looking to sort out the corporate histories. I'm not saying there needs to be an article titled CBS Corporation (1997), but I don't think such an article should be rejected out-of-hand. – wbm1058 (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Atsme, I've moved the new article to Draft:CBS Corporation (1997) for incubation. – wbm1058 (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Temporary full protection: BLP policy violations – BLP concerns over the release of a photo of her daughter, WP:AVOIDVICTIM. Reinstated several times. Article under a 1RR warning so I cannot revert more than once. BLP discussion here [[175]]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Morbidthoughts: It seems that ECP also involved in edit warring that violates 1RR and i see only one non-ECP users that adding and reverting most contents. So I my opinion, this is edit warring that mostly involved by ECP users, bit like more a content dispute for me. So the page needs to be temporary fully protected and taking the dispute resolutions on talk page to resolve the situation. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 02:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The disputed content also needs to be removed pending that BLPN discussion or RFC to restore. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also removed the disputed content pending discussion at the talk page and BLPN page. MelanieN (talk) 02:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you MelanieN. Morbidthoughts needs to request this page to be semi-protected because two days after it is unprotected, IP users will again to edit for the first time since 2018 and will conduct vandalism and reverts that will violate 1RR. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 03:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If someone will ping me then I will reinstall the indefinite semi-protection. Unless the full protection needs to be extended. -- MelanieN (talk) 03:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 11:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP edit warring Playlet (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive and false edits, following Conte's resignation as Prime Minister, which will be effective only when (and if) a new cabinet will be sworn in. -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The amount of times this article has suffered from disruption by IPs/new accounts who change the result to something like 'Muslim victory' (completely disregarding the cited sources in favour of their own POV and/or WP:JDLI) is mindboggling. Please put some kind of protection template on this article so these edits don't get through so easily. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Orchestrated edit war and trolling. GizzyCatBella🍁 16:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 03:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP user violating BLP by changing surname from Shon to Son. [176][177][178][179]. Paper9oll (📣📝) 04:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paper9oll: It's not vandalism: see the comments from 2014 at the top of the talk page (there is confusion about Shon/Son). There should be a more recent explanation of why the changes are being reverted. Johnuniq (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: As per source provided in the article, you can see the image depicted her surname as Shon. In addition, the link provided in the talk page also listed her name as Shon. Furthermore, user Lonedirewolf didn't provide RS to support his claims on Son usage either. In fact, I'm not the only editor reverting it, other watcher that normally edits Korean-related article also reverted it. Paper9oll (📣📝) 10:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good, but persuading me is not relevant. The point is that an explanation should be on article talk and passing editors should be encouraged (with a link in the edit summary of reverts) to see that explanation and discuss if wanted. Johnuniq (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: Erm okay, I forgot to also mentioned that the article have 3 RS (inclusive the talk page link and also 1 link of school website) supporting her surname. Also, it isn't really my fault for not directing IP user to the talk page (frankly speaking, only minority of IP user would bothered about going to talk page. If it's registered user, I can expect to be more interested) as other editor with more experience and higher edit count, didn't do as well. Looks talking so much, won't likely change your mind, so {{not done}} for request?
To be clear, I am hoping someone else will decide whether to protect the article or to decline the request. I just wanted to say that the talk shows genuine confusion (from 2014) and attempts to change the name should not be called vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm seeing occasional problem edits - adding unsourced content, not just last name disagreement - over the past month. Let's give PC a try. MelanieN (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ~ ItsJustLukas talk|Contribs 23:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This article has needed almost constant semi-protection for the past several months. Let's give it a rest. MelanieN (talk) 02:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs are socking by adding “The Belshill Cafu” to the article instead of his real name. Cupper52 (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism Icedmorning (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like things have been handled by a partial-block from the page and a move to draft space. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Melvin Capital is big news at the moment, thus this article is being vandalised. Devokewater (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism Icedmorning (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like things have been handled by a partial-block from the page and a move to draft space. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Melvin Capital is big news at the moment, thus this article is being vandalised. Devokewater (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

28 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - IPs keep blanking the page. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 14:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me to be a design flaw with the sandbox that the advisory is not in the form of an editnotice or so. Samsara 14:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is an editnotice for the sandbox, though. — The Earwig talk 19:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. There are sandbox clearing bots, though a couple are temporarily inactive for various reasons. Protecting the sandbox should be an absolute last resort for severe vandalism, and I don't think we're at that point yet, so I'm declining this. — The Earwig talk 19:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Being posted as TFA makes it heavily vandalized by multiple IPs and new users. 110.137.185.201 (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's how TFA works - a daily re-enactment of good vs. evil. Samsara 16:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Someone asked this at ANI as well. (CC) Tbhotch 20:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism going on for months, the vast majority of which is by unregistered users. Helper201 (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by some users. Eridian314 (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 208.70.36.22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Butt Chucks (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of content by multiple editors. AviationFreak💬 17:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pahunkat (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism (almost no productive edits in all of January), past protections have been ineffective. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism volumes due to this being a current event. VQuakr (talk) 17:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 18:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. A IP 2409:4072:9E:A472:C6B7:9400:BF63:53BA is removing content of notable people like Kamala Harris and other people that seemly distruptive. If this request is declined, please block that user. 110.137.190.132 (talk) 11:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP hopper persistently adding unsourced content

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent adding of unsourced content/changing of sourced content by IP hopper. Alivardi (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all four. MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The Singh article has been moved; I am changing the name here to the new name, so as not to confuse the bot. MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary/Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The current problem is just one user. I have given them a final warning on their talk page. If they do it again they should be blocked. MelanieN (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Flix11 (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks stale. Samsara 15:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 15:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes is not enough. Please see the recent revision history. Wario-Man talk 14:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Samsara 15:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Succession of IPs removing sourced information stating that the company is British-Swedish. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: vandalism and BLP violations from unregistered IP users. Danielaregay (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several IP users keep changing the date of death despite that the sources differ. DrKilleMoff (talk) 15:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 16:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent transfer happened - usual IP vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 14:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Huge history of unconstructive and harmful edits. The person is the most famous Romanian literary figure and had 57,637 views on the last 30 days, so I don't think temporary semi-protection would solve the issue. Super Ψ Dro 14:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Similar to J. T. Realmuto, persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content regarding a reported (but unconfirmed) free agent signing. Kncny11 (talk) 14:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article was protected since 2017, protection will expire on 2022. No disruptive activity happens until December 2020. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 02:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy @Samsara:. Although the protection might be the reason why there is no disruption. (CC) Tbhotch 05:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There was a reverted addition of unsourced content in December of 2020. I think SP is still needed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: That is on May 6, 2020, after ABS-CBN went off-air due to cease-and-desist order from the National Telecommunications Commission on May 5, 2020 after its franchise expired. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: last protecting admin. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 02:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just please clarify for me, is the request based on not seeing disruption after protection (protection effective, no change needed) or on a substantial change in article matter that would make it unlikely to receive further disruptive attention? Samsara 10:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Yes, the disruption stops last May 6, 2020. The last edit happens last December 2020 without disruptive activity. If the article disrupts again after the article unprotects, may we change it to pending changes because it's been a year since the article was protected. Sean Ethan James D. Querubin (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still a little concerned by your phrasing, which could be interpreted as not understanding how protection works. When you enable protection, you will simply not see attempts at disruption occurring. That doesn't mean there aren't people looking to disrupt. However, given that it's about 18 months remaining of a five-year protection, I've changed it to indef pending changes. However, please, if you're not quite sure about the differences between semi-protection and pending changes (the main one being that pending changes DOES show attempts at disruption, while semi does not if the edits aren't autoconfirmed), maybe read WP:PP and related documents again. Samsara 14:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 20:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article was protected in 2017, but is in need of improvement and hasn't been vandalised in a while - unprotection or at least pending changes should hopefully encourage constructive editing. ✨ Ed talk!07:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting admin Steel is inactive. The article has gone through a total of 8 protections already. I've enabled PC1 on a trial basis. Samsara 15:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 20:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Can the move protection be lowered to TE?. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a reasonable and uncontroversial request. @Ymblanter: What think ye? Samsara 19:10, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, there was probably some reason why I unlocked move protection, but I have not documented it, and I do not remember what it was.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: seems like you upped both to sysop protection, wrong button? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, indeed, thanks for noticing--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 20:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unnecessarily high protection. Not a likely target for vandalism. — TheThomanski | t | c | 19:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Highly visible template. About 1760 transclusions. In addition, there are redirects to this TP. Samsara 15:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 15:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 20:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unnecessarily high protection. Not a likely target for vandalism. — TheThomanski | t | c | 19:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1720 transclusions plus redirects on top of that. Samsara 15:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 15:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... (CC) Tbhotch 20:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

America's Got Talent - Multi-Season Articles

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing, exactly the same as what occurred with America's Got Talent (season 3). Likely the action of the same sockpuppets. Considering that article has been given this protection arrangement, would recommend the same for these ones, since its unwelcome for such a user to think that they can sneak around a ban and not only vandalize one article with false information, but to do the same with others covering other seasons of a programme. GUtt01 (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the disruption has stopped. GUtt01, can you confirm? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is never easy to know if the disruption has stopped, or if the person(s) doing it won't start up when people least expect it. Sometimes it is better to "be safe than sorry", as the saying goes. GUtt01 (talk) 15:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I semi'd season 6 for a short while, which was affected again. Let's see how it goes. Samsara 14:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive edits. Article has been temporarily semi-protected this year, but IPs are just waiting out the protection and reinserting the same edits. Recommend semi-protection at least for the rest of the season (SNL ends in late May 2021). -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP range is repeatedly implementing unsourced wording that a talk page discussion concluded against. NØ 19:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 16:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 19:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since protection expired 12 hours ago, we've already had 4 different IPs remove well-sourced content from the lead. Suggest we need at least another six months. SmartSE (talk) 11:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's enter a wrong height, ignoring the given source. Different IP's all the time. Kante4 (talk) 12:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated editing of infobox to include temporary hosts. Template:Infobox television for host parameter does not include detail for temporary hosts. AldezD (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AldezD: It seems that it only involves one IP namely 104.166.247.24. I report that user to AIV and let see whether the user is blocked. 110.137.185.201 (talk) 13:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just scored a goal vs United - getting some IP Vandals. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gone stale, it seems. Some constructive edits now. Samsara 10:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 10:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is getting attacked by IPs. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP users linked from 4chan's /sp/ board, making a joke simpson's reference regarding his name. Volteer1 (talk) 07:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. An IP user attacking the page. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Many IP users vandalizing this page with "stole my name". Larryzhao123 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Based on the editing history, I think short-term semi-protection is a better solution. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Moved three times into article space and back into draft space. Should be extended-confirmed protected so that only a neutral reviewer can promote it. At least for a few months. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. This protection can be bypassed by any extended-confirmed user. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Steve M (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Soon after previous semi-protection ended, persistent affiliate link spammer came back. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 22:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent spammer resumed after previous one month protection expired. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New accounts are derailing the conversation and making ludicrous accusations at genuine editors. -- haminoon (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. No point in semi-protection since most of the combatants are autoconfirmed editors. And we certainly aren't going to shut down the whole noticeboard because of an explosion at one discussion. Somebody should simply shut down and hat that whole unproductive discussion, ASAP. If you suspect socks, use WP:SPI. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to be affected by an upsurge in vandalism by IP-hoppers. DawidGiertuga (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant vandalism by addition of unsourced content. DawidGiertuga (talk) 00:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Bushranger. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and new accounts. DanCherek (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steve M (talk) 01:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Notable people vandalism. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Notable people vandalism. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Primarily vandalism or unnecessary info introduced, mostly by IPs, see page history for more details. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 05:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

29 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 05:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An unusual uptick in vandalism and otherwise frivolous editing on this page in the last two days, from both IPs and new accounts. No need to encourage such. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Walrus Ji (talk) 06:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DanCherek (talk) 06:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war by Sockpuppet

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Xcelltrasi (talk) 06.58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to all three. MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Mosesheron (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes- or semi-protection: for a few weeks, high level of IP- and new-account vandalism in last week or so. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and socks attacking the page. Ashleyyoursmile! 18:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is getting attacked by IPs and new accounts. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been multiple instances of vandalism on this article for the past 12 hours. Edipio (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is TFA. 110.137.117.75 (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing (removal of sourced critical content, presumably to whitewash article subject, without edit summaries or talk page engagement) by IP editors. Wham2001 (talk) 12:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Nominated for deletion --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Topical vandalism. BLP violations from IP editors. Likely to benefit from a spell of semi-protection. Jack Frost (talk) 13:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of WP:SPA disruption. Jingiby (talk) 13:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently topical subject with recurrent IP vandalism. Jack Frost (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent new-account vandalism for a single aim, possible sockpuppetery: user likely to switch accounts again for cause. Shadowssettle Need a word? 12:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent TikTok vandalism. Jack Frost (talk) 11:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: As an edit notice, semi is now redundant. (CC) Tbhotch 04:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Michael Greiner 04:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HickoryOughtShirt?4. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism in recent days by different IP addresses. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a burst of mostly IPs adding random people's names to the article. Largoplazo (talk) 23:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Notable people vandalism. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mainly related to the ongoing GameStop short squeeze, might ramp up Caius G. (talk) 00:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. He has a large following on social media and there are regular disruptive edits. He is also involved in the ongoing WSB Gamestop stock manipulation referenced above which has caused disruptive edits. Several months semi protected requested. Deltagammaz (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of poorly sourced content and/or vandalism by IP users. Limorina (talk!contribs) 10:24, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edits. Especially into the coming days due to Super Bowl. Maxen Embry (talk) 14:22, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxen Embry: Can you explain the dispute over the phrase and sourcing? [180] [181] It's not obvious to me this constitutes vandalism. Constructive edits by IPs would not be a reason to protect. Samsara 14:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 03:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users removing or adding information some of which has been discussed about on the talk page and subsequently decided against. Images being added which are non free images. E.Wright1852 (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. kpgamingz (rant me) 19:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please explain issues on article talk and ask new editors/IPs to engage there. Johnuniq (talk) 04:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Skimming the history, there is a long-term problem with that IP range. (CC) Tbhotch 21:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Flood of unsourced, unproductive edits all relating to the same candidate. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: LTA vandalism has resumed. The page had been the target of pesistent LTA vandalism for several days and was semi-protected, but apparently that protection has expired. The LTA attacks resumed. Consider extended confirmed protection instead, perhaps for a few weeks. Nsk92 (talk) 23:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. — The Earwig talk 03:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps this could be resolved by closing the discussion? It has been a week already and there seems to be a consensus. JayJayWhat did I do? 05:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 23:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Elizium23: I only see one recent edit by an IP, so that is not sufficient to warrant protection. The other editors appear to be autoconfirmed and would not be affected by semi-protection. If problem persists, let me know with more detail. Johnuniq (talk) 04:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 01:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Different IP editors keep adding unsourced changes. Bahooka (talk) 03:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:21, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent plague of vandalism by multiple IPs and new users. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is normal to insert and delete content without source. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 11:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Goszei (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goszei: After reading the content carefully, the art and layout are indeed not good, but I think it should be full-protection, because Special:Contributions/芄蘭 adds those content will not be restricted by the semi-protection.Do you need me to help you change it to full-protection.2402:7500:4D0:CCB3:0:0:370:D416 (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. Cupper52 (talk) 13:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No activity for over 24 hours. Only two IP edits in January. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 20:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection:  – Discussed this with DatGuy months ago, but I think we were each expecting the other to actually request it. Better late than never. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've also added some sysop move protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Rosalina2427 (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP violations and vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 06:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IPs keep vandalizing the King's birth date. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. the wub "?!" 17:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/MRY. Steve M (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator QEDK. (Pending changes protection) the wub "?!" 17:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently came back from protection and already ip hopper is back to smearing the subject. Crboyer (talk) 15:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A specific IP hopping sock is constantly targeting my page with frivolous warnings. BenkovacZrinjski (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs. They're removing all references to the subject as 'he/him' because he won't put pronouns in his Twitter bio, and claiming it's how he identifies. Ongoing twitter campaign encouraging the vandalism. Lilipo25 (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Persistent edit war between some users Kichu🐘 Discuss 04:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Pending changes would have no effect. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – fairly constant IP vandalism. Slatersteven (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. NASCARfan0548  04:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 04:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. NASCARfan0548  04:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Sorry I was watching Before Sunset Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI help 05:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Semi-protection: IP-jumping editor continues to re-adding false/incorrect content. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Bowling is life (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and misgendering from IP users. Funcrunch (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. While the cadence of disruptive edits is low enough that the PC patrollers could intercept them, the nature of those edits and the fact this is a BLP would seem to warrant semi-protection. Chetsford (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent removal of reliably sourced information. Fathomharvill (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There is a discussion about whether the material that's been removed is WP:DUE for the article on the article's Talk page. While the static IP editor who has removed the paragraph at the center of this dispute has done so with an unhelpful and WP:CLUEless edit summary, to suggest that removing material sourced to a stock photo website and a personal blog is disruptive on its face may be a stretch. Edit warring by a static IP should be addressed through the other mechanisms we have to resolve that. Any other questions about the appropriateness or inappropriateness of the material at the center of the dispute should continue to occur in the ongoing Talk page discussion. Chetsford (talk) 02:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent vandalism by IP and new accounts. Jack Frost (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IPv6 /64 blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 01:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 124.49.87.174 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 11:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. NASCARfan0548  01:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young. Steve M (talk) 02:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. NASCARfan0548  02:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors in changing principal name. Official sources state Yap Thiam Chuan is the current principal. See 1 and 2. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2401:7400:C802:2F19:0:0:0:0/64 was blocked for 1 month, please re-report if disruption continues. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated and recurring vandalism from a certain LTA; see protection log for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from IP numbers. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – part of Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TikTok_raid_discussion. (CC) Tbhotch 01:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent regular vandalism from IP users. Slabba (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., followed by indefinite pending changes. This is precisely the sort of article where PC makes sense: the core facts are set in stone and unlikely to need significant amendment in the future, so it isn't a major burden that it is under PC. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP hopping vandal/potential meatsock

Temporary full-protection: High level of POV vandalism from an IP hopper (that starts with 2402:7500:...), similar to the report made for Inner Mongolia by Akshaysmit. BenkovacZrinjski (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Ymblanter (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I have not reverted anything though--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Flix11 (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Most of the edits look to be well meaning anyways. Michael Greiner 00:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent IP vandalism / BLP violations. Jack Frost (talk) 10:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing by IPs after protection lapsed. Darren-M talk 10:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently a target of multiple editors vandalising the birth date in the infobox to nonsensical values. There appears to be somehting in the bush... Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 08:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current mass attempt at vandalism and blp violations. -- haminoon (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:DERRY violations by multiple IPs. FDW777 (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new users replacing India with Pakistan, despite the fact that the subject is an Indian citizen and India doesn't allow dual citizenship. [182] [183] [184]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I would like the page to be semiprotected for the duration of its TFA appearance (until 31 January) due to vandalism issues, a few days ago my last TFA, The Holocaust in Slovakia, received significant vandalism during its main page appearance and needed protection. (t · c) buidhe 13:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: This page cannot be protected preemptively per WP:NO-PREEMPT due to fact that this TFA article for 30 January do not have receive significant IP vandalism for now. IMO, the TFA that receives high level of IP vandalism is actually Pyramid of Nyuserre, which i see too many reverts and vandalism from IP addresses. 110.137.117.75 (talk) 13:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's rather dumb not to protect TFA articles from vandalism. (t · c) buidhe 13:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let see the article on 30 January. If the article receives significant level of IP vandalism at that time for examples too many reverts, it can be protected. Thanks. 110.137.117.75 (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. (CC) Tbhotch 04:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being targeted by Cutler LTA adding conspiracy nonsense (and personal attacks because he isn't allowed to push his utter nonsense on Wikipedia). Ravensfire (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Hut 8.5. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Malcolmxl5, They've hopped to a new IP and posted the same thing. The joys of an LTA. Ravensfire (talk) 04:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm hesitant to escalate from one-week protection to indefinite. If the situation continues, though, we can definitely revisit it. Thank you for monitoring the article. Chetsford (talk) 03:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Severe BLP violations from IPs and new users. Binksternet (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Went with a week, as the vandalism has been ongoing for about that long. Hopefully that'll nip it in the bud. This page requires protection a time or two a year, so if it keeps continuing, it may be time for indefinite pending changes. Hog Farm Talk 06:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

31 January 2021

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I can't seem to find a revision that was done in good faith by any IP in the last week. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edits by sock to sales figures without sources or with sources that 404. This article has been protected previously for the same reason. Robvanvee 07:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined All of the unsourced material is being added by the same user. Nobody has said anything to them on their talk page. I just gave them a warning. If they continue they should be blocked rather than protecting the page.  MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing, boasting about such on Twitter [[185]] AutumnKing (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Semi-protected for 7 days. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Vandal account blocked, no IP edits for well over 24 hours. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic targetting by IPs to represent origin as solely Irish, contrary to sources and elaboration in lede. Occasional other IP disruption. Happy with pending changes protection as alt., if deemed more appropriate. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GirthSummit (blether) 13:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 16:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom Morris (talkcontribs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of TikTok spam; see also filter log. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A IP user keeps performing the same disruptive edits over and over. Bowling is life (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 07:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A blocked user using IP 103.134.25.90 keeps adding original research & his own thought. See meta. Even if you block 103.134.25.90, this sock will come back with new IP. A page protection is necessary. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 02:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please, don't protect the page, the things which I edit are not vandalism or out of policy. If you block it, I will not be able to edit the page. 103.134.25.90 (talk) 03:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DrKay (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user was warned at 05:16 and hasn't edited the page since, though editing elsewhere. Re-report if disruption continues. DrKay (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

: Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 15:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated autobiography that has been speedy deleted three times in the last month. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harsha (director) and redirects

Temporary semi-protection: 3 days or so. A new PAID editor or two, likely acting in good faith are repeatedly rewriting Harsha (director). One of them has also tried to rewrite the redirect A. Harsha. 3 days is enough time for them to "get educated" in how Wikipedia handles COI/PAID editing, and they should be auto-confirmed by then anyway. Auto-confirm rather than page-block to discourage non-logged-in editing and to prevent a "block" in a new, seemingly-good-faith editor's block log. Pending-changes protection for 3 days may be a softer alternative. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 14:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard, the primary editor seems to understand now.[186] If the other editor in question doesn't understand, I may re-do this request. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor For now. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NJD-DE (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Please restore previous protection and rev/delete WP:BLP violations as necessary. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption from multiple IPs. Aspening (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been vandalized multiple times by an anon, requesting semi-protect. The Phase Master 18:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism by multiple accounts. MB 18:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandal. Larryzhao123 (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 22:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 21:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent serious violations of WP:BLP due to subject being in national news today. NedFausa (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism – IPs won't stop removing sourced information and asserting it's false. Rusted AutoParts 20:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Warned them now. Since it's always the same user, blocking is preferable. SoWhy 20:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much edit warring. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died done now. SoWhy 20:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After the recent transfer, there are many edits and users trying to impose their "way" in which how the article should look like. 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@8Dodo8: This article cannot be extended confirmed protected due to majority of distruption come from IP users. So IMO, the article would be likely semi-protected. 110.137.117.75 (talk) 00:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, plus we would not ECP unless semi-protection had been tried first. But most recent IP and new user edits appear to be in good faith and we would not protect a page just to keep it a certain way. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined No IP edits for two days, all seems quiet. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequently edited by Ajhenson21 LTA. MarioJump83! 04:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report next year if disruption continues. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Rosalina2427 (talk) 04:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: seems notable now, valid AfC at Draft:Souhardya De. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping to @Ohnoitsjamie: (CC) Tbhotch 20:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I reduced the protection to ECP. Any extended-confirmed reviewer may create the article from a valid draft. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and need for constant reverting of page versions. Jamzze (talk) 07:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 08:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. BLP violations by IP's, a few of which have already been redacted on RD2 Asartea Talk | Contribs 09:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No legitimate reason to protect this talk page. 220.246.55.231 (talk) 07:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For admin, please read ANI thread: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Please instruct how to deal with ip hopping, meat and suspected offsite canvassing from a lot of ip ranges from HK. Matthew hk (talk) 09:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The anonymous IP addresses could not refrain from engaging in political arguments that had nothing to do with improving the article. An article talk page is not a forum. Persistent usage of a talk page as a forum is a legitimate reason to protect it. The duration of protection seems rather long for a talk page, however. @Valereee: 3 months? ~Anachronist (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist feel free to adjust, but the same meatpuppet IPs have been arguing at Talk:List of lighthouses in China for six weeks nonstop, and I do mean nonstop. There's a forum somewhere that's got a bunch of Hongkongers who think registering an account will somehow make them more vulnerable to Chinese surveillance all whipped up that WP has a pro-Chinese bias in certain list articles. It's very strange. —valereee (talk) 11:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There has been no meatpuppetry. There has never been any conclusive SPI, and that forum post has never been located and submitted as evidence. There's nothing strange given what'd happened here over the past two years. 220.246.55.231 (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What political arguments are you exactly talking about? Please be specific and prove that they are. 220.246.55.231 (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Where may people submit proposed comments to such a talk page? (There's apparently no Talk talk:Title of the entry for them to submit it as an {{edit semi protected}}.., don't think that's ever needed had there been no one abusing their power to lock a page to lock a talk page.) 220.246.55.231 (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by several parties. VQuakr (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, seems to have gone to a constructive route, apologies for not reacting on time--Ymblanter (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism (repeatedly adding false claims to article due to longstanding joke that Conner is in the band Wallows). Was previously protected, but vandalism has increased since the protection was removed. – JayCoactus (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent removal of reliably sourced information. Alex (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Denying the authority of sources and immediately delete. Mad Irishman1789 (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would not affect this article, since all of the editors are autoconfirmed. — Newslinger talk 06:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: frequent editing of articles with Talysh titles. Mad Irishman1789 (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. — Newslinger talk 06:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: frequent editing of articles with Talysh titles. Mad Irishman1789 (talk) 12:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. — Newslinger talk 06:55, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Possible denial and removal of reliable sources. Mad Irishman1789 (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Newslinger talk 06:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 06:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: subject is reportedly going to be traded - needs to be protected from people prematurely changing team. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 03:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) There have also been some vandalism issues on this page. Aspening (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 03:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Another frequent target of adding names to the Notable People section. JayJayWhat did I do? 03:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – came out of protection and is back to being targeted by someone with a grudge against star George Mackay. Crboyer (talk) 04:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Larryzhao123 (talk) 04:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP / new account vandalism. Dan Bloch (talk) 01:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Talk pages are not semi-protected unless there is high levels of vandalism and/or WP:BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. KyleJoantalk 01:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Low-level IP and new user disruption; most of the recent edits from these users are reverts. Aspening (talk) 01:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Liz Cheney has unlocked a notable Wikipedia achievement, attracting simultaneous vandalism from drive-by IP editors on both sides of the political divide. This is a slow cadence of blatant vandalism covering the last couple weeks and can probably be handled by the PC reviewers. Chetsford (talk) 23:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes is a pain, requiring reverts for the BLP violations or confirmations for minor adjustments. Let's try this after the recent three days. Johnuniq (talk) 01:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article subject recently came out as trans. Several editors are currently warring over inclusion of deadname without consulting the relevant policy. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 23:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that there is an ongoing discussion on the talk page about the issue. – Rummskartoffel (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong objection to semi-protection as many of the edit warriors are autoconfirmed and this would privilege them above other editors, despite the fact that many are making no effort to engage in discussion. Several are extended-confirmed (though usually offering good faith edit summaries or also discussing on talk). See WP:ROUGHSEMI. Very few bad faith or vandalism edits, based on an editing dispute with autoconfirmed participants and constructive IP edits are being made. Full protection or no protection. — Bilorv (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Set it to full protection and use the deadname version that was used in the Elliot Page article (Same situation).2A02:8388:1603:BA00:4919:8F4B:3C67:B039 (talk) 00:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Semi three days Sorry Bilorv but working out what is going on would take quite a while. I see IPs edit warring. If edit warring continues from autoconfirmed users, please ping me and I'll have a look. You might do that from article talk where you propose that the article be reset to version at a particular date/time and protected to allow a full discussion or RfC. If it's just a couple of editors, warn them and I'll let them know that further edit warring will result in a block. Johnuniq (talk) 01:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: working out what is going on would take quite a while is the reason I made the summary. I don't agree that one should take an admin action without a full understanding of the situation, and if you can't afford the time then let another admin take it. If there was serious harm in the "wrong version" then I would understand urgency but this is just back-and-forth over two reasonable versions of an article, neither of which there is yet consensus for. — Bilorv (talk) 01:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I looked more and fortunately a recent edit by an autoconfirmed user demonstrated your point. I'm watching for a month. Johnuniq (talk) 01:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism, edit warring against consensus. Was previously semi protected. Bacondrum 00:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Bacondrum: Hmm, I saw this request in my watchlist and acted before reading what was here. It might get protected for a few months and then possibly a year but indefinite is very rare. If you ping me when problems resume I'll protect for longer. Johnuniq (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Johnuniq Bacondrum 01:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information. Alex (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Alexanderlee: Sorry but I only see one recent IP edit that could justify protection, and that was adding unsourced detail which is not vandalism however undesirable it is. Request again with more detail if problem persists. Johnuniq (talk) 01:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many reverts in the last weeks/months, mostly of IP-edits, some tagged as "possible vandalism". Phlsph7 (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and original research related to contestant progress template. Gagaluv1 (talk) 18:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]